Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 评论:为游戏玩家和创作者打造的配备 RTX 4070 的高端笔记本电脑

精彩的展示。

我们最近测试的 Nitro V 16 由于显示效果不佳,只给我们留下了有限的印象,而 Predator Triton Neo 16 的表现则要好得多。我们对这款配备 Meteor Lake CPU 和GeForce RTX 4070 的 16 英寸游戏机进行了测试。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Intel Meteor Lake Arc Nvidia Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

结论 - 宏碁的 "养眼 "产品

如果您正在寻找一款高品质、时尚的游戏和创作笔记本电脑,那么 Predator Triton Neo 16 可能就是您的最佳选择。宏碁不仅为这款 16 英寸的设备起了一个长得离谱的名字,还为其配备了一个稳定的金属外壳,银灰色的表面几乎不会留下任何指纹痕迹。由于支持 USB 4,它的连接选项也并不寒酸。此外,Neo 16 的画质同样令人印象深刻。其基于 IPS 技术的 165-Hz 屏幕具有良好的亮度水平、高分辨率(3,200 x 2,000 像素)、宽广的色彩空间覆盖范围,而且由于通过了 Calman 认证,色彩准确度也相当可观。

另一方面,它的 GPU 性能却不尽如人意。GeForce RTX 4070 只能发挥出有限的潜在性能,低于我们之前确定的平均水平。此外,维护和升级选项也不多。虽然这款 16 英寸设备有两个 M.2 插槽(其中一个还是空闲的),但它的内存是焊接上去的,因此我们的测试设备所配备的 32 GB 内存可能暂时足够大多数用户使用。总而言之,我们将 Predator Triton Neo 16 评为一款优秀的游戏和创作笔记本电脑。

竞争对手包括其他配备 RTX 4070 的 16 英寸设备,如华硕 ProArt P16 H7606WI、联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9、华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605M 和 Alienware m16 R2,不过这些设备的价格普遍较高。

Pros

+ 光滑优质的外壳
+ 明亮鲜艳的显示屏
+ 两个 M.2 插槽(一个闲置)
+ 稳定的电池寿命
+ 良好的输入设备
+ USB 4

Cons

- RTX 4070 的性能低于其可能性
- 风扇控制有待改进
- 内存无法更换
- 音效一般
- 固态硬盘有节流

价格和供应情况

目前,宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P 可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买,售价 1399 美元

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
81.1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,088.49
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
2. $1,089.00
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
3. $2,058.01
acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
List Price: 1900 EUR
2 kg21 mm16.00"
3200x2000
236 PPI
IPS
2.
87.8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,879.00
HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Pro...
2. $2,239.00
ASUS ProArt P16 Laptop, AMD ...
3. $93.99
20V 10A 200W Laptop Charger ...
List Price: 4000€
1.8 kg17.3 mm16.00"
3840x2400
283 PPI
OLED
3.
88.7% v7 (old)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,099.99
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt...
2. $38.99
170W Charger Fit for Lenovo ...
3. $38.00
Laptop Keyboard for Lenovo Y...
List Price: 2700€
2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"
3200x2000
236 PPI
Mini-LED
4.
92.3% v7 (old)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $1,888.86
List Price: 3000€
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
5.
90.2% v7 (old)
Alienware m16 R2
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $1,899.00
List Price: 1850 USD
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS

宏碁为我们的测试配置配备了 Core Ultra 9 185H以及前面提到的 GeForce RTX 4070.它还配备了令人印象深刻的 32 GB LPDDR5X 内存。安装的 NVMe 固态硬盘容量为 1 TB。笔记本电脑的屏幕纵横比为 16:10,操作系统为 Windows 11 Home。它的电池容量为 76 Wh,既不低也不特别大。

规格

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (Predator Triton Neo 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 85 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1695 MHz, RAM: 1975 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 566.36, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5X soldered (no expansion)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, Calman Verified, glossy: no, 165 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combined (Line-In/Out), Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 356 x 249
Battery
76 Wh
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Predator Sense, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.032 kg, Power Supply: 795 g
Price
1900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例

Predator Triton 最大的亮点之一是其优雅美观的外壳。其金属表面给人留下了高品质的印象,由于颜色较浅,几乎不会沾染指纹。除了一些细节问题(触摸板在某些地方会有轻微变形),外壳的稳定性同样出色。宏碁的铰链功能良好,也值得称赞,不过其最大开启角度约为 135°,可以再大一些。另一方面,我们对其制造质量也没有什么可批评的。

宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16

16 英寸设备的重量约为 2 千克,介于其竞争对手之间,它们的重量都在 1.8 至 2.5 千克之间。它们的高度和基本尺寸相似:在这方面,宏碁笔记本电脑在中场也很舒适。

尺寸比较

363.9 mm 249.4 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg362.72 mm 253.69 mm 18.3 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 249 mm 21 mm 2 kg354.9 mm 246.9 mm 17.3 mm 1.8 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

端口

Neo 16 提供多种端口。左侧为电源接口、音频插孔和两个 USB-C 端口(1x USB 4,带 DisplayPort 1.4 和 PowerDelivery),右侧则配备了一个 micro SD 读卡器、两个 USB-A 端口(3.1 Gen 2)、HDMI 2.1 和一个 Kensington 锁开口。即便如此,宏碁还是应该为该设备增加一个 RJ45 端口,以确保其获得非常好的连接性评级。

左侧电源、USB-C 4(包括 DisplayPort 1.4 和 PowerDelivery)、USB-C 3.1 Gen 2、音频
左侧电源、USB-C 4(包括 DisplayPort 1.4 和 PowerDelivery)、USB-C 3.1 Gen 2、音频
右侧:microSD、2 个 USB-A 3.1 Gen 2、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 锁
右侧:microSD、2 个 USB-A 3.1 Gen 2、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 锁

SD 读卡器

在我们的测试中,笔记本电脑读卡器的速度一般,大约为 90 MB/s。读卡器 Alienware m16华硕 ProArt P16在顺序读取方面要好得多。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
127 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
96 MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.7 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.3 MB/s -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
254.4 MB/s +183%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +128%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +34%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89.9 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.9 MB/s 0%

交流

它的无线模块名为 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x,在距离参考路由器 1 米的范围测试中,它的表现从发射(传输)到接收(接收)都非常出色。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1788 (1649min - 1890max) MBit/s +108%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +93%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1650 (1445min - 1723max) MBit/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1228 MBit/s +43%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s +40%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
859 (707min - 1085max) MBit/s
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (703 - 859, n=5)
779 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1711 (1658min - 1732max) MBit/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1699 (1607min - 1729max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1568min - 1702max) MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1397 MBit/s -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -28%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (774 - 1711, n=5)
1021 MBit/s -40%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø859 (707-1085)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1788 (1649-1890)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1445-1723)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1658-1732)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1698 (1607-1729)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1654 (1568-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)

网络摄像头

与大多数游戏笔记本电脑相比,该设备的 200 万像素网络摄像头稍显清晰,色彩也更准确,但你不能指望它会创造奇迹。摄像头没有盖子,无法保护隐私。

ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P: 5.29 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 10.67 ∆E

配件

宏碁笔记本电脑配有 230 瓦电源和多份信息宣传单。

维护

底板由 11 颗 Torx 螺钉固定,相当紧凑。机身内部相当整洁、直观。除了无线模块,只有固态硬盘和电池可以拆卸。笔记本电脑的冷却系统(据宏碁称,采用液态金属)由两个风扇和几根热管组成。

宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16

可持续性

Acer 在其中一张包装盒贴纸上注明了 "Post Consumer Recycled"(消费后回收)。包装材料主要由纸板组成。笔记本电脑用布袋包装,电源装置用塑料薄膜包装(每种类型都有标签)。

保修

该笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备

键盘

作为一款橡胶圆顶键盘,它的反馈和键入感都相当不错。宏碁选择了一种相当经典的布局,制造商没有使用数字键盘,只在 "主块 "右侧设置了一列,用于媒体控制和打开 Predator Sense 系统软件。除功能行外,所有按键的大小都比较合理,包括方向箭头。游戏玩家可以期待分为三个区域的多级可调 RGB 灯光。

宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16

触摸板

该设备的触摸板尺寸为 15 x 9 厘米,非常宽大,但在我们看来,它还可以更稳定一些,尤其是左键点击时会有明显的屈服感。我们认为它的表面非常光滑。对于手势和多点触控支持,我们也没有什么可批评的。

显示屏

相比之下 Nitro V 16相比之下,Predator Triton Neo 16 不得不使用有限的色彩空间和相对较低的亮度,它拥有高品质的 IPS 面板。

483
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B160QAN04.S tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 453.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1090:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.201
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display
7%
2%
7%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
94.2
99.9
6%
97
3%
99.9
6%
71
-25%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.3
99.1
16%
86.6
2%
96.9
14%
71.4
-16%
Response Times
83%
-137%
97%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.3 ?(5.9, 6.4)
1.58 ?(0.84, 0.74)
87%
22.2 ?(9.6, 12.6)
-80%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
98%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
54%
Response Time Black / White *
5.8 ?(2.2, 3.6)
1.25 ?(0.67, 0.58)
78%
17 ?(8.2, 8.8)
-193%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
96%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-50%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(52, 93)
4840 ?(100)
960 ?(60)
Screen
11%
29%
2%
-2%
Brightness middle
458
355
-22%
651
42%
416
-9%
345.8
-24%
Brightness
453
360
-21%
673
49%
418
-8%
337
-26%
Brightness Distribution
90
98
9%
93
3%
96
7%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.22
48%
0.3
29%
Contrast
1090
2959
171%
1153
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.58
1.2
24%
1.9
-20%
1.6
-1%
1.99
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.47
2.6
25%
4.2
-21%
2.1
39%
3.52
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.77
0.6
22%
0.62
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.2
48%
3
-30%
2.7
-17%
2.1
9%
Gamma
2.201 100%
2.14 103%
2.18 101%
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
CCT
6540 99%
6526 100%
6738 96%
6331 103%
6369 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 23%
-35% / -0%
35% / 20%
-5% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

453 cd/m² 的平均亮度不仅足以满足室内使用,而且根据光线条件,还能满足室外使用。与此同时,它的对比度仅为 1,100:1 不到,这是因为它的黑阶较低(0.42 cd/m²)。在这方面,一些竞争对手的 OLED 面板可以做得更好,其响应时间也是如此(尽管对于 IPS 面板来说,响应时间还算不错)。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)

另一方面,宏碁笔记本电脑采用低反射表面,在任何亮度下都不会出现闪烁。

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 对比 sRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 对比 sRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 与 AdobeRGB 的对比
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 与 AdobeRGB 的对比
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 与 DCI-P3 的对比
宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 与 DCI-P3 的对比

Neo 16 的目标是以其宽广的色彩空间吸引专业用户:几乎 100% 的 sRGB 覆盖率、94% 的 DCI-P3 覆盖率和 85% 的 AdobeRGB 覆盖率使这款 16 英寸的新产品成为真正的创作者产品。由于通过了卡尔曼验证,开箱后的色彩看起来已经相当自然。此外,合理的可视角度也为整套产品锦上添花。

日光
日光
子像素
子像素
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.2 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
亮度 75
亮度 75
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
0 % 亮度
0 % 亮度

性能

我们的测试版本 PTN16-51-978P 的性能处于(中上)水平。Predator Triton Neo 16 的起价不到 1200 美元。入门级机型配备 WQXGA 显示屏(2,560 x 1,600 像素,240 Hz)、一个 Core Ultra 7 155H, a GeForce RTX 406016GB内存和1TB固态硬盘。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

用户可以从四种不同的配置文件中进行选择,其中一些在性能和噪音发展方面差异很大。由于在 3D 模式下Turbo模式的噪音非常大(接近 58 分贝),我们在测试中选择了性能模式,该模式的性能略低,但也确保了工作噪音明显降低(尽管仍然很高)。

捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
捕食者意识
赛博朋克 2077》循环序列 (FHD/Ultra) 安静 平衡 性能 涡轮增压
噪音 39 dB(A) 47 dB(A) 50 dB(A) 58 dB(A)
性能 32 fps 62 fps 66 fps 74 fps
GPU 板功耗 最大。53 瓦 最大。66 瓦 最大。76 瓦 最大。116 瓦

处理器

Core Ultra 9 185H 是一款功能强大的笔记本电脑处理器,拥有 16 个内核(三种不同的内核类型),通过超线程技术最多可同时处理 22 个线程。在我们的基准测试过程中,CPU 性能与我们之前确定的 Ultra 9 185H 的平均水平大致相当。然而,一些竞争对手的 Ultra 7 155H 往往几乎没有什么表现(Alienware m16 甚至在总分上略微领先)。Cinebench 循环测试还显示,宏碁笔记本电脑的成绩并不特别稳定,而是出现了一些波动。不过,两款英特尔机型在与 AMD 的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2755 (2385.5-2930.83)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3476 (3466.5-3497.73)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
85.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
80.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
77.2 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
70.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
70.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68.7 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23750 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
22015 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19851 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19248 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (12688 - 19851, n=19)
17767 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -10%
Single Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2044 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1906 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1166 - 1912, n=19)
1787 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1754 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -4%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9246 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8361 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7651 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7546 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4843 - 7651, n=19)
6862 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
804 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
735 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (442 - 735, n=19)
689 Points +3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
666 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3498 (3466.5min - 3497.73max) Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3441 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3005 (2869.44min - 3004.58max) Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2931 (2385.5min - 2930.83max) Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1582 - 3165, n=21)
2729 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
280 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
276 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (191.9 - 281, n=19)
264 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -7%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (163 - 285, n=19)
191.1 Seconds * -8%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.1 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
163 Seconds * +8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * +21%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85859 MIPS +17%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83354 MIPS +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
76331 MIPS +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
73378 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51738 - 76331, n=19)
69330 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -8%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6320 MIPS +13%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6179 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5781 MIPS +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5594 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4199 - 5781, n=19)
5427 MIPS -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15367 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=113, last 2 years)
14205 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14031 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14001 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9140 - 14540, n=19)
13602 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12670 Points -10%
Single-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2877 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=113, last 2 years)
2649 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2570 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1490 - 2573, n=19)
2430 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2399 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2383 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15118 Points +7%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15012 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14072 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13936 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9330 - 14230, n=19)
13179 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -12%
Single-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2066 Points +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1902 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (986 - 1902, n=19)
1779 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points +2%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1726 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
24.6 fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22.7 fps +12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (14.1 - 22.7, n=19)
19.9 fps -2%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
73.5 s *
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
56.1 s * +24%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.8 s * +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.2 s * +34%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (34.5 - 73.5, n=19)
46.1 s * +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.7 s * +46%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (0.4313 - 0.759, n=20)
0.47 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4486 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4457 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4364 sec * +3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4041 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2931 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
177.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
276 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
666 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7546 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19248 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1754 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
111 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1027 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI -2!
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
85 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.7 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
70.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21996 KRay/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18621 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18470 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18446 KRay/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9220 - 18676, n=19)
16396 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
147248 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
107132 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95572 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95213 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92996 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (48865 - 96463, n=19)
85141 Points -11%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5843 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4927 MB/s +15%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4296 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4242 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (2394 - 4534, n=19)
3982 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117304 Points +24%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94661 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94527 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94395 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (66785 - 95241, n=19)
89708 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84180 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
19021 Points +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13306 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11392 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11312 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10617 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (7255 - 11392, n=19)
10546 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53901 Points +16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47685 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47315 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (24004 - 48020, n=19)
41756 Points -10%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109375 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94250 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (53116 - 154066, n=19)
91381 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90860 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82757 MB/s -9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81929 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1520 MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1372 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1297 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1295 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1219 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (678 - 1341, n=19)
1163 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
20608 KRay/s +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11845 KRay/s +23%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9802 KRay/s +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9768 KRay/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9631 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4428 - 10078, n=19)
8582 KRay/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53918 MPixel/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (44547 - 53918, n=19)
48798 MPixel/s +10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48273 MPixel/s +8%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44547 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40439 MPixel/s -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39532 MPixel/s -11%

系统性能

系统性能方面没有任何惊喜。PCMark 10 中的 7,443 分对于配备这些组件或属于这种性能级别的设备来说非常典型。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7817 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7752 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7443 - 7761, n=4)
7560 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7547 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
7443 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11133 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10832 Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9728 - 11133, n=4)
10451 Points +7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points +3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10009 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9728 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9912 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9891 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9555 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9067 - 9555, n=4)
9347 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9067 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points +8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
12771 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12183 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (11369 - 13194, n=4)
12039 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
12037 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11554 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years)
1912 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1794 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1663 - 1917, n=3)
1766 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1719 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years)
1811 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1573 - 1849, n=3)
1678 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1611 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1611 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2270 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years)
2101 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1993 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1872 - 2008, n=3)
1958 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years)
1709 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1338 - 1856, n=3)
1525 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1338 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1225 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points +13%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
298 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
295 Points +9%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (240 - 295, n=5)
272 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
270 Points
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
270 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years)
267 Points +7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (248 - 268, n=5)
255 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
249 Points
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
249 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
244 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
549 ms *
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
549 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (494 - 549, n=5)
525 ms * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
502 ms * +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
494 ms * +10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7443 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94254 MB/s +19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89675 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (69929 - 95718, n=19)
84413 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79538 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65752 MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100415 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87768 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (64619 - 87768, n=19)
79657 MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72422 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69626 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100176 MB/s +35%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75773 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74436 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51114 - 93871, n=19)
72498 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67472 MB/s -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (121.4 - 259, n=19)
145.5 ns * -3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141.5 ns *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.6 ns * +8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * +11%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.2 ns * +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * +33%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

宏碁(Acer)可以改进其延迟。LatencyMon 工具显示的延迟值相当高,但一些竞争对手也是如此。只有 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16保持在 1,000 微秒以下。

延迟监控
延迟监控
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3414 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * +27%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * +40%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
464.1 μs * +86%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

另一方面,Predator Triton 的超快 1 TB SSD(SK Hynix PC801)给人留下了深刻印象。根据我们的性能评级,宏碁笔记本电脑在对比设备中名列前茅。不过,需要指出的是,在长时间负载的情况下,性能波动很大,而竞争对手的情况并非如此(见 DiskSpd 循环)。

SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7052 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 976.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 608.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 397.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2957 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 976.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 228.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
94.1 pt
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
 
93.9 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
63.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.3 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
40.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (3772 - 5314, n=2)
4543 MB/s +20%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +19%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3772 (3723.81min - 3772.36max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2757 (2720.02min - 2757.13max) MB/s -27%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2119 (2090.65min - 2119.22max) MB/s -44%
seq write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5276 - 5300, n=2)
5288 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5276 (5235.14min - 5275.95max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3831 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3474 (3404.52min - 3474.32max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -52%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2138 (1936.3min - 2137.63max) MB/s -59%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +3%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (6856 - 7150, n=2)
7003 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
6856 (6264.4min - 6855.93max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6319 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6257 (5307.47min - 6256.78max) MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -27%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4785 (3105.25min - 4784.86max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (6184 - 6519, n=2)
6352 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
6184 (6135.32min - 6183.67max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6040 (5907.05min - 6040.01max) MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -48%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3109 (2917.35min - 3109.45max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
80.3 (79.74min - 80.34max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (78.3 - 80.3, n=2)
79.3 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
63.7 (63.29min - 63.65max) MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -34%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
39.9 (39.46min - 39.9max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (253 - 268, n=2)
261 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
253 (248.67min - 252.62max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
139.8 (135.84min - 139.76max) MB/s -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -49%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
75.9 (71.09min - 75.93max) MB/s -70%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
4884 (4800.09min - 4884.18max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (4820 - 4884, n=2)
4852 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2589 MB/s -47%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
859 (816.31min - 859.16max) MB/s -82%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -88%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
548 (543.4min - 547.55max) MB/s -89%
4k q32 t16 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (3073 - 3091, n=2)
3082 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3073 (3055.16min - 3073.44max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2144 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
439 (405.1min - 438.82max) MB/s -86%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -87%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
231 (200.24min - 231.41max) MB/s -92%
AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9306 Points
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (8486 - 9306, n=2)
8896 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6759 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5214 Points -44%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3843 Points -59%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -65%
Score Read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3081 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -2%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (2908 - 3081, n=2)
2995 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2451 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1397 Points -55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -67%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
962 Points -69%
Score Write
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
4656 Points
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (4106 - 4656, n=2)
4381 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3190 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3117 Points -33%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2455 Points -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -61%
Seq Read
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5653 - 5687, n=2)
5670 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5653.46 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5399 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -12%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3776 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5470.77 MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5335 - 5471, n=2)
5403 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3780 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3314 MB/s -39%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2397 MB/s -56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -65%
4K Read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
74.63 MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (70.3 - 74.6, n=2)
72.5 MB/s -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
64.2 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -43%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
28.7 MB/s -62%
4K Write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (226 - 231, n=2)
229 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
225.97 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
183.8 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -21%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
178 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -30%
4K-64 Read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
2441.35 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -3%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (2269 - 2441, n=2)
2355 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1885 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
793 MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -75%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
555 MB/s -77%
4K-64 Write
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3882.49 MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (3341 - 3882, n=2)
3612 MB/s -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2675 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2530 MB/s -35%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2038 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -62%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05545 ms * -50%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * -27%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (0.037 - 0.038, n=2)
0.0375 ms * -1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
0.037 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * +14%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.027 ms * +27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.021 ms * +43%
Access Time Write
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.137 ms * -661%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -289%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04715 ms * -162%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.02 ms * -11%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
0.018 ms *
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (0.018 - 0.018, n=2)
0.018 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6191 (3458.63-7113.78)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4823 (4004.26-4857.63)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6232 (4915.93-6315.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 4070 现在让人百感交集。虽然它的基本性能相当可观,但其有限的 8 GB VRAM 在运行要求苛刻的游戏时越来越成为绊脚石(以 夺宝奇兵为例)。此外,宏碁还为 Predator Triton Neo 16 选择了相当适中的 110 瓦 TGP(包括动态升压)(最高可达 140 瓦),这在基准测试中也很明显。在 GPU 测试中,这仅足以确保自己在测试领域中排名最后。有趣的是即使是 华硕 Zephyrus G16的 TGP 也更快(例如,在玩《赛博朋克 2077》时,Neo 16 中 RTX 4070 的功耗在使用性能模式时被限制在最大 76 瓦)。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
97.7 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
94.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
84.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
82.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43982 Points +22%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
42821 Points +19%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
40646 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=65)
40385 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37313 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
35972 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31524 Points +17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
30874 Points +15%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
30137 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=69)
29068 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26898 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26568 Points -1%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13169 Points +24%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12181 Points +15%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11941 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=67)
11602 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10989 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
10636 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
31196 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
196686 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58960 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23102 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10712 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * -5%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=66)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.7 Seconds * +1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=68)
40.1 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.6 Seconds * -2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * +6%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
34 Seconds * +6%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -7%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
309 Seconds *
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
296 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=65)
289 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
285 Seconds * +8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
214 Seconds * +31%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在日常游戏中,情况要好一些。在这方面,宏碁笔记本电脑比华硕的同类产品领先几个百分点,但仍然落后于其他竞争对手。一般来说,RTX 4070 的速度足以在全高清分辨率(如 1,920 x 1,080)下流畅运行当前大多数游戏的最高细节。而在 QHD 分辨率(如 2,560 x 1,440 像素)下,情况就不那么乐观了。计算密集型游戏,如 地狱之刃 2, 直到黎明潜行者 2需要减少细节或使用 DLSS(见表)。我们只建议在要求不高的游戏中使用 Neo 16 的原生分辨率。3,200 x 2,000 像素对于 RTX 4070 来说已经是极限了(除非使用强大的升频方法)。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.2 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
94.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
91.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
91.3 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
85.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
83 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
78.1 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +25%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
83.1 (28.4min) fps +20%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
80.7 (65.3min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=36)
79.1 fps +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
76.9 (18min) fps +11%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
69.1 (56min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
69 fps 0%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
128.5 fps +41%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
117.7 fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=46, last 2 years)
103.2 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=26)
101 fps +11%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
91.1 (29.4min, 35.3P0.1, 60.7P1) fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
82.5 fps -9%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.9 fps +9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
111.2 (9.03min, 76.9P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 141.6, n=61)
111.1 fps +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
110.9 (3.51min, 71.4P1) fps +6%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
104.6 (4.27min, 55.6P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -6%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.3 fps +21%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
119.3 fps +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
115.7 fps +16%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
115.3 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=63)
110.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
100.8 fps +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
99.7 fps
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
230 fps
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
213 fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
206 (86.5min, 156P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=62)
196.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.3 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=65)
147.9 fps +9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
141.6 (119.2min) fps +4%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
139.7 (120.9min) fps +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
139 (119.7min) fps +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
135.9 (115.5min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
131.6 (114.5min) fps -3%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=67)
104.4 fps +17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
90.8 fps +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
90.5 fps +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
89.2 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
81.2 fps -9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
72.3 fps -19%
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD
GTA V (2015) 173.4 166.4 104.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 169.6 150.5 144.3 135.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 132.4 99.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 130.8 116.5 89.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 108.4 94.8 91.1 65
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 93.9 80.1 69.1 42.3
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 53.2 39.3 42.2 27.1
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) 44.9 40.8 34.4 34.1 23.3
Space Marine 2 (2024) 74.4 72.8 67.9 65.1 48.2
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) 68.2 59 54.3 53.9 37.6
Until Dawn (2024) 83.7 58.9 44.9 41.5 32.9
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) 105 81 76 65 60
Stalker 2 (2024) 57.1 49.7 42.3 58.3 31.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
95.6 (35.4min) fps +19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
94.1 (77.9min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (74.7 - 103.6, n=29)
92.1 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.4 - 164.5, n=61, last 2 years)
92.1 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
90.5 (40.2min) fps +13%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
80.1 (66min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
77 fps -4%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +25%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
83.1 (28.4min) fps +20%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
80.7 (65.3min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=36)
79.1 fps +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
76.9 (18min) fps +11%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
69.1 (56min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
69 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=72, last 2 years)
64.9 fps +53%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
52.7 (40.5min) fps +25%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.4 (41.1min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24.8 - 57.1, n=34)
49 fps +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
47.8 (31.2min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
43.7 fps +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H
42.3 (36min) fps

与 CPU 和固态硬盘性能相比,笔记本电脑的 GPU 速度似乎相当稳定。在 30 分钟的测试中,我们使用 赛博朋克 2077的 30 分钟测试中,我们没有测到明显的 FPS 下降或类似情况。

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø65.8 (58.8-68.7)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø60.7 (28.6-75.5)

排放量

噪音排放

宏碁还可以修改风扇控制。在 "性能模式 "下,Neo 16 即使在空转时也会有相当明显的噪音(32 至 34 分贝),偶尔还会达到 40 分贝(A)。而同类产品通常要安静得多。我们注意到,在负载情况下,噪音约为 50 分贝(A),这在没有耳机的情况下非常明显,可能会令人讨厌。不过,竞争对手在这种情况下也能达到类似甚至更高的数值。

Noise Level

Idle
32 / 34 / 40 dB(A)
Load
48 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.73838.737.438.643.52541.634.837.937.136.439.93145.342.44239.841.1464029.831.628.627.227.929503643.335.735.736.534.46329.924.52422.723.731.68022.327.317.116.718.423.610020.921.615.616.113.823.912528.227.226.333.914.627.916028.726.622.126.116.327.220030.32721.621.42028.925029.225.219.920.915.828.931528.824.818.719.513.529.540032.125.422.422.511.634.450034.832.423.323.711.336.763036.531.124.525.110.739.380038.831.825.125.910.741.5100038.130.322.623.710.941.312503830.622.724.111.440.9160038.930.422.123.311.541.9200038.529.220.921.711.441.3250036.426.71919.41239.8315035.325.720.721.212.338.6400035.525.916.116.512.838.8500034.221.414.915.313.237.7630029.917.11414.213.335.2800024.414.413.813.613.529.61000021.113.513.413.213.226.51250017.412.814.814.812.722.41600014.512.813.213.51216.8SPL48.140.132.833.724.551.2N63.21.71.90.67.5median 32.1median 25.9median 20.7median 21.2median 12.7median 35.2Delta5.56.33.74.11.56.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
9%
14%
18%
16%
off / environment *
24
24.4
-2%
24.3
-1%
23.9
-0%
24.7
-3%
Idle Minimum *
32
24.4
24%
24.3
24%
23.9
25%
25.3
21%
Idle Average *
34
27.7
19%
24.3
29%
27.8
18%
25.3
26%
Idle Maximum *
40
32.3
19%
25.8
35%
30.1
25%
25.3
37%
Load Average *
48
42.2
12%
48.1
-0%
34.2
29%
31.7
34%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
50
53.2
-6%
Load Maximum *
51
53.2
-4%
53.9
-6%
46.4
9%
62
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.7
46.4
53.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

在温度方面,宏碁的分支产品也毫不逊色。对于 RTX 4070 设备来说,顶部最高温度为 46 °C,底部最高温度为 48 °C。在闲置模式下,机箱温度保持在 30 °C以下,因此可以保持良好的散热效果。

Max. Load
 45 °C46 °C45 °C 
 45 °C45 °C42 °C 
 34 °C33 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
47 °C48 °C43 °C
42 °C44 °C39 °C
34 °C34 °C34 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 40.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
6%
-5%
-20%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
46.9
-2%
41.7
9%
50.3
-9%
44.8
3%
Maximum Bottom *
48
50.9
-6%
46.3
4%
48
-0%
48
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
27
28.9
-7%
26.2
3%
28.8
-7%
37.2
-38%
Idle Bottom *
29
30
-3%
27.2
6%
29.8
-3%
42
-45%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中,以及在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,CPU 和 GPU 的发热温度都在 70 °C 左右,属于中等水平。

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077
赛博朋克 2077

发言人

笔记本电脑的音质属于中档。除了低音,中高音也需要更强劲、更精确。另一方面,这款 16 英寸设备的扬声器最大音量高达 86 dB(A)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.82536.434.83141.141.44027.927.45036.5366323.7268018.41910013.825.912514.642.116016.3462002051.125015.853.331513.555.440011.658.950011.362.263010.763.780010.768.4100010.973.4125011.474.6160011.577.1200011.475.325001268.5315012.366.3400012.876.4500013.275.4630013.378.7800013.574.21000013.2741250012.768.8160001267.8SPL24.586.2N0.664.9median 12.7median 68.4Delta1.59.635.641.331.233.642.933.838.540.426.435.225.539.728.148.120.960.820.265.217.961.719.46820.368.616.568.91471.111.771.711.174.410.974.410.571.910.77110.7691168.711.466.511.768.112.167.312.26412.563.612.365.212.460.812.259.411.65124.481.40.655.7median 12.2median 682.94hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978PAsus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

耗电量

由于采用了集成显卡开关,Predator Triton 在闲置时的功耗相当低--我们测得的功耗为 10 至 23 瓦,远低于游戏平均功耗。在负载情况下,宏碁笔记本电脑的功耗在 80 到 206 瓦之间,这意味着 230 瓦的电源在任何时候都不会超负荷。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 23 Watt
Load midlight 80 / 206 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
6%
-10%
21%
-13%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
10
8
20%
10.3
-3%
8.3
17%
8.1
19%
Idle Average *
15
9.9
34%
21.9
-46%
12.5
17%
13
13%
Idle Maximum *
23
11.6
50%
22.4
3%
12.8
44%
40.3
-75%
Load Average *
80
76.9
4%
96.9
-21%
71.3
11%
79
1%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
122
157.7
-29%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
118.7
156.6
-32%
Load Maximum *
206
212.6
-3%
173.8
16%
169.1
18%
254.9
-24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
159.6
127.5
188.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø134.8 (117.1-206)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15 (9.95-22.4)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø122 (114.8-132.3)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75 (56.1-126)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø121.1 (119.5-122.3)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø109.1 (104-129.4)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.7 (8.37-23)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø118.7 (111.6-124.9)

运行时间

虽然同类产品的电池容量稍大(84 至 90 Wh,而不是 76 Wh),但 Neo 16 的电池续航时间却毫不逊色。在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的情况下,无线上网时间约为 7.5 小时。相比之下,竞争对手的续航时间在 7 到 9 小时之间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 24min
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
12%
18%
-2%
9%
-15%
WiFi v1.3
444
499
12%
526
18%
435
-2%
483
9%
H.264
1260
692
671
Load
116
73
71
60
Reader / Idle
758

Notebookcheck 总评分

使用 Predator Triton Neo 16 不会有太大问题,因为这款 16 英寸机型没有明显的弱点。不过,其他制造商的竞争也很激烈,有时甚至会抢占先机。

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P - 12/31/2024 v8
Florian Glaser

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 83%
Weight
63 / 10-68 → 91%
Battery
76 / 95 → 80%
Display
86%
Games Performance
80%
Application Performance
86%
AI Performance
86%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 90%
Noise
58 / 90 → 65%
Audio
69%
Camera
42 / 75 → 57%
Average
64%
81%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
84.5%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 评论:为游戏玩家和创作者打造的配备 RTX 4070 的高端笔记本电脑
Florian Glaser, 2024-12-31 (Update: 2024-12-31)