联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 笔记本电脑评测:大屏幕、大电池,但性能一般
生产力怪物
联想 ThinkPad T16 G3 是办公室里的大块头:它配备了 16 英寸屏幕、数字键盘和 86 Wh 大容量电池,旨在提高人们的工作效率。遗憾的是,这款联想笔记本电脑的性能并没有达到我们的预期。Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论:T16 不如较小的 T14
虽然较小的 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 是一款出色的小型商务笔记本电脑,但较大的联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 却让我们倍感沮丧。作为一款 16 英寸的笔记本电脑,它的性能实在令人失望,尽管电池容量很大,但电池续航时间只能算不错,并不出色。T16 只是缺乏突出的功能。真正让它与众不同的是用户可更换键盘和 RJ45 以太网端口。缺少 AMD CPU 选项尤其令人沮丧。
但这并不意味着 ThinkPad T16 G3 是一款糟糕的办公笔记本电脑,恰恰相反,它拥有丰富的安全功能、数字键盘和酷炫的机身,对于任何对性能要求不高的企业来说都是一个不错的选择。不过,如果采用不同的处理器,这款笔记本的性能可能会更好,因为英特尔酷睿 Ultra 系列 1 在性能和效率方面的表现都不尽如人意。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们测试的联想ThinkPad T16 Gen 3配置在Lenovo.com上的售价约为1845美元。亚马逊提供的配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘的入门级版本售价为 1,269 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,067.77 List Price: 1800 Euro | 2 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,059.99 List Price: 1799 Euro | 1.8 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $799.00 List Price: 1504 Euro | 1.9 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,029.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | List Price: 1699 Euro | 1.6 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI AMOLED |
联想的 ThinkPad T 系列笔记本电脑多年来一直有两种尺寸可供选择。过去的选择是 14 英寸和 15 英寸两种型号。不过,自 2022 年起,更大的型号已改为新的 16 英寸 16:10 格式,即 ThinkPad T16 1 代取代了 ThinkPad T15 Gen 2.随着我们今天评测的新款联想ThinkPad T16 Gen 3的推出,新系列的寿命已经超过了T15系列。
与更小的型号相比,ThinkPad T16有何特别之处?首先,它拥有更宽敞的屏幕,还有专用的数字键盘。此外,更大的机身可以容纳更大的电池。它是大公司员工的理想生产力机器,至少联想是这样承诺的。这款全新的 T16 Gen 3 版本完全采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra Series 1(又称流星湖)处理器,这与之前的 联想ThinkPad T16 Gen 2不同的是,没有 AMD 可供选择。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳塑料 ThinkPad 外加镁合金外壳
就像较小的 联想 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5联想对 ThinkPad T16 G3 的设计进行了全面改造,联想称之为 "整张纸的重新设计"。这意味着联想是在一张白纸上开始设计的,而不是在前代产品的基础上进行设计。
当然,既然是 ThinkPad 系列,联想就不会偏离屡试不爽的配方太多。ThinkPad T16 依然采用全黑色机身,机盖上有一些红色点缀和银色的联想标志。与 ThinkPad T16 2 代相比,ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 采用了深色涂装,铰链和 ThinkPad 徽标均为黑色,使笔记本电脑看起来更加 "隐秘"。
此外,联想还在 T16 上采用了与目前大多数 2024 ThinkPad 相同的摄像头凸起设计--这是已停产的 ThinkPad Z 系列首创的设计特征。这一设计特质无疑使 ThinkPad 在外观上更能在竞争中脱颖而出。至于喜欢还是不喜欢,那就是个人品味的问题了。
机箱质量并非品味问题。总体而言,这款产品的结构非常坚固,厚实的强化塑料底座通过内部的镁合金框架得到进一步加强。屏幕和底座都不会轻易扭曲。遗憾的是,我们的设备在键盘稳定性方面存在问题。键盘右侧的数字键盘周围在打字时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。如果组装不当,这可能只是我们这台设备的特有问题,但还是令人失望。
机身上的黑色油漆给人一种光滑如桃的感觉。遗憾的是,它和大多数黑色笔记本电脑一样,也有同样的问题:它很容易沾染灰尘和油渍。如果你希望联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 看起来整洁美观,可以随身携带一块超细纤维布,以便经常擦拭。
虽然在外观上可能会有争议,但摄像头凸起作为打开屏幕的有用把手,提高了实用性。铰链非常好,能牢牢固定屏幕,不会晃动。其最大开启角度为 180 度,单手即可打开屏幕。
我们对比的 16 英寸笔记本电脑的占地面积都差不多,但联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 是最厚的一款。另一方面,它的重量与较薄的 惠普 EliteBook 865 G10.这两款商务笔记本的重量都在两公斤左右。这比以前的商务战舰要轻得多,但对于在路上使用,其他 16 英寸笔记本电脑要轻巧得多,如 宏碁 Swift Edge为例。
连接性:联想将风扇排气口移至背面
端口选择与 联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2.它们的位置只是略有改动,RJ45 以太网端口现在位于右侧,而不是左侧。现在,RJ45 端口在笔记本电脑中已经很少见了,但在这里绝对值得赞赏。T16 G3 的以太网端口现在有了一个小挡板,而 T16 G2 则没有。
值得注意的是风扇排气口没有了,T16 Gen 2 的风扇排气口位于右侧。经过重新设计,联想将其移到了笔记本电脑的背面,这一设计上的改变肯定会受到右手使用鼠标的用户的青睐。
交流
除了英特尔 I219-V 千兆以太网控制器,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 还配备了英特尔 AX211 Wi-Fi 适配器。它支持蓝牙 5.4 和 Wi-Fi 6E。在我们的评测中,Wi-Fi 模块的传输速度非常快,这也是这款 Wi-Fi 模块的预期效果。
这款 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑不支持 5G 或 4G-LTE,但联想设备可进行 WWAN 升级。这意味着可以使用 LTE 卡进行升级。所需的 M.2 卡槽、WWAN 天线和 nanoSIM 插槽一应俱全。不过要小心:只有联想 FRU 明确为 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 生产的 4G 卡才能兼容。所有其他第三方卡都无法使用。
网络摄像头
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 的网络摄像头分辨率为 500 万像素。在光线充足的环境中,其画质肯定是合格的,但在较暗的房间中使用时,画质很快就会下降。虽然与智能手机的画质相差甚远,但对于在办公环境中的日常使用来说,网络摄像头无疑已经足够好了。
安全
与真正的企业级机器一样,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 具有许多安全功能。首先是网络摄像头的物理隐私遮光板,然后是 Kensington 锁插槽、指纹识别器、智能卡插槽和用于面部识别的红外摄像头。此外,该系统还配备了 dTPM 芯片、Absolute 的 CompuTrace 和底部篡改检测功能,以防有人试图进入内部。
配件
除了 100 W USB-C 充电器外,包装盒内没有其他附件。
维护
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 底部共有七颗螺丝。必须拧松所有螺丝才能取下底盖,底盖也由几个夹子固定。这些螺丝不会丢失,因为它们是固定的,这意味着它们会一直卡在底盖上。
取下底盖后,除了屏幕和键盘外,用户可以接触到系统的大部分组件。与较小的 ThinkPad T14 5 代联想试图让联想ThinkPad T16 Gen 3比以前的T16系列机型更容易维修。这包括重新引入带有两个 SO-DIMM 插槽的可全面升级内存,以及更易于更换的内置电池。此外,还有一个开放式 M.2 2242 插槽可用于 4G-LTE 卡,固态硬盘则是一个可更换的 M.2 2280 模块。但仍有改进的余地:Wi-Fi 模块是焊接下来的,USB-C 充电连接器也是焊接的。
ThinkPad T16 系列的一个突出特点是用户可拆卸键盘,目前大多数主流笔记本电脑设计都不再提供这种功能。用户只需拧松联想笔记本底部的两颗螺丝,这两颗螺丝上标有一个键盘小图标。之后,键盘就可以直接滑出。
可持续性
在最近发布的产品中,联想一直在努力使自己的笔记本电脑更具可持续性。其中之一就是公布生产过程中的排放量--就 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 而言,生产过程中的排放量为 163 千克/二氧化碳当量,设备生命周期内的总排放量为 215 千克/二氧化碳当量。其他努力还包括使用无塑料、可回收的包装和可回收材料制作笔记本电脑外壳--30% 的 A 盖和 D 盖塑料以及 90% 的 C 盖镁合金框架均可回收利用。由于这是一款商务笔记本电脑,联想发布了详细的维修手册和视频教程,介绍如何维修机器。此外,还提供长达五年的软件更新和替换零件。
保修
在我们的评测机产地德国,联想笔记本电脑的保修期为三年。在前十二个月,它包括联想的卓越支持,包括现场服务。电池也有十二个月的有限保修。第一年后,它变成了标准的带入服务,这意味着设备必须在联想维修中心进行维修。由于这是一款商务设备,因此保修也适用于全球。德国以外地区不包括现场卓越支持服务。
输入设备:联想对 ThinkPad 键盘进行小改动
键盘
虽然联想对 ThinkPad T16 的大部分设计进行了调整,但键盘基本保持不变。变化主要集中在布局上,比如引入了 Copilot 键,这意味着 PrtScr 键被移到了 F9 键上。此外,联想还调换了 FN 键和左 Ctrl 键的位置,将 Ctrl 键放在了外侧,这与大多数笔记本键盘上的做法相同。对于习惯于将 FN 键放在最左边的 ThinkPad 老用户,联想仍然提供了调换键位的选项。最后但同样重要的是,联想在 FN、回车和音量键等重要按键上引入了新的触觉标记。这样做是为了让视障用户更容易使用键盘。
不变的是 1.5 毫米的键程、键帽设计(字母数字键采用圆形微凹键帽)以及两级亮度的白色背光。总体而言,这款键盘的键入手感非常舒适,既坚固又顺滑。由于数字键盘位于右侧,这款设备非常适合会计等经常与数字打交道的用户使用。
触摸板和 TrackPoint
与键盘略有不同的是,ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 的触控板和 TrackPoint 布局与 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 完全相同。 ThinkPad T16 2 代.
联想使用的触摸板尺寸为 11.5 x 6.7 厘米。它的表面材料是 "类似玻璃 "的 Mylar 塑料--很光滑,手感实际上有点接近玻璃,但很容易弄脏。触摸板是一块机械点击板,这意味着按下下部可以产生左或右点击。这块触摸板不会晃动,发出的 "嗒嗒 "声比较响亮,但很有力度。总的来说,这是一块不错的触摸板,尽管塑料表面不如玻璃那么高级,而且由于 TrackPoint 专用鼠标按键的存在,触摸板的尺寸也受到了限制。
一如既往,精确的 TrackPoint 仍是触摸板的绝佳替代品。在狭窄的环境中,戴上手套后,它比触摸板更好用,而且允许用户将手放在键盘上,而不是移到触摸板上。指点杆的工作原理是对其施加压力,就像 "推 "鼠标一样。使用 TrackPoint 的关键是触摸板上方的三个鼠标按钮。按住中间的按钮,它就会变成一个滚轮。
显示屏100 % sRGB 覆盖率的低功耗屏幕
商务笔记本电脑的一个典型标志就是拥有多种屏幕选项。联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 也是如此。所有五个屏幕选项都有相同的宽高比(16:10)和屏幕尺寸(16 英寸):
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), IPS, 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, 雾面
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,300 cd/m²,45 % NTSC,哑光,on-cell 触摸屏
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,400 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,低功耗
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,500 cd/m²,100 % sRGB NTSC,亚光,带触摸屏,隐私保护器
- WQUXGA(3,840 x 2,400),OLED,400 cd/m²,100 % DCI-P3,半亚光/半亚光,HDR
我们测试的可能是终端用户最常用的版本,因为低功耗屏幕在质量和低价格之间取得了良好的平衡,而且比 OLED 屏幕更省电。
根据我们的测量,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 的亮度超过了 400 cd/m²,达到了平均 433 cd/m²。在我们对比表中的其他 16 英寸笔记本电脑中,这是第二亮的屏幕--惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 的亮度几乎翻了一番,不过只有在使用 SureView 选项时才会如此,这给画面的视角稳定性带来了问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 2035:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
79% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo MNG007JA1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 865 G10 InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | -5% | 17% | 16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 79 | 67 -15% | 72.8 -8% | 99.9 26% | 99.7 26% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 96.9 -3% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 79.8 | 69.3 -13% | 75 -6% | 100 25% | 97 22% |
Response Times | 10% | -31% | 97% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.6 ? | 32 ? 5% | 48 ? -43% | 0.57 ? 98% | 2 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.3 ? | 20 ? 14% | 27.6 ? -18% | 1 ? 96% | 2 ? 91% |
PWM Frequency | 550 | 238.8 | |||
Screen | 17% | -7% | 12% | 155% | |
Brightness middle | 468 | 446 -5% | 865 85% | 379.8 -19% | 412 -12% |
Brightness | 434 | 414 -5% | 724 67% | 383 -12% | 412 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 47 -48% | 98 9% | 98 9% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.32 -39% | 0.34 -48% | 0.015 93% | |
Contrast | 2035 | 1394 -31% | 2544 25% | 27467 1250% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.5 56% | 4.86 -43% | 4.7 -38% | 2.34 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 2.2 69% | 11.58 -61% | 7.51 -4% | 3.34 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 1 44% | 1.05 42% | 0.55 69% | 2.95 -64% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 1.6 64% | 8 -78% | 0.8 82% | 2.78 38% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.24 98% | 2.66 83% | 2.22 99% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 6373 102% | 6482 100% | 6636 98% | 6381 102% | 6879 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
10% | -14% /
-10% | 42% /
28% | 88% /
116% |
* ... smaller is better
使用 X-Rite i1Pro 3 和 X-Rite i1Profiler 校准屏幕后,色彩准确度明显提高:校准后,Calman Colorchecker deltaE 从 3.4 降至 1.8,这意味着色彩变得更加准确。我们创建的配置文件可以一如既往地在上面的灰色框中免费下载。
正如联想所承诺的,屏幕覆盖了小范围的 sRGB 色域。我们测得的覆盖率为 99.99%。ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 的屏幕可用于基本的照片编辑。
在办公室外,屏幕亮度足以让显示内容在室外刺眼的光线下清晰可见。在这种情况下,磨砂表面还能避免不必要的反光。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 10.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise | |
↘ 18.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
成绩流星湖 U 在 T16 中的表现令人失望
与屏幕一样,CPU 也有很多选择,不过今年的 T16 G3 跳过了 AMD 芯片,专门采用英特尔的 Meteor Lake 系列。一共有八种不同的芯片可供选择,其中四种是 U 系列 CPU(酷睿 5 125U酷睿至强 5 125U, 超 5 135U, Ultra 7 155U, 超 7 165U)和四个 H 系列处理器(Core Ultra 5 125H, 超 5 135H, Ultra 7 155H, 超 7 165H).T 系列不再提供专用图形处理器,因此所有设备都依靠 英特尔图形处理器, 英特尔 7 核 ARC或 英特尔 ARC(8 核取决于所选的 GPU。
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 没有采用焊接式内存,而是配备了两个 SO-DIMM 内存插槽,总共可容纳 64 GB 内存(2x 32 GB),当然也可以容纳 96 GB 内存(2x 48 GB)。联想使用的是 DDR5-5600 内存。在存储方面,ThinkPad 只有一个 M.2-2280 插槽,可容纳一个 NVMe PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘。出厂最大容量为 2 TB。
测试条件
联想笔记本电脑的性能可通过 Windows 设置进行管理,其中有三种不同的功耗配置文件可供选择--功耗限制 1 是 CPU 在持续负载下的功耗,而功耗限制 2 则是短时间内的最大功耗:
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 10 W / PL2 42 W
- 平衡:PL1 13.5 瓦 / PL2 42 瓦
- 性能最佳:PL2 21 瓦 / PL2 42 瓦
请注意,在 "最佳电池寿命 "模式下,CPU 的功耗被锁定为 10 W,而其他两种模式则允许处理器在 ThinkPad 再次冷却后从 13.5 W / 21 W 升温。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U是英特尔代号为 "流星湖 "的酷睿 Ultra 系列 1 的入门级产品。这款处理器共有 12 个内核:两个大 P 内核(1.3 至 4.3 GHz)、八个 E 内核(0.8 至 3.6 GHz)和两个低功耗 E 内核(0.7 至 2.1 GHz)。使用超线程技术时,线程总数为 14 个。通过我们的 CPU 基准列表.
与较早的 Raptor Lake 芯片相比,Meteor Lake 确实提高了持续多线程性能,但单核速度却落后于较早的芯片。此外,英特尔酷睿 Ultra 系列 1 也无法与 AMD 现已过时的 Ryzen 7000 CPU 相媲美。总的来说,如果 CPU 性能是首要考虑的因素,ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 肯定不是一个很好的选择,尽管可选的 H CPU 可能会带来一定程度的改善。
在使用电池供电时,我们没有发现节流现象。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Average of class Office |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (6650 - 10483, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1534 - 1587, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2558 - 4033, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=91, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (592 - 608, n=7) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1117 - 1680, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=94, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (222 - 229, n=7) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (328 - 485, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (28563 - 41152, n=7) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4492 - 4659, n=7) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (8384 - 9601, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2129 - 2177, n=7) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7417 - 8581, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=93, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1531 - 1607, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7.26 - 12, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (45.5 - 55.5, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (0.526 - 0.555, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
系统性能
虽然 CPU 的总体性能并不出色,但联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 在日常任务和相应的基准测试中仍然表现出色。这不是一款让人感觉缓慢的设备。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=85, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5845 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
虽然整体系统中断情况并不严重,但 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 在通过 LatencyMon 测试方面仍存在问题。这可能与网络驱动程序有关,正如该工具的驱动程序页面所显示的那样。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想使用的是容量为 1 TB 的 United Memory SSD。这款可升级的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘速度很快,考虑到它是一款快速 NVMe PCIe 4.0 硬盘,这并不令人意外。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 采用了英特尔 ARC 系列最弱的版本,使用了 英特尔显卡配备 4 个 Xe 内核。与旧款 Iris Xe 型号相比,该 GPU 有所改进,但幅度不大。总性能仍然落后于当前的 AMD 解决方案,但对于商务笔记本电脑来说,这已经足够好了。工作结束后,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑还可以玩简单的老游戏,不过只能使用较低的图形设置。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7344 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4981 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2233 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U -2! | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE -3! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE -1! | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 -2! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -3! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 26.4, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Office (7.96 - 28.9, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (4.18 - 35.7, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=94, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 142.9 | 110.4 | 22.1 | 8.82 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.5 | 52.4 | 61.6 | 56 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.2 | 24.3 | 17.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.8 | 28.4 | 24.1 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 21.7 | 16.8 | 14.7 | 14.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 20.2 | 16.5 | 13.7 | 12.2 |
F1 24 (2024) | 40.6 | 36.8 | 26.9 | 7.33 |
排放:负载时声音很大,但很酷
系统噪音
虽然风扇在日常正常使用时处于关闭状态,但一旦启动,它的噪音就会超过对比中的其他所有 16 英寸笔记本电脑。在中等负载测试(配置文件:平衡)中,34 分贝(a)的噪音不算太差,但在最大负载(配置文件:最佳性能)下,46 分贝(a)的噪音肯定会很明显。不过,我们也不想过分夸张:总的来说,这款笔记本电脑并不令人担忧。由于性能不足以胜任要求极高的任务,用户可能很少有机会在最大负载设置下听到风扇的声音。
我们没有发现这款联想 ThinkPad T16 G3 有任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34 / 46.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 10% | -2% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23 7% | 23.4 5% | 25.2 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23 7% | 24.1 2% | 25.2 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23 7% | 24.3 2% | 25.2 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 26.8 -9% | 23 7% | 28 -13% | 29.3 -19% |
Load Average * | 34 | 26.8 21% | 29.17 14% | 41 -21% | 46.4 -36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.9 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 38.6 16% | 39.46 15% | 40.9 11% | 46.4 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.9 | 38.91 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然风扇在最大负荷时会发出很大的声音,但设备却能保持低温。我们测得的最高温度为 43.7 摄氏度或 111 华氏度,而且仅在底部的一个热点处。掌托完全保持凉爽。
在综合 GPU 和 CPU 负载的压力测试中,我们确实发现了一些节流现象,CPU 的功率会下降到 6 W。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.7 °C / 74.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -22% | -15% | -17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.1 | 40.5 -9% | 45 -21% | 41.6 -12% | 41.6 -12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.7 | 42.7 2% | 50 -14% | 46.6 -7% | 45 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.9 | 28.2 -13% | 30 -20% | 30.4 -22% | 31 -24% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 28 -8% | 34 -31% | 31 -19% | 33.6 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
虽然联想把扬声器移到了底部,但对于办公笔记本电脑来说,扬声器的质量肯定是合格的。与惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 相比,ThinkPad T16 G3 的扬声器音量更大。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:ThinkPad 的续航时间不如预期
耗电量
空闲功耗与旧版本几乎相同 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 英特尔.与 HP EliteBook 865 G10相比,空闲功耗更低。
最大情况下,联想 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的功耗约为 86 W,远低于 100 W 充电器的最大容量。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 3.1 / 6.4 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
44 / 86.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | -62% | -57% | -0% | -0% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 3.1 -0% | 5.2 -68% | 7.1 -129% | 3.9 -26% | 3.71 ? -20% | 4.47 ? -44% |
Idle Average * | 6.4 | 6.4 -0% | 12.8 -100% | 10.1 -58% | 4.8 25% | 6.77 ? -6% | 7.42 ? -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 6.8 14% | 14.1 -78% | 18.6 -135% | 10 -27% | 8.31 ? -5% | 8.9 ? -13% |
Load Average * | 44 | 29.3 33% | 65 -48% | 45.3 -3% | 44 -0% | 41.3 ? 6% | 42.1 ? 4% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 36.7 | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.6 | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 86.5 | 64.6 25% | 101.44 -17% | 52.9 39% | 63 27% | 65.5 ? 24% | 61.8 ? 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 68.2 | 39.5 | 42.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
考虑到联想为 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 配备了大容量电池,我们对其电池续航时间感到有些失望。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试(屏幕亮度为 150 cd/m²)中,13 个小时的续航时间固然不错,但对于一款采用低电压 CPU、低功耗屏幕和大电池的笔记本电脑来说,也不算好。尽管电池容量稍小,但 ThinkPad 在这方面还是被惠普的 EliteBook 865 G10.
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 86 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.5 Wh | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 76 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 5% | -9% | -59% | -14% | -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 820 | 690 -16% | 924 13% | 336 -59% | 613 -25% | 611 ? -25% |
Load | 122 | 154 26% | 86 -30% | 119 -2% | 116.7 ? -4% |
笔记本检查评级
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 为企业客户提供了许多有用的功能,不仅可以维修,还非常容易定制。遗憾的是,它在效率和性能方面令人失望。在 16 英寸级别中,我们觉得它的性能应该更好,因为这是一款可以支持更大散热系统的大型笔记本电脑。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE
- 11/22/2024 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.