Geekom AX8 Pro AI NUC PC 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD，0.47L 机箱

Name: Geekom AX8 Pro
Brand: Geekom

新喷漆和新 SoC！ Geekom 利用最近 NUC 设计升级的机会，现在也开始在紧凑的外壳中出货 AMD SoC。该制造商并不惧怕安装 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS。在这篇评测中，我们对 Geekom AX8 Pro 进行了近距离观察，并根据大量测量和基准测试对其性能进行了分类。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/21/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Mini PC Desktop AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon

从外观上看，Geekom AX8 Pro 确实非常抢眼。Geekom 利用自身的产品组合，安装了 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS.由于 Geekom 尚未使用 Meteor Lake 处理器，因此 AMD SoC 应该会在 3D 性能方面带来显著提升。在最高配置中，安装了 32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD。我们过去已经多次看到，Geekom 不一定会推销价格低廉的设备。Geekom AX8 Pro 也是如此，其最佳配置售价为 999 欧元。这已经是一个优惠价了，因为制造商的建议零售价是 1099 欧元--Geekom 为这款设备开出了一个傲人的价格。售价 879 欧元的 Geekom AX8 Pro 配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 Geekom AX8 Pro 售价为 879 欧元，稍便宜一些，但仍不便宜。

Geekom 本身可能是它最大的竞争对手，因为在技术方面与 Geekom AX8 Pro 不相伯仲的稍旧设备中，经常会出现一些诱人的优惠。在本次评测中，Geekom AX8 Pro 还必须与其他制造商的设备进行比较，以证明自己的实力。

Test device courtesy of Geekom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Geekom AX8 Pro

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 780M, Adrenalin 14.6.1

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600 MT/s

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Acer N7000, 2048 GB

, 1760 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 117 x 112

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Additional features

120-Watt-Power-Adapter (19V; 6.32A), 36 Months Warranty

Weight

548 g, Power Supply: 258 g

Price

999 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height
78.4 %	v8	08/2024	Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M	548 g	37 mm
80.8 %	v8	06/2024	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	653 g	60 mm
78 %	v8	07/2024	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	578 g	49.2 mm
72.4 %	v8	08/2024	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	555 g	37 mm
87.5 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	863 g	48.6 mm
83.4 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	768 g	57 mm

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里.

机箱 - 坚固的机箱，全新的彩色顶部处理

Geekom AX8 Pro 的基础与 Geekom XT13 Pro的外壳相同。 Geekom XT12 Pro.作为 AMD 的对应产品，Geekom AX8 Pro 有机会在同样紧凑的基础上证明自己的性能。这两款设备仅在外观上有所不同，Geekom AX8 Pro 的外壳涂成了蓝色。内部同类产品的银色和白色组件一如既往地质量上乘，配合得天衣无缝。不过，由于材料不同，颜色也有差异。外壳主要由金属制成，但盖子和底部则由塑料制成。我们的测试设备仅重 548 克，非常轻巧，而且 Geekom 的占地面积（11.7 x 11.2 厘米）也非常节省空间。Geekom AX8 Pro 可使用随附的 VESA 支架直接固定在显示器上。

尺寸比较

设备

在外部接口方面，Geekom AX8 Pro 无法与英特尔的同类产品相媲美。 Geekom XT13 Pro.乍一看，两者几乎没有任何区别，但仔细观察就会发现，Geekom AX8 Pro 只有一个 USB4 接口。这还不算太糟，因为扩展选项还在。Thunderbolt 功能也被省略了。英特尔型号（如英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 桌面版套件）曾作为 NUC 系列推出，现由华硕销售，但也提供 Thunderbolt 支持。Geekom AX8 Pro 的界面布局完全相同，尽管设计小巧，但在数据方面同样得分。

交流

Geekom AX8 Pro 采用了我们在其他 Geekom 迷你电脑上熟悉的无线模块。如果路由器提供该选项，联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN 模块还可以处理较新的 6 GHz 频率范围。根据我们的测试结果，这也是值得推荐的，因为传输速率明显优于 5 GHz 频率范围内的连接。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试。此外，用户还可以使用 2.5 Gbit/s 的 RJ45 插座。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1761 (1734^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1716 (1560^min - 1782^max) MBit/s +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1657 (1619^min - 1670^max) MBit/s
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1528 (1495^min - 1552^max) MBit/s -8%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=37)	1440 MBit/s -13%
Average of class Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=54, last 2 years)	1355 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1800 (1737^min - 1904^max) MBit/s
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1699 (1590^min - 1792^max) MBit/s -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1562 (1198^min - 1713^max) MBit/s -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1440 (1352^min - 1553^max) MBit/s -20%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1800, n=36)	1416 MBit/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=55, last 2 years)	1290 MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +63%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=52)	1412 MBit/s +44%
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	979 (962^min - 989^max) MBit/s
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	969 (946^min - 981^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Mini PC (192.9 - 1796, n=108, last 2 years)	933 MBit/s -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s -24%
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	707 (631^min - 811^max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +62%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=52)	1287 MBit/s +33%
Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	966 (921^min - 1008^max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=108, last 2 years)	860 MBit/s -11%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	806 (765^min - 844^max) MBit/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s -24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -27%
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	573 (145^min - 972^max) MBit/s -41%

Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1800 (1737-1904)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)

Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1656 (1619-1670)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)

Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (962-989)

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (676-758)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)

Geekom AX8 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (921-1008)

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø724 (369-756)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

配件

Geekom AX8 Pro 随附一个 120 瓦的电源装置和一个 VESA 支架（包括安装材料）。制造商不提供任何其他配件，如键盘或鼠标。

维护

Geekom AX8 Pro 可以毫无障碍地从底部打开：只需拧松四颗小螺丝即可。底板还可作为固态硬盘的被动散热元件。如有必要，还可以更换内存和大容量存储器。不过，Geekom AX8 Pro 不再提供任何升级选项。如果要清洁 CPU 风扇，必须拆下电路板和散热装置。不过，只要稍微灵巧一点，就不成问题。

可持续性

Geekom AX8 Pro 是一款非常小巧的微型电脑。尽管如此，制造商还是将该设备与易于管理的配件一起装入了一个相对较大的包装盒中。其尺寸与 Geekom XT13 Pro 的包装非常相似。而 Geekom XT12 Pro 的包装则小得多。就运输所需空间而言，Geekom 对我们的测试机型采取的做法并不符合合理的可持续发展原则。设备本身主要由金属和塑料制成。不过，我们不知道制造商在生产过程中是否使用了专门的回收材料。Geekom 的 36 个月保修期受到好评。

性能 - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 带来强劲动力

餈 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS是一款高端处理器，为大多数应用提供了足够的动力。如果您只需完成基本的办公任务，也可以选择性能较弱的设备。另外，Geekom AX8 Pro 也可以配备性能稍弱的 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS的处理器。两款 SoC 均为原生 8 核心，提供 16 个逻辑运算单元。说到内存，32 GB DDR5 内存总是不错的选择，不过至少要安装 1 TB 的大容量存储空间。

测试条件

在 Geekom AX8 Pro 的所有性能测试中，我们都使用了 "平衡 "能源配置文件。根据我们的测试标准，只有在功耗和噪音测量中出现了偏差。测试标准.根据制造商的规格，Geekom 允许 SoC 以最低的功耗运行。用数字表示，这意味着连续负载下的功耗限制为 45 瓦，但短时间内允许高达 60 瓦。BIOS 本身非常简单，几乎不允许更改。无法更改 SoC 的功率限制和 iGPU 的 RAM 分配。只能更改风扇预设值。默认激活性能模式。

处理器

Geekom AX8 Pro 搭载了AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ，这也出现在Geekom A8 中。不过，在直接对决中，AX8 Pro 不得不向 A8 认输。不过，由于在性能评级中仅有两个百分点的差距，我们可以说这两款设备的性能几乎完全相同。在单项测试中，Geekom AX8 Pro 并不能始终战胜竞争对手。尤其是搭载 Meteor Lake 处理器的设备（Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 和Acemagic F2A ），由于物理核心数量较多，在多核测试中可以明显脱颖而出。不过，在单核性能方面，AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 与Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 不相上下。
。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	58.8 pt
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	58.2 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	57.7 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	57.7 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57.6 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	56.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	53.9 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +20%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	967 Points +13%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	946 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points +10%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	852 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	680 Points -20%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	108 Points +1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	108 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	107 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	103 Points -4%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +16%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	16795 Points +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16099 Points +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	15516 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11997 Points -23%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1825 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1808 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1788 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points -2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1719 Points -5%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	287 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	284 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	281 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +9%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2640 Points +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2544 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2521 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2448 Points -3%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	711 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	703 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	700 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	649 Points -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +17%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6591 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points +3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6321 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6153 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	4935 Points -20%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3.45 Points +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3.38 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	3.28 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.93 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +15%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	31.31 Points +7%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	30.49 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	29.14 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	28.47 Points -2%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	14561 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	14451 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points -1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14232 Points -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points -4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13515 Points -6%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90144 Points +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +6%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	87296 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	84253 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	76558 Points -9%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	261 Seconds * -27%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	206 Seconds *
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds * +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	197 Seconds * +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	196 Seconds * +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +17%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -31%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	3.521 s * -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * -21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s * -1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.699 s * -0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2.688 s *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2.563 s * +5%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -489%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	429.446 s * -473%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * -86%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s * -32%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96.95 s * -29%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	74.917 s *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	67.933 s * +9%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +8%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	300 (299^min - 301^max) fps
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	298 (297^min - 305^max) fps -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	297.5 (283^min - 313^max) fps -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps -4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	288 (287^min - 289^max) fps -4%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +9%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	150.65 (150.4^min - 154.2^max) fps +7%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	144.15 (143.5^min - 146.6^max) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	141.2 (141^min - 143.9^max) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	110.15 (104.3^min - 134.9^max) fps -22%

WinRAR - Result
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7843 KB/s +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	7744 KB/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s 0%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7580 KB/s -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6365 KB/s -18%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.4 GB/s +6%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15.2 GB/s +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	14.5 GB/s
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13.3 GB/s -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -27%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.3 GB/s +10%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.1 GB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2.1 GB/s
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2 GB/s -5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -19%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1.4 GB/s +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -23%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12481 Points +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12228 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	11980 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11536 Points -4%
Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1996 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1994 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1986 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points -12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1708 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12386 Points +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12141 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	11804 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11464 Points -3%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1907 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1906 Points 0%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1905 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1678 Points -12%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8178 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	8140 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8125 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7389 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	49341 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49269 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	47917 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	42713 Points -11%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	22978 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	22340 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22237 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	18126 Points -19%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	71874 MIPS +8%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71631 MIPS +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	66557 MIPS
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	56068 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6691 MIPS
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6668 MIPS 0%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6661 MIPS 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5828 MIPS -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20.9 fps +1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.9 fps +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	20.6 fps
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.7 fps -29%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4693 sec * -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	0.4576 sec *
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec * +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	0.4346 sec * +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4346 sec * +5%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.7 s * -8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49.9 s * -0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	49.8 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	46.8 s * +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +11%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	323 Points +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	316 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	309 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points -11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	271 Points -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	550 ms * -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * -5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms * -2%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	510 ms * -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	506 ms *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	505 ms * -0%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27732 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	27363 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26617 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points -8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	23640 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11298 Points +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11049 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	10844 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points -8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	9741 Points -10%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7.512 s * -8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s * -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * -3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7.158 s * -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7.045 s * -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6.962 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +3%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s * -4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17.904 s * -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	17.549 s * -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	17.404 s *
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	16.436 s * +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +15%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s * -3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	653.976 s * -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	644.49 s *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	624.748 s * +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	424.723 s * +34%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +39%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +53%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Multi CPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	813 Points +35%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	770 Points +28%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	662 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	633 Points +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	623 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	603 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	520 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7594

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

46572

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17692

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

14451 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

84253 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

21619 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

25.8 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.28 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

29.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.96 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

284 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2521 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

212.18 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	97.2 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	93.1 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	90.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	81.2 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77.2 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57.1 pt
Average of class Mini PC	52.7 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	26514 KRay/s +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25916 KRay/s +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	24531 KRay/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s -28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s -29%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11780 KRay/s -52%
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=121, last 2 years)	11617 KRay/s -53%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	112419 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	109747 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	106518 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points -14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points -17%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59787 Points -44%
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=121, last 2 years)	59588 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4898 MB/s +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4695 MB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	4684 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s -9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2813 MB/s -40%
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=121, last 2 years)	2617 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	119250 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	116083 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	114586 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	91925 Points -20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -24%
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=121, last 2 years)	76050 Points -34%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14976 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14876 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	14631 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points -26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points -30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8181 Points -44%
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=121, last 2 years)	8128 Points -44%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	60098 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58597 Points +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	56505 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points -21%
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=121, last 2 years)	31212 Points -45%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29407 Points -48%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	167583 MB/s +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	163032 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s -11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	105740 MB/s -35%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85572 MB/s -48%
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=121, last 2 years)	83023 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1048 MB/s +7%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1015 MB/s +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	976 MB/s
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	819 MB/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=121, last 2 years)	673 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14162 KRay/s +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13875 KRay/s +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	13609 KRay/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s -32%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6242 KRay/s -54%
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=121, last 2 years)	6213 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +14%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40690 MPixel/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40245 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	40114 MPixel/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s -18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28315 MPixel/s -29%
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=121, last 2 years)	26668 MPixel/s -34%

Cinebench R15 多回路

Cinebench R15 耐久循环是一个极端场景，通过反复耐久测试对处理器施加压力，以确定散热系统的工作情况。Geekom 本身规定的 TDP 为 45 瓦。这只能在开始时达到，从第二次运行开始就会下降。持续的负载降低了 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS进一步降低。与竞争对手相比，最终结果非常令人沮丧。

Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2223 (2100.4-2438.43)

Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)

Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2563 (2486.79-2630.54)

Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

系统性能

Geekom AX8 Pro 的系统性能非常出色，比对比设备略胜一筹。不过，没有哪款设备会出现重大失误。即使是 Geekom XT13 Pro在我们的测试中也能提供足够的日常使用性能。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	7553 Points
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	7520 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	6102 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	11227 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points -1%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	11058 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points -2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	10908 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	10774 Points
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	10717 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points -17%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	7490 Points -30%

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	1865 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1837 Points -2%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1813 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1931 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points +17%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points +7%
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	1583 Points
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1527 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -13%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	2057 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points -1%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2011 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1889 Points -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points -8%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N7000	1786 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1756 Points -2%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1731 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -11%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core,	71990 MB/s +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M,	68924 MB/s
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M,	68449 MB/s -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M,	67777 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core,	62397 MB/s -9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs,	46670 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core,	75449 MB/s +22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core,	64323 MB/s +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M,	61836 MB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M,	61624 MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M,	61006 MB/s -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs,	45998 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M,	87138 MB/s
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M,	87118 MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M,	86677 MB/s -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core,	70596 MB/s -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core,	65057 MB/s -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs,	47241 MB/s -46%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core,	149 ns * -63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core,	146.1 ns * -60%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M,	91.4 ns *
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M,	90 ns * +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M,	88.6 ns * +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs,	83 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

UL Procyon AI Inference for Windows
Overall Score Integer NPU
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	499 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	368 Points
Overall Score Integer GPU
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	684 Points +850%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	526 Points +631%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	79 Points +10%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	72 Points

DPC 延迟

在延迟方面，Geekom AX8 Pro 的表现并不令人信服。我们记录了与 Geekom XT13 Pro.即使是简单的上网，DPC 值也很高。播放 4K 测试视频和短期压力测试对 DPC 值没有负面影响。在视频播放过程中，iGPU 的使用率明显较高，超过了 60%。Geekom A7 的 iGPU Geekom A7的 iGPU 使用率仅为 30%。与 Geekom AX8 Pro 相似的结果已经由 Geekom A8我们也测试了它与 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的配置。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -47%
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2198.8 μs * -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	1856 μs *
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	1671.7 μs * +10%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs * +46%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

Geekom AX8 Pro 的最高配置为固态硬盘，存储空间为 2 TB。更确切地说，Geekom 在这里安装了宏碁 N7000。从物理角度看，大容量存储空间的连接非常理想，因此测试中的传输速率很高。尽管如此，Geekom AX8 Pro 的固态硬盘还是无法达到我们在 Geekom XT13 Pro 上测试的性能。 Geekom XT13 Pro.正常使用时，性能没有明显差异。压力测试则显示了出色的性能。除了一个小例外，我们记录了稳定的读取性能。被动散热装置足以快速散热。Geekom AX8 Pro 只能安装一个大容量存储设备。这使我们的测试样品与基于英特尔的 Geekom XT13 Pro 有所区别，后者可安装两个大容量存储设备。

如需进一步比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的比较表.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Acer N7000

Sequential Read: 4151 MB/s

Sequential Write: 3824 MB/s

512K Read: 2501 MB/s

512K Write: 2696 MB/s

4K Read: 55.96 MB/s

4K Write: 144 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 594.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 627 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	87.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	81.3 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	63.9 pt
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	60.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	57.5 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	45.1 pt
Average of class Mini PC	43.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	3921 (3897.31^min - 3920.75^max) MB/s
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3690 (2901.41^min - 3690.32^max) MB/s -6%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s -21%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2411 (2346.63^min - 2410.89^max) MB/s -39%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -41%
Average of class Mini PC (233 - 4357, n=120, last 2 years)	2199 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -57%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s +22%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4196 (3895.46^min - 4196.19^max) MB/s +11%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	3791 (3695.18^min - 3790.57^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3650 (3239.07^min - 3649.71^max) MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Mini PC (222 - 5595, n=120, last 2 years)	2309 MB/s -39%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -64%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	7012 (5624.01^min - 7012.25^max) MB/s
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6932 (5986.51^min - 6931.53^max) MB/s -1%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s -26%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	4939 (4360.49^min - 4938.56^max) MB/s -30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=120, last 2 years)	3524 MB/s -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	5793 (5555.78^min - 5793.38^max) MB/s +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	5685 (5389.6^min - 5684.54^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s -16%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	4273 (4238.26^min - 4272.58^max) MB/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Mini PC (228 - 6669, n=120, last 2 years)	2587 MB/s -54%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -61%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	70.3 (66.06^min - 70.34^max) MB/s +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	62.2 (61.55^min - 62.23^max) MB/s
Average of class Mini PC (5.67 - 86.6, n=120, last 2 years)	53.6 MB/s -14%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	48.1 (43.1^min - 48.11^max) MB/s -23%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	335 (332.49^min - 335.43^max) MB/s +79%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s +47%
Average of class Mini PC (22 - 435, n=120, last 2 years)	189.9 MB/s +2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	187 (185.73^min - 187.04^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	184.8 (177.47^min - 184.84^max) MB/s -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4158 (4048.89^min - 4158.05^max) MB/s +153%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s +94%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s +11%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	1644 (1568.76^min - 1643.51^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1580 (1549.8^min - 1579.65^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=120, last 2 years)	1256 MB/s -24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -30%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s +462%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3142 (2751.87^min - 3141.57^max) MB/s +386%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s +122%
Average of class Mini PC (30.2 - 4288, n=120, last 2 years)	1201 MB/s +86%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	647 (598.22^min - 647.4^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	627 (618.33^min - 627.08^max) MB/s -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -23%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points +82%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6667 Points +21%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	6354 Points +15%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	5512 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -20%
Average of class Mini PC (151.3 - 10021, n=118, last 2 years)	3898 Points -29%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points +109%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2635 Points +47%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	1793 Points
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1757 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -17%
Average of class Mini PC (61 - 3741, n=118, last 2 years)	1454 Points -19%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points +51%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3759 Points +30%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	2896 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2741 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -28%
Average of class Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=118, last 2 years)	1751 Points -40%
Seq Read
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	4902 MB/s
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4882 MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s -12%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3891 MB/s -21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -23%
Average of class Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=118, last 2 years)	3037 MB/s -38%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -39%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s +48%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3506 MB/s +24%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	2835 MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2526 MB/s -11%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC (240 - 5783, n=118, last 2 years)	2097 MB/s -26%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s +51%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	84.3 MB/s +43%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s +7%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	59.1 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC (6.08 - 104.3, n=118, last 2 years)	57.5 MB/s -3%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	55.2 MB/s -7%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -29%
4K Write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	291 MB/s +60%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s +31%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s +22%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s +9%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	195.5 MB/s +8%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	181.4 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=118, last 2 years)	173 MB/s -5%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s +159%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2062 MB/s +66%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1313 MB/s +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	1244 MB/s
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -2%
Average of class Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=118, last 2 years)	1093 MB/s -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s +53%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3311 MB/s +36%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	2431 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s -4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2100 MB/s -14%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=118, last 2 years)	1368 MB/s -44%
Access Time Read
Average of class Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=118, last 2 years)	0.1022 ms * -29%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	0.079 ms *
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	0.077 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms * +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.069 ms * +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +15%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +42%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -97%
Average of class Mini PC (0.016 - 0.765, n=118, last 2 years)	0.1145 ms * -79%
Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000	0.064 ms *
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.056 ms * +12%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	0.023 ms * +64%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * +69%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms * +73%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom AX8 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6996 (5972.7-7027.76)

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4932 (4634.29-4944.25)

Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5637 (4899.21-6932.56)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

图形卡

餈 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS提供 AMD Radeon 780M - 这是一款非常强大的 iGPU，在 Ryzen 7000 SoC 中已经使用过。不过，性能并没有明显变化。相反，这取决于制造商给予 SoC 的功率限制以及内置冷却装置的功率有多大。虽然 Geekom AX8 Pro 不一定提供非常强大的散热装置，但 3D 性能方面的结果相对较好。我们的测试样品往往能超越 Aoostar GEM12的性能。不过，我们也看到，较新的 SoC 并不能保证性能更好，因为 Geekom AE7 有时也能提供更好的效果。在性能比较中，我们还看到 AMD 的 Radeon 780M 性能超过了英特尔 Arc 8的性能。

更多比较和基准测试可参见我们的 GPU 对比表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	97.6 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	93.8 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	93.6 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	91.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	58.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13824 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	13281 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points -12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7428 Points -44%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +12%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2970 Points +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2852 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1682 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8437 Points +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	8117 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5845 Points -28%

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	91.4 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	87.4 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	86.4 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	82.1 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	56 pt

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps +15%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33.2 fps +11%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	30 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	24.9 fps -17%
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	36.4 fps
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps 0%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36.1 fps -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	25.7 fps -29%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps +6%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	24.5 fps +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	23.1 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps -20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps -26%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.2 fps -34%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +57%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	20.6 fps
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	19.2 fps -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps -11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.6 fps -24%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	12232 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points 0%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12146 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points -17%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6603 Points -46%
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3698 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	3559 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	2254 Points -37%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +10%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1803 Points +9%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1649 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1128 Points -32%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9806 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points +10%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	8595 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points -27%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	3616 Points -58%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	488 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points -1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	481 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points -12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	290 Points -41%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	486 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points +8%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	427 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Points -33%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2560 Points +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2362 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points -31%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	851 Points -64%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2614 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2449 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points -35%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points -48%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	866 Points -65%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3665 Points +28%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points +7%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2868 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points -15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1323 Points -54%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1068 Samples/s
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1025 Samples/s -4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s -40%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	627 Samples/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -49%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +5%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2312 Samples/s +4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2218 Samples/s
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1970 Samples/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s -33%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +190%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +169%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	4332 Points +137%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1889 Points +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1831 Points
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points -7%

	Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945H	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Geekom AE7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS	Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		2%	-4%	-66%	-53%	-56%	-15%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	12.8	11.2 -12%	12.7 -1%	3.63 -72%	4.23 -67%	5.05 -61%	7.72 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=61, last 2 years) -40%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	13.3	19.9 50%	14.4 8%	3.15 -76%	6.03 -55%	4.61 -65%	11.2 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=61, last 2 years) -16%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	35.3	33.4 -5%	30.2 -14%	16 -55%	18.5 -48%	17.9 -49%	30.9 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=61, last 2 years) -12%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	25.1	23.2 -8%	23.7 -6%	7.9 -69%	11.1 -56%	10 -60%	19 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=60, last 2 years) -24%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	21.1	20.4 -3%	20.7 -2%	10.3 -51%	14.9 -29%	12.9 -39%	22.3 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=61, last 2 years) 6%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	65.7	64.1 -2%	61.3 -7%	6.13 -91%	6.24 -91%	5.7 -91%	41.8 ?(2.25 - 226, n=60, last 2 years) -36%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	49.6	47.7 -4%	47.4 -4%	26.8 -46%	37.7 -24%	35.4 -29%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 207, n=61, last 2 years) 19%

3DMark 05 Standard		62727 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		43083 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		39171 points
3DMark 11 Performance		13206 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		168337 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36962 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7504 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4037 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3206 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		510 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2756 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

性能卓越的 AMD Radeon 780M在游戏测试中也同样表现出色。不过，需要注意的是，这是一款 iGPU，无法与配备专用图形适配器的设备相媲美。在与竞争对手的直接比较中，Geekom AX8 Pro 在很大程度上证实了 AMD Radeon 780M 的性能。在较新的游戏中，我们的性能略有劣势，这是因为 SoC 的功耗较低。

要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能，请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	169.4 (3.69^min, 125^P1) fps
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	168 (6.33^min, 125^P1) fps -1%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps -3%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	123.5 (30.5^min, 66.7^P1) fps -27%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	65.9 (2.44^min, 41.7^P1) fps
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps -1%
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	65.1 (2.93^min, 29.4^P1) fps -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps -37%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps -53%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	22.1 (7.08^min, 16.4^P1) fps -66%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	163 (143.1^min) fps +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	157.5 (136^min) fps
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	117.2 (74.5^min) fps -26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -32%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -34%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	89.8 (75.7^min) fps +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	88 (69.2^min) fps
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps -10%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps -12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	72.5 (53^min) fps -18%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	45 (38^min) fps +9%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps +3%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	41.3 (34.5^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps -17%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps -29%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	18.6 (15.4^min) fps -55%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	27.4 (23.1^min) fps +6%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	25.8 (21.7^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps -7%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps -21%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13 (11^min) fps -50%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	67.4 (22.7^min, 28.3^P0.1, 43.6^P1) fps +11%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	60.8 (21.6^min, 28.1^P0.1, 35.6^P1) fps
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	60.3 (21.3^min, 36^P0.1, 46.1^P1) fps -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	28.2 (13.8^min, 15.1^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps -54%
1920x1080 High Preset
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	25.7 (11^min, 11.5^P0.1, 14.5^P1) fps +5%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	24.7 (16.6^min, 17.1^P0.1, 19.4^P1) fps +1%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	24.5 (17.7^min, 17.7^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13.5 (11.2^min, 11.2^P0.1, 11.6^P1) fps -45%

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	94.8 (81^min, 64^P1) fps +14%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	83.4 (28^min, 33^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	43.1 (36^min, 26^P1) fps -48%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	59.5 (50^min, 41^P1) fps +16%
Geekom AX8 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000	51.3 (23^min, 15^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	26.7 (23^min, 17^P1) fps -48%

FPS chart

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M: Ø19.2 (17.9-20.3)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	169.4	158.3	65.9	27.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	157.5	116.1	88	81.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	77.9	38.8	28.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	64.2	46.8	40.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	38.5	29.9	24.5	24.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	41.3	31.8	25.8	21.7
F1 24 (2024)	83.4	70.9	51.3

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行 Geekom AX8 Pro 性能测试

正如前面提到的连接方式，Geekom AX8 Pro 有一个 USB4 端口，可以使用外置显卡。我们结合 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti进行了一些测试。测试结果显示，与 AMD Radeon 780M.在合成测试中，Geekom AX8 Pro 的性能与对比设备几乎完全相同。在游戏测试中，采用 AMD 处理器的设备优势明显。

在这种组合下，迷你 PC 可以处理许多以前只能在有很大限制的情况下才能玩的游戏。有时，这种组合还能提供足够的性能，在不牺牲细节的情况下享受 1440p 的游戏。

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	99.5 pt
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	99 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	97.9 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	96.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34907 Points +163%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34034 Points +156%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33219 Points +150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	32085 Points +142%
	13281 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11180 Points +292%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11156 Points +291%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11085 Points +289%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10935 Points +283%
	2852 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25842 Points +218%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25665 Points +216%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25468 Points +214%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	24809 Points +206%
	8117 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7139 Points +227%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7103 Points +225%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7079 Points +224%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6997 Points +220%
	2184 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34726 Points +184%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	34168 Points +179%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33452 Points +173%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	25121 Points +105%
	12232 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	15240 Points +328%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15070 Points +323%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15008 Points +322%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14859 Points +318%
	3559 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7193 Points +336%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7117 Points +332%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7064 Points +328%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7029 Points +326%
	1649 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9419 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9206 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4079 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4047 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4016 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	4009 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	143.9 fps +523%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.7 fps +513%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.6 fps +509%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	135.9 fps +488%
	23.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	138.6 fps +573%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.6 fps +568%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	137 fps +565%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	133.5 fps +548%
	20.6 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +483%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	174.5 fps +482%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.6 fps +479%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	172.3 fps +474%
	30 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	163.6 fps +349%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +348%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	162 fps +345%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	158.8 fps +336%
	36.4 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	28156 Points +228%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	28076 Points +227%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27669 Points +222%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	26591 Points +209%
	8595 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2719 Points +457%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2715 Points +456%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2708 Points +455%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2683 Points +450%
	488 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2663 Points +524%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2657 Points +522%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2641 Points +519%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2618 Points +513%
	427 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5769 Points +144%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5760 Points +144%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5652 Points +139%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5358 Points +127%
	2362 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6335 Points +159%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6319 Points +158%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6223 Points +154%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5949 Points +143%
	2449 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10671 Points +272%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10626 Points +271%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10445 Points +264%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9982 Points +248%
	2868 Points

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	99 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	98.9 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	93.7 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	87.8 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	106 (82.3^min - 140.6^max) fps +54%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	103.1 (80.9^min - 132.1^max) fps +49%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	84.9 (65.5^min - 112.9^max) fps +23%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	70.2 (53.5^min - 91.7^max) fps +2%
	69 (56.9^min - 85.4^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	81.5 (64.7^min - 103.8^max) fps +156%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	81.5 (65.7^min - 103.4^max) fps +156%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	80.4 (63.9^min - 102.3^max) fps +153%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.2 (55.8^min - 97.4^max) fps +127%
	31.8 (27.5^min - 37.4^max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	64.5 (50.7^min - 85.9^max) fps +197%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	64.3 (50.9^min - 85.8^max) fps +196%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	63.9 (49.4^min - 86.6^max) fps +194%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	60.8 (43.6^min - 87^max) fps +180%
	21.7 (18.2^min - 28.6^max) fps

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	113.4 (62.4^min, 69.4^P0.1, 78.1^P1 - 216^max) fps +195%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	110.9 (57.4^min, 66.9^P0.1, 76.7^P1 - 233^max) fps +188%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	110.4 (37.6^min, 67.1^P0.1, 77.2^P1 - 235^max) fps +187%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	109.5 (51.8^min, 62.3^P0.1, 74.4^P1 - 198.7^max) fps +184%
	38.5 (19.4^min, 19.8^P0.1, 29.1^P1 - 102.2^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	90.8 (48.5^min, 55.2^P0.1, 61.7^P1 - 191.5^max) fps +204%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	89.4 (43.6^min, 53.5^P0.1, 60^P1 - 201^max) fps +199%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	88.5 (53.2^min, 55.5^P0.1, 59.9^P1 - 191.6^max) fps +196%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	87.3 (36.9^min, 43.6^P0.1, 57.2^P1 - 191.9^max) fps +192%
	29.9 (11.8^min, 18.6^P0.1, 23.5^P1 - 54.7^max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	79 (45.4^min, 46^P0.1, 53.2^P1 - 170.7^max) fps +224%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	78.2 (23.4^min, 47.3^P0.1, 51.1^P1 - 216^max) fps +220%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	76.8 (44.1^min, 46.7^P0.1, 49.8^P1 - 190.5^max) fps +215%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	76.3 (41.3^min, 43.7^P0.1, 50^P1 - 176.1^max) fps +213%
	24.4 (8.81^min, 15.2^P0.1, 19.3^P1 - 51.9^max) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	88.2 (48^min, 52^P1 - 106^max) fps +6%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	86.5 (48^min, 51^P1 - 108^max) fps +4%
	83.4 (28^min, 33^P1 - 100^max) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	77.3 (42^min, 43^P1 - 96^max) fps -7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.6 (41^min, 43^P1 - 87^max) fps -13%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	82.3 (47^min, 49^P1 - 97^max) fps +16%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	82.2 (47^min, 49^P1 - 95^max) fps +16%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	72.8 (41^min, 41^P1 - 85^max) fps +3%
	70.9 (20^min, 33^P1 - 84^max) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	70 (41^min, 42^P1 - 81^max) fps -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	68.7 (40^min, 40^P1 - 82^max) fps +34%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	68.3 (39^min, 38^P1 - 82^max) fps +33%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	61.3 (35^min, 37^P1 - 75^max) fps +19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	58.2 (34^min, 36^P1 - 71^max) fps +13%
	51.3 (23^min, 15^P1 - 63^max) fps

	Geekom AX8 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945H	Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS	Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS	Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H	Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		82%	83%	-9%	80%	-15%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	12.8	13 2%	13 2%	10.9 -15%	10.8 -16%	7.72 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=61, last 2 years) -40%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	13.3	21 58%	20.9 57%	17.8 34%	21 58%	11.2 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=61, last 2 years) -16%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	35.3	77.2 119%	76.8 118%	26.6 -25%	76.4 116%	30.9 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=61, last 2 years) -12%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	25.1	39.2 56%	39.2 56%	23.6 -6%	40.1 60%	19 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=60, last 2 years) -24%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	21.1	46.1 118%	46.5 120%	28.7 36%	47.3 124%	22.3 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=61, last 2 years) 6%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	65.7	16.7 -75%	16.6 -75%	11.4 -83%	16.5 -75%	41.8 ?(2.25 - 226, n=60, last 2 years) -36%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	49.6	198 299%	199 301%	47.5 -4%	196 295%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 207, n=61, last 2 years) 19%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	179	161.1	158.7	142.1		111.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	212	144.4	99.2		78	48.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	138.2	122.2	92.4			80
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	110.9	89.4	78.7	78.2	60.5	37
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	95.4	81.5	71.7	64.3	44.7	22.3
F1 24 (2024)	86.5	82.3	68.7	47.5	37	15

排放量

噪音排放

由于设计紧凑，Geekom AX8 Pro 配备了小型散热装置。空转时，它能安静地工作，这一点非常出色。然而，在负载情况下，这种情况很快就会改变，我们测得的声压级为 50 dB(A)，不容忽视。高频率的风扇噪音导致主观感觉音量更大。风扇转速的性能配置文件默认在 BIOS 中激活。此外，还有其他两个选项可供选择。我们还使用静音风扇配置文件进行了压力测试，结果只能测得轻微的改善。48 dB(A)的噪音仍然明显高于某些竞争对手。这种设计与强大的硬件相结合，成为运行噪音的主要障碍。

Noise Level

Idle		24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A)
Load		50.1 / 50.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.9 dB(A)

	Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Noise		7%	-1%	-2%	-3%	-0%
off / environment *	24.9	24.3 2%	24.4 2%	25 -0%	24.1 3%	24.9 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24.9	27.5 -10%	24.9 -0%	27.6 -11%	29.8 -20%	25.4 -2%
Idle Average *	24.9	27.6 -11%	25 -0%	27.8 -12%	29.9 -20%	25.7 -3%
Idle Maximum *	24.9	27.6 -11%	25 -0%	27.9 -12%	30 -20%	25.7 -3%
Load Average *	50.1	36 28%	52 -4%	42.2 16%	37.3 26%	47.8 5%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	50	35.4 29%	52 -4%	46.6 7%
Load Maximum *	50.2	38.2 24%	51.4 -2%	49.5 1%	43.5 13%	49 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *		35.4			40.2	45.23

* ... smaller is better

温度

我们无法记录怠速或负载时的任何临界表面温度。新鲜空气从两侧吸入，然后从后部排出机壳。后部的温度相应略高。在压力测试中，AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的温度略低于 93 °C，尚不值得担心。根据 AMD 的规定，该系统芯片的最高工作温度可达 100 ℃。在我们的测试中，由于 SoC 的最大允许功率为 60 瓦，因此仅在短时间内达到了最高值。在 Prime95 压力测试中，CPU 平均温度稳定在 87 °C，但永久功耗为 45 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle


35.2 °C	39.7 °C	40.8 °C
36.2 °C	36.6 °C	30.2 °C
30.4 °C	33.1 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 34.6 °C


36.8 °C	34.9 °C	36 °C
31.6 °C	32.7 °C	30.3 °C
32.8 °C	31.8 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 33 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.9 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.9 °C / 89 F.

耗电量

Geekom AX8 Pro 在能耗方面的表现令人惊喜。不过，我们的测试样本并非最经济的设备之一。Geekom AX8 Pro 比其竞争对手需要更多的能源，尤其是在闲置状态下。负载情况下的平均功耗为 76.4 瓦，与同样配备 AMD SoC 的设备差不多。120 瓦的电源装置最大耗电量为 99.1 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.7 / 1.1 Watt
Idle	14 / 15.9 / 19.5 Watt
Load	76.4 / 99.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Average AMD Radeon 780M	Average of class Mini PC
Power Consumption		11%	26%	34%	24%	23%	40%	23%
Idle Minimum *	14	8.2 41%	4.5 68%	6.3 55%	8.2 41%	9.1 35%	6.15 ?(2.7 - 14, n=43) 56%	9.72 ?(1.9 - 46.5, n=116, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	15.9	10 37%	4.7 70%	7.1 55%	12.1 24%	10.3 35%	8.25 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=43) 48%	11.7 ?(1.9 - 63, n=115, last 2 years) 26%
Idle Maximum *	19.5	14.6 25%	8.1 58%	9 54%	14 28%	14.4 26%	10.8 ?(5.4 - 27, n=43) 45%	15.1 ?(2.6 - 68.9, n=116, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	76.4	73.9 3%	81.8 -7%	49.8 35%	53.1 30%	54.9 28%	54.9 ?(19.7 - 81.8, n=43) 28%	55.8 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=116, last 2 years) 27%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	54.3	79.9 -47%	71.2 -31%	54 1%
Load Maximum *	99.1	95.3 4%	100.3 -1%	94.5 5%	100.4 -1%	110.4 -11%	74.6 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=43) 25%	93.4 ?(18.1 - 296, n=116, last 2 years) 6%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance Rating | Power Consumption

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	97.5 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	95.7 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	79.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.1 pt

Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	238 Points per Watt +9%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	219 Points per Watt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	205 Points per Watt -6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	192.3 Points per Watt -12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	183.7 Points per Watt -16%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61.4 Points per Watt +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	58.3 Points per Watt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	55.6 Points per Watt -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	54.2 Points per Watt -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39.9 Points per Watt -32%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, Radeon 780M	35.9 Points per Watt
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	33.2 Points per Watt -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	31.2 Points per Watt -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27.5 Points per Watt -23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	26.6 Points per Watt -26%

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.9 (14.3-19.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø89.4 (87.8-94.6)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø54.3 (43.7-67.1)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø76.5 (55.7-96.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.9 (72.6-96)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (63.2-83)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31 (25.6-51.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.9 (66.8-89.8)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.7 (73.1-99.9)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Pros

+ 坚固紧凑的外壳

+ 现代设计和高品质金属表面

+ 完美的做工

+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS（8 核 16 线程）

+ 可用的 iGPU 性能

+ USB4

+ 易于打开

+ 性能稳定的快速 2 TB SSD

+ 36 个月保修

Cons

- 有限的 BIOS 选项

- 只能安装一个固态硬盘

- 负载时声音明显

- 冷却装置很快就会达到极限

- 购买价格高

评价：性能良好的时尚迷你 PC

Geekom AX8 Pro 基于 NUC 平台，采用了 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，可提供强大的性能。然而，紧凑的设计使其无法以更低的噪音水平获得更好的性能发展。Geekom AX8 Pro 的设计从根本上说并不新颖，因为在相同基础上的其他设备也在排放方面表现出类似的弱点。在颜色方面，Geekom AX8 Pro 明显有别于搭载英特尔处理器的同类产品。不过，你是否喜欢蓝色的概念就见仁见智了。为了给制造商的产品组合带来一股新鲜空气，Geekom 应该考虑是否要继续采用这种设计。一款小巧的迷你 PC，却拥有充足的动力，这无疑是一种好方法。然而，日常办公桌上的背景噪音并不令人愉悦。竞争对手表明，如果不一定要注重紧凑型设计，也可以有不同的做法。

Geekom AX8 Pro 是一款性能卓越的时尚迷你电脑。要跟上竞争对手的步伐，它需要的不仅仅是一层新漆。

总而言之，Geekom AX8 Pro 是一款性能出色的迷你电脑，但对于简单的办公用户来说，它的性能实在太强了。基于 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 的机型性能稍弱，可能是一个不错的替代品，对钱包来说也更轻松一些。在外部连接方面，Geekom 做了一些妥协。不过，Geekom AX8 Pro 提供了所有重要的连接。甚至还安装了 USB4 接口。不过，Geekom AX8 Pro 离完美的连接还有很长的路要走。许多微型电脑已经配备了两个 USB4 接口和一个 OCuLink 连接。此外，还不支持 Thunderbolt。如果你对它有依赖性，你应该仔细看看目前的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 设备。

这些当然都是高层次的批评意见。不过，就目前 999 欧元的购买价格（RRP：1,099 欧元）而言，这些批评是有道理的。任何花这么多钱购买迷你 PC 的人都不可能愿意妥协。更何况，它的竞争对手往往更便宜。首先是 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti应该提及。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击这里.

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时，用户可在 Geekom 官方网店订购 Geekom AX8 Pro。此外，亚马逊（Amazon）上也有该款迷你电脑，起价为 750 美元。

Geekom AX8 Pro - 2024-08-16 08/16/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Connectivity

64 / 81 → 79%

Weight

82%

Games Performance

51 / 80 → 64%

Application Performance

84 / 92 → 91%

Workstation

55%

AI Performance

89%

Temperature

91%

Noise

79%

Average

55%

78%

Mini PC - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
70.4%

Repairability
12.5%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 28.7%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 434458 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Geekom AX8 Pro AI NUC PC 评测：AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS，32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD，0.47L 机箱

Sebastian Bade, 2024-08-21 (Update: 2024-08-21)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2518
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2518
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	2519
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M	2521
Geekom Mini IT13 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2531
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2531
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2535
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13199
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	13200
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	13203
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M	13206
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13224
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13249
Asus ExpertBook B3 B3404CVF i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	13299
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163