惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 笔记本电脑评测:对ARM平台Windows寄予厚望
![HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14](fileadmin/_processed_/f/8/csm_PXL_20240702_2134088452_d2ad11467c.jpg)
惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1p 14 是微软上个月在西雅图举行的 Surface 大会上公布的众多笔记本电脑型号之一。这次发布尤为重要,因为它标志着微软开始第三次尝试将 Windows 引入 ARM 平台。不过,这一次,Windows 制造商有了高通公司(Qualcomm)的人工智能骁龙(Snapdragon)处理器和惠普、戴尔、联想和华硕等主要制造商的支持,来推动该平台的发展。
我们今天的评测机型是面向商务的 EliteBook Ultra G1p 14,配备骁龙 X Elite X1E-78-100 SoC、16 GB LPDDR5x-8400 焊接内存和 512 GB SSD,零售价为 1700 美元。截至发稿时,尚无其他型号。惠普还推出了一款名为 OmniBook X 14 的相关但独立机型,其规格与 OmniBook X 14 非常相似,但价格却比 OmniBook X 14 便宜 500 美元,而且设计更加面向消费者。
我们建议您阅读 我们对华硕 Vivobook S 15 的评测它与惠普配备了相同的高通 ARM 处理器。因此,这两款笔记本的软件体验非常相似。
更多惠普评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.3 % | v8 (new) | 07/2024 | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
83.3 % | v8 (new) | 06/2024 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
89.4 % | v7 (old) | 03/2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.3 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.8 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.1 kg | 14.96 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
92.8 % | v7 (old) | 11/2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
表壳 - 采用回收铝和塑料精心制作而成
EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 可能采用了全新的 ARM 处理器,但其外壳似乎深受去年采用 AMD 处理器的 蜻蜓 Pro.从机身颜色、键盘布局、铰链设计到视觉触感,一切都让人联想到 14 英寸的 Dragonfly 系列,而不是 14 英寸的 EliteBook 1040系列。这意味着,尽管采用了超轻超薄的设计,但高通这款机器给人的感觉同样高级。
遗憾的是,小铰链是原本坚固的机身中最薄弱的部分。我们在对 Dragonfly Pro 的评测中也注意到了这一点,但在 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 上看到同样的问题还是有点令人失望。在较宽的角度下,铰链的刚性不是很强,而且在调整角度时,盖子往往会明显摇晃。戴尔 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 的铰链比较紧实,我们能更好地感受到它的使用寿命。 戴尔Latitude 9450相比之下,戴尔 9450 系列的铰链更紧实,使用寿命更长。
尺寸和重量是 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 的亮点,因为该机型明显比包括Latitude 9450 2-in-1 在内的许多竞争对手更薄、更轻、 XPS 14 9440或 MacBook Pro 14.不过,用户还可以通过选择 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12或 LG Gram 14因此,我们这款基于高通技术的机器并不一定是最轻的。
连接性
该系统包含一个 USB-A 端口,而大多数其他 14 英寸的子笔记本电脑甚至包括惠普自己的 Dragonfly 系列都不提供该端口。值得庆幸的是,该系统支持 USB4,可兼容更多扩展坞和显示器。
与Latitude 9440 2-in-1 或 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 不同的是,它没有 Kensington 锁。
网络摄像头
标配的 500 万像素传感器、用于免提登录的红外线和用于保护隐私的物理滑块。相比之下,其他一些惠普笔记本电脑,如 Dragonfly Folio G3则配备了 800 万像素传感器。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/1/b/csm_WIN_20240629_19_50_27_Pro_f0ecc50e7e.jpg)
维护
配件和保修
零售包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。考虑到该机型的售价,如果能提供一个保护套就更好了。
制造商提供三年的标准保修,以及一年的 HP Wolf Security Pro 软件保护。较长的基本保修期是区分面向消费者的 OmniBook X 14 和面向企业的 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 的关键因素。
输入设备 - 熟悉的蜻蜓手感
键盘
键盘布局与 Dragonfly Pro 更为相似,而不是 EliteBook 845尤其是在按键大小和字体方面。键程感觉很浅,包括空格键和回车键,如果能有更强的反馈效果就更好了。
背光激活时,所有按键和符号都会发光。
触摸板
表面积比 Dragonfly Pro 略宽 蜻蜓专业版(12.5 x 8 厘米对 12.0 x 8 厘米),更加宽敞,便于多点触控输入。在较慢的速度滑行时,牵引力非常平稳,只有一点粘滞感,从而提高了精确度。向下按压表面时的反馈也比 XPS 或联想 IdeaPad 系列更清晰、更坚定、更响亮。至少在不考虑带有专用按键的触控板的情况下,这是一款更令人满意、更可靠的触控板。
显示屏 - 标准 60 赫兹 IPS
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 341.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 875:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.14
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14.00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AU Optronics AUOA49A, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 76.6 | 80.6 | 99.7 | 99.2 | ||
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 77.4 | 80.1 | 98.2 | |||
Response Times | 97% | -145% | -130% | 96% | -297% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.8 ? | 0.61 ? 97% | 65.6 ? -188% | 59.6 ? -161% | 0.91 ? 96% | 80.8 ? -254% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.9 ? | 0.67 ? 96% | 36 ? -101% | 35.6 ? -99% | 0.76 ? 96% | 78.8 ? -340% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240.3 | 14878 ? | |||
Screen | 306% | 45% | 48% | 50% | 68% | |
Brightness middle | 341.4 | 378 11% | 425.9 25% | 501.4 47% | 417 22% | 610 79% |
Brightness | 315 | 379 20% | 405 29% | 491 56% | 417 32% | 600 90% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 98 13% | 87 0% | 88 1% | 98 13% | 96 10% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.02 95% | 0.26 33% | 0.32 18% | ||
Contrast | 875 | 18900 2060% | 1638 87% | 1567 79% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.63 | 1 82% | 2.81 50% | 2.52 55% | 1.26 78% | 1.7 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.94 | 2.6 78% | 4.91 59% | 4.87 59% | 3.6 70% | 2.3 81% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.8 | 1.2 86% | 2.2 75% | 2.8 68% | 1.3 85% | 2.1 76% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6034 108% | 6460 101% | 6688 97% | 6270 104% | 6355 102% | 6874 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.68 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 202% /
264% | -50% /
7% | -41% /
12% | 73% /
62% | -115% /
-24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.3 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.3 ms rise | |
↘ 13.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17594 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
表现--起步不错,但还不够好
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。包括 3DMark 在内的许多基准测试都必须经过模拟才能运行,这使得与英特尔或 AMD 芯片进行直接比较变得更加困难。
处理器
原始多核性能与同类产品不相上下 酷睿至尊 7 165U并驾齐驱,但比竞争对手 Ryzen 7 7840U或 8840U.单核运行的结果甚至更糟,我们的 骁龙 X 精英 X1E-78-100可比上述英特尔和 AMD 芯片慢 35% 至 40%。将高通芯片与 Apple M2系列或更新机型进行比较时,也会发现类似的结果。
当压力过大时,性能会随着时间的推移而下降,因为高时钟频率无法长时间维持。虽然这种情况并不少见,但与许多酷睿U或Ryzen-U替代产品相比,性能下降的幅度更大。例如,当循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,2175 分的初始分数在循环六次后将下降 27%,而去年采用 AMD 技术的 Dragonfly Pro.我们怀疑这是由于 EliteBook Ultra G1q 设计的散热解决方案较小,而较大的 Vivobook S 15 OLED 显示屏的散热解决方案较小。 Vivobook S 15 OLED在类似的测试条件下,采用相同高通处理器的 Vivobook S 15 OLED 可以持续获得更高的分数。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (7801 - 8083, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (21914 - 24109, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (3187 - 3249, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (67909 - 67959, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1518 - 1880, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (14459 - 14598, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (56088 - 64583, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (658 - 745, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (2957 - 4166, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (27950 - 37638, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
系统性能
当然,我们通常使用的一些基准应用程序无法在 ARM 环境中运行,这也在意料之中:
- Far Cry 5:无法启动
- X-Plane:仅在低设置下运行;在中和高设置下崩溃
- 博德之门 3》:在 DX12 模式下无法启动
- HWiNFO64:ARM 版本即将推出
- i1Profiler:无法识别色度计
- LatencyMon:无 ARM 版本
- 3DMark06:SysInfo 错误;可规避
- Geekbench 6.2:无法启动
值得一提的是,上述大多数应用程序都是用于基准测试目的,大多数买家都不会运行。浏览器、视频播放器和 Microsoft Office 等日常生产力应用程序的运行没有问题。
笔记本型号 | Word 分数 | Excel 分数 | PowerPoint 分数 | 边缘得分 | 综合得分 |
EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 (Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100) | 8191 | 24856 | 11731 | 12557 | 13159 |
Latitude 7350(Core Ultra 5 135U) | 5710 (-30%) | 18505 (-26%) | 10244 (-30%) | 12767 (-13%) | 10842 (-18%) |
PCMark 10 Standard 也与 ARM 不兼容,因此我们改用 PCMark 10 Applications。上表中的分数高于Latitude 7350 配备酷睿至尊 5 135U 的记录,这表明高通机器在日常应用方面更类似于酷睿至尊 7 系列,而不是低端 SKU。
有趣的是,尽管重新进行了测试,惠普的 WebXPRT 和 Kraken 分数还是比华硕系统低得多。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) (395 - 419, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) (285 - 286, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (45988 - 61071, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (60078 - 115323, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (37763 - 43206, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (7.8 - 8.1, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N这是一种常见的 PCIe4 x4 硬盘,可在其他高端机型上使用,例如 联想 Yoga 9 14IRP G8或 EliteBook 840 G9.不幸的是,我们的 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 上的硬盘往往会出现节流现象,下面的 DiskSpd 循环测试结果就说明了这一点。传输速率在最初几分钟内保持稳定,然后降至 3500 MB/s。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们的 骁龙 X Adreno与 Arc 4 或更老的 Iris Xe 96 EUs而不是 Arc 8 或 Radeon 680M/780M系列。这意味着英特尔和 AMD 的最新集成 GPU 在原始图形处理能力方面比高通解决方案快 50% 到 80%。
电源配置文件 | 物理得分 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 18921 | 5569 | 2250 |
均衡模式 | 18781 (-1%) | 5574 (-0%) | 2301 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 6013 (-68%) | 5573 (-0%) | 1885 (-16%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行时,性能似乎没有下降。不过,使用电池供电会大大降低处理器性能,这与大多数采用 Core-U 或 Ryzen-U 处理器的子笔记本电脑不同,后者的性能不足更常见。联想 联想 ThinkBook 14 2 合 1 G4例如,在 "性能 "模式和 "电池 "模式之间根本不会出现性能下降。我们在使用电池供电运行采用 ARM 处理器的华硕 VivoBook 时,也没有遇到性能大幅下降的情况。惠普表示,BIOS 更新(F.07)即将推出,以解决这一问题。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5372 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18704 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5346 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1799 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
如果用户想购买一款搭载 ARM 技术的 Windows PC 来玩游戏,那可就找错地方了,因为这款骁龙芯片并非专为游戏玩家设计。尽管如此,高通公司还是臭名昭著地吹嘘它能以 1080p 和 30 FPS 的速度运行《博德之门 3》,这立即引起了大多数评论员的注意。然而,在没有 FSR 的帮助下,我们在 1080p Low 和 720p Low 设置下的平均帧数分别只有 23 FPS 和 35 FPS。在其他游戏中的表现也同样令人失望,正如上面的 3DMark 合成结果所预测的那样,比竞争对手 Arc 8 或 Radeon 680M 慢得多。
目前最糟糕、最明显的问题可能是我们在大多数测试游戏中遇到的帧步调不一致或跳帧现象。即使像《小小蒂娜的仙境》这样平均帧率还不错的游戏,跳帧也会比英特尔或 AMD 的跳帧频率高得多,以至于让人心烦意乱。高通公司要想让自己的驱动程序变得和竞争对手一样成熟,肯定还有很长的路要走。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max -4! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 -1! | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1! | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon -1! | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) () | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) () | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) () | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) () | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) () |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 109.2 | 70.9 | 39.7 | 17.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 77.9 | 60.9 | 55.9 | 49.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51 | 23 | 14.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.4 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 114.3 | 43.6 | 36.7 | 32 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 41.5 | 30.8 | 20.6 | 16.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 57.6 | 51 | 36.2 | 27 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23.1 | 19.6 | 17.1 | 16.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 22.1 | 18.3 |
排放 - 几乎听不到
系统噪音
风扇噪音比其他大多数 14 英寸超极本都要小。在浏览网页或视频流时,内部风扇的噪音往往稳定在 25 分贝(A),而背景噪音为 23.4 分贝(A),在使用过程中基本上听不到。最糟糕的情况是,在玩游戏或运行要求非常高的任务时,系统会保持在 35 分贝(A)以下,这仍然明显低于大多数传统替代产品,如 MacBook Pro 14 或 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 24.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25 / 34.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 Radeon 680M, R7 7736U, PSEIB512GABBMC0 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -7% | -18% | -9% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 24.3 -4% | 23 2% | 23.9 -2% | 23.8 -2% | 24.8 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 24.3 -4% | 23 2% | 23.9 -2% | 24 -3% | 24.8 -6% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 24.3 -4% | 23 2% | 23.9 -2% | 24 -3% | 24.8 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 26.2 -8% | 23 5% | 23.9 2% | 24 1% | 24.8 -2% |
Load Average * | 25 | 32.5 -30% | 27.8 -11% | 36.4 -46% | 31.5 -26% | 25.8 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 40.6 -33% | 44.7 -46% | 37.8 -24% | 43.4 -42% | |
Load Maximum * | 34.8 | 39.8 -14% | 40.3 -16% | 44.7 -28% | 37.8 -9% | 43.4 -25% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | 14% | 11% | -0% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.8 | 43.6 -7% | 38.6 5% | 35.4 13% | 44.2 -8% | 45.9 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.4 | 53.1 -31% | 42.8 -6% | 37.8 6% | 41.2 -2% | 42.1 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.2 | 26.7 17% | 22.2 31% | 27.2 16% | 29.4 9% | 23.4 27% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.2 | 27.2 13% | 23.6 24% | 28.2 10% | 31.2 -0% | 23.8 24% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
ARM 设备以耗电著称,EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 也不例外。在台式机上空转时,根据亮度的不同,功耗在 3 瓦到 6 瓦之间,低于大多数其他超极本。同样,运行要求更高的负载(如游戏)时,功耗仅为 24 瓦,而采用酷睿 U 处理器的二合一笔记本功耗为 35 瓦至 55 瓦。 Latitude 9450 2 合 1.总体而言,EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 的运行速度可能会慢一些,但至少它的功耗要低一些。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 2240x1400, 14.00 | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, PSEIB512GABBMC0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -29% | -46% | -52% | -74% | -148% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 4.4 -76% | 3.2 -28% | 3.2 -28% | 3.9 -56% | 2.6 -4% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 6.2 -9% | 5.4 5% | 6.4 -12% | 5.8 -2% | 11.8 -107% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 7.5 -29% | 5.6 3% | 10.8 -86% | 16 -176% | 12.2 -110% |
Load Average * | 24.2 | 33.6 -39% | 42.2 -74% | 54.6 -126% | 46.1 -90% | 99.9 -313% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 23.1 | 29.9 -29% | 60 -160% | 35.5 -54% | 50.4 -118% | 92.5 -300% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 33.5 | 39 -16% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 69.3 -4% | 82 -23% | 70.2 -6% | 67.4 -2% | 101.7 -53% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, 59 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU, 70 Wh | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | 13% | 8% | -33% | -13% | |
Reader / Idle | 1222 | 1393 14% | 1300 6% | 1069 -13% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 792 | 783 -1% | 777 -2% | 815 3% | 466 -41% | 911 15% |
Load | 124 | 97 -22% | 158 27% | 143 15% | 70 -44% | 73 -41% |
H.264 | 885 | 1077 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 良好的开端,但还不够好
如果要说服普通人选择 ARM 版 Windows,而不是Apple 或其他公司的传统替代产品,那么它就必须在性能、价格、电池续航时间和外形尺寸等几个方面表现出色。下面让我们逐一进行分析:
性能。该产品的性能充其量只能与酷睿 Ultra 7 155U/165U 相提并论,但在单核运行时,其速度却与较早的酷睿 i7-1165G7 不相上下。与英特尔和 AMD 最新的集成 Arc 和 Radeon 解决方案相比,图形性能也不尽如人意。
价格惠普EliteBook Ultra G1q 14的售价为1700美元,与其他以商务为中心的酷睿Ultra 7笔记本电脑(如 戴尔Latitude 7350或 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon.
电池寿命。由于每瓦性能较高,运行时间非常出色,比大多数英特尔或 AMD 超薄笔记本更长。不过,英特尔和 AMD 也有效果相当的替代产品,包括 2023 Dragonfly Pro 或 戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1.
外形。体积小、重量轻、风扇噪音小是惠普高通机的亮点。不过,像 LG Gram 14, 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro或 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 等机型可以更小,甚至更轻。
EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 面临的挑战并不是说它不好,而是目前英特尔/AMD 机器的竞争非常激烈。买家已经有很多优秀的子笔记本电脑可供选择(包括惠普自己的产品组合),它们的功能和性能可以与 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 相媲美,甚至更胜一筹,尤其是在兼容性方面。因此,对于绝大多数用户来说,很难推荐 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 而不是上述许多替代产品。
EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 是高通公司的一个良好开端,但它还需要做得更多,因为在相同价格下,英特尔和 AMD 的最新产品已领先一步。
如果 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 的起售价比竞争对手低得多,那么它的许多缺点都可以被原谅。遗憾的是,它的价格与竞争对手差不多,但在性能和功能方面却没有任何优势。这是一个很好的开始,但高通公司和个人电脑制造商还有很长的路要走,才能说服用户使用ARM平台的Windows系统。
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14
-
07/02/2024 v8 (new)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.