三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 评测--配备 S Pen 和皱纹的经济型平板电脑

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Brand: Samsung

欢迎来到现在。

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 是一款经济实惠的中端平板电脑，配有一支触控笔。在我们的评测中，您将发现这款三星平板电脑的第二版是否仍然值得购买。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/15/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Tablet Galaxy Tab

Tab S6 Lite Galaxy Tab S6 Lite于 2020 年首次问世，并于 2022.现在它已经是第二次更新了。与 2022 年一样，制造商只是更换了 10.4 英寸Galaxy Tab S6 Lite（2024 年）的芯片组--从原来的高通骁龙 732G换成了三星 Exynos 1280.

除此以外，三星选择使用与 Tab S6 Lite 相同的硬件组件。 Galaxy Tab S6 Lite.这意味着 2024 版本只有 4 GB 工作内存和 64 GB 闪存，这似乎不再是最新版本。在我们的评测中，我们将了解附带的 S Pen 能否弥补这一缺陷。Wi-Fi 版售价 330 美元。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Galaxy Tab Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 1280 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.40 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 1TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: position sensor, acceleration sensor, hall sensor, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G: 850 MHz, GSM 900 MHz, DCS 1.800 MHz, PCS 1.900 MHz, 3G: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900), 4G: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B3 (1.800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2.600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B17 (700), B20 (800), B25 (1.900), B26 (850), B28 (700), B66 (AWS-3), B38 (2.600), B40 (2.300), B41 (2.500), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 244.5 x 154.3

Battery

7040 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/1.9, AF)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix /f/2.0)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, info material, One UI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

467 g

Price

429 Euro

Amazon

$279.99

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	467 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5	524 g	6.5 mm	10.90"	2304x1440
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Amazon Fire Max 11 MT8188J, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200

保护套 -Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 金属制造

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite（2024）重 456 克，外观与 2020 Tab S6 Lite 无异。 Tab S6 Lite.我们拍摄的产品照片显示的是 2024 年的当前机型，但理论上我们可以重复使用以前评测中的照片。

金属机身可容纳 10.4 英寸显示屏，边框相当宽，这使 Tab S6 Lite（2024）有别于当前的 Tab S9 系列.显示屏与机身的比例为 81.6%，还算不错。

不过，鉴于其良好的制造质量，我们对其整体印象还是比较满意的。平板电脑的背面手感很好，由于采用了磨砂表面，所以指纹并不明显。三星平板电脑没有获得 IP 认证。

尺寸比较

Amazon Fire Max 11 OnePlus Pad Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Xiaomi Pad 6 Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 配备 USB 2.0 接口的三星平板电脑

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 配备了手写笔、立体声扬声器，根据制造商的规格表，还支持蓝牙 5.3 - 尽管Exynos 1280 名义上仅支持 5.2 标准。

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 的 64GB UFS 2.0 内存并不宽裕，由于操作系统和几个预装应用程序的原因，设置后的可用容量只有 48GB。至少，用户可以将视频和照片存储在 microSD 卡上，或使用附带的 USB 2.0 接口通过 USB OTG 连接外部存储设备。

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 在 2024 年再次不支持基于线缆的图像输出，但允许用户使用 Miracast 将内容无线传输到外部显示器。借助 Widevine L1，用户可以高清画质观看流媒体服务中的视频内容。

microSD 读卡器

在我们的跨平台磁盘测试中，三星平板电脑的卡槽与我们的参考卡（AV PRO V60）配合使用，实现了良好的 microSD 性能。尽管在我们的测试中，姊妹机型Galaxy Tab S9 FE 复制照片的速度稍快，但复制速度还是非常不错的。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	58.36 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)	47.6 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.8 (16.3-51.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.6 (43.2-109.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)

软件 - SamsungGalaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024，含Android 14

这款中端三星平板电脑搭载了目前基于Android 14 的 One UI 6.1。在测试时，Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 使用的是从 2024 年 3 月开始的最新安全补丁。根据制造商的指导原则，这些补丁应该每三个月更新一次。

目前还没有关于三星希望在多长时间内为其 Galaxy Tab 提供软件更新的官方信息。由于前代产品的安全补丁，我们预计 2024 年款的 Tab 也会有类似的更新时间。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 LTE 的三星平板电脑

我们测试的Galaxy 平板电脑配置可以使用 WiFi 5 或 LTE 网络建立互联网连接。在 Tab S6 Lite (2024) 中，三星 SoC Exynos 1280不支持更现代的标准，不过理论上它应该能与 5G 标准兼容。这款三星平板电脑可以接入总共 17 个 4G 频段，包括 Band 20 和 Band 28。Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 也是一款仅支持 WiFi 的设备。

在我们的 WiFi 测试中，使用激活的 5 GHz 连接，传输速度仍然低于 500 MBit/s，这可能表明没有集成所宣传的 VHT80 频道。相比之下 Galaxy A34 5G在使用 VHT80 时的最高传输速率接近 700 MBit/s。在使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 时测得的传输速率比较稳定，但仍明显低于 WiFi6 竞争对手（例如：华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）。小米 Pad 6, Galaxy Tab S9 FE).

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	450 (min: 371) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	493 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	847 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	795 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼46%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	932 (min: 727) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	880 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼51%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1696 (min: 1635) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1710 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	391 (min: 385) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	499 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼29%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø450 (371-488)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø847 (791-876)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø493 (472-514)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (342-895)

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 的 WiFi 和 LTE 版本都使用 GNSS 模块进行定位。不过，我们的测试配置也使用 A-GPS 进行定位。除此以外，三星平板电脑还使用了单频段中大多数常见的主要卫星系统。它们是北斗（B1）、GPS（L1）、伽利略（E1）和格罗纳斯（L1）。

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 并非总能完美定位我们的位置，但偏差很小。我们的对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 的定位结果与三星平板电脑非常相似。

摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024，带自动对焦功能

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 前置的 500 万像素摄像头光圈为 f/2.0，成像效果尚可。由于分辨率较低，细节很少，视频最高只能以 1080p 和 30 fps 的速度录制。主摄像头只能拍摄 4K。

这款中端平板电脑的背面采用单摄像头模块，光圈为 f/1.9。与前置镜头不同，800 万像素传感器采用自动对焦，图像清晰度对于这个价位的平板电脑来说令人满意。不过，图像质量并不是特别高。尤其是照片的动态效果不是很明显。不过，任何想要拍摄文件（如做笔记）的人都会对图像质量感到满意。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

Apple iPhone 15

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

Apple iPhone 15

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

Apple iPhone 15

Canon EOS 600D

我们检查了 8-MP 传感器在受控照明条件下的色彩准确性。就平板电脑而言，我们确定的参考色偏差很小，而且完全没有真正的异常值（>15）。大多数颜色都呈现出和谐的效果，但看起来比原色略亮。只有绿色明显偏亮。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024: 6.54 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 12.25 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带充电器的三星平板电脑

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 随附一条 USB 数据线（两侧均为 USB C）、一本简短的用户手册、一个 SIM 卡工具和一支配色 S Pen。三星还提供三种不同颜色的书套供用户选购。

输入设备和操作 - SamsungGalaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024（不带指纹识别器

在 10.4 英寸液晶面板上，手指的输入可以得到快速而精确的处理。不过，60Hz 的低刷新率无法流畅显示 One UI 的动画，尤其是与 90 Hz 以上的智能手机相比。超过 90 赫兹.处理器 Exynos SoC似乎被液晶屏的高分辨率搞得有些力不从心，偶尔会出现明显的性能问题和滞后现象。

这个价位的手机不一定支持手写笔。附带的 S Pen 可以让用户轻松地在 Tab S6 Lite 上手写笔记。三星没有说明延迟情况，但我们在操作过程中没有感觉到明显的延迟。S Pen 不需要充电，这也意味着它不支持 Tab S9 的某些功能。 Galaxy Tab S9手势控制等功能。

2024 Tab S6 Lite 没有配备指纹扫描仪，功能明显不足。生物面部识别只能通过前置摄像头进行，最多只能识别两张保存的面部。不过，在白天的测试中，这种不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能还是令我们信服。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 -Galaxy 平板电脑，带液晶显示屏

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 的 TFT 面板分辨率为 1200p，像素密度为 224ppi，清晰度不如竞争对手。不过，在日常使用中，这种差异应该不会太明显。小米小米平板 6的像素密度为 300 ppi，刷新率高达 144 Hz。

在亮度方面，我们的 Tab S6 Lite (2024) 达到了 486 cd/m² 的最大亮度，明显低于 Galaxy Tab S9 FE.不出所料，APL18 的亮度为 546 cd/m²，与全白显示屏相比仅略有提高。对 PWM 比较敏感的人会很高兴地了解到，LCD 并没有使用低频闪烁。


461 cd/m²	462 cd/m²	449 cd/m²
477 cd/m²	486 cd/m²	452 cd/m²
478 cd/m²	477 cd/m²	452 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 486 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 466 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 486 cd/m²
Contrast: 1869:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"	Amazon Fire Max 11 TFT LCD, 2000x1200, 11"
Screen		-10%	-1%	-7%	-27%
Brightness middle	486	694 43%	541 11%	474 -2%	564 16%
Brightness	466	695 49%	494 6%	447 -4%	509 9%
Brightness Distribution	92	88 -4%	89 -3%	89 -3%	86 -7%
Black Level *	0.26	0.66 -154%	0.65 -150%	0.32 -23%	0.4 -54%
Contrast	1869	1052 -44%	832 -55%	1481 -21%	1410 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.29	2.1 8%	0.9 61%	3.16 -38%	4 -75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.82	4.3 37%	1.8 74%	5.37 21%	7.1 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	3.3 -18%	1.4 50%	2.5 11%	5 -79%
Gamma	2.229 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.26 ^97%	2.09 ^105%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7145 ^91%	7010 ^93%	6710 ^97%	7112 ^91%	1168 ^557%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Tab S6 Lite 与当前的 Galaxy Tab S9 代是无法校准显示屏。用户无法对色温或饱和度进行任何更改。

我们使用 Calman 分析软件检查了 TFT 面板的校准情况。我们测得的 sRGB 色彩空间 DetaE 值在目标范围内（<3）。只有蓝色色调与参考色有明显差异。0.26 cd/m² 的黑色值产生了 1800:1 的良好对比度。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
21.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24.4 ms rise
43.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在初夏进行测试时，Tab S6 Lite（2024）在户外具有良好的可读性。不过，用户还是要避免玻璃表面的反光。液晶面板的可视角度稳定性不错，在广视角下亮度会降低，色彩也仅有轻微失真。

性能 -Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024（配备三星 SoC

Galaxy Tab S6 (2024) 中的Exynos 1280 是一款稳健的中端 SoC，于 2022 年首次投放市场。我们的三星平板电脑有两个 Cortex A78 内核，只有 4GB DDR4 内存，性能相当一般。

三星芯片组无法赶上

Exynos 1380的 Tab S9 FE也赶不上高通骁龙 870的小米 Pad 6在多核 Geekbench 测试结果方面也是如此。Antutu 和 CrossMark 基准测试的结果也有类似的限制。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +74%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	2858 Points +41%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2363 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (2021 - 2152, n=3)	2078 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	2021 Points
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	1011 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (961 - 976, n=3)	968 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	966 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11	949 Points -2%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad	1279 Points +67%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	778 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	767 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (736 - 767, n=6)	745 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -8%
Amazon Fire Max 11	702 Points -8%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Pad	3998 Points +96%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	2728 Points +33%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +22%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2070 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	2045 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (1826 - 2045, n=6)	1955 Points -4%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)	759506 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	573936 Points +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (459194 - 474853, n=3)	467559 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	459194 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad	15951 Points +26%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	12637 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (11077 - 13748, n=6)	12301 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	11259 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -22%
Amazon Fire Max 11	7249 Points -43%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Pad	1114 Points +85%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +28%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	673 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	601 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (579 - 601, n=3)	593 Points -1%
Amazon Fire Max 11	587 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Pad	7453 Points +87%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	4424 Points +11%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	3976 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (3477 - 3976, n=4)	3700 Points -7%
Amazon Fire Max 11	3263 Points -18%
System
OnePlus Pad	10635 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	9016 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	8365 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (7157 - 8365, n=4)	7538 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points -13%
Amazon Fire Max 11	6786 Points -19%
Memory
OnePlus Pad	6873 Points +75%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points +56%
Amazon Fire Max 11	6055 Points +54%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	4486 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	3932 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (3604 - 3932, n=4)	3805 Points -3%
Graphics
OnePlus Pad	22155 Points +331%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points +119%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	7031 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (5104 - 5274, n=4)	5175 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	5145 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11	2501 Points -51%
Web
OnePlus Pad	1906 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	1433 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	1347 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (1041 - 1433, n=4)	1259 Points -12%
Amazon Fire Max 11	1103 Points -23%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
OnePlus Pad	29879 Points +487%
Amazon Fire Max 11	17202 Points +238%
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points +224%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	6110 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	5087 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (4126 - 5087, n=5)	4653 Points -9%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Samsung Exynos 1280

Average of class Tablet

在 GFXBench 图形测试中，我们的Mali G68 MP4 落后于三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE ，配备Mali G68 ，尽管该设备的 GPU 周围也有 5 个管道。

小米

小米 Pad 6的 Adreno 650则完全不同。我们的 Tab S6 Lite (2024) 也比 OnePlus Pad 慢 75%。一加平板电脑的速度慢了 75%。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3001 Points +368%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points +260%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	641 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	310 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points +276%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	632 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 Points -49%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points +275%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2987 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2268 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1078 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	7933 Points +245%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2958 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2299 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1101 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points +150%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5013 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3876 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2525 Points -35%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points +216%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5233 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4008 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2310 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points +63%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4369 Points +34%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3747 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3256 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +39%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	63 fps +7%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	59 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps +159%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	120 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	95 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +7%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	56 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps +181%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	63 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps -46%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	38 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -13%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps +205%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	42 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -48%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	21 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps +192%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	25 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -44%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps +86%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	14 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps +270%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	10 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps +20%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	20 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps +244%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	27 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -44%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps +278%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4.5 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.3 fps -49%

在基准测试中，三星平板电脑的浏览器性能看起来还不错。但在日常使用过程中，我们偶尔会发现延迟现象。60Hz 的面板也会让滚动感觉迟缓。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	102.6 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)	102.343 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (63.5 - 102.3, n=5)	86.3 Points -16%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	74.31 Points -27%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)	114 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (106 - 114, n=3)	109.7 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	107 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points -18%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	75 Points -34%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	133 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	125 Points -6%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	122 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (69 - 187, n=4)	117.8 Points -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min +31%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)	90.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	80.1 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (48 - 90.6, n=5)	67.7 runs/min -25%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	65.6 runs/min -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	34739 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)	32436 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (24159 - 32736, n=5)	29314 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -12%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	24222 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -194%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	1831.1 ms * -42%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (1244 - 1920, n=5)	1518 ms * -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)	1287.1 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	1208.7 ms * +6%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的 AndroBench 基准测试中，这款老旧的 UFS 2.0 存储设备仍能取得不错的成绩。

与

小米 Pad 6相比，三星平板电脑的读写速度明显较低。Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 的读写速度尤其低。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	Xiaomi Pad 6	OnePlus Pad	Amazon Fire Max 11	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		64%	334%	650%	-47%	17%	239%
Sequential Read 256KB	521.67	526.65 1%	1673.97 221%	1866.48 258%	299.4 -43%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) -2%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 100%
Sequential Write 256KB	80.44	282.47 251%	745.32 827%	1616.83 1910%	78.21 -3%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) 118%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 750%
Random Read 4KB	167.23	225.02 35%	298.45 78%	341.39 104%	81.85 -51%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) -30%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 13%
Random Write 4KB	98.68	68.78 -30%	304.34 208%	420.93 327%	8.23 -92%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -18%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 92%

游戏 - 不适合游戏

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 的 2024 版本因其相对较弱的性能而不是为游戏而生的。 Mali-G68 MP4.GameBench 应用程序测量了该设备的精确刷新率，并确认由于采用 60Hz 面板，它不适合 HFR 游戏。

在玩 PUBG 手机游戏时，虽然平板电脑不支持最高图形设置（UHD），而且在稍低的设置（HD）下只能达到 30 帧/秒，但性能还是令人满意的。Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 即使在最低图形设置下也无法显示 60 fps。

对图形要求较高的游戏，如《源氏冲击》，就玩得不尽兴。在低细节时，刷新率只能达到平均每秒 31 帧，包括帧数下降到每秒 20 帧以下。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø31.3 (7-59)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø23 (5-35)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.6 (20-32)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.5 (21-31)

排放 -Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 保持冷静

温度

在日常使用中，三星机箱的发热量很小。即使在连续负载的情况下，Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 也有足够的散热，以避免Exynos 1280 出现明显的节流现象。

3DMark 测试表明，即使在长时间负载的情况下，性能下降也不超过 2%。

Max. Load

Idle


33.8 °C	30.4 °C	28.5 °C
29.5 °C	28.4 °C	29.4 °C
27.5 °C	28.1 °C	28.1 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 32.6 °C


29.5 °C	33.4 °C	35.9 °C
28.8 °C	30.5 °C	32.2 °C
28.5 °C	28.7 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 30.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.8 (13.7-13.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.6 (6.58-6.62)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.8 (3.77-3.83)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.924 (1.907-1.936)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	99.3 (5.03^min - 5.07^max) % +1%
Amazon Fire Max 11	98.5 (1.907^min - 1.936^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	98.2 (3.77^min - 3.83^max) %
OnePlus Pad	84.8 (12^min - 14.1^max) % -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6	82.5 (6.1^min - 7.39^max) % -16%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Amazon Fire Max 11	99.5 (6.58^min - 6.62^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024	99.1 (13.7^min - 13.8^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	98.4 (17.6^min - 17.9^max) % -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6	83.1 (21.1^min - 25.4^max) % -16%
OnePlus Pad	72 (35.1^min - 48.8^max) % -27%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

Tab S6 Lite (2024) 有两个扬声器，最大音量相对较低，只有 76 dB(A)。虽然几乎听不到低音，但音质不错。除此之外，这款中端平板电脑还能线性地再现中音和高音，但在粉红噪声图中，非常高的音调会有所下降。

该设备有一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔，可通过线缆输出音频，并支持蓝牙 5.3（根据数据表）进行无线音频输出。不过，音频编解码器的选择仅限于 SBC、AAC、aptX、SCC 和 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

7040 毫安时电池的最大充电功率为 15 瓦。由于制造商没有为Galaxy Tab 配备合适的充电器，我们在测试时使用了一个电源箱（PD 3.0，最大功率 100 瓦）。大约 2.5 小时后，电池就充满了电。这款 10.4 英寸平板电脑在空载和负载情况下的耗电量都非常出色。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load	2.5 / 8.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 7040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh
Power Consumption		-199%	-175%	-238%	-110%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.13 6%	0.96 20%	3.64 -203%	1.04 13%
Idle Average *	1.4	4.81 -244%	4.91 -251%	6.84 -389%	4.25 -204%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	4.89 -172%	5.07 -182%	7.15 -297%	4.3 -139%
Load Average *	2.5	15.02 -501%	11.8 -372%	8.98 -259%	7.62 -205%
Load Maximum *	8.3	15.22 -83%	15.9 -92%	11.9 -43%	9.69 -17%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø5.36 (1.921-8.29)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380: Ø6.76 (2.38-11.7)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.81 (2.42-5.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.4 (4.89-6.13)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.378 (1.251-2.27)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)

电池寿命

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 的亮度为 150 cd/m²，在我们的实际电池测试中取得了中端设备的平均成绩。不过，由于三星平板电脑的硬件较弱，我们本希望它能提供更好的电池续航时间。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		50h 57min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 123)		12h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 47min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 7040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh
Battery Runtime		16%	-13%	-15%	4%
Reader / Idle	3057		2154 -30%	1345 -56%	2383 -22%
H.264	942		741 -21%	963 2%	1188 26%
WiFi v1.3	754	872 16%	823 9%	648 -14%	988 31%
Load	287		265 -8%	310 8%	228 -21%

Pros

+ 固态 LC 显示屏

+ 集成 S Pen

+ 不错的电池续航时间

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 高品质机身

Cons

- 慢速存储设备

- 内存模块小

- 只有 60 赫兹

- 无指纹识别器

- 仅提供 Wifi 5 和 LTE

- 充电速度慢

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 的评价

回顾：SamsungGalaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024。测试机由 cyberport.de 提供

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) 是价格敏感的Galaxy Tab 系列粉丝希望获得 S Pen 支持的不错选择。

不过，我们认为三星在更新 Tab S6 Lite2024 的翻版受到了硬件老化的影响。从过时的存储设备、不足的工作内存到不再符合最新标准（WiFi 5、不支持 5G、USB 2.0......）。

不需要 S Pen 支持的用户可能更喜欢三星Galaxy Tab A9+在相似的价格范围内，三星平板电脑的配置更加完善。否则 Galaxy Tab S9 FE是一款支持 S Pen 的优秀中端平板电脑，只需支付少量费用即可购买。

Galaxy Tab S6 Lite（2024）是一款不错的平板电脑，我们只推荐给三星的粉丝。

最大的弱点之一是三星选择的芯片组及其系统性能。三星 Exnnos 1280要么不能提供足够的性能储备以保证系统流畅运行，要么 One 用户界面没有针对小内存模块进行充分优化。

用户可能也会对Galaxy 以外的一款有趣的替代产品感兴趣，它在日常使用中的问题要少得多：小米 Pad 6。小米平板 6同样支持触控笔，而且采用了更现代化的组件。

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 在亚马逊网站的售价为 330 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 - 05/09/2024 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

67 / 80 → 84%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 64%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

90%

Display

87%

Games Performance

42 / 78 → 54%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 80%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

56 / 85 → 65%

Average

75%

85%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 评测--配备 S Pen 和皱纹的经济型平板电脑

Marcus Herbrich, 2024-05-15 (Update: 2024-08-15)