data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a53ce/a53cef43a62e3d3b2c41513805af8c751b28ca65" alt="Teaser"
华硕 ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA 可折叠笔记本电脑评测--AMD 的 Strix Halo GPU 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑不相上下
13 英寸设备中最快的 CPU。
华硕开始为其游戏敞篷跑车 ROG Flow Z13 配备 AMD 最新的 Strix Halo 处理器。除了与 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 不相上下的令人印象深刻的 CPU 性能外,集成的 Radeon 8060S 还可与GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop 竞争。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 配备 AMD Strix Halo 的 ROG Flow Z13 CPU 性能更强
2025 版游戏可折叠华硕 ROG Flow Z13 是首款搭载 AMD 最新 Strix Halo 系列高端移动处理器的设备。凭借 16 个 Zen 5 核心,Ryzen AI Max+ 395 在多核场景下提供了巨大的 CPU 性能,可与 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.对于一款 13 英寸设备来说,这样的性能令人印象深刻,您必须购买 MacBook Pro 14才能获得类似的多核性能数据。
集成显卡 Radeon 8060S 是目前最快的 x86 iGPU,与 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(的 TGP 在 65-75 瓦之间)不相上下。不同的游戏会有差异,但总体而言,现代游戏的成绩相当。Radeon APU 的效率更高一些,如果你需要大量的 VRAM,新的 AMD 芯片在图片/视频编辑方面也很有吸引力。我们的评测机配备 32 GB 内存,最多可为 GPU 分配 24 GB,而其他型号最多可分配 48 或 96 GB VRAM。
华硕仍然使用 WQHD 分辨率的 IPS 显示屏,但刷新率从 165 Hz 提高到了 180 Hz。整体图像质量不错,但无法与 OLED 屏幕丰富的高对比度图像相媲美。我们相信,目前市场上还没有相应的 13 英寸 OLED 屏幕。由于采用了更大的电池,运行时间也得到了改善。
散热装置做得还不错,但你会听到风扇的声音,尤其是在 Turbo 模式下,我们建议你戴上耳机,因为集成的扬声器也不是很好。其他缺点还包括内存不可升级,以及整体维护选项有限。紧凑型 M.2-2230 固态硬盘只有一个维护舱。此外,它还是一款相当昂贵的敞篷车,售价为 2499 欧元。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
测试规格中的 ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA 的零售价为 2499 欧元,将于 2 月 25 日上市。我们没有更多内存 SKU 的价格信息。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon RX 8060S ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,749.99 ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2023) Gam... 2. $1,899.99 EXCaliberPC 2022 ASUS ROG Fl... 3. $139.99 Original Magnetic Keyboard f... List Price: 2499€ | 1.6 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,749.99 ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2023) Gam... 2. $22.49 FYDIKHN Privacy Screen Prote... 3. $1,899.99 EXCaliberPC 2022 ASUS ROG Fl... List Price: 3400€ | 1.7 kg | 20 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,809.99 ASUS ProArt PX13 (Replace P1... 2. $39.99 Smatree ASUS Laptop Hard Cas... 3. $93.99 20V 10A 200W Laptop Charger ... List Price: 2999€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $78.00 180W 20V 9A Charger ADP-180T... 2. $99.99 180W Charger for Asus ROG Ze... 3. $99.99 180W Charger for Asus ROG Ze... List Price: 2499€ | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $3,359.99 List Price: 2700 USD | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,199.99 Razer Blade 15 Gaming Laptop... 2. $1,599.99 Dell G16 7630 Gaming Laptop ... 3. $84.99 280W 14.36A 19.5V GaN Laptop... List Price: 2600 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,679.00 List Price: 2100 Euro | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI IPS |
华硕更新了其游戏敞篷车,现在采用了 AMD 最新的 Strix Halo APU(Ryzen AI Max),它不仅提供了非常强大的 CPU,还提供了 iGPU,应该可以与专用显卡相媲美。此外,它还升级到了 180 Hz 显示屏,并改进了蒸汽腔冷却装置。华硕为之前的型号提供了两个版本,一个是普通机箱和高达GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑,另一个是更具视觉冲击力的 ACRNM 特别版 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。
我们的评测机型号为 ROG Flow Z13 GZ302-RU073W,配备新旗舰芯片 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395(16 个 Zen 5 核心)以及 Radeon 8060S iGPU 和 32 GB 内存。这款产品的零售价为 2499 欧元。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
机箱 - 带有微妙照明的铝制机箱
底盘设计与普通版的上一代车型相似 上一代机型对于一款游戏敞篷车来说,深色机箱显得相当低调。只有后面板上显示部分组件的开孔提供了 RGB 照明。铝制机身的稳定性很好,而且还有防指纹涂层,效果不错。集成的脚架支持 170 度的最大打开角度,可以完成工作,但铰链有一点晃动,尽管本身的阻力还不错。
附带的键盘盖通过磁力吸附在底部,当你提起可折叠本时不会脱落。当设备关闭时,它还能充当屏幕保护罩,底部由仿皮材料制成,给人留下精致的印象。机箱本身无法打开,因此维护选项有限。只有一个用于 M.2-2230 固态硬盘的维护盖。
我们测量的可转换机重量约为 1.23 千克,包括键盘盖在内约为 1.62 千克。键盘厚度分别为 14 毫米和 20 毫米,因此整体重量和厚度略高于 华硕 ProArt PX13甚至 ROG Zephyrus G14.200W PSU 的重量为 571 克。
连接性 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7
福禄 Z13 提供所有重要的端口,包括两个 USB-C 4.0、HDMI 以及一个普通的 USB-A 端口。右侧有一个电源按钮、一个音量摇杆和一个命令中心按钮。布局功能齐全,甚至可以外接华硕 XG Mobile(RTX 5090 笔记本电脑)。它可以通过 USB-C 接口为设备充电,而且由于配备了 50 TOPS 的强大 NPU,它还是一款 Copilot+ 设备。
SD 读卡器
左侧的 microSD 读卡器(弹簧装置)在使用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro v60)时,传输速率高达 250 MB/s。但从卡中复制文件时,传输速率则明显较低,仅为 85 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.4 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (25.2 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
华硕采用了联发科的 Wi-Fi 模块(MT9725),支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。我们使用华硕的参考路由器进行了标准化的 Wi-Fi 测试,结果显示传输速率非常好且稳定。在评测期间,我们也没有发现任何稳定性问题。
Networking | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
Z13 仍提供两个网络摄像头:前置一个 500 万像素传感器(包括用于面部识别的红外模块),后置一个 1300 万像素传感器。网络摄像头支持工作室效果,500 万像素摄像头的画质比普通 1080p 传感器更好。1300 万像素摄像头拍摄的图像效果更好(尤其是更清晰)。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89874/8987421bf45eb16a28f290d2e9f8fa95eee70bf5" alt="ColorChecker"
可持续性
华硕没有提供任何有关该设备的可回收材料或生产过程中的二氧化碳排放量的信息。不过,包装大部分是可回收的。
输入设备 - 细微改进
包装盒中再次附带了可拆卸键盘盖,可以平放或略微倾斜使用。与上一代 前代产品可以看出,键入体验略微更坚固、更精确,这主要是稳定性增强的结果。键帽也略有增大。键盘提供三段式背景照明,可自定义颜色(单区)。总之,它是一款可靠的键盘。
点击板的尺寸从 10.5 x 6.1 厘米增至 12.8 x 7.2 厘米,这在使用设备时一眼就能看出来。滑动性能非常好,我们在评测期间没有发现任何光标控制或手势方面的问题。唯一的缺点是按压触摸板时会发出响亮的 "咔嗒 "声。当然,你也可以使用电容式触摸屏(大猩猩 DCX 玻璃),它也能像预期的那样完美无瑕地工作。此外还支持手写笔输入,但包装盒中并没有附带手写笔。
显示屏 - IPS,现在为 180 赫兹
与 去年的机型我们再次获得了一块分辨率为 2560 x 1600 像素(16:10)的 13.4 英寸 IPS 屏幕,但刷新率从 165 Hz 提高到了 180 Hz。尽管 OLED 屏幕能提供对比度更高的更丰富的图像,但主观图像表现仍然非常出色。不过,IPS 面板不使用 PWM 闪烁,响应时间也非常快,因此对游戏没有任何限制。在高亮度水平下,你会发现在暗色背景下会出现一些背光出血现象,但这在实际使用中并不明显。当你仔细观察时,还能发现明亮的图像上有轻微的颗粒效果,这是由触摸屏层造成的(但这是高水平的呻吟)。亮度和色温都无法通过传感器控制,也不支持 HDR 内容。
华硕仍然标榜亮度为 500 尼特,我们的评测机也证实了这一点(最高 518 尼特,平均约 490 尼特)。因此,它的亮度略高于前代机型,最大对比度(黑色值为 0.3 cd/m²)也达到了约 1700:1。不过,最低亮度约为 28 尼特,对于非常暗的环境来说有点太亮了。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1727:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
89.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W TL134ADXP03, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 180 Hz | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 165 Hz | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B140QAN06.U, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 1% | 2% | -1% | -1% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 95.1 | 96.94 2% | 99.4 5% | 99.6 5% | 96.9 2% | 97.3 2% | 65 -32% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 99.92 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 95.3 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.7 | 85.17 -5% | 88.9 -1% | 89.9 0% | 85 -5% | 85.3 -5% | 66.8 -26% |
Response Times | 45% | 63% | 87% | -55% | -105% | -20% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.4 ? | 2.1 ? 61% | 1.94 ? 64% | 0.62 ? 89% | 6 ? -11% | 11.9 ? -120% | 5.4 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 4.2 ? | 3 ? 29% | 1.63 ? 61% | 0.68 ? 84% | 8.3 ? -98% | 8 ? -90% | 5.9 ? -40% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 960 ? | |||||
Screen | -22% | 133% | 323% | -11% | -71% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 518 | 464 -10% | 360 -31% | 423 -18% | 484.1 -7% | 559.3 8% | 450 -13% |
Brightness | 489 | 455 -7% | 358 -27% | 424 -13% | 466 -5% | 560 15% | 433 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 98 8% | 98 8% | 89 -2% | 88 -3% | 87 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.4 -33% | 0.02 93% | 0.01 97% | 0.38 -27% | 0.44 -47% | 0.45 -50% |
Contrast | 1727 | 1160 -33% | 18000 942% | 42300 2349% | 1274 -26% | 1271 -26% | 1000 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2 -33% | 1.1 27% | 0.7 53% | 2.23 -49% | 4.44 -196% | 2.26 -51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4 | 4.2 -5% | 2.3 42% | 1.8 55% | 4.57 -14% | 9.3 -133% | 7.5 -88% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.2 -9% | 0.74 33% | 0.39 65% | 1.21 -10% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.7 -69% | 1.4 12% | 0.8 50% | 1.6 -0% | 6.8 -325% | 3.2 -100% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.214 99% |
CCT | 6536 99% | 6832 95% | 6554 99% | 6505 100% | 6816 95% | 6242 104% | 6121 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
-8% | 66% /
92% | 137% /
212% | -22% /
-15% | -59% /
-61% | -27% /
-34% |
* ... smaller is better
预装的 Armoury Crate 软件提供了不同的色彩配置文件,我们用专业的 CalMAN 软件测试了它们。默认原生配置文件的准确度很高,与 P3 配置文件没有明显差别,这让我们感到有些惊讶。华硕设备上的原生配置文件通常会略微过度饱和,以获得更丰富的色彩。灰度和色彩的偏差都已经非常小,因此没有校准的必要。我们还是尝试并成功地进一步提高了图像质量(可在上面的框中免费下载相应的配置文件)。您还可以获得非常精确的 sRGB 配置文件,P3 色域几乎完全覆盖。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 87 % brightness setting | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - AMD Ryzen Max+,最高 128GB 内存
新款 ROG Flow Z13 可配备 Ryzen AI Max+ 395(16 个 CPU 内核)或 Ryzen AI Max 390(12 个 CPU 内核)。内存至少为 32 GB(LPDDR5x-8000),但也有 64 GB 甚至 128 GB 的型号。
审查设置
预装的 Armoury Crate 软件提供三种电源配置文件(静音、高性能、涡轮增压)以及手动模式,在手动模式下可以调整电源限制和风扇曲线(在特定参数范围内)。电源配置文件还与 Windows 的电源设置相关联。我们在Turbo 模式下进行了以下所有基准测试和测量。使用电池供电时,只能使用性能 模式。
功率曲线 | TDP/TGP | CB2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | CP2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇噪音 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
安静 | 55/40/35 瓦 | 1289 点 | 6026 点 | 28 fps | 33 dB(A) |
性能 | 70/52/45 瓦 | 1403 分 | 8524 分 | 39 fps | 39.1 dB(A) |
涡轮 | 86/70/60 瓦 | 1648 点 | 10224 点 | 46 fps | 45.4 dB(A) |
手动 | 最高 93/92/80/ 瓦特 | 1757 点 | 10787 点 | 51 fps | 49.8 dB(A) |
32 GB 内存是共享内存,因此 GPU 也可以访问它。您可以为 GPU 分配一定量的专用 VRAM,我们的评测机的设置范围在 0.5 到 24 GB 之间。我们测试了不同的设置,专用 VRAM 具有一定的优势,尤其是在游戏时。不过,"自动 "设置也很有效。华硕建议使用 8GB 专用 VRAM,我们在基准测试中使用的就是 8GB 专用 VRAM。配备 64GB 内存的机型最多可为 GPU 分配 48GB 内存,配备 128GB 内存的机型最多可分配 96GB VRAM。
处理器 - 16 个 Zen 5 内核,性能卓越
......(英文 Ryzen AI Max+ 395使用 16 个 Zen 5 内核(32 个线程),最高主频为 5.1 GHz,缓存为 80 MB。CPU 的功耗最高可达 86 瓦,然后在 70 瓦处趋于稳定。该处理器在多核情况下的性能令人印象深刻,而旧款福禄 Z13 配备的 酷睿 i9-13900H的性能要高出大约 50-70%。总而言之,新款 Max+ 395 可与 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D(Zen4)的 115 瓦运行功耗相当。如果你想在类似尺寸的封装中获得类似的多核性能,你将不得不购买当前的Apple M4 Pro。在我们的 Strix Halo 分析文章.
单核性能处于典型的 Zen 5 水平,因此与英特尔当前的芯片(快速的 Arrow Lake 和 Lunar Lake 型号)以及骁龙 X Elite 系列的快速版本相比稍慢。Apple但 M3,尤其是 M4 这一代则完全不同。
多核性能在持续工作负载下非常稳定,但在电池电量不足时会下降约 12%(功率曲线:性能,70/52 瓦)。更多 CPU 基准测试,请访问技术版块 。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 -4! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U -2! | |
Average of class Convertible |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (420 - 1648, n=20, last 2 years) |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Convertible (88 - 127, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (2949 - 29063, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (914 - 2163, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (1124 - 11357, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (348 - 827, n=60, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (478 - 4830, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 317, n=60, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Convertible (107 - 1051, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 121368, n=60, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6540, n=59, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (2291 - 21269, n=47, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (1003 - 2978, n=48, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Convertible (2188 - 22023, n=59, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (806 - 2275, n=59, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 36.2, n=59, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (42.7 - 84.3, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.3985 - 0.84, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (2179 - 64158, n=60, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (11392 - 183760, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (797 - 8151, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (22413 - 145339, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (5749 - 97193, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (21774 - 169089, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Convertible (218 - 2001, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=59, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Convertible (13761 - 81626, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
系统性能
系统性能非常出色,合成基准测试(在比较组中名列前茅)和我们的主观性能印象都证实了这一点。我们也没有遇到任何稳定性问题。Adobe Photoshop 和 Premiere Pro 的两项 PugetBench 测试结果也不错,但 DaVinci Resolve 的测试结果受到了限制。与 RTX 4070 Laptop 的竞争对手相比,Basic 基准测试结果要好一些,但我们在编辑一个评测视频时遇到了两次崩溃,而 Nvidia GPU 几乎从未出现过这种情况。目前,我们还无法确认这个问题是由软件还是 GPU 驱动程序造成的。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Convertible (3229 - 9125, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12005, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (4777 - 10800, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=57, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average of class Convertible (554 - 1925, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average of class Convertible (381 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=61, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=58, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S () |
* ... smaller is better
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score 1.01 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
Tuxedo Gemini 17 Gen3 AMD | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 1.1 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
Tuxedo Gemini 17 Gen3 AMD | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench / Basic Score 1.1 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
PCMark 10 Score | 9125 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (29473 - 158525, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Convertible (28905 - 126517, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Convertible (30110 - 216896, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 () | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Flow Z13 配备了一个紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘,该固态硬盘来自 Kioxia,存储容量为 1 TB。初始设置后,您可以使用 859 GB 来存储自己的文件和应用程序。PCIe 4.0 硬盘的传输速率非常好,在持续工作负载下也很稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
除了强大的 CPU 之外,Radeon 8060S iGPU 也是 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 的另一大亮点,因为 AMD 希望提供最快的集成 x86 GPU。所有技术规格均列于我们的 分析文章中列出了所有技术规格,因此我们想重点谈谈性能。我们可以证实 AMD 的说法,Radeon 8060S 甚至击败了 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(65 瓦)。配备 75 瓦版 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 ProArt PX13 也不相上下。两款 x86iGPU Radeon 890M以及 Arc Graphics 140V分别比它们高出 2.6 倍和 2.8 倍。GPU 性能在持续工作负载下保持稳定,但电池电量下降了约 13%。
GPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Beelink SER9 |
我们还测试了新款 Radeon 8060S 与 ARM 竞争对手(来自Apple 和高通公司)的对战情况。最快版本的高通 Adreno X1-85(4.6 TFLOPS)在新的 Strix Halo iGPU面前毫无胜算。与Apple的 GPU 相比,情况发生了变化,根据不同的基准测试,8060S 分别位于两个 M4 Pro GPU 之间或略微领先。而 M4 Max GPU 则遥不可及。
GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Geekbench 6.3: GPU OpenCL
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 66409 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 92510 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 33493 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23537 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10370 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1874 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 9653 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Convertible (163 - 2067, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 8060S () |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Convertible (23 - 31, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average of class Convertible (37 - 54, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
实际的游戏基准测试显然比合成测试更重要,这里的结果稍差一些。在我们的默认游戏测试中,新款 ROG Flow Z13 略微落后于配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的旧款 Flow Z13(-6 %)和 ProArt PX13(-2 %),因此差距并不大。不过,配备 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的 ROG Flow Z13 显卡速度较慢,而 AMD 和英特尔当前的其他 iGPU 显卡再次不敌它。游戏性能在较长时间内也保持稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 83.5, n=31, last 2 years) |
我们还有旧的 流 Z13和 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,因此我们用它在现代游戏中进行了直接的正面对比(两款设备均采用 Turbo 模式)。新款 Radeon 8060S 在 1080p 和最大细节下的表现更好。在《赛博朋克 2077》或《使命召唤黑色行动 6》等游戏中,AMD GPU 的优势为 13%-17%,而许多游戏的效果不相上下。也有一些负面的例子,如《GTA V》或《F1 24》(-12% 到 -21%)。总而言之,两款设备的性能基本相当。
Gaming 1080p Ultra Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Horizon Forbidden West - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Black Myth: Wukong - 1920x1080 cinematic TSR 100 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
God of War Ragnarök - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Ghost of Tsushima - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Monster Hunter Wilds - 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 1920x1080 Very Ultra Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Star Wars Outlaws - 1920x1080 cinem. ultra | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
在 QHD 分辨率下,情况非常相似,尽管GeForce Flow Z13 稍微领先(+5%)。许多游戏一般都能在 QHD 和最高细节下正常运行,只有《黑色神话:悟空传》、《星球大战外传》、《夺宝奇兵》或《怪物猎人荒野》等要求非常高的游戏才会低于 30 帧/秒。
Gaming QHD Ultra Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Horizon Forbidden West - 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Black Myth: Wukong - 2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
God of War Ragnarök - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Ghost of Tsushima - 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Monster Hunter Wilds - 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
Star Wars Outlaws - 2560x1440 cinem. ultra | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W |
一些游戏也支持 FSR 3 升频以提高性能,但与 Nvidia 的 DLSS 技术相比,其支持范围较为有限。我们检查了一些现代游戏的效果,尽管 FSR 3 已经明显改善了性能,但在额外帧生成的情况下,你会看到最大的改进。原生帧数往往能达到两倍以上,即使是《黑色神话悟空 传》、《怪物猎人荒野》或《星球大战外传》等要求苛刻的游戏也能达到流畅的帧数。 至少在理论上是这样,因为游戏体验会有很大差异。例如,《星球大战外传》或《地平线西部禁区》就出现了明显的伪影和图像失真,尤其是在移动过程中。
游戏 | 本机 | FSR 3 | FSR3 + FG |
---|---|---|---|
Ghost of Tsushima | 40.1 fps | 52.4 fps | 90.8 fps |
GoW Ragnarök | 57.5 fps | 49.7 fps | 81.4 fps |
赛博朋克 2077 | 46.4 帧/秒 | 64.5 帧/秒 | 109.7 帧/秒 |
怪物猎人荒野》 | 28.4 帧/秒 | 36.4 帧/秒 | 59.3 帧/秒 |
地平线禁西 | 38.3 帧/秒 | 44.8 帧/秒 | 69 帧/秒 |
黑色神话:悟空 | 16 帧/秒 | 25 帧/秒 | 48 帧/秒 |
星球大战亡命之徒 | 19.8 帧/秒 | 27.4 帧/秒 | 54.3 帧/秒 |
CoD Black Ops 6 | 64 fps | 79 fps | 114 fps |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.9 | 83.5 | 64.3 | 72.9 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 101 | ||||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 223 | 192.3 | 164.4 | 142 | 87 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 182.7 | 117.6 | 86.6 | 63.6 | 34.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 138.8 | 104.9 | 76.7 | 60.4 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 453 | 221 | 192.7 | 167.9 | 109.9 | 57.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 128.8 | 100.9 | 87.9 | 85.3 | 55.2 | 28.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 124.8 | 105.3 | 85 | 75.6 | 46.4 | 18.8 | |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 48.7 | 44.8 | 38.3 | ||||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 78.1 | 65.1 | 59.2 | 51.2 | 40.1 | 23 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 207 | 185.6 | 147.7 | 46 | 28.8 | 13 | |
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 27 | 28 | 20 | ||||
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 32.7 | 33.3 | 23.1 | ||||
God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 111.8 | 96.4 | 82.8 | 76.1 | 49.7 | 57.5 | 33.2 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 83 | 79 | 64 | ||||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 77.2 | 49.4 | 40.3 | 27.4 | |||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 59.8 | 50.2 | 39.2 | 28.8 | 15.9 |
排放 - 带蒸气室的敞篷车
系统噪音
冷却装置由一个蒸汽室和两个风扇组成,空转时始终保持静音。一旦开始对系统施加压力,风扇的活动和噪音水平主要取决于功率曲线。在 Turbo 模式下,我们测得普通任务的噪音值为 34-37 dB(A),而在玩游戏和压力测试时,噪音值为 45 dB(A)。这种噪音非常明显,因此你应该使用耳机。其他两个功率配置文件分别为 33 分贝(A)和 39 分贝(A),保持了较低的噪音,因此我们建议您在玩自己喜欢的游戏时也试试它们,并测试其性能。如果选择手动模式并使用最高功率限制,风扇噪音将达到近 50 分贝(A)。我们的测试设备没有出现线圈啸叫等电子噪音问题。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.5 / 45.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Radeon RX 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -16% | -5% | -4% | -1% | -23% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 24.7 -5% | 23.9 -1% | 24.3 -3% | 22.7 4% | 24 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 24.7 -5% | 23.9 -1% | 25 -6% | 23.4 1% | 29 -23% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 28.4 -20% | 23.9 -1% | 25 -6% | 23.4 1% | 31 -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 36.5 -55% | 30.9 -31% | 23.9 -1% | 25 -6% | 23.4 1% | 36 -53% |
Load Average * | 37.5 | 41.3 -10% | 43 -15% | 46.2 -23% | 33 12% | 33 12% | 47 -25% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.4 | 53.3 -17% | 50 -10% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 45.4 | 46.9 -3% | 53.3 -17% | 46.2 -2% | 51.9 -14% | 55.6 -22% | 52 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 46.2 | 49.5 | 51.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the class Convertible.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-13.3 °C / -23.9 F).
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon RX 8060S | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -3% | 0% | -9% | -0% | -19% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.5 | 42.5 -0% | 45.3 -7% | 46.6 -10% | 41.8 2% | 37.4 12% | 57 -34% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.9 | 42.6 5% | 47.9 -7% | 47.8 -6% | 42.2 6% | 35.2 22% | 55 -22% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.6 | 26.2 11% | 28.5 4% | 26.7 10% | 34.8 -18% | 33.2 -12% | 32 -8% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.5 | 26 12% | 29.9 -1% | 27.8 6% | 37.4 -27% | 36.2 -23% | 33 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器仍然是这款游戏敞篷车的一个弱点。它们的声音不是特别大,也不是很强劲。因此,我们建议使用耳机,尤其是在玩游戏时。
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 改进电池运行时间
耗电量
最大亮度下的闲置功耗比前代机型高出约 4-5 瓦,这可能是新的 180 Hz 显示屏和/或 Strix Halo 处理器的功劳。我们测得游戏时的功耗约为 110 瓦,与前代产品相比降低了约 10-12 瓦。 ProArt PX13尽管性能略胜一筹。在压力测试中,我们最初测得的功率为 138 瓦,但很快就降到了 110-116 瓦。因此,所提供的 200 瓦电源适配器绰绰有余。配备 64 或 128 GB 内存的型号的峰值功耗会更高。待机和关机时的功耗极低。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon RX 8060S, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Average AMD Radeon RX 8060S | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 12% | 27% | -56% | -45% | -13% | 0% | 49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.4 | 8.9 14% | 7.5 28% | 6.9 34% | 20.9 -101% | 19.5 -88% | 6 42% | 10.4 ? -0% | 5.08 ? 51% |
Idle Average * | 17 | 12.6 26% | 9.3 45% | 8.6 49% | 25.6 -51% | 24.7 -45% | 11 35% | 17 ? -0% | 8 ? 53% |
Idle Maximum * | 17.3 | 13 25% | 9.6 45% | 9 48% | 32.1 -86% | 27 -56% | 21 -21% | 17.3 ? -0% | 10.8 ? 38% |
Load Average * | 92.9 | 92.5 -0% | 74.1 20% | 75.2 19% | 72.7 22% | 83.2 10% | 93 -0% | 92.9 ? -0% | 45.9 ? 51% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 109.3 | 121.6 -11% | 147.9 -35% | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 113.2 | 121.5 -7% | 146.3 -29% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 138.1 | 133.6 3% | 185 -34% | 161.6 -17% | 228.4 -65% | 204.5 -48% | 252 -82% | 138.1 ? -0% | 67.4 ? 51% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 104.4 | 109.7 | 182.1 | 165.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon RX 8060S, 70 Wh | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | 2% | 6% | 9% | -9% | 21% | -30% | 46% | |
H.264 | 764 | 312 -59% | 616 -19% | 725 -5% | 555 -27% | 284 -63% | 833 ? 9% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 560 | 398 -29% | 510 -9% | 555 -1% | 428 -24% | 374 -33% | 519 -7% | 298 -47% | 617 ? 10% |
Load | 51 | 52 2% | 69 35% | 64 25% | 72 41% | 59 16% | 100 96% | 61 20% | 111.7 ? 119% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 50 | 90 ? |
笔记本检查评级
最新版游戏敞篷跑车 ROG Flow Z13 是首款搭载 AMD 怪兽级 APU 的设备 Ryzen AI Max+ 395,给人留下了非常好的整体印象。多核 CPU 性能非常出色,目前还没有其他 13 英寸设备能与之匹敌。集成的 Radeon 8060S 是目前速度最快的 x86iGPU,在 65-75 瓦的 TGP 水平下运行时,与GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑不相上下。电池运行时间有所改善,但可折叠和键盘盖的整体包装相对较厚较重。
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
- 02/17/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.