联想 Yoga 7 二合一 14IML9 可折叠机评测:低于 700 美元的经典之作
Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 是一款介于低端 IdeaPad Flex 14 系列和 Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 之间的中端可折叠设备。 IdeaPad Flex 14 系列和高端 Yoga 9 14 系列之间。.2024 型号继承了去年的版本,除了CPU升级到英特尔流星湖处理器之外,还增加了一些外部功能。
我们这次评测的是入门级配置,配备酷睿至尊 5 125U 和 1200p IPS 显示屏,售价约为 680 美元。更贵的配置配备了速度更快的酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 1800p OLED 显示屏,售价为 1200 美元,但我们非常感谢联想给我们寄来了基本配置,因为低端 SKU 通常代表性不足,被大多数评测人员所忽视。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他中端 14 英寸可折叠产品,如 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1, 惠普 Envy x360 2-in-1 14或 华硕 VivoBook Flip 14.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.64 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
80.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.2 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
79.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX | 1.5 kg | 18.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 通过 MIl-STD-810H 认证
Yoga 笔记本电脑的边缘凸起,尤其是底座周围,而其他大多数笔记本电脑的边缘都是平的。2024 Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 继承了 2022 机型的机身设计,但后部和底部面板的通风栅格、橡胶脚垫和扬声器栅格有一些不同。除此之外,从正面看,两款机型在视觉上的差异很小。
机箱的刚性和制造质量都非常出色,在向下按压键盘中心或外盖时,没有吱吱作响,只有极小的翘曲。不过,铰链需要改进,因为当打开到更大角度时,铰链会开始变弱和摇晃。Inspiron147445二合一笔记本的铰链 Inspiron 14 7445 2 合 1相比之下,Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 的铰链感觉更坚固,各个角度都更均匀,使用寿命更长。
整体尺寸与价格较高的 Yoga 9 二合一 14.这两款机型的主要区别在于重量,Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 明显重了约 300 克,这在旅行时会很麻烦。它仍然比 Inspiron 14 7445 2 合 1 轻,但其他竞争机型,如 Envy x360 2 合 1 14 或 Vivobook Flip 14都要轻一些。
连接性
2022 Yoga 7 14 2 合 1 上的所有端口都回来了,只是重新排列了一下。虽然我们很欣赏双 Thunderbolt 4 端口,但如果能像 Razer Blade 14 那样把它们分隔在笔记本电脑的两侧就更好了。 雷蛇刀锋 14这样在充电和连接外接显示器时会更加自由。Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 或 Envy x360 2-in-1 14 等竞争机型也集成了比联想笔记本更多的 USB-A 端口。
SD 读卡器
MicroSD 读卡器又回来了,但性能没有提高。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
该机型配备了与之前相同的英特尔 AX211 模块,可连接 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。不支持 Wi-Fi 7。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 |
网络摄像头
200 万像素网络摄像头、红外传感器和用于保护隐私的物理快门与 2022 版设计相同。
维护
使用一字螺丝刀和锋利的刃口,可以比较轻松地卸下底部面板。由于内存模块是焊接的,而且不支持二级固态硬盘,因此内部没有太多可升级的地方。请注意,主固态硬盘必须是 42 毫米或更短,因为不支持 80 毫米硬盘。
可持续性
包装不含塑料,完全可回收。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括文件和交流适配器。如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。
输入设备--名为 Yoga,实为 IdeaPad
键盘
联想有意识地为其 ThinkPad 机型配备最好的键盘,而面向消费者的 IdeaPad 和 Yoga 机型则配备较差的键盘。在打字时,Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 的按键比一般 ThinkPad 的按键更浅,反馈也更柔和,因此差异非常明显。虽然这并不可怕,但如果能对键盘进行一些改进,以获得更好的键入体验,那就更好了。按键 Envy x360 14例如,Envy x360 14 的按键比 Yoga 上的按键更坚硬、更深,手感更令人满意。
触摸板
点击板尺寸与去年的型号相同,仍为 12 x 7.5 厘米。用户必须考虑升级到价格更高的 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 型号,以获得更大的 13.5 x 8 厘米表面积。即便如此,对于 14 英寸的屏幕尺寸来说,目前的点击板尺寸还是令人满意的。我们尤其欣赏按下时响亮而咔哒作响的反馈,而大多数其他笔记本电脑上的点击板往往更柔和、更安静。
显示屏 - 实体面板选项
有以下三种触摸屏可供选择:
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,300 尼特,40% DCI-P3,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,OLED,400 尼特,100% DCI-P3,60 赫兹,DisplayHDR
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特,100% DCI-P3,120 赫兹,DisplayHDR
即使使用我们的基本 IPS 配置,图像质量也很清晰,但有限的色彩和平庸的刷新率无法与最新的 120 Hz OLED 面板相比,例如在 惠普 Envy x360 2 合 1.幸运的是,联想提供了这种更高端的面板,如果你打算进行大量的图像编辑和视频播放,建议支付额外的费用。只有 OLED 选项才支持有限的 HDR。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 335.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1081:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.11
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AU Optronics B14UAT, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Chi Mei CMN N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 109% | 109% | -14% | 107% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 99.8 140% | 99.9 140% | 35.7 -14% | 99.9 140% | 41.6 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.1 | 100 61% | 100 61% | 53.6 -14% | 100 61% | 62.1 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 97.3 126% | 97.2 126% | 36.9 -14% | 94.8 120% | 43 0% |
Response Times | 96% | 96% | 17% | 56% | -46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25.7 ? | 0.8 ? 97% | 1 ? 96% | 23 ? 11% | 10.8 ? 58% | 39 ? -52% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.2 ? | 1 ? 95% | 1 ? 95% | 15.8 ? 22% | 9.37 ? 54% | 28 ? -39% |
PWM Frequency | 240.5 ? | 360 ? | 120 ? | 25000 ? | ||
Screen | 25% | 104% | -2% | 32% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 335.1 | 371.6 11% | 386 15% | 267.6 -20% | 366 9% | 205 -39% |
Brightness | 321 | 373 16% | 389 21% | 240 -25% | 368 15% | 186 -42% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 99 9% | 98 8% | 84 -8% | 98 8% | 78 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.05 84% | 0.31 -0% | 0.22 29% | ||
Contrast | 1081 | 7720 614% | 863 -20% | 932 -14% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 4.91 3% | 2.6 49% | 4.67 8% | 2.74 46% | 5.14 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.98 | 8.33 56% | 4.8 75% | 17.52 8% | 4.37 77% | 19.57 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.11 | 1.59 25% | 1.8 15% | 2.49 -18% | 1.48 30% | 3.17 -50% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 2.2 56% | 2.3 54% | 2 60% | 3 40% | 4.1 18% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6436 101% | 6120 106% | 6121 106% | 6585 99% | 6146 106% | 6807 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 43.04 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.1 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 77% /
58% | 103% /
104% | 0% /
-2% | 65% /
55% | -20% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
IPS 显示屏没有经过预校准,因此饱和度较低的色彩往往不准确。使用我们的 X-Rite 色度计进行校准后,平均灰度 deltaE 从 5.0 提高到 2.0,从而解决了这一问题,但由于上述色彩配置文件的局限性,饱和度较高的色彩在该面板上永远不会得到改善。尽管如此,我们仍然建议使用上述经过校准的 ICM 配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 13.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
虽然 14 英寸的可转换外形尺寸使该机型在户外环境中使用非常方便,但由于屏幕的最大亮度仅为 300 至 400 尼特左右,因此并不是为明亮的环境条件而设计的。因此,在办公室或客厅以外的大多数环境下,眩光是不可避免的。你必须花更多的钱购买其他机型,如 惠普 EliteBook 840这样的机型,如果您把室外可视性放在首位,则可以选择 1000 尼特的面板。
性能 - 流星湖人工智能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将联想 Vantage 和 Windows 设置为性能模式。与戴尔不同,联想软件没有将其电源配置文件与 Windows 电源配置文件同步的功能,因此更改配置文件非常麻烦。
处理器
酷睿至尊 5 125U 酷睿至尊 5 125U对于 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14 来说,酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 可能是最便宜的选择,但它的速度绝对不慢。原始多线程性能超过了去年常见的 酷睿 i7-1355U领先 20% 至 25%。升级到 酷睿至尊 7 155U预计只能将性能提高 5% 至 10%,这意味着您必须跳级到 酷睿至尊 5 125H或 酷睿至尊 7 155H才能看到明显的性能优势。
同类 U 系列 CPU 的速度明显快于 Core Ultra 5 125U,包括 Ryzen 7 7840U或更老的 Ryzen 7 6800U.因此,Core Ultra 5 125U 与 Ryzen 5 系列 CPU(包括 Ryzen 5 7530U.
在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,性能的可持续性还算不错。如下图所示,我们最初的 1657 分在重复一到两次后会下降约 15%。如果配置酷睿 Ultra H 系列 CPU,下降幅度可能会更大。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5430 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (28563 - 41152, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5430 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4492 - 4659, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升至 2.8 GHz 和 41 W,几秒钟后达到 88 C 的核心温度。此后,CPU 会下降并稳定在 1.8 GHz 和 23 W,以保持 70 C 的较低核心温度。 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14相比,我们在配备速度更快的酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 处理器的 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14 上记录到的结果既慢又冷。因此,配置 Core Ultra H CPU 可能会导致温度高于我们在 Core Ultra U 评测机上记录的温度。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》来代表游戏负载会再次导致核心温度达到 70 C。 Inspiron 14 7445 2 合 1在较重的 Inspiron 14 7445 二合一机型上重复这项测试,其集成的 Radeon 780M 处理器速度更快,因此整体温度较低。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 45 |
Prime95 压力 | ~1.8 | -- | 69 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~0.8 - 1.2 | ~950 | 71 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.8 | 1700 | 70 |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数低于 2022 AMD 型号这是因为与 Ryzen 7 6800U 和 Radeon 680M 相比,我们的 Core Ultra 5 CPU 和 Arc 4 GPU 运行速度较慢。根据我们使用 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9 的情况,升级到 Ultra 7 155H 配置后,2024 机型的性能应该会超过前代机型。
今年的内存性能稍快,为 7467 MHz,而 2022 机型为 6400 MHz,我们更高的 AIDA64 分数也反映了这一点。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6052 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 没有发现任何重大的 DPC 问题,而 4K60 视频播放则完美无缺,没有任何掉帧记录。在可靠的多媒体功能方面,我们对英特尔最新 CPU 系列的期望不低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
M.2 2242 三星 PM9C1a与 2022 型号的 Kioxia BG5 相比,我们的设备有了明显的改进,因为它的性能提高了 2 倍多,而且没有出现节流问题。后者尤其值得注意,因为较短的 M.2 2242 固态硬盘往往比全长的 80 毫米硬盘更容易出现节流问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - Iris Xe Vibes
集成的 4 核弧的性能与去年的 Iris Xe 96 EUs在许多 Raptor Lake 和 Alder Lake 笔记本电脑上大受欢迎。升级到酷睿 Ultra 5 125H 或酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 配置后,图形性能有望大幅提升约 50%至 60%,因为酷睿 H Meteor Lake CPU 配备了更强大的 Arc 7或 弧 8图形处理器。如果你打算使用 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14 玩游戏,建议升级到酷睿 H。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 5295 | 19800 | 2006 |
均衡模式 | 5307 (-0%) | 19634 (-0%) | 1877 (-6%) |
电池电量 | 5284 (-0%) | 19750 (-0%) | 1835 (-9%) |
在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行似乎不会对性能产生重大影响。在电池电量充足的情况下,整体性能依然出色。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7206 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23230 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5023 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2070 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ -2! | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 103.9 | 115.9 | 21.6 | 8.81 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88.3 | 52.2 | 28.5 | 15.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.8 | 53.9 | 61.6 | 58.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 42.3 | 24.2 | 19.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 35.7 | 28.9 | 23.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 45 | 24 | 22 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 123 | 49.7 | 39.8 | 25.1 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 30.2 | 22.9 | 16.1 | 12.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 44.4 | 42 | 31 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 16.4 | 13.4 | 11 | 10.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 19.5 | 16.1 | 13.7 | 12 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 安静的机器
在我们的配置中,风扇噪音不是问题。即使在较高负载的情况下,系统也能在尽可能长的时间内保持安静。例如,在运行3DMark 06 时,内部风扇会缓慢升高,在第一个基准场景结束时达到 30 分贝(A),而 Envy x360 则为 35 分贝(A)或更高。 Envy x360 2 合 1 14或 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 的噪音为 35 分贝(A)或更高。游戏等要求更高的负载会导致风扇噪音高达 41 dB(A),与大多数其他 14 英寸可折叠机的噪音上限相似。
配置更强大的酷睿 Ultra H CPU 可能会增加风扇的活动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.5 / 41.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Xe MAX, i5-1135G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -15% | -7% | -3% | -25% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.2 -1% | 24.5 -7% | 23.6 -3% | 21.38 7% | 29.95 -30% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.6 -3% | 24.5 -7% | 24.3 -6% | 25.18 -9% | 29.95 -30% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.6 -3% | 24.5 -7% | 24.3 -6% | 25.18 -9% | 29.95 -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 25 -9% | 28.1 -22% | 24.8 -8% | 25.18 -9% | 29.95 -30% |
Load Average * | 29.5 | 34.8 -18% | 42.8 -45% | 33.5 -14% | 34.37 -17% | 39.84 -35% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.2 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 41.3 | 46.2 -12% | 42.8 -4% | 43.8 -6% | 34.38 17% | 39.84 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.7 | 42.8 | 43.8 | 37 | 42.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱左半部分的表面温度比右半部分高,最热和最冷区域的温度分别达到 38 摄氏度和 27 摄氏度。遗憾的是,温度较高的区域靠近 WASD 键,不利于游戏或打字。相比之下 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7445 2 合 1最热的区域靠近键盘中心,手掌和手指不会放在那里。即便如此,我们在使用过程中也从未发现联想的键盘温度过高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | 0% | -11% | -3% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 40 -5% | 42.3 -11% | 41.2 -8% | 39.4 -4% | 41 -8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.6 | 43 -9% | 45.4 -15% | 48.4 -22% | 45.2 -14% | 41.2 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 32 -7% | 26.2 13% | 29.4 2% | 29 3% | 29.6 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 35.2 -14% | 26.6 14% | 35.2 -14% | 29.4 5% | 30 3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
该系统非常高效,尤其是在空闲时,即使在最大亮度设置下,功耗也不会超过 6 瓦。不过,配置 Core Ultra H 或 OLED 会增加功耗,例如我们的 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14为例。
在运行游戏等较高负载时,耗电量仍低于同类 14 英寸可转换机型,但请注意,我们的设备还配备了速度更慢的 GPU。运行《赛博朋克 2077》时的平均功耗为 41 瓦,比速度更快的 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 低 18%。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以通过小巧(约 9 x 4.7 x 2.7 厘米)的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器记录到 65 W 的临时最大功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.55 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 5.7 / 5.9 Watt |
Load |
42.4 / 64.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -37% | -27% | -24% | 17% | -106% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.2 -0% | 5.1 -21% | 4.5 -7% | 3.54 16% | 8.6 -105% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 7.1 -25% | 8.2 -44% | 8.4 -47% | 4.66 18% | 9.56 -68% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.9 | 12.9 -119% | 8.7 -47% | 8.9 -51% | 6.38 -8% | 25.82 -338% |
Load Average * | 42.4 | 58.9 -39% | 51.4 -21% | 50.7 -20% | 28.2 33% | 47 -11% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 38.2 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.5 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 64.5 | 66.7 -3% | 64.8 -0% | 62.4 3% | 46.9 27% | 69.48 -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 46.3 | 50.8 | 27.4 | 45.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池续航时间--从开始到结束的时间
电池容量与 2022 款 Yoga 7 二合一设计相比没有变化。不过,运行时间却大幅增加,从 2022 款 AMD 机型的近 10 小时增加到 2024 款英特尔机型的 16 小时以上。这一大幅提升可归功于 IPS 显示屏和酷睿 U 系列 CPU,而我们的 2022 型号配备的是要求更高的 OLED 选项。我们的 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14IML9 评测配置是目前最长寿的 14 英寸可转换机型之一。请注意,配置 H 系列 CPU 和 OLED 触摸屏会缩短电池寿命。
从空电到满电需要 90 多分钟。
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 59 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -44% | -29% | -21% | -38% | -55% | |
Reader / Idle | 2331 | 855 -63% | 1330 -43% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 981 | 600 -39% | 584 -40% | 787 -20% | 605 -38% | 440.9 -55% |
Load | 134 | 93 -31% | 110 -18% | 134 0% | ||
H.264 | 762 | 810 |
Pros
Cons
结论--即使在基本级别也极具价值
Yoga 7 2-in-1 14 在评测中的售价为 700 美元,如果完全配置酷睿至尊 7 155H CPU 和 OLED 显示屏,售价可达 1200 美元。该机型的基本配置性价比很高,包括可转换外形、美观的金属设计、超长的电池续航时间、IPS 显示屏以及集成 AI 支持的现代 CPU。该机型没有任何廉价感,基本配置足以胜任日常多媒体和浏览任务。对于大多数预算紧张的家庭用户来说,这是一款值得推荐的产品。
偶尔玩游戏和编辑或希望获得最佳多媒体体验的高要求用户,可以考虑升级到配备酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 OLED 面板的高端 SKU。不过,此时的价格会大幅上涨,机型不再那么划算。例如,1200 美元的售价也能买到一台 ZenBook 14 OLED或HP Spectre x360 14这两款产品都是各自制造商推出的更时尚的旗舰机型。可以说,联想机型的吸引力大打折扣。
2024 Yoga 7 二合一 14 在基本配置上非常划算。不过,如果配置更高端的选项,竞争就会变得更加激烈。
对于未来的改版,我们希望看到铰链和老化的键盘有所改进。虽然它们对于基本配置来说已经足够体面,但对于联想要求超过一千美元的高价配置,我们的期望值就会变得更高。
价格和供应情况
我们评测的配置目前在联想 或百思买的售价为 680 美元。配备 OLED 和 Core Ultra H 的高端配置售价可达 1200 美元。
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
- 07/25/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.