联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 评测:90 WGeForce RTX 4050 几乎与 RTX 4060 不相上下
在最近评测了更便宜的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMHiGPU 和 IPS 配置之后,我们现在准备来看看价格更高的 dGPU 和 OLED 配置。我们的特定测试机配备了高端选件,包括零售价为 1500 美元的流星湖酷睿 9 185H。它也是为数不多的配备 90 WGeForce RTX 4050 的超薄多媒体笔记本电脑之一,因为该类别中的大多数其他产品通常以较低的 TGP 上限为目标。
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 有别于旗舰产品 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9.例如,后者提供迷你 LED 和 RTX 4070 选项,而 IdeaPad 没有这些选项。
IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH 的替代产品包括其他中高端 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1, 华硕 Zenbook S16, 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra或 惠普 Envy 系列.我们建议您查看我们对 iGPU IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 的现有评测,以了解有关该机型物理特性的更多信息。该机型还有一个较小的 14 英寸版本,称为 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G9.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.7 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.95 mm | 16.00" | 2048x1280 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
案例
机箱左侧边缘有一个专用的交流适配器端口,便于从视觉上区分 iGPU 和 dGPU 配置。GPU 和 OLED 面板增加了约 100 克的总重量,因此我们的设备并不比 iGPU 基本配置重多少。其他方面的尺寸、设计和材料均保持不变。
连接性
我们的 dGPU 配置支持通用 USB-C 充电和专有 AC 适配器充电,而 iGPU 配置仅支持前者。要为酷睿 Ultra H CPU 和 90 W Nvidia 独立显卡供电,就必须使用桶装交流适配器,而不必采用较低的 50 W TGP 上限,这也是三星在其Galaxy Book4 Ultra 上采用的方法。
其他端口选项与 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1但比三星提供的更多。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
英特尔 AX211 标配支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。与我们的 AXE11000 测试路由器配对时,传输速率稳定在 1 Gbps 以上。
网络摄像头
200 万像素网络摄像头标配红外和物理快门,可保护个人隐私。
维护
底部面板由九颗 Torx 螺钉固定,维修相对方便。尽管硬件要求更高,但冷却解决方案与 iGPU 版本保持不变,这意味着我们可以预期噪音会更大,平均温度会更高。
可持续性
底盖由 50% 的回收铝制成,而包装中的塑料则由 90% 的海洋来源制成。我们还非常感谢官方维修指南可直接从联想免费下载。
配件和保修
零售包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买,通常适用一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
与 ThinkPad 机型的键盘相比,IdeaPad 机型的键盘较浅,反馈较弱。虽然可以使用,但打字体验肯定比联想最好的产品要差一些,即使是 1500 美元的高端配置,也更接近廉价系统。
显示屏--从 IPS 到 OLED
有以下两种显示选项:
- 2560 x 1600,IPS,120 赫兹,非触摸式
- 2048 x 1280,OLED,120 赫兹,触摸式
与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同的是,OLED 显示屏并不一定比 IPS 显示屏更好,因为它可以用更高的原始分辨率换取更深的色彩和更好的 HDR 支持。如果你的工作负载主要是电子表格或窗口多任务处理,那么分辨率更高的 IPS 面板会更有效率。而对于视频播放或视频编辑等任务,OLED 的深色和暗色对比则能提升体验。
尽管如此,1280p 的分辨率还是低于其他 16 英寸笔记本电脑,如 华硕 Zenbook S 16Envy x360 2-in-1 16 或Galaxy Book4 Ultra 都配备了 1800p OLED 面板。这很可能是有意为之,以鼓励购物者考虑更高端的 Yoga Pro 9 16 G9 系列但这仍然使 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 与其直接竞争对手相比吸引力稍逊一筹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 367.6 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 LEN1602K, OLED, 2048x1280, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -25% | -2% | -1% | -0% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 63.3 -37% | 99.4 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 98.6 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 95.2 -5% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.8 | 65.3 -33% | 92.5 -5% | 95.6 -2% | 96.5 -1% | 88.5 -10% |
Response Times | -1708% | -2489% | 46% | 26% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.58 ? | 15 ? -2486% | 15.4 ? -2555% | 0.56 ? 3% | 0.8 ? -38% | 0.54 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 10.3 ? -930% | 60.6 ? -5960% | 0.65 ? 35% | 0.89 ? 11% | 0.69 ? 31% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 2753.7 ? 1047% | 480 100% | 491.8 ? 105% | 240 ? 0% | |
Screen | -14% | -21% | 43% | 10% | 20% | |
Brightness middle | 367.6 | 368 0% | 413 12% | 407 11% | 399.4 9% | 390 6% |
Brightness | 371 | 368 -1% | 409 10% | 405 9% | 405 9% | 393 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 98 0% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.02 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.31 | 2.4 44% | 3.48 19% | 0.6 86% | 4.05 6% | 1.4 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.85 | 6.5 5% | 6.97 -2% | 1.2 82% | 6.69 2% | 2.7 61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 0.8 28% | 1.02 8% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.5 -165% | 4.5 -165% | 0.5 71% | 1.1 35% | 2.1 -24% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6272 104% | 6324 103% | 6446 101% | 6453 101% | 6419 101% | 6431 101% |
Contrast | 1187 | 2950 | 20350 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -582% /
-299% | -837% /
-633% | 29% /
33% | 12% /
11% | 10% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然出厂时未进行校准,但显示屏对 P3 标准的准确度相当高,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别为 1.7 和 4.31。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.56 ms rise | |
↘ 0.44 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.28 ms rise | |
↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 38 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
240 Hz 的脉宽调制频率在所有亮度水平下均可检测到,并且始终如一。
OLED 选项并不一定比 IPS 选项更适合户外观看,因为它们的最大亮度水平差不多。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是 OLED 配置由于采用了亮面覆盖层,而 IPS 配置则采用了哑面覆盖层以减少眩光,因此效果更差。
性能 - Core Ultra 9 功能强大
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和联想 Vantage 都设置为性能模式。仅支持 Optimus 1.0,不支持 G-Sync、MUX 或 Windows VRR 选项。
处理器
有三种 Meteor Lake CPU 可供选择: Core Ultra 5 125H, Core Ultra 7 155H和 Core Ultra 9 185H.从酷睿 Ultra 5 跳转到酷睿 Ultra 7 可大幅提升 80% 的性能,而从酷睿 Ultra 7 跳转到酷睿 Ultra 9 只能再提升 5% 到 10%,这在大多数使用场景中几乎是无法察觉的。因此,除非你想不惜一切代价获得最好中的最好,否则酷睿至尊 7 对绝大多数用户来说就足够了,尤其是它的速度仍然快于这一尺寸类别中的大多数其他选择。
原始性能领先于竞争对手 AMD CPU,包括 Ryzen 7 8840HS和最新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.Raptor Lake Core i7 HX 系列的速度甚至更快,但这些 CPU 缺少集成的 NPU,无法加速兼容的 AI 任务。请注意,Co-Pilot Plus 与 Meteor Lake 处理器不兼容。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=17) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=17) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=17) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 的主频将升至 3.2 GHz,功耗为 81 W,温度为 94 C。一分钟左右后,CPU 会降至 2.8 GHz、65 W,以保持 87 C 的稍低核心温度。80 C 的高温度范围仍然很高,这表明如果机箱稍大一些并采用更强的冷却解决方案,CPU 的性能可能会更快。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,GPU 的频率稳定在 2595 MHz,温度为 82 C,功率为 80 W,这代表了典型的游戏负载,而 Spectre x360 16 的温度仅为 71 C 和 75 C。 Spectre x360 16或 联想 LOQ 15的温度分别为 71 C 和 75 C。考虑到纤薄的机身设计、酷睿 Ultra H 系列 CPU 和相对较高的 90 W TGP 目标值,运行温度普遍较高也就不足为奇了。
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 | 40 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.9 | -- | 87 | 61 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.5 | 2295 - 2550 | 84 | 80 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.3 | 2580 | 81 | 82 |
系统性能
PCMark 的结果与其他集成显卡速度较慢的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑一致。PCMark 10 基准通常无法区分 dGPU 和 iGPU 笔记本电脑,尤其是在不支持 MUX 的情况下。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (7431 - 7846, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10672 - 10807, n=2) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9717 - 9986, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10607 - 12301, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1790 - 1811, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1717, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (2037 - 2038, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1419 - 1493, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (293 - 301, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (268 - 271, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (498 - 512, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7431 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=17) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题和不完美的 60 FPS 4K 视频回放。我们能在一分钟的时间跨度内记录到 20 个丢帧,这些丢帧在流式视频时表现为丢帧。这种情况令人失望,因为我们的 iGPU 配置相比之下不会出现丢帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
系统随附相同的 三星 PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB硬盘。有趣的是,它也表现出相同的传输速率特性,在我们的 DiskSpd 循环测试中,几分钟后性能就会从 5100 MB/s 跃升至 6100 MB/s。大多数其他硬盘,如 Galaxy Book4 Ultra则从头到尾保持稳定。
主固态硬盘配有散热垫,可帮助下面的金属盖散热。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU 性能 - 90 W 的差异
90 瓦 GeForce RTX 4050GPU 的 TGP 上限比许多采用相同 GPU 的其他非游戏笔记本电脑更高。Spectre x360 16 的 RTX 4050 和 三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16为例,其 TGP 值较低,分别只有 55 W 和 60 W。因此,IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 的 GPU 比我们数据库中采用相同 RTX 4050 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑快 10%。这一差距足以持续超越同类产品中 70 W RTX 4060 的性能。 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640的性能。
从旧版 GeForce RTX 3050的用户,可以期待 RTX 4050 在性能上有 70% 至 80% 的显著提升。如果从集成的 集成的 Arc 8配置。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 23210 | 30448 | 9741 |
均衡模式 | 21032 (-9%) | 30008 (-1%) | 8158 (-16%) |
电池电量 | 19718 (-15%) | 30484 (-0%) | 8216 (-16%) |
根据Fire Strike 上的结果表,在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行,图形性能最多会受到 10% 的影响,而 CPU 性能则相对保持不变。使用电池供电对处理器性能的影响没有我们最初预期的那么大。
3DMark 11 Performance | 27986 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 60960 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21049 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8963 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1873 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然不是明确的游戏笔记本电脑,但 90 W RTX 4050 使联想能够比预期更好地运行游戏。事实上,《最终幻想 15》、《赛博朋克 2077》、《小蒂娜的仙境》等游戏的运行速度比采用相同 RTX 4050 GPU的惠普 Spectre x360 16 快了 25% 到 30%。我们的系统还超越了 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640及其 70 W RTX 4060 GPU,正如上述 3DMark 分数所预测的那样。在这种情况下,与 1600p IPS 面板相比,OLED 面板较低的原始分辨率有利于获得更流畅的游戏体验。
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 183 | 178.4 | 166.9 | 98.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 167.2 | 151.9 | 145.9 | 137.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 171.3 | 123.3 | 87.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 127.7 | 114.1 | 89 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 155 | 129 | 120 | 113 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 411 | 204 | 172.9 | 149.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 181.6 | 149.2 | 96 | 74 |
F1 22 (2022) | 211 | 204 | 156.6 | 54.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 110.1 | 91.4 | 81.3 | 78.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 103.1 | 82.2 | 69.4 | 59.8 |
排放 - 负载时声音大且发热
系统噪音
在运行浏览器或 Word 等要求不高的负载时,风扇噪音保持安静,没有恼人的脉冲或尖峰现象。在运行3DMark 06 等较重负载时,风扇噪音在第一个基准测试场景的大部分时间里都稳定在 26 分贝(A)左右,最终上升到接近 46 分贝(A),与我们在 iGPU 配置上记录到的噪音相近。
游戏时,风扇噪音最高略高于 48 dB(A),比 iGPU 配置的噪音大几个分贝。这也比同类 16 英寸笔记本电脑的噪音要大得多,包括 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 或三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra。因此,dGPU 选项的声音并不一定比 iGPU 选项大,除非你开始引入要求更高的负载。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.7 / 48.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 1% | 5% | 10% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 24.7 -7% | 22.9 -0% | 24.2 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 22.9 -0% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 24.1 -3% | 22.9 2% | 24.7 -6% | 23 1% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 28.2 -21% | 25 -7% | 26.4 -13% | 23 1% | 24.2 -4% |
Load Average * | 45.7 | 44.4 3% | 45.1 1% | 35.7 22% | 23.8 48% | 37.9 17% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.4 | 44.9 7% | 36.8 24% | |||
Load Maximum * | 48.4 | 44.4 8% | 44.9 7% | 36.8 24% | 43.8 10% | 41.7 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.5 | 43.8 | 41.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在空闲状态下,表面温度也明显比 iGPU 配置高出几度以上。游戏时,键盘和底面的热点温度分别高达 42 摄氏度和 52 摄氏度,而 iGPU 版本仅为 32 摄氏度和 38 摄氏度。值得庆幸的是,热点位于键盘中心,但为了获得最佳的气流,你肯定希望尽可能在平整的桌面上运行高负荷运行。
该系统的运行温度高于Galaxy Book4 Ultra ,尽管两款机型都配备了类似的酷睿 Ultra H CPU 和GeForce RTX 选项。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.4 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 28% | 11% | 10% | 18% | 28% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.2 | 36.3 25% | 46.8 3% | 46.9 3% | 42.6 12% | 38.5 20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 59.4 | 39.1 34% | 45.6 23% | 53.5 10% | 47.8 20% | 41.2 31% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.2 | 24.9 27% | 32.2 6% | 29.5 14% | 27.4 20% | 23.5 31% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.8 | 26.1 25% | 31.4 10% | 30.2 13% | 27.8 20% | 24.1 31% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
主要由于 OLED 面板的缘故,台式机闲置时的功耗高达 15 瓦,而 iGPU 配置的功耗仅为 10 瓦。在运行游戏等高负荷负载时,功率差距会更大,达到 70 瓦到 80 瓦。值得注意的是,我们的 RTX 4050 GPU 在运行游戏时的功耗略高于 80 W,而 iGPU 仅为 ~50 W。 Galaxy Book4 Ultra因此,联想的整体功耗明显更高,几乎等同于入门级游戏笔记本电脑。
当 CPU 和 GPU 的使用率达到 100%时,我们可以通过中等尺寸(约 15 x 7.8 x 2.2 厘米)的 170 W AC 适配器记录到 172 W 的临时最大功耗。在游戏时,耗电量将徘徊在 140 W 以下,因此在需要时,系统仍能以适当的速度同时充电。我们很高兴看到联想系统支持桶式交流充电,而不仅仅是 USB-C,因为后者较低的功率会严重影响性能。例如,Galaxy Book4 Ultra 仅支持 USB-C 充电,但由于我们的功率上限较高,因此联想的性能始终优于三星。
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.14 Watt |
Idle | 5.6 / 7.3 / 14.6 Watt |
Load |
86.3 / 172 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2048x1280, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | 11% | 32% | 26% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 3.5 37% | 6.1 -9% | 5.4 4% | 5 11% | 4.8 14% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 9.6 -32% | 13.5 -85% | 10.5 -44% | 6.2 15% | 7.5 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.6 | 9.9 32% | 13.8 5% | 10.9 25% | 14.7 -1% | 7.9 46% |
Load Average * | 86.3 | 62.7 27% | 63.6 26% | 47.8 45% | 49.9 42% | 79.3 8% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 135.8 | 64.6 52% | 46.7 66% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 136.4 | 67 51% | 49.2 64% | |||
Load Maximum * | 172 | 101.2 41% | 109.7 36% | 58.6 66% | 65 62% | 125 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.8 | 54.5 | 79.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
由于上文提到的原因,运行时间预计会比 IPS iGPU 配置短。即便如此,10.5 小时的实际 WLAN 浏览时间仍然相当长,可与 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1 或 Zenbook S 16.
从空电到满电的充电时间约为 60 分钟,与大多数其他超极本的 90 分钟相比,充电速度非常快。使用 USB-C AC 适配器充电会慢一些。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | 30% | 57% | 25% | 30% | |
Reader / Idle | 1338 | 1310 -2% | 935 -30% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 639 | 756 18% | 686 7% | 640 0% | 459 -28% | 656 3% |
Load | 50 | 68 36% | 93 86% | 107 114% | 116 132% | 78 56% |
H.264 | 957 | 1204 | 1076 |
Pros
Cons
结论--1500 美元的价格非常均衡
低端 iGPU 配置是一款值得尊敬的多媒体设备,而高端 dGPU 配置则是一款边缘游戏设备。其 90 WGeForce RTX 4050 图形处理器的速度比大多数其他多媒体笔记本电脑都要快,如 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra甚至可以与许多采用 RTX 4060 显卡的入门级游戏笔记本电脑(如Legion LOQ)相媲美。考虑到轻薄的外形和沉闷的办公风格设计,该系统的性能相当强劲。
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 的 90 WGeForce RTX 4050 GPU 在完全配置后比它看起来更快。
与低端 iGPU 选项和 16 英寸领域的大多数竞争对手相比,在如此轻薄的机身中实现如此高性能的代价是更短的电池续航时间、更大的风扇噪音和更高的温度。联想本可以采用较慢的 50 瓦 GPU 来减轻这些弊端,但实际上我们喜欢他们采用较高的 90 瓦上限,以更好地将 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 与竞争对手区分开来。它在办公方面的表现并不像 ThinkPad T16或游戏方面的优势。 Legion Pro 5 16一样出色,但它在这两方面的表现都好于平均水平,是一款不错的全能解决方案。
价格和供应情况
好市多现已出货联想 IdeaPad Pro 5i 16 配置酷睿超 9 185H 和 RTX 4050,限时促销期间售价为 1500 美元或 1350 美元。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050
- 09/08/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.