华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 的超薄游戏笔记本电脑
现在，华硕又推出了一款采用全新 AMD Zen 5 移动处理器的知名 ROG Zephyrus G16。不过，目前只有配备传统散热系统的配置，因此新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370可以与 英伟达GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑最多。更强大的 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU 以及 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑与蒸汽室冷却装置的组合仍然只能与英特尔的流星湖芯片搭配使用。目前，有两款配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和 32 GB 内存的机型可供选择。我们的测试设备配备了 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑售价约为 2800 美元，而配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的版本售价略低于 3000 美元。
除了新的处理器外，这款笔记本电脑只做了极少的改动（例如 WLAN 模块），这也是我们在本文中主要关注性能和排放的原因。有关 ROG Zephyrus G16 的更多信息，请参阅我们对该设备的详细评测：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.9 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | from EUR 1500 |
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | from EUR 1500 |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.30" | 3840x2400 | from EUR 1500 |
| 90 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | from EUR 1500 |
| 92.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | from EUR 1500 |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | from EUR 1500 |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | from EUR 1500 |
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
与英特尔型号相比的差异
在外壳设计方面，ROG Zephyrus G16 与英特尔型号相比没有任何不同。你仍然可以选择深灰色或白色版本，其中深色版本仍然很容易留下指纹。如前所述，新的 AMD 型号只能购买传统的散热系统，该系统由三个风扇和普通热管组成。同样，两颗隐藏的螺丝和胶粘的橡胶脚垫使得笔记本电脑的部件很难接触到。
WLAN 模块可以更换，AMD 机型配备了联发科的 Wi-Fi 7 模块，这比英特尔机型更具优势。它的传输速率非常好，我们在测试期间没有遇到信号质量问题。它的键盘现在配备了专用的 Copilot 键，但除此之外，它与以前的机型相同，仍然是笔记本电脑领域最舒适的键盘之一。
总的来说，新款 AMD G16 凭借更快的 NPU 支持高级 Copilot 功能，例如实时字幕。遗憾的是，它的网络摄像头目前还不支持 Studio Effects。 Zephyrus G14与 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS支持这些功能。我们已经与华硕取得了联系，一旦得到答复，我们将立即更新本文。
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Zen 5
ROG Zephyrus G16 的新 GA605 版本配备了新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 32 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）作为标准配置，这无疑是对旧款流星湖机型的改进，旧款机型也可以配备 16 GB 内存。不过，内存是焊接上去的，没有选择 64GB 的选项。这是为相同配置的 ProArt P16.
测试条件
预装的 Armoury Crate 软件具有我们熟悉的静音、高性能和涡轮增压能量曲线。我们在下表中总结了相应的性能值。此外，还有用于 GPU 切换和超频的其他设置选项。我们使用标准设置的性能模式进行了基准测试和测量。
| 能源概况 | TDP | CB R23 Multi | TGP | Time Spy 图形 | 压力测试 | CP 2077 QHD Ultra |
最大风扇噪音排放 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 60/55 瓦 | 22,141 分 | 42 瓦 | 7,003 分 | CPU：30 瓦 GPU：42 瓦 |
26.6fps | 43.3 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 70/65 瓦 | 22,724 分 | 80 瓦 | 9,286 分 | CPU：30 瓦 GPU：65 瓦 |
38.9fps | 48.3 dB(A) |
| Turbo | 80 瓦 | 23,592 分 | 100 瓦 | 10,244 分 | CPU：35 瓦 GPU：85 瓦 |
42.7fps | 54.8 dB(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
在我们的 CPU 分析中，我们已经对新款 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 进行了详细介绍。 CPU分析中.它拥有 12 个 Zen 5 内核，最高主频为 5.1 GHz。它的性能非常出色，在多核和单核测试中都明显优于竞争对手，包括 Core Ultra 9 185H.配备酷睿至尊 7 155H 的 ROG Zephyrus G16 在多核测试中的速度要慢 20%以上。要想获得更好的性能，您必须使用英特尔或 AMD 的 HX CPU（如 Ryzen 9 7945HX）。 Ryzen 9 7945HX).此外，即使在连续负载的情况下，它的性能也非常稳定。在电池模式下，其性能起初保持不变，但在电池电量为 24% 或更低时，处理器的功耗仅为 19 瓦。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 -2! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
系统性能
主观而言，这款笔记本电脑的系统性能非常出色，基准测试结果也证实了这一点。在日常使用中，输入的执行速度很快，我们在测试期间没有发现系统稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7645 - 7915, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7915 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 92030, n=14) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 仍配备了两个完整的 M.2 2280 SSD 插槽。我们的测试设备安装了 1 TB 版本的美光 2400 固态硬盘，其中 860 GB 在首次启动笔记本电脑后仍然可用。固态硬盘的传输速率总体上只能达到平均水平，但至少在长时间负载的情况下仍能保持稳定的性能。更多固态硬盘基准测试 点击这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
处理器集成了 Radeon 890M处理器集成的 Radeon 890M 可以处理简单的图形计算，如果要求更高（例如游戏时），那么专用的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑接手。先进的 Optimus 技术用于两者之间的切换，但在切换时总会有短暂的延迟。值得庆幸的是，这完全正常。RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的功耗可达 100 瓦，使用性能模式时为 80 瓦。
基准测试结果与预期差不多，即使在性能模式下，这也是对比领域内速度最快的 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑。配备RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 （60 瓦 TGP）的戴尔 XPS 16 仅比它快一点点，在 GPU 基准测试中，它与配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的ROG Zephyrus G16 的差距仅为 13%。
RTX 4060 笔记本电脑和 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的组合意味着这款笔记本电脑在游戏方面也表现出色--我们测试的所有游戏都能以 QHD 分辨率流畅运行，并能获得最大的细节。如果您还想使用光线追踪技术，那么您就必须依靠 DLSS 和/或帧生成等升级技术（如果游戏支持这些技术）。
在运行我们的标准精选游戏时，Zen 5 测试设备的性能实际上与旧版 G16（酷睿超 7 + RTX 4070 笔记本电脑）相同，即使在玩更现代的游戏时，如《赛博朋克 2077》，它的 领先优势也不是很大。
在持续负载以及长时间游戏过程中，GPU 的性能保持稳定。在电池模式下，RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的最大功耗仅为 42 瓦，因此我们注意到在这种情况下性能下降了 28%。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问这里 。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 27941 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21496 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9561 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2025 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 9201 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=53) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
| Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 171.2 | 100.1 | 78.3 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 389 | 295 | 181 | 95 | 70 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 172.8 | 154.8 | 149.8 | 139.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 178.2 | 126.5 | 90.7 | 67.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 89.9 | 83.5 | 66.5 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 142 | 125 | 118 | 112 | 90 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 378 | 252 | 202 | 174.9 | 119.1 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 204 | 203 | 166.4 | 50.2 | 31.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 122.9 | 94.2 | 83.2 | 82.9 | 56.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 104.8 | 90 | 75.2 | 66.4 | 38.9 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 125 | 112 | 83 | 78 | 54 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 86.1 | 81.4 | 58.5 | 50.9 | 39.6 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 81.7 | 69.4 | 65.9 | 55.6 | 41.1 |
排放与动力
噪音排放
笔记本电脑的散热系统仍然由三个风扇组成，这也是 Zephyrus G16 最薄弱的地方。与英特尔机型一样，小型系统风扇的高速运转是最大的问题。如果不使用静音模式，风扇几乎从未静止过，这让人非常恼火。我们感到有些惊讶，因为华硕显然想通过 BIOS 更新来纠正 GU605 的这一行为，即使是相同配置的 ProArt P16 也要好得多。它们在负载情况下的最大噪音排放也不相上下，但 AMD 型号的整体噪音略高于英特尔型号。我们注意到测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
| 能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 34.4 dB(A) | 42.8 dB(A) | 43.3 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 42.8 dB(A) | 48.3 dB(A) | 48.3 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 53 dB(A) | 54.8 dB(A) | 54.8 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.8 / 48.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Dell XPS 16 9640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 6% | 13% | 7% | -2% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 24.6 | 24.3 1% | 24.5 -0% | 24 2% | 23.9 3% | 25 -2% | 22.9 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 24.3 15% | 24.5 14% | 24 16% | 23.9 16% | 26 9% | 23.1 19% |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 24.3 15% | 24.5 14% | 24 16% | 27.8 3% | 29 -1% | 23.1 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 25.8 10% | 27.5 4% | 27.2 5% | 30.1 -5% | 34 -19% | 27.7 3% |
| Load Average * | 42.8 | 48.1 -12% | 39.6 7% | 29 32% | 34.2 20% | 43 -0% | 33.3 22% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.3 | ||||||
| Load Maximum * | 48.3 | 53.9 -12% | 49.7 -3% | 45 7% | 46.4 4% | 48 1% | 54 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.7 | 49.7 | 42.1 | 46.4 | 48 | 54 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑的表面温度并不出人意料。在空闲模式和低负载情况下，机箱保持良好的冷却状态，但在负载情况下，我们测得的温度超过了 50 °C。即便如此，两个风扇周围的区域仍然非常凉爽，这也是游戏时键盘 WASD 区域保持超低温的原因。在压力测试中，处理器在几分钟后稳定在 30 瓦，显卡稳定在 65 瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 13% | 17% | -1% | -21% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.2 | 41.7 13% | 39.4 18% | 39.7 18% | 50.3 -4% | 55 -14% | 40.6 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.3 | 46.3 10% | 36.9 28% | 42.9 16% | 48 6% | 66 -29% | 42 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 26.2 6% | 28.2 -1% | 23.7 15% | 28.8 -3% | 33 -18% | 27.8 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.8 | 27.2 6% | 27.4 5% | 23.5 18% | 29.8 -3% | 35 -22% | 26.6 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
总体而言，我们的耗电量测量结果也没有出现意外，两款 ROG Zephyrus G16 机型的 TDP/TGP 值相当，因此取得了非常相似的结果。游戏时的功耗略低于 130 瓦。在压力测试中，我们最初测得的功率略低于 180 瓦，几分钟后这一数值趋于稳定，约为 135 瓦。因此，所提供的 200 瓦电源完全够用。1.3 瓦的待机功耗略高。
| Off / Standby | 0.06 / 1.3 Watt |
| Idle | 6.9 / 12.6 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
84.1 / 177.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Dell XPS 16 9640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -42% | 11% | -8% | 1% | -24% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 10.3 -49% | 7.7 -12% | 5.2 25% | 8.3 -20% | 8 -16% | 9.4 -36% |
| Idle Average * | 12.6 | 21.9 -74% | 10.3 18% | 14.4 -14% | 12.5 1% | 12 5% | 15.5 -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 22.4 -72% | 10.6 18% | 15.4 -18% | 12.8 2% | 23 -77% | 24.4 -88% |
| Load Average * | 84.1 | 96.9 -15% | 76.5 9% | 105.4 -25% | 71.3 15% | 94 -12% | 74.1 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 127.2 | ||||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 124.5 | ||||||
| Load Maximum * | 177.6 | 173.8 2% | 138.5 22% | 195.2 -10% | 169.1 5% | 215 -21% | 206.5 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 159.6 | 126.4 | 107.6 | 127.5 | 181.5 | 112.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
其电池容量仍为 90 Wh，但 AMD 版的运行时间略好于英特尔版 英特尔型号.在 150 cd/m² 和 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间略低于 8 小时（240 Hz 时约为 7.5 小时），比 GU605 长 45 分钟。但在全屏亮度下，其运行时间相同，均为 5:45 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，新款 GA605 也有明显优势，我们测得的时间为 13:44 小时，而 GU605 为 11:11 小时。
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 12% | 2% | -20% | -15% | -22% | -28% | |
| H.264 | 824 | 692 -16% | 988 20% | 784 -5% | 671 -19% | 444 ? -46% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 478 | 526 10% | 629 32% | 734 54% | 435 -9% | 405 -15% | 425 -11% | 384 ? -20% |
| Load | 103 | 73 -29% | 87 -16% | 58 -44% | 71 -31% | 70 -32% | 84.9 ? -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 699 | 580 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语 - G16 的 Zen 5 性能更佳，但风扇仍是其弱点
由于采用了全新的 AMD Zen 5 移动处理器，华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 的 CPU 性能比旧款英特尔机型有了大幅提升。 英特尔型号流星湖芯片，它运行游戏的性能确实相当不错。此外，它的电池续航时间也变得更好了一些，所有型号的 GA605 都标配 32 GB 内存。但仍没有 64 GB 版本，这是 ProArt P16 的专利。
另一方面，AMD 型号充其量只能购买GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑，而且你还得放弃蒸汽室冷却和更快的 GPU。这就引出了 AMD-G16 的最大弱点，即风扇。在日常使用过程中，第三个系统风扇的高转速尤其恼人，你几乎不得不使用静音模式，以确保即使在笔记本空转时也能关闭风扇。这让我们大吃一惊，因为华硕本应通过 BIOS 更新和 ProArt P16和 ProArt P16 的构造完全相同，因此不存在这个问题。
新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 提供了比流星湖处理器更强的性能，也改善了笔记本电脑的运行时间。不过，Zephyrus G16 GA605 的弱点仍然是它的风扇配置，有一个恼人的第三个系统风扇。
价格方面，情况变得有些棘手。因为华硕为配备酷睿 Ultra 9、32 GB 内存和 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 GU605 开出的售价仅为不到 3000 美元，而配备 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑和 32 GB 内存的变体在网上已经可以买到，价格约为 2500 美元。即使 AMD 版本更好（而且风扇问题可能很快就会通过更新得到解决），但与同类的 Meteor Lake 机型相比，300 美元左右的附加费用也很难让人信服。
价格和供应情况
华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 目前可通过百思买等主要在线零售商购买，配备 RTX 4070 和 32 GB 内存的型号目前售价为2,299.99 美元。
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV
- 08/20/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
