
华硕 V16 V3607V 笔记本电脑评测: GeForce 无需破费的 RTX 显卡
酷睿 7 240H 性能首次亮相。
只要你知道哪些地方存在偷工减料的情况,华硕 V16 就能成为一个可靠的万用解决方案,在大多数家庭、办公室或教室场景下都能表现出色。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 功能齐全,价格低廉
随着 Vivobook 系列价格的不断攀升,V16 作为新的低端选择被推出,供预算紧张的用户选择。V16 很好地满足了这个约 1000 美元的空间,它平衡了全新的、速度适中的 CPU 和独立的 RTX GPU,设计相当轻薄便携,可与 惠普Pavilion Plus 16 或更重的戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640.
尽管如此,我们还是能感觉到一些偷工减料的地方。例如,显示屏的色彩覆盖面较窄,而塑料机箱给人的感觉相当廉价。前面提到的惠普感觉更强,它甚至能提供大于 99% 的 sRGB 色彩,尽管价格比华硕高。
截至目前,RTX 4050 配置的售价比 RTX 3050 配置高出 100 美元。潜在买家可能会考虑 RTX 4050 选项,因为它的图形性能比 RTX 3050 快 50%以上。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
V16 不会与 VivoBook 16 混淆,它是华硕的经济型多媒体机型,起售价甚至低于 VivoBook 系列。它缺少 VivoBook 上的某些豪华功能,如 OLED 和吸引人的金属设计。2025 V16 配备了新的中高端酷睿 7 240H。
我们的测试机配备了上述 CPU、1200p 144 Hz IPS 显示屏和较旧的 6 GBGeForce RTX 3050,以将价格控制在 1000 美元以内。其他 SKU 可能会配备 RTX 4050。
V16 的替代品包括其他配备独立 GPU 的预算多媒体笔记本电脑,如HPPavilion Plus 16,Dell Inspiron 16 Plus, 或Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 。
更多华硕评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳 - 黑色单色塑料
机身是毫无保留的塑料材质,甚至包括外盖,而制造商通常会使用金属材质来获得更好的第一印象。底座和盖子容易扭曲,而且极易留下难看的指纹。
连接性
USB-C 端口不支持 Thunderbolt,这与价格更高的 VivoBook Pro 16不同,它集成了更多的端口。令人讨厌的是,V16 使用的交流适配器线缆也与 VivoBook 系列不同。
交流
可拆卸的 Realtek RTL8852BE 标配 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7。
网络摄像头
标配带物理快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头。为了节约成本,没有红外摄像头。

可持续性
华硕的目标是实现碳中和,但除此之外并没有提供有关 V16 制造过程的具体信息。零售包装主要是纸和纸板,很少有塑料包装。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商提供为期一年的保修服务。
输入设备 - VivoBook Vibes
键盘
无论好坏,V16 都采用了 VivoBook 16 系列的键盘。键盘的键程和回馈力度本可以更深更强,但它的功能足够可靠,无需花更多钱购买键盘更好的替代品,如 ThinkPad T 系列 或 精英本.
触摸板
点击板的尺寸较大,为 15 x 10 厘米,而戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 的尺寸仅为 11.5 x 8 厘米。 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640.遗憾的是,反馈非常柔和、安静。按下时所需的力度也比其他大多数笔记本电脑大,用不了多久就会感到不舒服。
显示屏 - 标准配置为 144 赫兹
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 313.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 627:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2.63
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
42.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Asus V16 V3607V MNG007QX2-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx AU Optronics AUOFDA4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 112% | 78% | 2% | 76% | 115% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.9 | 98.7 141% | 76 86% | 41.6 2% | 74.6 82% | 99.9 144% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.7 | 99.7 67% | 99.8 67% | 61.2 3% | 99 66% | 100 68% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.2 | 96.5 129% | 76.7 82% | 43 2% | 76.5 81% | 98 132% |
Response Times | 58% | -11% | 9% | 59% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.9 ? | 0.68 ? 97% | 25.6 ? -12% | 18.4 ? 20% | 9.06 ? 60% | 0.4 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 16.1 ? | 13.2 ? 18% | 17.6 ? -9% | 16.5 ? -2% | 6.7 ? 58% | 0.6 ? 96% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 120 ? | ||||
Screen | 26% | 45% | -7% | 36% | 7243% | |
Brightness middle | 313.3 | 353 13% | 314.7 0% | 321.2 3% | 403 29% | 407 30% |
Brightness | 298 | 354 19% | 291 -2% | 319 7% | 394 32% | 405 36% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 98 11% | 89 1% | 92 5% | 90 2% | 98 11% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.28 44% | 0.37 26% | 0.34 32% | 0.001 100% | |
Contrast | 627 | 1124 79% | 868 38% | 1185 89% | 407000 64812% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 4.23 31% | 1.62 73% | 8.7 -43% | 3.13 49% | 2.27 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.31 | 7.13 63% | 2.94 85% | 19.85 -3% | 6.14 68% | 4.46 77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.63 | 2.42 8% | 1.08 59% | 1.82 31% | 1.65 37% | 2.17 17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 2.5 39% | 1.3 68% | 9.2 -124% | 4.5 -10% | 2.3 44% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.4 92% | 2.26 97% | 2.83 78% | 2.18 101% | 2.231 99% |
CCT | 6031 108% | 6642 98% | 6385 102% | 6200 105% | 6261 104% | 6443 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 65% /
53% | 37% /
44% | 1% /
-3% | 57% /
48% | 2485% /
4695% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.2 ms rise | |
↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8556 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 无明显改善
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为 "性能模式",将 MyAsus 设置为 "性能模式 "和 "优化模式"。独立 GPU 可以完全禁用,无需重启。
处理器
核心 7 240H 酷睿 7 240H 酷睿 7 240H 的性能与酷睿 Ultra 155H 类似,只是没有集成 NPU 以节省成本。经济型游戏玩家或编辑的目标受众甚至不太可能需要或使用 NPU。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1! | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (11285 - 12846, n=2) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (2646 - 2648, n=2) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G5 IRX 21N50011GE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) |
压力测试
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 55 | 53 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.1 | -- | 78 | 63 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.9 | 1035 | 73 | 69 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能模式) | 0.9 | 1612 | 71 | 70 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 0.9 | 1402 | 67 | 65 |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6624 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average Intel Core 7 240H (n=1) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
......(英文 GeForce RTX 3050 比 RTX 2050或比 RTX 4050.需要注意的是,华硕出货的 RTX 3050 是更好的 6GB 版本,而不是 4 GB 版本.
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理分数 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 11986 | 27077 | 4071 |
平衡模式 | 11317 (-6%) | 28246 (-0%) | 3842 (-6%) |
电池电量 | 9900 (-17%) | 20557 (-24%) | 3573 (-12%) |
在平衡模式下运行会对图形性能造成轻微影响,而电池模式则会进一步降低性能,如我们上面的Fire Strike 结果表所示。
3DMark 11 Performance | 16644 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10790 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5033 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
RTX 3050 可能已经过时,但它仍然足够强大,可以在原生 1080p 或 1200p 分辨率下运行《赛博朋克 2077》等要求苛刻的游戏,大多数设置为 "高"。
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (198 - 236, n=3) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (110.9 - 163.5, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (106.1 - 151.5, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (85.5 - 109.7, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (30.7 - 34, n=4) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (105.6 - 113.3, n=2) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (84.7 - 89.7, n=2) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (55.9 - 59.2, n=2) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (44.3 - 46.4, n=2) | |
Asus V16 V3607V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.2 | 178.4 | 127.3 | 63.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 181.4 | 161.2 | 146.8 | 135.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 126.5 | 67.6 | 49.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 96.3 | 89.3 | 78.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 149 | 85 | 78 | 74 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 246 | 106.9 | 88.4 | 77 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 105.6 | 84.7 | 55.9 | 44.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 149.9 | 138.9 | 102 | 31.6 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 59.7 | 50.3 | 45.4 | 44.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 66.7 | 51.4 | 42.7 | 36.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 51 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus V16 V3607V GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Core 7 240H | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Radeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 5% | 18% | 9% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 20.96 10% | 23.8 -2% | 23.1 1% | 22.22 5% | 25 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 25.28 -8% | 24.2 -3% | 23.1 2% | 22.22 5% | 26 -11% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 25.28 -7% | 24.2 -2% | 23.1 3% | 22.22 6% | 29 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 25.28 -7% | 24.2 -2% | 23.1 3% | 22.22 6% | 39 -65% |
Load Average * | 48 | 51.88 -8% | 28.9 40% | 23.2 52% | 42.03 12% | 45 6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.5 | 29.2 28% | 43 -6% | |||
Load Maximum * | 51 | 51.8 -2% | 51 -0% | 32.6 36% | 42.1 17% | 45 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 51 | 42.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21.8 °C / 71.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+7 °C / 12.6 F).
Asus V16 V3607V Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -30% | -13% | 7% | -28% | -24% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.2 | 42.6 -3% | 43.4 -5% | 33.2 19% | 49.6 -20% | 48 -17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 34.4 | 48.4 -41% | 41.6 -21% | 41.2 -20% | 45.8 -33% | 60 -74% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.8 | 39.4 -37% | 32.8 -14% | 23.4 19% | 39.2 -36% | 28 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 39.8 -37% | 32.4 -12% | 26.6 8% | 35.4 -22% | 31 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus V16 V3607V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -247% | -22% | 18% | -13% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 21.06 -903% | 4.2 -100% | 4.3 -105% | 3.3 -57% | 8 -281% |
Idle Average * | 7.2 | 24.27 -237% | 6.9 4% | 8.9 -24% | 7.3 -1% | 10 -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 25.12 -135% | 15.2 -42% | 9.1 15% | 14.24 -33% | 15 -40% |
Load Average * | 99.4 | 52.4 47% | 70.4 29% | 31.7 68% | 91.7 8% | 42 58% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 88.7 | 35.2 60% | 42.8 52% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 92.1 | 39.4 57% | 44.4 52% | |||
Load Maximum * | 137.8 | 146 -6% | 137.4 -0% | 66.7 52% | 115.8 16% | 49 64% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 110.2 | 115.9 | 96.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管电池容量为 63 Wh,但 WLAN 实际浏览时间却达到了近 9 小时。测试是在 dGPU 未激活和生态/平衡模式下进行的。
Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | 48% | -2% | 16% | -46% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 539 | 606 12% | 799 48% | 528 -2% | 624 16% | 290 -46% |
H.264 | 585 | 720 | ||||
Reader / Idle | 1150 | |||||
Load | 79 |
笔记本检查评级
Asus V16 V3607V
- 03/19/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus V16 V3607V Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 900 USD | 2 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,199.99 ASUS Vivobook Pro 16X Laptop... 2. $41.99 JUYOON 20V 7.5A Charger for ... 3. $39.99 150W 4.5mm Tip AC Charger fo... List Price: 2199 EUR | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,299.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $772.20 List Price: 750 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,089.99 HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap... 2. $29.99 200W 150W 135W AC Charger Fo... 3. $50.99 Power4Laptops 5 Volt Version... List Price: 1350 USD | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $219.89 HOULISE Replacement for Acer... List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.