ZOTAC Gaming Zone 手持设备评测：Precision 控制器、亮丽的 OLED 显示屏和小巧的机身
在区域内
Zotac Gaming Zone 是手持设备市场的热门竞争产品。OLED 显示屏、强大的 AMD Ryzen 7 和出色的控制器使其成为玩家的梦想，并确保了身临其境的体验。遗憾的是，这款配备 7 英寸屏幕的掌上游戏机在弥补重量轻的不足方面存在一个小弱点。Marc Herter, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
Zotac Zone 彻底颠覆了掌上电脑的世界。它拥有强大的游戏性能，并通过 FSR 提升了出色的帧率，同时还拥有出色的稳定性和高品质的外壳，为该领域树立了新的标准。它的控制器不仅符合人体工程学并可定制，而且还能通过丰富的触觉反馈为你的指尖提供舒适的体验。
诚然，它的电池有点弱。但许多其他游戏掌上电脑也会为了提高触觉效果而吝惜电池寿命，同时降低整体重量。通过与其他类似尺寸的设备进行比较，我们发现其性能数据、基准测试结果和测量值与它们基本相当。
众泰的软件（Zotac Gaming One Launcher）可以实现其目的，但感觉有点简陋。众泰可以在这方面做一些改进，并应从竞争对手（如 Ayaneo）那里获得灵感。
尽管存在一些小缺点，但 Zotac Zone 仍不失为一款优秀的掌上电脑，它将主要吸引那些重视触觉、性能和高品质屏幕的游戏玩家。它的触觉效果尤其能营造出一种真正的高级感。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Zotac Zone 并不是最便宜的掌上电脑之一。它的价格通常略高于 800 美元。目前，它在美国的销售量仍然有限。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79.3%  | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $25.99 PowerHOOD 65W USB-C AC/DC Ad... 3. $12.99 Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect... | 692 g | 35 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI OLED |
2. 85.2% v7 (old)  | Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.95 BoxWave Screen Protector Com... 2. $19.95 BoxWave Screen Protector Com... 3. $29.97 brotect Glass Screen Protect... List Price: 999€ | 942 g | 22 mm | 8.40" 2560x1600 359 PPI IPS |
3. 84.9% v7 (old)  | ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 1017 USD | 876 g | 43 mm | 8.40" 2560x1600 IPS |
4. 77.4%  | MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $498.00 List Price: 849€ | 672 g | 33 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS |
5. 84.9% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $569.98 List Price: 800€ | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS |
6. 84.6%  | Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $517.97 List Price: 899€ | 685 g | 36.9 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS |
游戏掌上电脑市场在不断发展！新设备不断推出，硬件越来越强大，功能越来越新颖。其中一个新的挑战者就是 Zotac Gaming Zone、 作为预生产设备，我们对其进行了测试.虽然在测试时，它的软件还没有完全完善，但我们已经清楚地认识到，Zotac Gaming Zone 具有颠覆游戏世界的潜力。出色的 OLED 屏幕、优秀的控制器和强大的 AMD Ryzen 7 相结合，形成了令人印象深刻的整体组合，会让玩家心跳加速。我们之前发布的 报告因为我们想在这里更详细地介绍这款掌上电脑的技术。
规格
外壳和连接
Zotac Gaming Zone 拥有高品质的构造和兼具稳定性和人体工学的设计。其外壳由耐用的塑料制成，给人以坚固耐用的印象。所有控制器元件均可轻松触及，并采用符合人体工程学的排列方式，即使长时间游戏也能保持舒适。该设备设计小巧，便于携带，是外出旅行的理想伴侣。有关 Zotac Gaming Zone 的外壳和连接的详细信息，请参阅我们的 预生产设备的评测.从外观和触感上看，没有任何变化。
除了上述控制器布局外，Zotac Gaming Zone 还具有强大的连接功能，可丰富日常移动游戏。其集成的读卡器读取数据的速度高达 187 MB/s，可实现快速加载。它的 Wi-Fi 连接具有出色的稳定性和高速度，因此您可以在线玩游戏，而不会遇到恼人的延迟和断开连接问题。对于手持设备来说，一个与众不同的功能是其集成的网络摄像头。虽然它不能提供高分辨率的图像，而只能提供 720p 的分辨率，但其色彩还原度很高，可以以可接受的质量进行视频通话或直播。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 (Angelbird AV PRO microSD) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| MSI Claw (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 184, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 (Angelbird AV PRO microSD) | |
| MSI Claw (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 260, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
可持续性
说到可持续发展，Zotac Gaming Zone 可谓光影熠熠。遗憾的是，它的包装盒中含有泡沫和薄膜，既不环保，也不易回收。此外，也没有关于设备本身使用的可回收材料比例或生产条件和二氧化碳排放量（PCF 信息）的信息。
不过，值得肯定的是，Zotac Zone 很容易维修。打开机壳背面几乎不费吹灰之力。隐藏在橡胶盖下的八颗螺丝将背板固定到位。背板上没有卡扣，松开螺丝后即可轻松取下。小提示：轻按肩部按钮，可以更轻松地松开背板。由于连接 RGB 灯带的线缆较短，打开时仍需小心。
在设备内部，你可以选择将固态硬盘更换为更大的型号，但无法进一步升级。不过，打开机箱可以清洁和维护设备，从而延长其使用寿命。Zotac Zone 的备件目前很难找到。
配件
ZOTAC 为 Zone 提供了实用的配件，扩大了它在旅途中的使用范围。扩展坞不仅为额外的 NVMe 固态硬盘提供了空间，还提供了大量连接，如 DisplayPort、USB 和 LAN。此外，还提供了一个时尚的硬盒，带有织物盖，可以安全地运输 Zone。
如果您不仅想将 ZOTAC Zone 用于游戏，还想用于移动办公，可选择集成键盘的便携式显示器，如 Elecrow CrowView Note-就是一个有趣的补充。
输入设备
Zotac Zone 采用游戏玩家熟悉的经典控制器布局。两个精确的模拟摇杆、一个 D 型手柄、ABXY 按钮以及肩部按键和触发器使设备的控制感觉非常直观。按键的压点舒适，反馈良好，完全没有海绵感。配备霍尔效应传感器的模拟摇杆尤其值得一提。这项技术不仅能保证精确控制，还能延长使用寿命，有效防止摇杆漂移问题。触发器可分两级调节，因此可提供模拟或数字输入，这对于赛车游戏或射击游戏尤其有利。您可以使用背面的滑动开关快速更改模式。
除了经典的控制器布局外，Zotac Zone 还提供额外的输入选项。两个触摸板可实现精确的鼠标控制，这对于策略游戏或浏览 Windows 桌面等非常有用。让我们感到新奇的是，右侧触摸板甚至能区分左右点击。我们以前从未在掌上电脑上体验过这种功能。集成的触摸屏进一步扩展了其操作选项。
触摸板下方还有三个按钮。左边的按钮可以启动 Zotac Zone Launcher。右边的两个按钮可分配各种功能，如最小化应用程序、调用叠加菜单或 Windows 安全屏幕（任务管理器等）。在设备的背面，Zotac Zone 有两个可自由编程的按钮，可根据用户的需要进行单独调整。模拟摇杆周围有旋转旋钮，可惜不能用于游戏控制。相反，它们可用于控制音量、屏幕亮度和 RGB 灯光。
显示屏
Zotac Zone 采用了出色的 7 英寸 OLED 显示屏，这在掌上电脑领域仍属罕见。与 Ayaneo Air一样，Zotac Zone 是目前我们数据库中为数不多的采用这种显示技术的设备之一。OLED 显示屏具有完美的黑阶、鲜艳的色彩和强烈的对比度，为 Zotac Zone 带来了令人印象深刻的画面体验。
得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，游戏显示流畅，没有任何恼人的卡顿。全高清分辨率确保了清晰的图像和高水平的细节。显示屏亮度高达 830 cd/m²，即使在明亮的环境条件下也能确保良好的可视性。它的响应速度很快，即使在玩动作游戏时也不会出现难看的条纹。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 826 cd/m²
Contrast: 13016:1 (Black: 0.064 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 2.95
ΔE Greyscale 11.99 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.213
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 ZDZ0501, OLED, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz | MSI Claw TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | Asus ROG Ally X TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -23% | -6% | -24% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.43 | 91.9 -8% | 67 -33% | 92.1 -7% | 66.2 -33% | 99.85 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.93 | 99.3 -1% | 94.4 -6% | 99.56 0% | 93.4 -7% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.89 | 81.6 -18% | 69.4 -31% | 90.09 -10% | 68.5 -31% | 99.71 0% |
| Response Times | -1203% | -362% | -466% | -380% | -54% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.08 ? | 25.5 ? -2261% | 9.2 ? -752% | 20.8 ? -1826% | 9.7 ? -798% | 4.4 ? -307% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.3 ? | 22.73 ? -144% | 6.6 ? 29% | 14.4 ? -55% | 5.7 ? 39% | 5 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 700 483% | 240 ? 100% | |||
| Screen | -18% | -39% | -72% | -46% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 833 | 318 -62% | 477 -43% | 411 -51% | 484 -42% | 331 -60% |
| Brightness | 830 | 287 -65% | 461 -44% | 413 -50% | 456 -45% | 339 -59% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 48 -47% | 88 -2% | 80 -11% | 88 -2% | 90 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.064 | 0.1118 -75% | 0.32 -400% | 0.42 -556% | 0.35 -447% | 0.07 -9% |
| Contrast | 13016 | 2844 -78% | 1491 -89% | 979 -92% | 1383 -89% | 4729 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 4.81 28% | 2.6 61% | 5.94 11% | 2.9 57% | 4.76 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.04 | 6.93 42% | 5.8 52% | 10.56 12% | 7.1 41% | 9.2 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.95 | 1.53 48% | 1.5 49% | 2.95 -0% | 1.4 53% | 5.04 -71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.99 | 6.12 49% | 3.9 67% | 0.92 92% | 4.5 62% | 8.79 27% |
| Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.003 110% | 2.17 101% | 1.93 114% | 2.24 98% | 2.155 102% |
| CCT | 8033 81% | 7707 84% | 7250 90% | 8064 81% | 7534 86% | 7571 86% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -410% /
-185% | -141% /
-82% | -181% /
-137% | -150% /
-89% | -25% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.54 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.54 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 10 % Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8631 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
遗憾的是，OLED 显示屏在 120 Hz 的频率下会出现一些典型的闪烁，这是逐行刷新像素造成的。不过，这不会对 Zotac Zone 的小显示屏造成任何干扰。
尽管亮度很高，但由于屏幕反光很强，户外使用可能会有些困难。
性能
Zotac Zone 的核心是 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U 处理器，它采用 Zen 4 架构，拥有 8 个核心和 16 个线程，可确保足够的性能。集成的 AMD Radeon 780M 负责显示图形。16GB LPDDR5 内存可确保流畅的多任务处理，而 512GB NVMe SSD 则为游戏、应用程序和操作系统提供了存储空间。
测试条件
Zotac 软件（Zotac Gaming One Launcher）提供各种电源模式，可影响设备的功耗和性能。处理器的功耗可设置为最高 30 瓦，最低 8 瓦。在测试中，我们选择了 "性能 "模式，该模式下 CPU 和 GPU 的功耗分布均衡，功耗为 28 瓦。这在一定程度上限制了 CPU/boost，但并不一定能确保在处理器基准测试中取得最佳成绩。
您还可以为风扇控制创建自定义设置，甚至自定义风扇曲线。我们坚持使用自动风扇控制设置。
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U具有现代掌上电脑应有的典型性能。例如，在 Cinebench R23 多核测试中，它取得了 13016 分的好成绩，介于联想和苹果之间。 联想Legion Go和 OneXPlayer 2 Pro.与其他典型的手持设备处理器相比，如 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U和 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H和 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme在 CPU 性能方面没有真正的差异。Ryzen 7 8840U 的 8 个内核和 16 个线程可以轻松驾驭要求苛刻的游戏和应用程序。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| MSI Claw | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 16546, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (10162 - 13563, n=7) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 2006, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1088 - 1740, n=7) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 6449, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (3987 - 5336, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 787, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (427 - 680, n=5) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1539 - 2453, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2499, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (176.6 - 304, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (176.6 - 275, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (239 - 315, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (192 - 315, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (47579 - 59549, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 66618, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (4168 - 6469, n=5) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6143, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (9609 - 12664, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 13426, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1654 - 2607, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2904, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (8205 - 11296, n=5) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4457 - 11975, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1278 - 1937, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1278 - 2134, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (12.5 - 20.3, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (12.5 - 16.5, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (49 - 63.8, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (46.2 - 63.8, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (0.4514 - 0.678, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.678, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (10795 - 25901, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (15166 - 20723, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (58068 - 109745, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (64229 - 87120, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2707 - 4847, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (3156 - 3896, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (69419 - 114294, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (76873 - 110682, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8463 - 16640, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (10289 - 13143, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (28245 - 58482, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (34209 - 45793, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (57678 - 166333, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (70017 - 119040, n=5) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (654 - 1077, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (654 - 869, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5732 - 13846, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (7715 - 10812, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (34561 - 40481, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (26622 - 49287, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
系统性能
在一般系统性能方面，Zotac Zone 也毫不逊色。在各种基准测试（如 PCMark 10 和 CrossMark）中，它的排名与我们测试的其他手持电脑无缝衔接。强大的 CPU、高速内存和 NVMe SSD 的组合确保了系统的流畅性和响应速度。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5940 - 7098, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5866 - 7471, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9541 - 10664, n=5) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (9068 - 11262, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7522 - 10386, n=5) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7323 - 10031, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7204 - 10017, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7690 - 8762, n=5) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1541 - 1766, n=4) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1847, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1514 - 1695, n=4) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1719, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1677 - 1948, n=4) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 2077, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1262 - 1543, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (831 - 1610, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (216 - 306, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 323, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (170.4 - 249, n=4) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 266, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (515 - 779, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 779, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6636 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (65911 - 76458, n=5) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 89385, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 100208, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (49381 - 61307, n=5) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (83400 - 106180, n=5) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (105.5 - 139.6, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (98.9 - 133.7, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Zotac Zone 配备了 512 GB NVMe 固态硬盘，在我们的测试中表现出色。它的读写速度在预期范围内，确保了游戏和应用程序的短加载时间。不过，512 GB 的容量对于某些游戏玩家来说可能有点紧张。目前的游戏通常需要 30 到 90 GB 的存储空间，这意味着在紧急情况下，只有很小一部分 Steam 库可以下载到 Zotac Zone 上。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average Phison PS5021-E21 512GB | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
集成 AMD Radeon 780M显示了它在 Zotac Zone 中的能力。赛博朋克 2077》和《F1 2024》等现代游戏可在显示器的原生全高清分辨率下运行，帧率在 30 至 60fps 之间。不过，如果要避免恼人的撕裂，最好将帧速率限制在 60fps。由于采用了 FSR 等现代升频技术，您可以使用最高图形设置流畅运行当前的游戏。
大多数游戏都提供各种设置选项来调整图形和性能。FPS 限制器和 FSR 等升级技术可以降低能耗，并大大降低设备的温度和风扇噪音。毕竟，游戏手持设备并不总是追求最高帧率，而是追求流畅、愉快的游戏体验。这正是 Zotac Zone 的真正优势所在。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Ally X -1! | |
| MSI Claw -1! | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12670 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 181792 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28734 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7793 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4128 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3337 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 504 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2786 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| Ayaneo Kun -1! | |
| MSI Claw -1! | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 26.6, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 29.1, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.6 - 32.8, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 32.5, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 56.1, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 50.5, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 67.7 | 29 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 127 | 106.9 | 83.8 | 74.5 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 38.3 | 28.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.4 | 39.3 | 32.9 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 178.9 | 72.5 | 58.1 | 49.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 30.2 | 25.4 | 24.5 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 39.2 | 24.9 | 25.9 | 19.5 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 27.2 | 24.1 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 63.8 | 46.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Zotac Zone 并非静音，但也不会造成干扰。在空闲模式和执行简单任务时，内置风扇通常会转动，但大部分时间都会以 30 至 32 分贝（A）的音量融入背景中。在负载情况下，音量会增大，但不会达到 40 分贝（A）。因此，在游戏过程中，风扇几乎不会令人讨厌，通常也不会引起注意。值得一提的是，不会产生令人不悦的啸叫声。呼呼的噪音非常均匀。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.6 / 28.4 / 33.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 38.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.6 dB(A) | ||
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Phison PS5021-E21 512GB | Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U | MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02 | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | 6% | -8% | 14% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 25.6 | 24.4 5% | 25.7 -0% | 23 10% | 24.7 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.6 | 25.31 1% | 24.4 5% | 25.7 -0% | 23 10% | 24.7 4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 25.31 11% | 24.4 14% | 31.7 -12% | 23 19% | 24.7 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 34.5 -3% | 30.6 8% | 31.7 5% | 25 25% | 28.5 15% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 45.5 -21% | 42.6 -13% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 38.9 | 50.78 -31% | 39.3 -1% | 45.5 -17% | 37 5% | 42.6 -10% |
| Load Average * | 34.9 | 36 | 36.6 | 37 | 42.6 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然 Zotac Zone 的手柄始终保持凉爽，但触摸屏和背面在负载情况下会明显发热。塑料部件的温度从未达到惊人的数值，但玻璃触摸屏的温度高达 50 °C，长时间输入会让人感到不舒服。
发言人
Zotac Zone 的扬声器发出的声音是掌上电脑的典型音效。低音略有减弱，高音也不太平衡，因此声音有些沉闷。音质足以满足游戏和电影的需要，但发烧友可能更喜欢连接耳机。
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Zotac Zone 配备了一个小巧实用的 65 瓦 USB-C 电源，由于随附了适配器，该电源适用于全球各地。在测试过程中，我们测得压力测试的最大功耗为 50 瓦。设备开机时的功耗最低约为 10 瓦。
| Idle | 7.3 / 8.3 / 12.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
遗憾的是，采用 3 芯锂离子电池（48.5 瓦时）的 Zotac Zone 的续航时间并不长。Wi-Fi 网上冲浪 6 小时尚可，但玩要求较高的游戏时，一个多小时就没电了。因此，出门在外的游戏玩家应该确保在包里放一个移动电源或在附近有电源插座。
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 48.5 Wh | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh | MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 67% | 80% | 17% | -1% | 117% | -1% | 39% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 360 | 602 67% | 648 80% | 466 29% | 358 -1% | 949 164% | 355 -1% | 501 ? 39% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 73 | 76 4% | 124 70% | |||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 101 | 72 | 86.5 ? | |||||
| Gaming | 122 | 97 | 74 | 129.2 ? | ||||
| Load | 50 | 76 | 128 | 63 | 79.3 ? | |||
| H.264 | 527 | 1174 | 185 | 629 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Zotac Zone 凭借出色的触觉、专业级控制器、绚丽的 OLED 屏幕和相对安静的风扇获得了好评。电池续航时间和扬声器还有待改进。总之，对于那些希望拥有高端移动游戏设备的用户来说，这是一款几乎全面成功的掌上游戏机。
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01
- 01/30/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
