宏碁掠夺者 Triton Neo 16 评论:为游戏玩家和创作者打造的配备 RTX 4070 的高端笔记本电脑
精彩的展示。
我们最近测试的 Nitro V 16 由于显示效果不佳,只给我们留下了有限的印象,而 Predator Triton Neo 16 的表现则要好得多。我们对这款配备 Meteor Lake CPU 和GeForce RTX 4070 的 16 英寸游戏机进行了测试。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 宏碁的 "养眼 "产品
如果您正在寻找一款高品质、时尚的游戏和创作笔记本电脑,那么 Predator Triton Neo 16 可能就是您的最佳选择。宏碁不仅为这款 16 英寸的设备起了一个长得离谱的名字,还为其配备了一个稳定的金属外壳,银灰色的表面几乎不会留下任何指纹痕迹。由于支持 USB 4,它的连接选项也并不寒酸。此外,Neo 16 的画质同样令人印象深刻。其基于 IPS 技术的 165-Hz 屏幕具有良好的亮度水平、高分辨率(3,200 x 2,000 像素)、宽广的色彩空间覆盖范围,而且由于通过了 Calman 认证,色彩准确度也相当可观。
另一方面,它的 GPU 性能却不尽如人意。GeForce RTX 4070 只能发挥出有限的潜在性能,低于我们之前确定的平均水平。此外,维护和升级选项也不多。虽然这款 16 英寸设备有两个 M.2 插槽(其中一个还是空闲的),但它的内存是焊接上去的,因此我们的测试设备所配备的 32 GB 内存可能暂时足够大多数用户使用。总而言之,我们将 Predator Triton Neo 16 评为一款优秀的游戏和创作笔记本电脑。
竞争对手包括其他配备 RTX 4070 的 16 英寸设备,如华硕 ProArt P16 H7606WI、联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9、华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605M 和 Alienware m16 R2,不过这些设备的价格普遍较高。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,088.49 Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... 2. $1,089.00 Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... 3. $2,058.01 acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... List Price: 1900 EUR | 2 kg | 21 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI IPS | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,879.00 HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Pro... 2. $2,239.00 ASUS ProArt P16 Laptop, AMD ... 3. $93.99 20V 10A 200W Laptop Charger ... List Price: 4000€ | 1.8 kg | 17.3 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,099.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt... 2. $38.99 170W Charger Fit for Lenovo ... 3. $38.00 Laptop Keyboard for Lenovo Y... List Price: 2700€ | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Mini-LED | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,888.86 List Price: 3000€ | 1.8 kg | 16.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,899.00 List Price: 1850 USD | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Table of Contents
宏碁为我们的测试配置配备了 Core Ultra 9 185H以及前面提到的 GeForce RTX 4070.它还配备了令人印象深刻的 32 GB LPDDR5X 内存。安装的 NVMe 固态硬盘容量为 1 TB。笔记本电脑的屏幕纵横比为 16:10,操作系统为 Windows 11 Home。它的电池容量为 76 Wh,既不低也不特别大。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
Predator Triton 最大的亮点之一是其优雅美观的外壳。其金属表面给人留下了高品质的印象,由于颜色较浅,几乎不会沾染指纹。除了一些细节问题(触摸板在某些地方会有轻微变形),外壳的稳定性同样出色。宏碁的铰链功能良好,也值得称赞,不过其最大开启角度约为 135°,可以再大一些。另一方面,我们对其制造质量也没有什么可批评的。
16 英寸设备的重量约为 2 千克,介于其竞争对手之间,它们的重量都在 1.8 至 2.5 千克之间。它们的高度和基本尺寸相似:在这方面,宏碁笔记本电脑在中场也很舒适。
连接性
端口
Neo 16 提供多种端口。左侧为电源接口、音频插孔和两个 USB-C 端口(1x USB 4,带 DisplayPort 1.4 和 PowerDelivery),右侧则配备了一个 micro SD 读卡器、两个 USB-A 端口(3.1 Gen 2)、HDMI 2.1 和一个 Kensington 锁开口。即便如此,宏碁还是应该为该设备增加一个 RJ45 端口,以确保其获得非常好的连接性评级。
SD 读卡器
在我们的测试中,笔记本电脑读卡器的速度一般,大约为 90 MB/s。读卡器 Alienware m16和 华硕 ProArt P16在顺序读取方面要好得多。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
交流
它的无线模块名为 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x,在距离参考路由器 1 米的范围测试中,它的表现从发射(传输)到接收(接收)都非常出色。
网络摄像头
与大多数游戏笔记本电脑相比,该设备的 200 万像素网络摄像头稍显清晰,色彩也更准确,但你不能指望它会创造奇迹。摄像头没有盖子,无法保护隐私。
配件
宏碁笔记本电脑配有 230 瓦电源和多份信息宣传单。
维护
底板由 11 颗 Torx 螺钉固定,相当紧凑。机身内部相当整洁、直观。除了无线模块,只有固态硬盘和电池可以拆卸。笔记本电脑的冷却系统(据宏碁称,采用液态金属)由两个风扇和几根热管组成。
可持续性
Acer 在其中一张包装盒贴纸上注明了 "Post Consumer Recycled"(消费后回收)。包装材料主要由纸板组成。笔记本电脑用布袋包装,电源装置用塑料薄膜包装(每种类型都有标签)。
保修
该笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
作为一款橡胶圆顶键盘,它的反馈和键入感都相当不错。宏碁选择了一种相当经典的布局,制造商没有使用数字键盘,只在 "主块 "右侧设置了一列,用于媒体控制和打开 Predator Sense 系统软件。除功能行外,所有按键的大小都比较合理,包括方向箭头。游戏玩家可以期待分为三个区域的多级可调 RGB 灯光。
触摸板
该设备的触摸板尺寸为 15 x 9 厘米,非常宽大,但在我们看来,它还可以更稳定一些,尤其是左键点击时会有明显的屈服感。我们认为它的表面非常光滑。对于手势和多点触控支持,我们也没有什么可批评的。
显示屏
相比之下 Nitro V 16相比之下,Predator Triton Neo 16 不得不使用有限的色彩空间和相对较低的亮度,它拥有高品质的 IPS 面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1090:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.201
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware m16 R2 BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 7% | 2% | 7% | -14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 94.2 | 99.9 6% | 97 3% | 99.9 6% | 71 -25% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.3 | 99.1 16% | 86.6 2% | 96.9 14% | 71.4 -16% |
Response Times | 83% | -137% | 97% | 2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.3 ? | 1.58 ? 87% | 22.2 ? -80% | 0.22 ? 98% | 5.7 ? 54% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.8 ? | 1.25 ? 78% | 17 ? -193% | 0.25 ? 96% | 8.7 ? -50% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 4840 ? | 960 ? | ||
Screen | 11% | 29% | 2% | -2% | |
Brightness middle | 458 | 355 -22% | 651 42% | 416 -9% | 345.8 -24% |
Brightness | 453 | 360 -21% | 673 49% | 418 -8% | 337 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 98 9% | 93 3% | 96 7% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.22 48% | 0.3 29% | ||
Contrast | 1090 | 2959 171% | 1153 6% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.58 | 1.2 24% | 1.9 -20% | 1.6 -1% | 1.99 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.47 | 2.6 25% | 4.2 -21% | 2.1 39% | 3.52 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.77 | 0.6 22% | 0.62 19% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.2 48% | 3 -30% | 2.7 -17% | 2.1 9% |
Gamma | 2.201 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6540 99% | 6526 100% | 6738 96% | 6331 103% | 6369 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
23% | -35% /
-0% | 35% /
20% | -5% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
453 cd/m² 的平均亮度不仅足以满足室内使用,而且根据光线条件,还能满足室外使用。与此同时,它的对比度仅为 1,100:1 不到,这是因为它的黑阶较低(0.42 cd/m²)。在这方面,一些竞争对手的 OLED 面板可以做得更好,其响应时间也是如此(尽管对于 IPS 面板来说,响应时间还算不错)。
另一方面,宏碁笔记本电脑采用低反射表面,在任何亮度下都不会出现闪烁。
Neo 16 的目标是以其宽广的色彩空间吸引专业用户:几乎 100% 的 sRGB 覆盖率、94% 的 DCI-P3 覆盖率和 85% 的 AdobeRGB 覆盖率使这款 16 英寸的新产品成为真正的创作者产品。由于通过了卡尔曼验证,开箱后的色彩看起来已经相当自然。此外,合理的可视角度也为整套产品锦上添花。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
我们的测试版本 PTN16-51-978P 的性能处于(中上)水平。Predator Triton Neo 16 的起价不到 1200 美元。入门级机型配备 WQXGA 显示屏(2,560 x 1,600 像素,240 Hz)、一个 Core Ultra 7 155H, a GeForce RTX 406016GB内存和1TB固态硬盘。
测试条件
用户可以从四种不同的配置文件中进行选择,其中一些在性能和噪音发展方面差异很大。由于在 3D 模式下Turbo模式的噪音非常大(接近 58 分贝),我们在测试中选择了性能模式,该模式的性能略低,但也确保了工作噪音明显降低(尽管仍然很高)。
赛博朋克 2077》循环序列 (FHD/Ultra) | 安静 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
噪音 | 39 dB(A) | 47 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 58 dB(A) |
性能 | 32 fps | 62 fps | 66 fps | 74 fps |
GPU 板功耗 | 最大。53 瓦 | 最大。66 瓦 | 最大。76 瓦 | 最大。116 瓦 |
处理器
Core Ultra 9 185H 是一款功能强大的笔记本电脑处理器,拥有 16 个内核(三种不同的内核类型),通过超线程技术最多可同时处理 22 个线程。在我们的基准测试过程中,CPU 性能与我们之前确定的 Ultra 9 185H 的平均水平大致相当。然而,一些竞争对手的 Ultra 7 155H 往往几乎没有什么表现(Alienware m16 甚至在总分上略微领先)。Cinebench 循环测试还显示,宏碁笔记本电脑的成绩并不特别稳定,而是出现了一些波动。不过,两款英特尔机型在与 AMD 的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI -2! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=19) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=19) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=19) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=19) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=19) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=19) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=19) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=19) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=19) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44547 - 53918, n=19) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
系统性能
系统性能方面没有任何惊喜。PCMark 10 中的 7,443 分对于配备这些组件或属于这种性能级别的设备来说非常典型。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7443 - 7761, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9728 - 11133, n=4) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9067 - 9555, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11369 - 13194, n=4) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1663 - 1917, n=3) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1573 - 1849, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1872 - 2008, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1338 - 1856, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (240 - 295, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (248 - 268, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (494 - 549, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7443 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=19) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=19) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=19) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=19) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
宏碁(Acer)可以改进其延迟。LatencyMon 工具显示的延迟值相当高,但一些竞争对手也是如此。只有 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16保持在 1,000 微秒以下。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
另一方面,Predator Triton 的超快 1 TB SSD(SK Hynix PC801)给人留下了深刻印象。根据我们的性能评级,宏碁笔记本电脑在对比设备中名列前茅。不过,需要指出的是,在长时间负载的情况下,性能波动很大,而竞争对手的情况并非如此(见 DiskSpd 循环)。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 4070 现在让人百感交集。虽然它的基本性能相当可观,但其有限的 8 GB VRAM 在运行要求苛刻的游戏时越来越成为绊脚石(以 夺宝奇兵为例)。此外,宏碁还为 Predator Triton Neo 16 选择了相当适中的 110 瓦 TGP(包括动态升压)(最高可达 140 瓦),这在基准测试中也很明显。在 GPU 测试中,这仅足以确保自己在测试领域中排名最后。有趣的是即使是 华硕 Zephyrus G16的 TGP 也更快(例如,在玩《赛博朋克 2077》时,Neo 16 中 RTX 4070 的功耗在使用性能模式时被限制在最大 76 瓦)。
3DMark 11 Performance | 31196 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 196686 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58960 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23102 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10712 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=36) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 141.6, n=61) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=62) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 173.4 | 166.4 | 104.6 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 169.6 | 150.5 | 144.3 | 135.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 132.4 | 99.7 | ||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 130.8 | 116.5 | 89.2 | |||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 108.4 | 94.8 | 91.1 | 65 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 93.9 | 80.1 | 69.1 | 42.3 | ||
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 53.2 | 39.3 | 42.2 | 27.1 | ||
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 44.9 | 40.8 | 34.4 | 34.1 | 23.3 | |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 74.4 | 72.8 | 67.9 | 65.1 | 48.2 | |
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 68.2 | 59 | 54.3 | 53.9 | 37.6 | |
Until Dawn (2024) | 83.7 | 58.9 | 44.9 | 41.5 | 32.9 | |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 105 | 81 | 76 | 65 | 60 | |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 57.1 | 49.7 | 42.3 | 58.3 | 31.7 |
与 CPU 和固态硬盘性能相比,笔记本电脑的 GPU 速度似乎相当稳定。在 30 分钟的测试中,我们使用 赛博朋克 2077的 30 分钟测试中,我们没有测到明显的 FPS 下降或类似情况。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
排放量
噪音排放
宏碁还可以修改风扇控制。在 "性能模式 "下,Neo 16 即使在空转时也会有相当明显的噪音(32 至 34 分贝),偶尔还会达到 40 分贝(A)。而同类产品通常要安静得多。我们注意到,在负载情况下,噪音约为 50 分贝(A),这在没有耳机的情况下非常明显,可能会令人讨厌。不过,竞争对手在这种情况下也能达到类似甚至更高的数值。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32 / 34 / 40 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 14% | 18% | 16% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 24.4 -2% | 24.3 -1% | 23.9 -0% | 24.7 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 24.4 24% | 24.3 24% | 23.9 25% | 25.3 21% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 27.7 19% | 24.3 29% | 27.8 18% | 25.3 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 32.3 19% | 25.8 35% | 30.1 25% | 25.3 37% |
Load Average * | 48 | 42.2 12% | 48.1 -0% | 34.2 29% | 31.7 34% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50 | 53.2 -6% | |||
Load Maximum * | 51 | 53.2 -4% | 53.9 -6% | 46.4 9% | 62 -22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.7 | 46.4 | 53.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在温度方面,宏碁的分支产品也毫不逊色。对于 RTX 4070 设备来说,顶部最高温度为 46 °C,底部最高温度为 48 °C。在闲置模式下,机箱温度保持在 30 °C以下,因此可以保持良好的散热效果。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 6% | -5% | -20% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 46.9 -2% | 41.7 9% | 50.3 -9% | 44.8 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 50.9 -6% | 46.3 4% | 48 -0% | 48 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 28.9 -7% | 26.2 3% | 28.8 -7% | 37.2 -38% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 30 -3% | 27.2 6% | 29.8 -3% | 42 -45% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中,以及在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,CPU 和 GPU 的发热温度都在 70 °C 左右,属于中等水平。
发言人
笔记本电脑的音质属于中档。除了低音,中高音也需要更强劲、更精确。另一方面,这款 16 英寸设备的扬声器最大音量高达 86 dB(A)。
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
由于采用了集成显卡开关,Predator Triton 在闲置时的功耗相当低--我们测得的功耗为 10 至 23 瓦,远低于游戏平均功耗。在负载情况下,宏碁笔记本电脑的功耗在 80 到 206 瓦之间,这意味着 230 瓦的电源在任何时候都不会超负荷。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 10 / 15 / 23 Watt |
Load |
80 / 206 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | -10% | 21% | -13% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10 | 8 20% | 10.3 -3% | 8.3 17% | 8.1 19% | 13.6 ? -36% |
Idle Average * | 15 | 9.9 34% | 21.9 -46% | 12.5 17% | 13 13% | 19 ? -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 11.6 50% | 22.4 3% | 12.8 44% | 40.3 -75% | 26.9 ? -17% |
Load Average * | 80 | 76.9 4% | 96.9 -21% | 71.3 11% | 79 1% | 106.1 ? -33% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 122 | 157.7 -29% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 118.7 | 156.6 -32% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 206 | 212.6 -3% | 173.8 16% | 169.1 18% | 254.9 -24% | 250 ? -21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 159.6 | 127.5 | 188.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
虽然同类产品的电池容量稍大(84 至 90 Wh,而不是 76 Wh),但 Neo 16 的电池续航时间却毫不逊色。在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的情况下,无线上网时间约为 7.5 小时。相比之下,竞争对手的续航时间在 7 到 9 小时之间。
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | 18% | -2% | 9% | -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 444 | 499 12% | 526 18% | 435 -2% | 483 9% | 378 ? -15% |
H.264 | 1260 | 692 | 671 | 413 ? | ||
Load | 116 | 73 | 71 | 60 | 85.8 ? | |
Reader / Idle | 758 | 574 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
使用 Predator Triton Neo 16 不会有太大问题,因为这款 16 英寸机型没有明显的弱点。不过,其他制造商的竞争也很激烈,有时甚至会抢占先机。
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
- 12/31/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.