微星 Summit A16 AI Plus 评测：功能强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 可折叠电脑
Zen 5 性能提升
在处理器性能方面，微星的这款机型是目前市场上速度最快的 16 英寸可折叠电脑之一。不过，由于缺乏独立显卡选项，它在与惠普 Spectre x360 16 等其他主要竞争对手的竞争中处于劣势。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论：CPU 性能极高，但没有独立 GPU 选项
Summit A16 AI Plus 的最大优势在于其快速的处理器性能和明亮的 165 Hz 触摸屏。AMD Zen 5 处理器的性能比上一代机型的酷睿 i7-1280P 高出好几个档次，而显示屏仍然是目前较好的 16 英寸 IPS 面板之一。
微星的几个缺点使其无法成为市场上最好的 16 英寸可折叠电脑。200 万像素网络摄像头、缺乏 3K 或 4K OLED 显示屏选项，以及不支持独立 GPU 或二级 M.2 SSD，这些都可能会让强力用户或更专业的游戏玩家望而却步。因此，用户可能更喜欢图形性能更出色的惠普 Spectre x360 16，或者更轻便的三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 16 及其分辨率更高的 OLED 触摸屏。
值得注意的是，我们在使用过程中遇到了与点击板故障有关的明显问题，有时开机时间异常长。我们不确定这些问题是否普遍存在，但值得在购买时立即检查。
Pros
+ 同类产品中的快速处理器性能
+ 高质量 1600p 165 Hz IPS 触摸屏
+ 可观的图形性能
+ 更长的电池寿命
+ 快速 MicroSD 读卡器
Cons
- 无独立显卡选项
- 无 4K、HDR 或 VRR 选项
- 扬声器音量可以更大
- 游戏时风扇声音较大
- 仅有 2 MP 网络摄像头
$1,546.45
MSI Summit A16 AI+ (2024) 16” QHD+ 165Hz 2-in-1 Touchscreen Laptop: AMD Ryzen AI 9-365, Radeon Graphics, 32GB LPDDR5x, 1TB NVMe SSD, 360 Flip, Pen, Win 11 Home: Ink Black A3HMTG-015US
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.9%  | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,546.45 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 84.2% v7 (old)  | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 Intel Core i7-1280P ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $126.00 Generic 16.0"" WQXGA 2560(RG... 2. $49.91 Original New for MSI Summit ... 3. $131.00 Replacement Screen 16.0 inch... List Price: 2580 Euro | 1.9 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 91.1% v7 (old)  | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,399.99 HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Lapto... 2. $1,575.00 HP Spectre 16T x360 2-in-1 L... 3. $2,699.00 Best Notebooks New Spectre x... List Price: 1600 USD | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
4. 86.5% v7 (old)  | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Intel Core i7-1260P ⎘ Intel Arc A350M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $45.99 90W USB C Charger for Asus A... 2. $61.99 A-Tech 16GB RAM for ASUS Exp... 3. $46.99 100W AC Charger Fit for Asus... List Price: 2199 Euro | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED |
5. 82.8%  | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,697.00 List Price: 1850€ | 1.4 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
6. 86.7% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $679.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 ... 2. $58.88 Laptop Cover Case for 16 inc... 3. $860.00 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Laptop... List Price: 900 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2024 年 Summit A16 AI Plus 接替了 2022 峰会 E16 Flip.虽然名称不同，但它们采用了相同的二合一外观设计。但在内部，2024 型号更换了英特尔 CPU 和 Nvidia GPU，改用 AMD Zen 5 解决方案。
我们的测试机配置了 Ryzen AI 9 365 CPU、集成 Radeon 880M 图形处理器和 1600p 165 Hz IPS 触摸屏，售价约为 1600 美元。目前还没有其他主要的 SKU，因此这三项主要功能是固定不变的。
Summit A16 AI Plus 的替代产品包括其他 16 英寸多媒体转换器，如 联想 Yoga 7 2-in-1, 惠普 Spectre x360 16或 LG Gram Pro 2-in-1.
更多微星评论：
规格
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 10 x 2 - 5 GHz, 71 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 880M, Core: 2800 MHz, RAM: 937 MHz, LPDDR5, 32.0.12019.1028
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5x-7500, Dual-Channel, 23-17-20-40
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, glossy: yes, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Weight
2.118 kg, Power Supply: 422 g
Price
1600 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
机身与 2022 年的设计保持一致。即便如此，与惠普、联想或华硕目前的替代产品相比，它的尺寸和重量仍然具有竞争力。
连接性
端口选项与 2022 版本略有不同。例如，HDMI 端口现在位于系统的右侧边缘，而不是左侧。此外，新型号比旧款少了一个 USB-A 端口。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
高通公司的 FastConnect 7800 标配支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。性能可靠，但与更常见的英特尔 AX211 相比，速度没有我们预期的那么快。
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (442-893)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (716-992)
网络摄像头
带红外和物理快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头保持不变。
9.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
维护
要拆下底部面板，必须撕开防拆贴纸。从内部来看，该机型与旧款 Summit E16 Flip 类似，只是没有专用 GPU，如下图所示，风扇左侧为空置空间。
可持续性
微星没有宣传该机型生产过程中的任何可持续发展措施。包装主要采用纸板和纸张，配件采用塑料包装。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括微星Pen 2主动式触控笔，支持微软MPP 2.6和触觉反馈。
厂商提供一年有限保修服务。
显示屏
微星没有对触摸屏进行任何改动，因为我们的 2024 机型采用了与 2022 机型相同的高端友达光电 B16QAN02.N 面板，以获得相同的观看体验。这并不一定是坏事，因为 FreeSync 面板支持快速响应时间、深度 P3 色彩和高刷新率。即便如此，Windows HDR 和可变刷新率（VRR）也是很好的补充。
需要注意的是，除非禁用 AMD Vari-Bright 功能，否则在使用电池供电时，最大亮度会从 475 尼特降至 363 尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B16QAN02.N tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 475.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 439.8 cd/m² Minimum: 22.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 475.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 6% | -4% | 4% | -49% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 96.8 | 98.9 2% | 99.6 3% | 71.7 -26% | 99.9 3% | 40.9 -58% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 61.4 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.7 | 86.5 2% | 96.7 14% | 97.1 15% | 92.7 9% | 42.3 -50% |
| Response Times | -1% | 92% | 81% | 18% | -147% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.9 ? | 13 ? -1% | 0.78 ? 94% | 2 ? 84% | 14 ? -9% | 32.1 ? -149% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.9 ? | 9 ? -1% | 0.86 ? 90% | 2 ? 78% | 5 ? 44% | 21.8 ? -145% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 240 ? | 481 | |||
| Screen | -10% | 13% | 297% | 206% | -51% | |
| Brightness middle | 475.4 | 314 -34% | 385.2 -19% | 379 -20% | 402 -15% | 313.3 -34% |
| Brightness | 440 | 294 -33% | 387 -12% | 382 -13% | 403 -8% | 294 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 99 11% | 98 10% | 99 11% | 82 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.28 22% | 0.01 97% | 0.017 95% | 0.35 3% | |
| Contrast | 1321 | 1121 -15% | 37900 2769% | 23647 1690% | 895 -32% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.99 | 3.08 -3% | 1.73 42% | 2.79 7% | 1.67 44% | 4.41 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.64 | 5.49 28% | 3.95 48% | 5.29 31% | 2.87 62% | 15.75 -106% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.74 | 0.88 -19% | 2.5 -238% | 1.32 -78% | 1.84 -149% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.99 -38% | 2.6 10% | 1.92 34% | 1.27 56% | 4.4 -52% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.38 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6472 100% | 6219 105% | 6133 106% | 6270 104% | 6724 97% | 7395 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-6% | 37% /
26% | 125% /
202% | 76% /
136% | -82% /
-64% |
* ... smaller is better
面板根据 P3 标准进行了适当校准，平均 deltaE 值较低。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 MSI Center 设置为性能模式。此外，还有一个单独的最大风扇模式，称为 Cooler Boost 模式。
处理器
处理器的原始性能 Ryzen AI 9 365是所有非游戏型 16 英寸笔记本电脑中速度最快的之一。与 2022 Summit E16 Flip 及其 酷睿 i7-1280P相比，我们的 AMD CPU 快了约 20% 至 25%。对于一款可折叠笔记本电脑来说，性能的持续性也比预期的要好，在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时没有出现重大的性能下降。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø2784 (2638-2841.72)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 Intel Core i7-1280P: Ø2059 (1955.03-2339.73)
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1705 (1414.83-2302.95)
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1613 (1568.63-2022.76)
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Normal cooling mode: Ø1595 (1216.25-2200.1)
LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; High cooling mode: Ø1742 (1692.19-2188.66)
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1351 (1250.47-1657.34)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 29902, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 114482, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 4841, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16315, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 61298, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1243, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 16159, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 50517, n=3) | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会在最初几秒钟内提升至 3.8 GHz 和 71 W，然后降至 3.2 GHz 和 50 W。如果关闭 Cooler Boost，核心温度会稳定在 82 C，如果开启 Cooler Boost，则为 74 C。该功能的主要目的是降低核心温度，而不是直接提高性能。
如果玩游戏，核心温度将稳定在 75 摄氏度，而 HP Spectre x360 16 的核心温度为 72 摄氏度。 惠普 Spectre x360 16相比，配备速度更快的 RTX 4050 显卡的惠普 Spectre x360 16 的核心温度为 72 C。
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 32 |
| Prime95 压力（关闭散热器升压） | 3.2 | -- | 82 |
| Prime95 Stress (Cooler Boost on) | 3.1 | -- | 74 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.2 | 1412 | 81 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.7 | 2787 | 75 |
系统性能
由于采用了快速的 Zen 5 CPU 和集成 GPU，PCMark 的成绩在 16 英寸可折叠产品中名列前茅。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (7045 - 7641, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10421 - 11140, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (9841 - 10293, n=3) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (8973 - 10976, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1658 - 1733, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1508 - 1593, n=2) | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (2044 - 2074, n=2) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1124 - 1360, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (322 - 336, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (255 - 267, n=4) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (436 - 456, n=4) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7618 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (88985 - 90113, n=3) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 99376, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (93627 - 100507, n=3) | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (116.3 - 121.1, n=3) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时，LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。在其他方面，以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美，没有掉帧记录。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP | |
| HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
| MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 三星 PM9C1而不是 2022 型号上的 PM9A1。遗憾的是，如下图所示，PM9C1 的传输速率要慢 1500 MB/s。
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
5043MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
3358MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
2400MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
2846MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
536MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
309MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
55.4MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
139.5MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
4828MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4828 (3978.51-5043.21)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6626 (6157.24-6654.79)
图形处理器性能
集成 Radeon 880M比 Iris Xe 96 EUs自 2020 年以来，大多数可转换笔记本电脑上常见的 Iris Xe 96 EUs 都得到了大幅升级。与上一代冠军相比 Radeon 780M相比，Radeon 880M 的速度提高了约 15% 至 25%。这样的速度足以在 1080p 低设置下玩现代游戏，甚至包括《赛博朋克 2077》这样要求苛刻的游戏。
微星没有提供配备 Radeon 890M这将使图形性能再提升 10%至 15%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 9203 | 26559 | 3122 |
| 均衡模式 | 8821 (-4%) | 25223 (-5%) | 2948 (-6%) |
| 电池供电 | 8747 (-5%) | 20465 (-23%) | 3098 (-1%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示，在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行会略微降低性能。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14646 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36919 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8391 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3399 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 550 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M: Ø24.8 (23-25.8)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 170.6 | 80.5 | 32.5 | 22.3 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 156.7 | 133.6 | 47.2 | 46.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 87 | 43.7 | 31.4 | 23.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 79.9 | 63.1 | 48.8 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 102 | 58 | 53 | 50 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 192.9 | 79.7 | 67 | 56.7 | 35.7 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 84.9 | 61.4 | 40.2 | 31.9 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 101.1 | 92.5 | 70.3 | 18.3 | 11.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 44.1 | 36.1 | 29.9 | 28.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.5 | 38.3 | 30.4 | 26.3 | 19.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
尽管没有独立 GPU，但风扇噪音并不比以前小多少。无论负载如何，风扇几乎始终处于工作状态，而且当负载较高时，风扇转速会相对较快上升。此外，风扇噪音很高，因此任何转速变化都会更加明显。
在游戏时，Summit A16 的噪音超过 46 分贝（A），不亚于许多专用游戏笔记本电脑。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 29.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37.5 / 56.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365 | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-1280P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN A350M, i7-1260P, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00 | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 17% | -6% | 5% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 23.8 | 25 -5% | 23.3 2% | 27.5 -16% | 25.12 -6% | 22.8 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 23.6 6% | 27.5 -10% | 25.12 -0% | 22.8 9% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 25 -0% | 23.6 6% | 27.5 -10% | 26.17 -5% | 22.8 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 28.9 2% | 23.6 20% | 28.3 4% | 26.17 11% | 22.8 23% |
| Load Average * | 37.5 | 49.3 -31% | 29.2 22% | 40.7 -9% | 36.33 3% | 30.8 18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.5 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 56.1 | 48.2 14% | 32.1 43% | 53.6 4% | 41.61 26% | 40.8 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.1 | 31 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在运行苛刻负载时，后部热点的温度会超过 45 摄氏度。不过，由于我们的 AMD 机型没有专用 GPU，因此平均表面温度比 2022 机型要低。这一点很明显，因为 2024 机型的右半部分要比 2022 机型的右半部分温度低得多，而 2022 机型的右半部分正是 dGPU 所在的位置。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.8 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.4 °C / -4.3 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.8 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.4 °C / -4.3 F).
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 Intel Core i7-1280P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | 8% | 11% | 3% | 16% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 52.8 | 49.2 7% | 39.6 25% | 37.9 28% | 34.5 35% | 37.8 28% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 50.2 -20% | 39.2 7% | 39.4 6% | 55.4 -32% | 38.8 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.6 | 29.4 4% | 29 5% | 28.8 6% | 28.7 6% | 25.4 17% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.6 | 30 -1% | 31.6 -7% | 29.1 2% | 28.7 3% | 26.8 9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
我们的 AMD 系统在桌面空闲时的功耗比 Intel-Nvidia 2022 型号低几瓦，这也是电池续航时间普遍较长的原因，具体见下文。在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，功耗可能会高出几瓦，但这被更快的处理器性能所抵消，因此每瓦性能仍然有利于我们的 AMD 设备。
100 瓦 USB-C 交流适配器非常小，只有 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.9 厘米。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.56 / 0.63 Watt |
| Idle | 5.4 / 11 / 11.2 Watt |
| Load |
76.6 / 91.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -53% | 3% | 24% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 9.8 -81% | 5.8 -7% | 6.5 -20% | 6 -11% | 3 44% |
| Idle Average * | 11 | 15.3 -39% | 12.3 -12% | 7.6 31% | 7.5 32% | 8.5 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 16.3 -46% | 33.9 -203% | 9.8 12% | 8.2 27% | 8.9 21% |
| Load Average * | 76.6 | 87 -14% | 83.3 -9% | 85 -11% | 45.2 41% | 41.1 46% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 49.2 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 61.1 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 91.8 | 100 -9% | 120.8 -32% | 91 1% | 61.4 33% | 64.6 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 86.1 | 89.1 | 85.6 | 38.9 | 30.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø79.2 (73.7-91.7)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.5 (72.6-102.4)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.86 (6.4-10)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.4 (16.6-19.1)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø61.1 (54.2-70.6)
Power Consumption external Monitor
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.4 (71.7-85.8)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.4 (67.2-95.2)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø72.1 (68-80.6)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø94.2 (86.3-96.2)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø69.8 (63.3-73)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (71.2-82.3)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.96 (5.37-7.4)
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.6 (13-15.1)
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø49.2 (48.5-51.2)
电池寿命
WLAN 运行时间比 2022 机型长约两个小时，这主要是由于 2024 机型没有专用 GPU。
| MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M, 84 Wh | LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90SP Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | 21% | -11% | 6% | 35% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 547 | 428 -22% | 660 21% | 488 -11% | 581 6% | 738 35% |
| Load | 101 |
笔记本检查评级
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG
- 12/05/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
