Eurocom Blitz Ultra 笔记本电脑评测:易于使用的专业解决方案
Meteor Lake 通过 MIL-STD 810H 认证。
Blitz Ultra 是一款低调的 16 英寸轻薄型产品,专为在政府或私人应用中轻松部署而设计。虽然它的外观平易近人,但其性能和功能还需要升级。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 功能强大,但需要更多显示选项
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 深知自己的受众群体,因此它在一些特定功能上表现出色,例如可以在没有网络摄像头的情况下进行配置,而且设计易于使用,不像大品牌面向消费者的替代产品那样封闭或集成。简洁无徽标的外观基本上适用于任何场景,同时考虑到 16 英寸的大屏幕尺寸,它还具有合理的便携性。
可以改进的方面包括缺少任何显示选项,以及如果不设置为静音模式,风扇会有强烈的脉动趋势。前者尤其令人失望,因为附带的 1200p IPS 面板质量低于预期,不适合图形编辑或其他对色彩准确性要求较高的应用。此外,它的光线也相当暗淡,室外能见度很低。同时,虽然处理器的速度和效率不如 AMD 的某些最新解决方案,但在性能模式下,风扇的声音会变得相当大和明显。联想 联想 ThinkPad T16 系列在这方面提供了更多的显示屏和处理器选择。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory | List Price: 2000 USD | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $750.25 List Price: 750 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,409.99 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB RAM for Acer Asp... 2. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB RAM for Acer Asp... 3. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB Module for Acer ... List Price: 929 Euro | 1.9 kg | 21 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $940.77 List Price: 1800 Euro | 2 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,099.99 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 2. $835.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 S5506MA L... 3. $16.99 65W AC Charger Fit for Asus ... | 1.6 kg | 16 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
Blitz Ultra 是 Eurocom 的轻薄型多媒体/办公机型,配备 Meteor Lake-H CPU 选项。它放弃了独立 GPU,外形更加便携。
从酷睿 Ultra 5 125H 到酷睿 Ultra 7 155H,所有 SKU 均配备 1200p IPS 显示屏。此外,还有一款 14 英寸机型,CPU 选项相同。Eurocom 型号因其易于维修和拆卸,尤其受到许多政府和私营行业的青睐。
Blitz Ultra 的替代产品包括其他流行制造商生产的 16 英寸多媒体/办公笔记本电脑,如华硕 Vivobook S16, 联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3或宏碁 Aspire 16.
更多 Eurocom 评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
哑光黑和银色设计基于 Clevo V5x0TU 白色标签,外盖和底座主要由金属合金组成。虽然它通过了 MIL-STD 810H 认证,但与 Razer Blade 16 等密度较高的一体式机身设计相比,其轻薄的机身材料更容易变形和弯曲。例如,向键盘中心施加压力时,表面的翘曲程度会明显高于其他高端 16 英寸机型,如 惠普 Spectre x360 16或联想 ThinkPad T16。
尺寸和重量在同类产品中处于平均水平,一些竞争对手如 联想 ThinkBook 16 G7 IML等竞争对手要稍薄和轻一些。
连接性
虽然端口选择非常多,但请记住,两个 USB-C 端口并不相同,因为只有一个支持 Thunderbolt 4 和 DisplayPort。与华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 不同的是,这两个端口之间的间距很大。 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16不同,华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 的大部分端口都挤在一起。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
交流
网络摄像头
令人失望的是,网络摄像头只有 100 万像素或 720p,没有更高分辨率选项、红外或隐私快门。可以选择配置不带网络摄像头的功能。
维护
底部面板只需一把十字螺丝刀即可轻松拆卸。用户最多可安装两个 DDR5 SODIMM 模块,总容量达 95 GB,还可安装两个 M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4 固态硬盘。
可持续性
制造商没有说明在生产过程中采取了任何可持续发展措施。包装主要是硬纸板加保护泡沫和塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了常见的交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。制造商通常提供一年有限保修,也可选择升级到三年。
输入设备
键盘
大多数 Eurocom 机型的键入体验都很相似,因为它们都采用了 Clevo 或同方的设计。在这种情况下,键盘与 猛禽 X17除了现在必须使用的副驾驶键。与许多其他 16 英寸笔记本电脑相比,它的 "哗哗 "声更小,但反馈更柔和。
触摸板
点击板大小适中(8.3 x 12.2 厘米),光标控制反应灵敏。不过,输入点击时的反馈偏软,对于多点触控操作来说并不可靠。
显示屏
IPS 显示屏的色彩为约 60% sRGB,刷新率为 60 赫兹,最大亮度为 255 尼特,显示效果一般。更现代的 IPS 显示屏,如 微星巅峰 A16 AI Plus提供了更出色的色彩、更快的刷新率和更亮的背光,从而明显提高了图像质量和室外可视性。
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 255 cd/m²
Contrast: 981:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 1.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 AU Optronics AUOF49A, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 N160JCA-EEK (Chi Mei CMN163D), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 100% | 4% | 81% | 102% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.1 | 41.6 1% | 96.8 136% | 42.3 3% | 79 92% | 98.5 140% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.8 | 61.2 1% | 99.8 64% | 63.6 5% | 99.9 64% | 99.9 64% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.4 | 43 1% | 84.7 100% | 43.7 3% | 79.8 88% | 86.1 103% |
Response Times | 16% | 49% | -26% | -34% | 74% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.2 ? | 18.4 ? 24% | 12.9 ? 47% | 31.4 ? -30% | 33.6 ? -39% | 2 ? 92% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 16.5 ? 8% | 8.9 ? 51% | 22 ? -22% | 23.3 ? -29% | 8 ? 56% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -93% | 18% | -19% | 8% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 255 | 321.2 26% | 475.4 86% | 352 38% | 468 84% | 504 98% |
Brightness | 240 | 319 33% | 440 83% | 324 35% | 434 81% | 465 94% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 92 15% | 89 11% | 86 8% | 90 13% | 87 9% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.37 -42% | 0.36 -38% | 0.27 -4% | 0.23 12% | 0.35 -35% |
Contrast | 981 | 868 -12% | 1321 35% | 1304 33% | 2035 107% | 1440 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.14 | 8.7 -110% | 2.99 28% | 4.41 -7% | 3.4 18% | 1.83 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.49 | 19.85 -13% | 7.64 56% | 15.04 14% | 7.2 59% | 5.51 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.91 | 1.82 5% | 0.74 61% | 3.52 -84% | 1.8 6% | 1.34 30% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 9.2 -736% | 2.9 -164% | 3.32 -202% | 4.5 -309% | 3.02 -175% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.83 78% | 2.31 95% | 2.44 90% | 2.1 105% | 2.39 92% |
CCT | 6552 99% | 6200 105% | 6472 100% | 7122 91% | 6373 102% | 6688 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-57% | 56% /
40% | -14% /
-15% | 18% /
18% | 66% /
46% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板开箱后校准良好,平均灰度 DeltaE 值仅为 1.1。不过,如上所述,该面板的色彩还原能力有限,这意味着即使经过我们自己的 X-Rite 校准测试,最大色彩 DeltaE 值也会超过 17。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.7 ms rise | |
↘ 8.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.8 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将控制中心设置为性能模式。建议机主熟悉预装软件,因为它是控制系统大部分功能的中枢。
处理器
处理器性能与我们数据库中相同型号笔记本电脑的平均性能相差几个百分点。 酷睿至尊 7 155H处理器。遗憾的是,它只不过是去年的 酷睿 i7-13700H和更老的 酷睿 i7-12700H这意味着,充其量它的同比涨幅微乎其微。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Ninkear A16 Pro | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 -2! | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE -1! |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Ninkear A16 Pro | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=48) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=48) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=48) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=48) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=33) | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=33) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=33) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=33) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=33) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=32) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=32) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=32) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=33) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=28) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=34) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6622 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=48) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=48) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。此外,在 YouTube 上播放 4K60 内容时,即使经过多次重复测试,也会出现至少几帧掉帧的情况,这在采用 Core-H 系列 CPU 的专业系统上是很令人失望的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试机配备了 1 TB 三星 990 Evo Pro最高传输速率可达 4400 MB/s。性能持续稳定,没有节流问题,但也有速度超过 7000 MB/s 的更快硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
弧形 弧 8GPU 推出不到一年,就已经落后于 AMD 的最新替代产品。Radeon 880M Radeon 880M例如,根据基于 DX11 的Fire Strike 基准测试,它比我们的 GPU 高出 30%,与去年的 Radeon 780M 大致相当。尽管如此,它仍然比老的 Iris Xe 系列.
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 7189 | 22933 | 2643 |
平衡模式 | 7168 (-0%) | 21727 (-5%) | 2678 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 4090 (-43%) | 16388 (-29%) | 1335 (-49%) |
在平衡模式下运行对性能影响不大。不过,即使设置为 "性能 "模式,电池电量也会使性能降低近 50%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 10505 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27876 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6724 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3265 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (77.4 - 96.1, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (44.9 - 54.6, n=12) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.3 - 45, n=12) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (24.7 - 31.6, n=12) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (20.2 - 25.9, n=12) | |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 158.7 | 145.9 | 35.4 | 14.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.1 | 89.7 | 69.3 | 66.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 60.8 | 33.4 | 23 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 51.9 | 39.7 | 34.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 64 | 38 | 35 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 143.6 | 63.2 | 52.5 | 43.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 50.7 | 40 | 27.6 | 22.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 64.5 | 58.2 | 44 | 12.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 27.4 | 22.8 | 20 | 19.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 25.8 | 21.5 | 19 | 17 |
排放量
系统噪音
在 22.7 dB(A) 的背景噪音下,即使在桌面上空转,风扇噪音也会经常达到 29 dB(A)。因此,如果担心风扇脉动问题,建议使用 "静音 "模式,而不是 "娱乐 "或 "性能 "模式。与其他 16 英寸笔记本电脑相比,Eurocom 的风扇在运行高负载时会更快达到最大转速。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.3 / 29 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.4 / 53.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 21% | -0% | -0% | 6% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 23.1 -2% | 23.8 -5% | 23 -1% | 24.7 -9% | 25.2 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23.1 -0% | 25 -8% | 23 1% | 24.7 -6% | 25.2 -9% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 23.1 1% | 25 -7% | 23 1% | 24.7 -6% | 25.2 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 23.1 20% | 29.5 -2% | 31 -7% | 24.7 15% | 25.2 13% |
Load Average * | 45.4 | 23.2 49% | 37.5 17% | 46.57 -3% | 34 25% | 55.1 -21% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50.3 | 29.2 42% | 46.5 8% | 50 1% | 45.9 9% | |
Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 32.6 39% | 56.1 -5% | 50 6% | 46.2 13% | 61.5 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机身右半部分的表面温度最高,键盘和底盖上的热点温度分别高达 39 摄氏度和 50 摄氏度。幸好这些区域位于机身后部,在使用过程中与皮肤的接触极少。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.6 °C / 4.6 F).
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | -18% | -21% | 2% | -28% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 33.2 13% | 52.8 -38% | 47 -23% | 37.1 3% | 44.2 -16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.8 | 41.2 17% | 42 16% | 50 -0% | 43.7 12% | 53 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.2 | 23.4 -1% | 30.6 -32% | 31 -34% | 24.9 -7% | 32.1 -38% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.6 | 26.6 -4% | 29.6 -16% | 32 -25% | 26 -2% | 38.4 -50% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
运行 Prime95 时,核心温度徘徊在 90 摄氏度左右,比我们希望的 H 系列系统温度要高。更强大的 Ryzen 9 微星 Summit A16 AI Plus的温度会稳定在 80 C 左右。在测试开始时,封装功率会飙升至 60 W,然后几乎立即降至 53 W。
当运行《赛博朋克 2077》来代表典型的游戏压力时,核心温度将稳定在 72 C,而上述微星处理器在类似条件下的核心温度为 75 C。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 43 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.3 | -- | 89 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.5 | 1400 | 73 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.25 | 1300 | 72 |
发言人
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
怠速功耗并不比 ThinkBook 16 G7或微星Summit A16 AI(分别搭载Core-U和Ryzen AI 9处理器)相比,怠速功耗并没有明显增加。不过,在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,尽管我们的英特尔图形处理器速度更慢,每瓦性能更低,但平均功耗几乎与微星系统相同。运行 Prime95 时也有类似的结果。
我们使用小巧(约 12.5 x 5 x 3 厘米)的 90 瓦桶装交流适配器记录的最大功耗为 103 瓦。我们希望该机型在未来的迭代中能完全采用 USB-C 充电技术。
Off / Standby | 0.24 / 1.9 Watt |
Idle | 5.9 / 8.6 / 9.3 Watt |
Load |
54.7 / 101.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -9% | -35% | 27% | -74% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.9 | 4.3 27% | 5.4 8% | 8.8 -49% | 3.1 47% | 8.7 -47% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 8.9 -3% | 11 -28% | 12.8 -49% | 6.4 26% | 13.1 -52% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 9.1 2% | 11.2 -20% | 14.1 -52% | 7.9 15% | 18.3 -97% |
Load Average * | 54.7 | 31.7 42% | 76.6 -40% | 80 -46% | 44 20% | 116 -112% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 55.6 | 35.2 37% | 49.2 12% | 72 -29% | 36.7 34% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 58.1 | 39.4 32% | 61.1 -5% | 73.5 -27% | 40.6 30% | |
Load Maximum * | 101.1 | 66.7 34% | 91.8 9% | 90.53 10% | 86.5 14% | 162 -60% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 117.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
72 Wh 电池的 WLAN 运行时间与许多其他 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑相当,可持续浏览近 9 小时。
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 86 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 0% | 4% | 15% | 56% | -17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 528 0% | 547 4% | 607 15% | 820 56% | 435 -17% |
Reader / Idle | 1150 | |||||
Load | 79 | 130 | 122 | |||
H.264 | 498 |
笔记本检查评级
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 16
- 01/13/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.