
最接近 MacBook Air 13 的 Windows 竞争对手:联想 ThinkPad X9-14 笔记本电脑评测
ThinkBook ThinkPad。
随着 ThinkPad X9-14 Aura Edition 的推出,联想为已经非常丰富的 14 英寸 ThinkPad 产品线再添新成员。在我们的评测中,我们发现尽管它的设计明显不符合 ThinkPad 的风格,但它仍不愧为该系列的新成员。Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论MacBook Air 的完美竞争者
联想造出了非 ThinkPad:至少从外观上看,联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition 不是 ThinkPad。不过,就部件质量和背后的工程设计而言,这款设备确实具有 ThinkPad 的品质。从智能化、易于维护的设计,到打字手感极佳的键盘,再到联想为这款 MacBook Air 的竞争对手配备 HDMI 端口,X9-14 表面上不是 ThinkPad,但内在却是 ThinkPad。
X9 还缺少一些功能,如 USB-A、机械相机快门和 5G/LTE,还有标志性的红色 ThinkPad TrackPoint。所有这些都使 X9 对 ThinkPad 的老客户来说不那么有趣,但我们认为它很好地实现了预期目标:与 MacBook Air 以及戴尔 XPS 等其他 "专业 "机型竞争。X9-14 入门级配置的最大缺陷是 1080p 网络摄像头效果一般。此外,风扇的声音可能会比较大,不过使用平衡模式可以基本保持安静。除此之外,它是 ThinkPad 产品线的又一力作,也是日常办公笔记本电脑的绝佳选择,同时还能带来全方位的优质体验。
Pros
Cons
联想为久负盛名的 ThinkPad 品牌推出全新机型系列的情况并非每天都有。在今年的 CES 2024 上,联想展示了全新的 ThinkPad X9。
我们已经测试过尺寸更大的 联想ThinkPad X9-15第一代灵光版.今天,我们来看看联想 ThinkPad X14-14 1 代灵气版,它的目标是 Apple MacBook Air.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳没有太多 ThinkPad 特色的铝制 ThinkPad
就外观而言,ThinkPad X9 系列无疑是我们迄今为止见过的最不像 ThinkPad 的 ThinkPad。与其他 ThinkPad 相比,它看起来既现代又普通。在这里,ThinkPad 品牌的设计特征并不明显。如果去掉 ThinkPad 徽标,X9 可能就是其他联想 Yoga 系列笔记本电脑。
黑色是 ThinkPad 的主色调,但联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition 却是个例外。它披上了深灰色的外衣。联想在 ThinkPad X9-14 上采用了积极的倒角处理,使其看起来比实际更薄。这也是 X9-14 底盖上有黑色条的原因--风扇和端口都在这里。
全铝结构对于 ThinkPad 来说并不新鲜。铝合金的手感非常好,与常见的黑色 ThinkPad 涂层不同,基本上不会留下指纹。稳定性也不错。与 X1 Carbon 相比,X9-14 的键盘挠性稍大,但这只是在用力按键盘时才会出现的问题。整体工艺非常好。
漂亮:屏幕仍然可以 180 度打开,因此至少在这方面,X9-14 的表现与典型的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑无异。铰链允许单手打开,而且屏幕不会晃动。
作为一款 14 英寸笔记本电脑,联想 ThinkPad X9-14 的机身相当小巧,因为它比我们对比的其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑都要小。就重量而言,它与 13 英寸的 Apple MacBook Air和 戴尔 XPS 13 更为接近,但在这方面,它显然被 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代.
连接性X9-14 不带 USB-A
联想从旧款 ThinkPad(如 X1 Nano或 ThinkPad Z13联想从老款 ThinkPad(如 X1 Nano 或 ThinkPad Z13)中了解到,商务用户需要一个 HDMI 端口,因此我们在联想 ThinkPad X9-14 的左侧发现了一个 HDMI 端口。不过,与更大的 ThinkPad X9-15没有 USB-A 接口,这无疑是一种妥协。至少,联想在两侧各放置了一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口,这样用户就可以选择在哪一侧为 X9 充电--我们希望联想今后也能在其他 ThinkPad 机型上采用这种设计。
交流
联想 ThinkPad X9-14 G1 采用了最新的英特尔 Wi-Fi BE201,是 2025 年笔记本电脑中最好的 Wi-Fi 解决方案之一。焊接的 Wi-Fi 模块支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准和蓝牙 5.4。传输速度很快,不过发送数据比接收数据慢。
尽管是企业级产品线,但 ThinkPad X9 系列没有 5G/LTE 选项。
网络摄像头
这里使用的 WUXGA 面板还捆绑了一个 1080p 网络摄像头。图像可用于视频聊天,但图像清晰度明显低于我们测试过的 800 万像素网络摄像头。 联想 ThinkPad X9-15.

安全
联想 ThinkPad X9-14 G1 可能是一款商务笔记本电脑,但与其他 ThinkPad 机型相比,它的安全装备略显有限。它缺少智能卡读卡器、Kensington 锁插槽和实体摄像头快门。电子快门按钮(F9)根本无法提供同样的安全保障。
X9 配备的是嵌入电源按钮的指纹传感器。借助红外摄像头,它还能通过面部识别进行登录。模块化固态硬盘也提高了数据的安全性。
配件
随 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑附送一个 65 W USB-C GaN 充电器。这是 ThinkPad X9 14 包装盒中唯一的配件。
维护
联想让打开过程变得异常简单。底盖的四个角上总共只有四颗飞利浦螺钉,它们都是固定的,不会丢失。拧松螺丝后,底盖会轻微抬起,这样就可以轻松打开设备背面的几个卡扣。正面实际上是用磁铁对准的,因此重新组装也很容易。
打开过程非常简单:ThinkPad X9 的内部空间并不大。与所有 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑一样,内存是焊接在包装上的。没有 WWAN 选项,因此也没有用于 WWAN 模块的开放式 M.2 插槽,Wi-Fi 卡也是焊接的。只有 M.2 2242 固态硬盘可以升级,这是比类似 Apple MacBook Air相比,这是一个优点。至少,联想让 X9 的电池更换变得简单。
可持续性
与最近推出的所有 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑一样,联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 的包装完全不使用塑料,而且可以堆肥。在可持续发展方面,联想使用了 50% 的可回收铝作为外壳,锂聚合物电池中的钴也是 100% 可回收的。生产一台 ThinkPad X9 14 的碳排放量为 150 千克/二氧化碳当量。
由于这是一款企业级笔记本电脑,联想将在多年内提供软件更新,在更换部件支持方面也是如此。此外,还有书面和视频形式的维修手册。
保修
联想销售的 ThinkPad X9-14 提供三年现场保修,但只在德国有效。在全球范围内,保修期仅为自带保修期。如果要升级保修服务,需要支付一定的费用。可选项包括长达五年的更长运行时间、更长的电池保修期和意外损坏保护(ADP),后者涵盖因跌落和泼溅造成的功能损坏。
输入设备:全新的 ThinkPad 键盘
键盘
ThinkPad X9-14 是过去 13 年中 ThinkPad 键盘设计的最大变革。联想保留了键盘的整体chiclet 特性,但完全重新设计了键帽。按键看起来更方正,但底部仍保留了微笑形状和非常轻微的凹陷。键程比其他大多数 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑都短,只有 1.35 毫米。新增了白色键盘背光自动模式、
我们非常喜欢这款键盘的输入体验。尽管键程很短,但它提供了 ThinkPad 所特有的枕头般的感觉。虽然我们不喜欢键盘布局的变化,但它绝对是一款可以长时间打字的舒适键盘。尤其是改变了方向键,取消了专门的 PgUp/Down 键、PrtScr 键和 Insert 键,这些都是糟糕的设计决定。
触摸板
显示屏ThinkPad X9 仅有 OLED 屏幕可供选择
在屏幕方面,联想在 ThinkPad X9 上迈出了商务笔记本电脑的大胆一步,全线产品全部采用 OLED 屏幕,IPS 屏幕在这里无处可寻。联想 ThinkPad X9-14 1 代灵光版提供两块 14 英寸 16:10 OLED 屏幕:
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 400 cd/m², 100 % DCI P3, 雾面, 60 Hz, HDR
- 2.8k (2,880 x 1,800), 500 cd/m², 100 % DCI P3, 半亚光/半亚光, 120 Hz VRR, HDR, 多点触控
我们测量的平均值为 399 cd/m²,因此该屏幕几乎完全达到了承诺的 400 cd/m²。这使它在与一些提供 450 至 500 cd/² 的 IPS 竞争产品相比时处于劣势。当然,作为 OLED 屏幕,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的显示屏还具有其他优势,如完美的黑色和极强的对比度、HDR 支持或快速响应时间。OLED 的一个缺点是使用 PWM 来调节屏幕亮度,但频率为 480 Hz,对大多数用户来说应该不是大问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition ATNA40CT04-0 , OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9350 LG Philips 134WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X NE140QDM-NX4, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14", 144 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 MNE007JA1-2 , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | -21% | -19% | -0% | -19% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.2 | 98.4 -1% | 67.3 -32% | 70.8 -29% | 99.5 0% | 69.6 -30% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 99 -1% | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.8 | 87.9 -10% | 68.6 -30% | 71.6 -27% | 97.1 -1% | 71.4 -27% | |
Response Times | -799% | -493% | -830% | -784% | 8% | -780% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3 ? | 34.5 ? -1050% | 22.8 ? -660% | 37.3 ? -1143% | 36.3 ? -1110% | 2.4 ? 20% | 33.6 ? -1020% |
Response Time Black / White * | 4.2 ? | 27.2 ? -548% | 17.9 ? -326% | 25.9 ? -517% | 23.4 ? -457% | 1.9 ? 55% | 26.9 ? -540% |
PWM Frequency | 480 | 240 ? -50% | |||||
Screen | 29% | -85% | 42% | -20% | -4% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 398 | 525 32% | 341.4 -14% | 462.8 16% | 457 15% | 407 2% | 436 10% |
Brightness | 399 | 506 27% | 315 -21% | 435 9% | 457 15% | 410 3% | 420 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 92 -6% | 87 -11% | 87 -11% | 95 -3% | 99 1% | 93 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.24 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 1.4 71% | 5.63 -17% | 1.92 60% | 4.9 -2% | 4.9 -2% | 1.2 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 2.8 69% | 11.94 -31% | 3.45 62% | 8.5 7% | 9.1 -0% | 3.5 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5 | 0.48 90% | 1.7 66% | 4.7 6% | 0.7 86% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2 -18% | 8.8 -418% | 0.6 65% | 5.7 -235% | 2.3 -35% | 1.4 18% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6485 100% | 6876 95% | 6034 108% | 6539 99% | 7647 85% | 6310 103% | 6477 100% |
Contrast | 1250 | 875 | 2436 | 3808 | 1817 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -258% /
-130% | -289% /
-187% | -270% /
-119% | -274% /
-147% | 1% /
-0% | -254% /
-114% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
表现月牙湖表现稳健
ThinkPad X9-14 有一系列英特尔酷睿至尊 5 和英特尔酷睿至尊 7 可供选择: 英特尔酷睿至尊 226V, 228V, 238V, 258V和 268V.除 226V 采用 16GB 内存外,其余均采用英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器,并搭配 32GB LPDDR5X-8553 内存(焊接封装)。配备的 iGPU 为 英特尔 ARC 130V或 ARC 140V.联想使用单个 M.2-2242-SSD 作为存储设备,容量高达 2 TB。
测试条件
联想利用 Windows 设置让用户设置 ThinkPad 的电源模式。共有三种模式,通过设置处理器的功耗限制(功耗限制 1/PL1 = 持续负载下的功耗,功耗限制 2/PL2 = 短期负载下的最大功耗)来影响 CPU 功耗,进而影响性能和发热量:
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 10 W / PL2 37.5 W
- 平衡:PL1 17 瓦 / PL2 37.5 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 30 瓦 / PL2 40 瓦
我们在 "最佳性能 "模式下进行了所有性能基准测试。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 258V是英特尔 "月湖 "一代处理器。它共有八个内核,四个较大的 P 内核和四个较小的 E 内核。时钟频率范围为 2.2 至 4.8 GHz。通过我们的 CPU 比较列表.
英特尔 Lunar Lake 平台的重点不是性能,而是效率。这一点在多核基准测试中尤为明显,因为搭载 AMD Ryzen AI 的 ThinkPad T14s 6 代和采用高通骁龙 X Elite 处理器的 惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1q都超过了联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition。与其他 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑相比,ThinkPad X9 的持续多核性能达到了大致相同的水平。
当设备使用电池供电时,CPU 性能没有出现节流现象。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU -9! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1947, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4314, n=13) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1504 - 1656, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 414, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36724, n=13) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5265 - 5869, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9311 - 11334, n=13) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2593 - 2795, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3655, n=65, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7717 - 9864, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1891 - 2046, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4852, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4440, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37728 - 40753, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51323 - 54971, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
系统性能
Lunar Lake 也许不能提供最好的多核性能,但其日常性能非常出色。这一点在系统性能基准测试中也有所体现。联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition 是一款不会让用户等待太久的系统。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9333 - 10026, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=57, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1978, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=12) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=12) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2298, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 479, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=11) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average of class Subnotebook (278 - 1104, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7081 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 114336, n=13) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (109734 - 117935, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
与Apple 的 MacBook Air 不同,联想坚持采用模块化设计,这一点非常好。不过,M.2-2242 外形并不流行,而且限制了最大存储容量。在我们的存储基准测试中,联想笔记本电脑表现尚可,但 PCIe 4.0 硬盘肯定不是最快的。至少,它在持续负载情况下不会出现卡顿。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
图形处理器性能是 Lunar Lake 的强项之一,因为作为一款集成图形芯片,它的图形处理器速度相当快。英特尔 英特尔 ARC 图形处理器 140V轻松击败了 AMD Radeon 880M的 ThinkPad T14s 第 6 代 AMD.不过,ThinkPad X9 并没有达到最佳状态,因为在《赛博朋克 2077》持续负载测试中出现了一些节流现象。不过,ThinkPad X9-14 绝对可以满足一些轻度游戏需求,尤其是在使用英特尔 XeSS 升采样等功能时。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12057 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8855 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4296 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 151 | 137.5 | 50.1 | 23.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101.6 | 88.6 | 88.5 | 85.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 63 | 36.9 | 29.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.6 | 36.7 | 33.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 77 | 48 | 44 | 45 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.1 | 28.4 | 27.5 | 24 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.2 | 27.4 | 25.6 | 23.3 |
F1 24 (2024) | 72.1 | 71.6 | 54.8 | 17.2 |
排放:风扇大部分时间处于关闭状态,但在负载情况下声音会变大
系统噪音
联想 ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition 的两个风扇在空转时很安静,但在负载情况下转速会很高。这种情况只发生在设备处于 "最佳性能 "模式时。在最大负载情况下,我们测得的最大噪音值为 43.6 dB(a),超过了任何竞争对手,除了 戴尔 XPS 13.如果将联想笔记本电脑设置为 "平衡 "模式,风扇噪音就会温和得多,中等负载下仅为 26.5 dB(a)。
我们在联想 ThinkPad X9-14 上没有发现任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 26.5 / 43.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Dell XPS 13 9350 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Micron 2550 512GB | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 3% | 6% | 2% | -1% | ||
off / environment * | 24.9 | 23.4 6% | 24.1 3% | 24.1 3% | 23.2 7% | 23.6 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24.9 | 23.4 6% | 24.4 2% | 24.1 3% | 23.2 7% | 23.6 5% | |
Idle Average * | 24.9 | 23.4 6% | 24.4 2% | 24.1 3% | 23.2 7% | 26.5 -6% | |
Idle Maximum * | 24.9 | 24.3 2% | 24.4 2% | 24.1 3% | 23.2 7% | 27.6 -11% | |
Load Average * | 26.5 | 25 6% | 26.2 1% | 31.2 -18% | 29.9 -13% | 26.5 -0% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.5 | 34.2 16% | 31.7 22% | 43.3 -7% | 41.9 -3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 43.6 | 34.8 20% | 45.2 -4% | 31.2 28% | 40.5 7% | 41.8 4% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, AMD Radeon 880M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | 3% | 18% | 11% | 9% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.4 | 44.3 2% | 40.8 10% | 34.8 23% | 41.6 8% | 42.3 7% | 45.9 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46.4 | 43.4 6% | 40.4 13% | 37.4 19% | 43.2 7% | 40.1 14% | 48.7 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.2 | 22.3 26% | 32.2 -7% | 25.4 16% | 25.7 15% | 27.3 10% | 29.6 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.9 | 22.1 26% | 31.2 -4% | 26.2 12% | 25.3 15% | 28.3 5% | 28.5 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
近年来,联想改进了多年来一直很糟糕的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的扬声器。联想 ThinkPad X9-14 1 代灵气版可能是近期所有 14 英寸 ThinkPad 中扬声器效果最好的一款。侧面的双立体声扬声器不如 MacBook Air 13 的扬声器响亮。 Apple MacBook Air 13的扬声器那样响亮,但低音效果更好。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理:尽管采用了 OLED 屏幕,但依然高效
耗电量
在我们的对比列表中,联想 ThinkPad X9-14 G1 是唯一配备 WUXGA OLED 屏幕的设备。其闲置功耗高于 WUXGA IPS 屏幕,但低于配备更高分辨率 IPS 显示屏的笔记本电脑。总体而言,对于配备 OLED 显示屏的笔记本电脑来说,其功耗之低确实令人印象深刻。
充电器可为联想笔记本电脑提供高达 65 W 的功率,足以满足大约 61 W 的最大功耗。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Radeon 880M, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | 12% | 18% | -29% | -1% | 2% | -22% | -41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 1.95 46% | 2.5 31% | 1.3 64% | 3.9 -8% | 4.7 -31% | 2.8 22% | 3.66 ? -2% | 4.28 ? -19% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 8.7 -89% | 5.7 -24% | 2.5 46% | 8.9 -93% | 5.7 -24% | 5.1 -11% | 6.02 ? -31% | 7.31 ? -59% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.2 | 8.9 -71% | 5.8 -12% | 4.1 21% | 9.6 -85% | 6.1 -17% | 5.8 -12% | 7.79 ? -50% | 9.08 ? -75% |
Load Average * | 31.2 | 34.3 -10% | 24.2 22% | 40.1 -29% | 43.4 -39% | 29.8 4% | 33.1 -6% | 40 ? -28% | 44.6 ? -43% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 47.3 | 33.5 29% | 46.1 3% | 42.8 10% | 35.3 25% | 44.6 6% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 48.4 | 26.8 45% | 43.1 11% | 41.8 14% | 34.1 30% | 39.4 19% | |||
Load Maximum * | 61.8 | 35.4 43% | 66.4 -7% | 57.3 7% | 64.1 -4% | 60.1 3% | 66.4 -7% | 62.5 ? -1% | 68 ? -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 23.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
与更大的 ThinkPad X9-15(80 Wh)相比,联想 ThinkPad X9-14 的内置电池容量更为保守--只有 55 Wh。再加上高效的 Lunar Lake 平台和分辨率较低的 OLED 屏幕,这仍然足以接近 Apple MacBook Air 13的电池续航时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试(150 cd/m²)中,被称为电池续航时间基准的Apple 笔记本电脑续航时间略高于 15 小时,ThinkPad 为 14 小时。在黑暗模式下,电池寿命可能更长。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 55 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 59 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 55 Wh | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 63 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, Radeon 880M, 58 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 67% | 28% | 66% | 71% | -5% | 7% | 25% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 850 | 914 8% | 792 -7% | 1236 45% | 973 14% | 658 -23% | 847 0% | 753 ? -11% |
Load | 76 | 171 125% | 124 63% | 142 87% | 173 128% | 86 13% | 87 14% | 122.6 ? 61% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 94 |
笔记本检查评级
ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition 是联想为与 MacBook Air 竞争而量身打造的,它在很多方面都做得很好。虽然在功能设置上有一些妥协,但它仍不失为一款适用于轻型任务的生产力笔记本电脑。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition
- 03/27/2025 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,799.93 List Price: 1800 Euro | 1.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,299.00 List Price: 1759€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,279.00 List Price: 1700 USD | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,499.99 2025 Latest Dell XPS 13 9350... 2. $1,899.00 NewDell XPS 13 9350 Powerful... 3. $1,549.99 Dell XPS 13 9340 Business La... List Price: 1400 USD | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" 1920x1200 169 PPI IPS | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,199.99 ASUS ExpertBook P5 Copilot+ ... 2. $1,099.00 EXCaliberPC [2024] ASUS Expe... List Price: 1500€ | 1.3 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS LED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,497.99 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 2. $1,936.11 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 3. $2,799.00 Lenovo Gen 13 ThinkPad X1 Ca... List Price: 2700 Euro | 982 g | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,999.00 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 U... 2. $1,399.00 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 U... 3. $799.98 Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Business... List Price: 1500 Euro | 1.3 kg | 19.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.