GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 掌上电脑评测：小巧、快速、可爱

Name: GPD Pocket 4
Brand: GPD

比大多数笔记本电脑更强大。

可折叠的 Pocket 4 在 8.8 英寸的小巧机身上集成了完整笔记本电脑的性能和功能，而且几乎没有任何妥协。尤其是 AMD 处理器，使其运行速度超过大多数迷你 PC、游戏掌上电脑甚至传统笔记本电脑。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/01/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
AMD Convertible / 2-in-1 Gaming Handheld Zen 5 Touchscreen

评语：真正的笔记本电脑替代品，但也有不足之处

GPD Pocket 4 成功地将传统笔记本电脑的性能和功能整合到了体积更小的笔记本电脑中。它几乎改进了 Pocket 3 的所有方面 Pocket 3尤其是在显示质量和性能方面，它可以满足办公、停靠、旅行，甚至是中轻度图形编辑和游戏的需要，只要您有外接鼠标和键盘。考虑到其小巧的体积，该机型能提供的功能和在许多方面的出色表现给我们留下了深刻印象。

Test device courtesy of GPD

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

当然，小巧的机身也有一些不可避免的缺点。最明显的是，打字体验很拥挤，电池续航时间一般，性能比搭载完全相同的 Ryzen AI 9 处理器的其他 PC 慢几个档次。这些弊端可能是无可奈何的，但为了获得更好的用户体验，还应该解决其他一些问题，如运行高负载时高亢的风扇噪音、缺少网络摄像头快门以及 VRR 和 FreeSync 的缺失。附带的主动式手写笔也会让平板模式的使用更加理想。

Pros

+ 高质量 1600p144 触摸屏，具有 DCI-P3 色彩

+ 比许多传统笔记本电脑速度更快

+ 大音量立体声扬声器

+ 小巧紧凑

+ 良好的端口选择

Cons

- 游戏时风扇噪音大且明显

- 低频 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU

- 不支持 OLED、HDR 或 FreeSync

- 游戏时电池寿命短

- 固态硬盘在负载情况下会出现节流

价格和供应情况

Indiegogo 页面列出了基本配置为较旧的 Ryzen 7 8840U、16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价为 895 美元，而我们的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、32 GB 内存和 2 TB 评测配置则超过 1400 美元。

亚马逊目前出货的 Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 365 配置价格为 1355 美元。

$1,355.95

GPD Pocket 4: Mini Laptop with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 365 CPU, Radeon 880M GPU, 32GB LPDDR5X RAM, 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, 8.8 Inch 2.5K 144Hz Display, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, Modular AI Handheld PC

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 80.2%	GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: $1,355.95 List Price: 1400 USD	777 g	22.2 mm	8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS
2. 80.3% ^{v7 (old)}	GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,297.95 GPD Win 4 2025 Handheld Gami... 2. $1,229.99 GPD Win 4 2024 [AMD Ryzen 7 ... 3. $970.95 GPD Win 4 2024 Handheld Gami... List Price: 1100 USD	607 g	28 mm	6.00" 1920x1080 367 PPI IPS
3. 86.3% ^{v7 (old)}	GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7 ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,199.99 List Price: 1000 USD	730 g	20 mm	8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS
4. 79.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB SSD	List Price: 381 EUR	1.6 kg	21.2 mm	11.60" 1366x768 TN
5. 88.4% ^{v7 (old)}	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,089.95 Microsoft Surface Pro 9, 13.... 2. $1,999.00 Microsoft Surface Pro 9, 13.... 3. $1,010.99 Microsoft Surface Pro 9 (QIZ... List Price: 2200€	877 g	9.3 mm	13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI IPS
6. 81% ^{v7 (old)}	Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 605 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $292.80 Acer TravelMate Spin B3 B311... 2. $334.99 Acer TravelMate Spin B3 B311... 3. $405.42 Acer TravelMate Spin B3 B311... List Price: 399 Euro	1.5 kg	20.95 mm	11.60" 1920x1080 190 PPI IPS

评语：真正的笔记本电脑替代品，但也有不足之处
规格
案例
连接性
输入设备
显示屏
性能
排放量
能源管理
笔记本检查评级

GPD Pocket 4 继承了三年前的 Pocket 3，引入了更新的硬件功能和最新的 AMD Ryzen AI Zen 5 处理器。它本质上是一款 8.8 英寸 UMPC，旨在整合与全尺寸笔记本电脑相同的功能和性能。

我们的测试机是最高端的 SKU，配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU、Radeon 890M GPU 和 32 GB LPDDR5x 7500 MT/s 内存，售价约 1300 美元。较少的 SKU 可能会配备 Ryzen AI 9 365 或 Ryzen 7 8840U，分别配备较慢的 Radeon 880M 和 780M 图形处理器。1600p144 触摸屏在所有选项中都是固定的。

Pocket 4 的替代产品包括其他高性能或以游戏为中心的掌上电脑，如Asus ROG Ally X,Ayaneo Flip KB, 或MSI Claw 。

更多 GPD 评论：

规格

GPD Pocket 4

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 28 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 890M, Core: 2112 MHz, LPDDR5x, 32.0.12033.1030

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x, 7500 MT/s, Dual-Channel

Display

8.80 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 343 PPI, 10-point capacitive, YHB03P24, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Accelerometer, KVM

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 22.2 x 206.8 x 144.5

Battery

45 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1440p30
Primary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2 W stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Wincontrols, Motion Assistant, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

777 g, Power Supply: 202 g

Price

1400 USD

Amazon

$1,355.95

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例

机身比 Pocket 3 稍大、稍重，以适应屏幕尺寸的增加（8.0 英寸增至 8.8 英寸）。整体设计的边缘和边角也更加扁平，让人联想到任天堂 DS Lite。除此之外，机身采用了与以前相同的铝合金材料，质量和观感与以前相差无几。

尺寸比较

Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U GPD Win 4 GPD Pocket 4 GPD Pocket 3 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

与 Pocket 3 相比，这次减少了 USB-A 端口。作为回报，PLEXTALK Pocket 4 增加了一个 USB-C 端口，与 USB-A 端口相比，USB-C 端口的通用性更强。需要注意的是，两个 USB-C 端口中只有一个支持 USB4 设备。

右：USB-A 2.0，3.5 毫米耳机USB-A 2.0、3.5 毫米耳机右侧：USB-A 2.0、3.5 毫米耳机

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	63.3 MB/s +92%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	32.9 MB/s
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	25.5 MB/s -22%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	92.8 MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	74.7 MB/s
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	27.6 MB/s -63%

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1058 (914^min - 1225^max) MBit/s
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	670 (627^min - 705^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1144 (1084^min - 1189^max) MBit/s
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	636 (611^min - 645^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
GPD Pocket 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1281 (1157^min - 1433^max) MBit/s
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	882 (470^min - 936^max) MBit/s -31%
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	669 (485^min - 777^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
GPD Pocket 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1380 (1142^min - 1522^max) MBit/s
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	990 (909^min - 1056^max) MBit/s -28%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	925 (906^min - 944^max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1529^min - 1677^max) MBit/s +33%
GPD Pocket 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1224 (1083^min - 1345^max) MBit/s
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	712 (410^min - 795^max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1632 (1569^min - 1654^max) MBit/s +73%
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	951 (921^min - 975^max) MBit/s +1%
GPD Pocket 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	942 (915^min - 1026^max) MBit/s

GPD Pocket 4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1224 (1083-1345)

GPD Pocket 4; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (915-1026)

网络摄像头

500 万像素网络摄像头位于屏幕左侧边缘，与大多数其他笔记本电脑相比角度偏斜。没有隐私快门，也不支持红外功能。

ColorChecker GPD Pocket 4: 16.12 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 24.5 ∆E

维护

底部面板由九颗小型十字螺丝固定，维修起来相对容易。不过，由于只有电池和 M.2 2280 固态硬盘可拆卸，因此升级空间不大。

可持续性

生产商没有提到在生产过程中使用了回收材料。包装本身主要是硬纸板和一些保护性塑料包装。

配件和保修

可选配件包括 MicroSD 读卡器、KVM、RS232 或 4G LTE 等扩展模块，所有这些都必须用螺丝固定在机身背面。如果能提供触控笔或便携包就更好了。

如果在美国购买，制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。

输入设备

键盘

键盘与 Pocket 3 上的键盘几乎是 1:1 的匹配，甚至包括按键尺寸和辅助功能。奇怪的是，这次大写锁定键没有 LED 指示灯，原因不明。

触摸板

触摸板的大小与以前一样，为 6.3 x 3.3 厘米。虽然它能可靠地控制光标，但实际的鼠标按钮在设备的另一侧，因此需要双手才能有效地使用鼠标。如果没有外接鼠标，最好使用触摸屏进行大部分输入。

显示屏

1440p 144 Hz IPS 触摸屏是 Pocket 3 的重大升级。不仅分辨率和刷新率都更高，色彩覆盖率、响应时间和亮度也都明显提高，真正实现了显而易见的差异。小尺寸和高 PPI 也让 2.5K 显示屏看起来像 4K 屏幕一样清晰。

该显示屏的一个主要缺点是缺乏对 FreeSync、Windows VRR 和 HDR 的支持，而这三种技术分别可以减少屏幕撕裂、延长电池寿命和改善图像质量。OLED 本来也是不错的选择，但制造商可能出于电池寿命的考虑而放弃了。


568.8 cd/m²	521.5 cd/m²	511.3 cd/m²
567.7 cd/m²	511.2 cd/m²	487.9 cd/m²
560.6 cd/m²	508.6 cd/m²	475 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

YHB03P24 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 568.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 523.6 cd/m² Minimum: 6.79 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 511.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1278:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 0.95
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	GPD Pocket 4 YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz	GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6", 60 Hz	GPD Pocket 3 Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 60 Hz	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA TN, 1366x768, 11.6", 60 Hz	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz	Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK AU Optronics B116HAN05.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6", 60 Hz
Display		-23%	-37%	-46%	-19%	-39%
Display P3 Coverage	92.7	63.1 -32%	51.1 -45%	43.19 -53%	65.6 -29%	49.6 -46%
sRGB Coverage	99.6	92 -8%	74.7 -25%	64.95 -35%	97.7 -2%	72.9 -27%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	90	64.6 -28%	52.8 -41%	44.62 -50%	67.7 -25%	51.3 -43%
Response Times		-9%	-57%	-26%	20%	-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5)	26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3) 4%	37.2 ?(17.6, 19.6) -33%	37.68 ?(19, 18.68) -35%	13 ?(6, 7) 53%	34 ?(16, 18) -22%
Response Time Black / White *	17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9)	20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5) -22%	31.2 ?(17.2, 14) -81%	20 ?(15, 5) -16%	19.4 ?(6.8, 12.6) -13%	21 ?(11, 10) -22%
PWM Frequency				25000 ?(71)	29896 ?(55)
Screen		-29%	-38%	-39%	14%	-6%
Brightness middle	511.2	413.1 -19%	438.4 -14%	290 -43%	455 -11%	272 -47%
Brightness	524	407 -22%	421 -20%	274 -48%	453 -14%	267 -49%
Brightness Distribution	84	81 -4%	92 10%	87 4%	94 12%	87 4%
Black Level *	0.4	0.39 2%	0.4 -0%	0.48 -20%	0.38 5%	0.3 25%
Contrast	1278	1059 -17%	1096 -14%	604 -53%	1197 -6%	907 -29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.54	6.97 -54%	5.02 -11%	7.68 -69%	1.7 63%	4.1 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.96	14.11 -57%	9.59 -7%	9.6 -7%	3.8 58%	9.08 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.95	1.24 -31%	4.05 -326%	1.9 -100%	1.5 -58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.4	9.9 -55%	4 37%	7.4 -16%	1.5 77%	4.03 37%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.04 ^108%	2.29 ^96%	2.658 ^83%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	8125 ^80%	9571 ^68%	7087 ^92%	8017 ^81%	6761 ^96%	6557 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-20% / -25%	-44% / -41%	-37% / -39%	5% / 8%	-22% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

开箱即按照 P3 标准校准色彩，以充分发挥显示屏大于 92% P3 的宽广色彩。不过，色温略微偏冷。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.3 ms rise
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.4 ms rise
27.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8648 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

触摸屏的亮度比其他大多数手持设备都要高，最大亮度略高于 500 尼特，在阴暗处也能使用。眩光仍然存在，但不会过分分散注意力，除非你站在阳光直射或阴暗处。

性能

测试条件

在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。我们还将 BIOS 设置为默认设置，并将所有超频功能设置为 "自动"。

请注意，在低风扇和高风扇模式之间切换的热键与 "Plus "键绑定。

处理器

我们的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370的性能比我们数据库中采用相同处理器的普通笔记本电脑大约慢 15% 到 20%。华硕华硕 TUF Gaming A14的多线程性能大约快 35%。这是因为 Pocket 4 的 CPU 目标 TGP 值较低，下面的压力测试部分将对此进行说明。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38)

GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)

GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø655 (525.83-745.35)

GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø570 (564.07-573.67)

Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100: Ø237 (229.37-246.24)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35)

Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030: Ø165.5 (117.01-202.8)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	95 pt
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	88.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	81 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	75.7 pt
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75.3 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	71.2 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 ^-14! AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	68.4 pt
GPD Win 4 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	67.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U ^-2! Intel Core i7-1255U	64.9 pt
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	61.5 pt
GPD Pocket 3 ^-4! Intel Core i7-1195G7	49.2 pt
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	24.2 pt
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK ^-2! Intel Pentium Silver N5030	12.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23786, n=17)	19737 Points +19%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16546 (14363.5^min - 16546.4^max) Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	15120 Points -9%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14463 Points -13%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	13016 Points -21%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	11939 Points -28%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10546 (8992.1^min - 10546^max) Points -36%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	10198 Points -38%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	10162 (10024.9^min - 10161.8^max) Points -39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	9517 Points -42%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	3634 (3614.51^min - 3633.97^max) Points -78%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1577 Points -90%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	911 Points -94%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1953 - 2049, n=10)	2009 Points 0%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2006 Points
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1770 Points -12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1733 Points -14%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1712 Points -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1708 Points -15%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1703 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1656 Points -17%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1534 Points -24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	1389 Points -31%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1088 Points -46%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	747 Points -63%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	430 Points -79%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9246, n=9)	8251 Points +28%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6449 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	5794 Points -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5077 Points -21%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4805 Points -25%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	4616 Points -28%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	4107 Points -36%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	3987 Points -38%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	3616 Points -44%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	1402 Points -78%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	590 Points -91%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	360 Points -94%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=9)	788 Points 0%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	787 Points
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	684 Points -13%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	672 Points -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	670 Points -15%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	664 Points -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	638 Points -19%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	602 Points -24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	537 Points -32%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	427 Points -46%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	285 Points -64%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	171 Points -78%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3498, n=9)	3174 Points +27%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2499 (2245.42^min - 2499.38^max) Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2336 (2041.02^min - 2336.18^max) Points -7%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2054 (1929.2^min - 2053.81^max) Points -18%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1950 (1902.14^min - 1950.08^max) Points -22%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1947 (1799.86^min - 1946.66^max) Points -22%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1776 (1450.64^min - 1776.28^max) Points -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1576 (1168.77^min - 1576.35^max) Points -37%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1539 (1503.99^min - 1538.94^max) Points -38%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	745 (525.83^min - 745.35^max) Points -70%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	574 (564.07^min - 573.67^max) Points -77%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	246 (229.37^min - 246.24^max) Points -90%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	203 Points -92%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 315, n=9)	306 Points +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	304 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	268 Points -12%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	266 Points -12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	262 Points -14%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -16%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	246 Points -19%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	223 Points -27%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	207 Points -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	222 Points -27%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	176.6 Points -42%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	118.8 Points -61%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	86 Points -72%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	3580 Seconds * -1765%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1956 Seconds * -919%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	821 Seconds * -328%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	382 Seconds * -99%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	315 Seconds * -64%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	304 Seconds * -58%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	283 Seconds * -47%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	246 Seconds * -28%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	239 Seconds * -24%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	214 Seconds * -11%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	192 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=9)	158.8 Seconds * +17%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66618 - 83572, n=9)	77832 MIPS +17%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	66618 MIPS
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	64454 MIPS -3%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	57550 MIPS -14%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	53599 MIPS -20%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	50223 MIPS -25%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	49708 MIPS -25%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	47579 MIPS -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	37320 MIPS -44%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	17053 MIPS -74%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	7532 MIPS -89%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	6598 MIPS -90%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6063 - 6208, n=9)	6144 MIPS 0%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6143 MIPS
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	6077 MIPS -1%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	6064 MIPS -1%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	6012 MIPS -2%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	5472 MIPS -11%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5318 MIPS -13%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	5264 MIPS -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	5150 MIPS -16%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	4168 MIPS -32%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	3046 MIPS -50%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	2735 MIPS -55%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13426 - 15367, n=10)	14679 Points +9%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13426 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	12026 Points -10%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10464 Points -22%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	10366 Points -23%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	9711 Points -28%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	9609 Points -28%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	2283 Points -83%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2904 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2904, n=10)	2852 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2550 Points -12%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2528 Points -13%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2442 Points -16%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2433 Points -16%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1654 Points -43%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1133 Points -61%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11975 - 15012, n=9)	14020 Points +17%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	11975 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	10713 Points -11%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10076 Points -16%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	9258 Points -23%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	9225 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8821 Points -26%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	8205 Points -31%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7737 Points -35%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1911 Points -84%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	1221 Points -90%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2134 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2134, n=9)	2051 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1917 Points -10%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1879 Points -12%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1818 Points -15%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1780 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1712 Points -20%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1549 Points -27%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1278 Points -40%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	915 Points -57%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	512 Points -76%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=9)	24.1 fps +19%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20.3 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	18.7 fps -8%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	15.8 fps -22%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	15 fps -26%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14.7 fps -28%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	12.9 fps -36%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12.5 fps -38%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	10.1 fps -50%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	4.81 fps -76%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1.72 fps -92%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	0.71 fps -97%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	137 s * -176%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	129.6 s * -161%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	63.8 s * -28%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 66.6, n=9)	54.5 s * -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	53.6 s * -8%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	51.4 s * -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	51.3 s * -3%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	50.9 s * -2%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	49.7 s *
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	49.2 s * +1%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	47.6 s * +4%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.2 s * +7%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030	1.402 sec * -236%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100	1.06 sec * -154%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.678 sec * -63%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	0.609 sec * -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	0.52 sec * -25%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	0.52 sec * -25%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.4765 sec * -14%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.474 sec * -14%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4665 sec * -12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	0.4601 sec * -10%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4167 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.4041 - 0.4257, n=9)	0.4142 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2499 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

266 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

304 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6449 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

787 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2006 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16546 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

117 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

956 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	97.3 pt
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	81.3 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	58.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42.3 pt
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28.8 pt
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	11.9 pt
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	6.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=8)	32739 KRay/s +27%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	25805 KRay/s
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	11279 KRay/s -56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8127 KRay/s -69%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4760 KRay/s -82%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	1685 KRay/s -93%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	609 KRay/s -98%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=9)	127594 Points +33%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	95655 Points
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	72386 Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41353 Points -57%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20576 Points -78%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	8977 Points -91%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	3917 Points -96%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=9)	5376 MB/s +20%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	4475 MB/s
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	2485 MB/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2089 MB/s -53%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1457 MB/s -67%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	595 MB/s -87%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	245 MB/s -95%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (80927 - 99088, n=9)	92363 Points +14%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	86451 Points +7%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	80927 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65820 Points -19%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39180 Points -52%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	20893 Points -74%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	20636 Points -75%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=9)	18292 Points +10%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	16640 Points
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	11141 Points -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5095 Points -69%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3524 Points -79%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	1064 Points -94%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	742 Points -96%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 79251, n=8)	66597 Points +32%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	50357 Points
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	39913 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19899 Points -60%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12994 Points -74%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	4415 Points -91%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	2158 Points -96%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	102968 MB/s +49%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=9)	77615 MB/s +12%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	69125 MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52338 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42553 MB/s -38%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	11223 MB/s -84%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	6215 MB/s -91%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1520, n=9)	1375 MB/s +28%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1077 MB/s
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	631 MB/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	588 MB/s -45%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	261 MB/s -76%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	181.9 MB/s -83%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	81.4 MB/s -92%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20608, n=9)	17895 KRay/s +31%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13665 KRay/s
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	5926 KRay/s -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4400 KRay/s -68%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2631 KRay/s -81%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	859 KRay/s -94%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	327 KRay/s -98%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	49112 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=9)	47924 MPixel/s -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44054 MPixel/s -10%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31863 MPixel/s -35%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	27090 MPixel/s -45%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	15527 MPixel/s -68%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	5209 MPixel/s -89%

压力测试

在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会提升到 2.4 GHz 和 28 W，几分钟后又略微下降到 2.2 GHz 和 25 W。相比之下，采用相同处理器的大型笔记本电脑（如华硕 TUF Gaming A14）可以达到并维持更高的 TGP 值。

运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，如果启动涡轮风扇，GPU 会稳定在 2112 MHz 和 62 C。如果禁用涡轮风扇，时钟频率将略微降至 1850 MHz，而核心温度将略微升高，约为 67 C。如果游戏时担心风扇噪音，那么禁用涡轮风扇可能更合适，因为预计它不会对游戏性能造成明显影响。

	CPU 平均时钟 (GHz)	GPU 时钟 (MHz)	CPU 平均温度 (°C)
系统闲置	--	--	38
Prime95 压力	2.2	--	72
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	1.9	732	67
赛博朋克 2077》压力（开启涡轮风扇）	0.5	2112	62
赛博朋克 2077》压力（关闭涡轮风扇）	0.5	1850	68

系统性能

PCMark 结果显示，与即将上市的 Pocket 3 和目前市场上的大多数其他掌上电脑相比，PCMark 全面提升了性能。内存性能尤其明显提高，与全尺寸笔记本电脑的性能更为接近。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7173 - 7646, n=5)	7478 Points 0%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	7471 Points
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	6394 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	5257 Points -30%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	5153 Points -31%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	2823 Points -62%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	1838 Points -75%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	11262 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9751 - 11262, n=5)	10659 Points -5%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	10606 Points -6%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	10205 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	10062 Points -11%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	6898 Points -39%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	4614 Points -59%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9393 - 10615, n=5)	10039 Points 0%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10031 Points
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	9235 Points -8%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	7390 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	6553 Points -35%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	4167 Points -58%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	3036 Points -70%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=5)	10637 Points +6%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10017 Points
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	7529 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	5978 Points -40%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	4737 Points -53%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	2126 Points -79%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	1204 Points -88%

CrossMark / Overall
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1847 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1692 - 1847, n=4)	1769 Points -4%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1575 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1499 Points -19%

CrossMark / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1719 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1719, n=4)	1640 Points -5%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1596 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1465 Points -15%

CrossMark / Creativity
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2077 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1868 - 2117, n=4)	2023 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1612 Points -22%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1596 Points -23%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1610 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1398 - 1610, n=4)	1490 Points -7%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1457 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1293 Points -20%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	323 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (267 - 323, n=4)	299 Points -7%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	293 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	265 Points -18%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	259 Points -20%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	156.3 Points -52%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	95.4 Points -70%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	266 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (225 - 266, n=5)	249 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	228 Points -14%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	220 Points -17%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	128.3 Points -52%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	3145 ms * -635%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	1122 ms * -162%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	652 ms * -52%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	594 ms * -39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	574 ms * -34%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (428 - 503, n=6)	447 ms * -4%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	428 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7471 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (88377 - 92030, n=9)	89726 MB/s 0%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	89385 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67017 MB/s -25%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57029 MB/s -36%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	51518 MB/s -42%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	30676 MB/s -66%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	11294 MB/s -87%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100208 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=9)	99880 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59579 MB/s -41%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52892 MB/s -47%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	44068 MB/s -56%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	29183 MB/s -71%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	10011 MB/s -90%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98429 - 108954, n=9)	100201 MB/s +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	98820 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62132 MB/s -37%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58596 MB/s -41%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	51117 MB/s -48%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	35073 MB/s -65%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	10325 MB/s -90%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (105.5 - 119.4, n=9)	112.9 ns * -7%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	110.3 ns * -5%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	105.5 ns *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	101.2 ns * +4%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	90.9 ns * +14%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, UHD Graphics 605	72.5 ns * +31%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	67.6 ns * +36%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在 4K60 视频播放测试中，LatencyMon 没有显示重大的 DPC 问题，也没有出现掉帧现象，这与我们在旧版 Pocket 3 上观察到的情况类似。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	30049.6 μs * -6276%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5030, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	2080 μs * -341%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1942.1 μs * -312%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	732.6 μs * -55%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	645 μs * -37%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	471.3 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试设备配备了 Kioxia KXG70ZNV1T02M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘，传输速率超过 6800 MB/s。不幸的是，这一传输速率在大约一分钟的压力下是不可持续的，我们的 DiskSpd 循环测试结果如下所示，性能将骤降至 2900 MB/s 左右。Pocket 4 的设计不支持固态硬盘散热器，而散热器很可能会提高性能的可持续性。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6483 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4839 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 656.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 433.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3824 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4722 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 227.7 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
GPD Pocket 4	93.2 pt
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	74.5 pt
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	64.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	55.6 pt
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	18.6 pt
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	9.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
GPD Pocket 4	3543 (3463.87^min - 3542.51^max) MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2500 (1776.5^min - 2499.6^max) MB/s -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2492 (2463.73^min - 2492.26^max) MB/s -30%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2119 (2112.04^min - 2119.17^max) MB/s -40%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	507 (503.57^min - 506.5^max) MB/s -86%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	121 (119.12^min - 121.01^max) MB/s -97%
seq write
GPD Pocket 4	4625 (3480.81^min - 4624.62^max) MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2757 (2694.69^min - 2756.71^max) MB/s -40%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2623 (1837.52^min - 2623.12^max) MB/s -43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1954 (1874.02^min - 1954.13^max) MB/s -58%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	373 (260.16^min - 373.18^max) MB/s -92%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	43 (39.93^min - 42.99^max) MB/s -99%
seq q8 t1 read
GPD Pocket 4	6355 (5605.9^min - 6355.08^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3499 (2732.17^min - 3499.31^max) MB/s -45%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	3410 (3100.94^min - 3410.49^max) MB/s -46%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	3051 (2850.45^min - 3051.36^max) MB/s -52%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	825 (723.33^min - 825.23^max) MB/s -87%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	124.2 (121.22^min - 124.15^max) MB/s -98%
seq q8 t1 write
GPD Pocket 4	4867 (4538.6^min - 4867.19^max) MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2842 (2705.33^min - 2842.27^max) MB/s -42%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2824 (2685.19^min - 2824.02^max) MB/s -42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2410 (2398.51^min - 2410.26^max) MB/s -50%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	486 (349.94^min - 485.99^max) MB/s -90%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	46.7 (34.53^min - 46.65^max) MB/s -99%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	80.5 (80.36^min - 80.45^max) MB/s +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	79.7 (72.36^min - 79.71^max) MB/s +35%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	77.5 (77.45^min - 77.51^max) MB/s +31%
GPD Pocket 4	59 (58.74^min - 58.95^max) MB/s
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	28 (20.74^min - 27.95^max) MB/s -53%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	5.55 (5.17^min - 5.55^max) MB/s -91%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	279 (271.06^min - 278.75^max) MB/s +23%
GPD Pocket 4	227 (220.18^min - 227.04^max) MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	213 (211.2^min - 212.65^max) MB/s -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	125.6 (122.85^min - 125.61^max) MB/s -45%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	59.2 (50.68^min - 59.16^max) MB/s -74%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	1.23 (0.99^min - 1.23^max) MB/s -99%
4k q32 t16 read
GPD Pocket 4	3497 (1357.47^min - 3497.01^max) MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1647 (1638.92^min - 1646.84^max) MB/s -53%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1403 (1068.66^min - 1403.24^max) MB/s -60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	665 (643^min - 665.11^max) MB/s -81%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	378 (316.72^min - 377.74^max) MB/s -89%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	7.49 (7.35^min - 7.49^max) MB/s -100%
4k q32 t16 write
GPD Pocket 4	1720 (1666.75^min - 1720.14^max) MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1330 (899.5^min - 1330.47^max) MB/s -23%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1113 (1107.59^min - 1113.49^max) MB/s -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	354 (346.58^min - 354.16^max) MB/s -79%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	310 (178.62^min - 309.52^max) MB/s -82%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	1.5 (1.33^min - 1.5^max) MB/s -100%

AS SSD
Score Total
GPD Pocket 4	6318 Points
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	4445 Points -30%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	4241 Points -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2783 Points -56%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	799 Points -87%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	774 Points -88%
Score Read
GPD Pocket 4	2849 Points
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1859 Points -35%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1723 Points -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	841 Points -70%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	383 Points -87%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	303 Points -89%
Score Write
GPD Pocket 4	2054 Points
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1846 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1551 Points -24%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1437 Points -30%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	320 Points -84%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	247 Points -88%
Seq Read
GPD Pocket 4	5293.31 MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2981 MB/s -44%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2972.75 MB/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2802 MB/s -47%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	925 MB/s -83%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	702 MB/s -87%
Seq Write
GPD Pocket 4	4532.38 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2598.37 MB/s -43%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2555 MB/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1692 MB/s -63%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	446.1 MB/s -90%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	294 MB/s -94%
4K Read
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	72.4 MB/s +23%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	70.67 MB/s +20%
GPD Pocket 4	58.86 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	51.17 MB/s -13%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	25.23 MB/s -57%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	18 MB/s -69%
4K Write
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	234.6 MB/s +17%
GPD Pocket 4	200.12 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	177.01 MB/s -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	147.09 MB/s -26%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	46.51 MB/s -77%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	28.2 MB/s -86%
4K-64 Read
GPD Pocket 4	2260.35 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1490.58 MB/s -34%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1352 MB/s -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	509.42 MB/s -77%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	272 MB/s -88%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	207.6 MB/s -91%
4K-64 Write
GPD Pocket 4	1400.18 MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1356 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1234.89 MB/s -12%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1000.03 MB/s -29%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	228.5 MB/s -84%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	189.6 MB/s -86%
Access Time Read
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	0.302 ms * -268%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	0.266 ms * -224%
GPD Pocket 4	0.082 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.05 ms * +39%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	0.045 ms * +45%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.027 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	0.289 ms * -345%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	0.157 ms * -142%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	0.088 ms * -35%
GPD Pocket 4	0.065 ms *
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.049 ms * +25%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.03 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPD Pocket 4 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3370 (2671.04-6425.82)

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6717 (6257.13-6734)

图形处理器性能

3DMark 结果比我们数据库中集成了相同的 Radeon 890M图形处理器。因此，原始图形性能与 Radeon 780M或最新传统笔记本电脑上常见的 Arc 8 竞争产品相当接近。

有趣的是，根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表，在低风扇模式而不是高风扇模式下运行对性能的影响非常小。值得庆幸的是，如果使用电池供电，性能也不会人为降低。

电源配置文件	图形得分	物理得分	综合得分
性能模式（高风扇）	8540	25111	3114
平衡模式（高风扇）	8408	24928	3048
性能模式（低风扇）	8479	24708	3088
电池电量	8552	24851	3113

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average AMD Radeon 890M	100 pt
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	92.3 pt
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	92.2 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	87.4 pt
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 ^-1! AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	78.4 pt
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	74.6 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	69.8 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	68.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	48.6 pt
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	25 pt
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA ^-1! Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100	9.4 pt
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030	3.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average AMD Radeon 890M (13267 - 16800, n=7)	15303 Points +15%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	13828 Points +4%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13267 Points
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12918 Points -3%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12205 Points -8%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	11254 Points -15%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10261 Points -23%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	10150 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	6251 Points -53%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	2942 Points -78%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100	1468 Points -89%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030	588 Points -96%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average AMD Radeon 890M (8188 - 10037, n=7)	9105 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	8775 Points +3%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8618 Points +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8540 Points
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	8397 Points -2%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7459 Points -13%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7129 Points -17%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	6865 Points -20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	6683 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	5517 Points -35%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	3236 Points -62%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030	411 Points -95%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average AMD Radeon 890M (3286 - 3676, n=8)	3496 Points +6%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3491 Points +6%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3286 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	3196 Points -3%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	3021 Points -8%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2680 Points -18%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2554 Points -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2444 Points -26%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	2303 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	1606 Points -51%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	783 Points -76%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100	322 Points -90%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030	113 Points -97%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Average AMD Radeon 890M (3642 - 4073, n=7)	3859 Points +6%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3829 Points +5%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3642 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	3507 Points -4%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	3337 Points -8%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2954 Points -19%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2832 Points -22%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2832 Points -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2688 Points -26%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	2559 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	1821 Points -50%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	880 Points -76%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100	364 Points -90%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5030	129 Points -96%

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		12940 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34977 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7942 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3642 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		570 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	302 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Intel Processor N100	3964 Seconds * -1204%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	730 Seconds * -140%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	550 Seconds * -81%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	517 Seconds * -70%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	437 Seconds * -44%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	420 Seconds * -38%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	393 Seconds * -29%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	365 Seconds * -20%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	304 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 890M (229 - 306, n=6)	263 Seconds * +13%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

运行游戏时的平均性能大约比华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.由于采用了更新的架构和更快的内存，它比 Arc 8 或 Radeon 780M 快的幅度也比上述 3DMark 结果所显示的要大。虽然我们不建议将目标锁定为原始 1600p 分辨率，但像《博德之门 3》这样要求苛刻的游戏在 1200p 和低设置下仍能运行得相当不错。

F1 22
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 890M (173.2 - 186.8, n=3)	179.6 fps +4%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	173.2 (147^min, 114^P1) fps
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	136.1 (110^min, 91^P1) fps -21%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	128.2 (96^min, 87^P1) fps -26%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	106 (86^min, 79^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=6)	104.4 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	94.9 (81^min, 70^P1) fps -10%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	78.1 (58^min, 57^P1) fps -26%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	72.2 (61^min, 60^P1) fps -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.4 (39^min, 38^P1) fps -55%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	97.1 (81^min, 74^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=6)	96 fps -1%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	86.7 (75^min, 66^P1) fps -11%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	70.4 (57^min, 56^P1) fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	65.2 (55^min, 54^P1) fps -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43.5 (36^min, 36^P1) fps -55%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=6)	73.8 fps +2%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	72.3 (59^min, 58^P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	64.6 (55^min, 53^P1) fps -11%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	51.5 (44^min, 44^P1) fps -29%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	46.6 (39^min, 39^P1) fps -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.7 (24^min, 25^P1) fps -58%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=6)	20.5 fps +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	20.2 (13^min, 14^P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	17.8 (14^min, 14^P1) fps -12%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	12.6 (9^min, 9^P1) fps -38%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	12.4 (8^min, 8^P1) fps -39%

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (148.2 - 172.1, n=3)	163.5 fps +10%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	148.2 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	84.3 fps -43%
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (84.4 - 88.3, n=3)	86.5 fps +2%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	84.4 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	51.6 fps -39%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (60.7 - 62.3, n=3)	61.7 fps +2%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	60.7 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	39.9 fps -34%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (39.5 - 41.8, n=3)	40.8 fps +3%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	39.5 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.9 fps -37%
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (31.6 - 34.1, n=3)	32.7 fps +3%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	22.2 fps -30%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average AMD Radeon 890M (75.5 - 94.6, n=8)	84.5 fps +3%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	81.9 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	80.7 fps -1%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	71.1 fps -13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	63.2 fps -23%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58.5 fps -29%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	57.1 fps -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.9 fps -48%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.7 fps -66%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	4.15 fps -95%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	45.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (37 - 48.4, n=8)	43.9 fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps -12%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	38.3 fps -15%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.9 fps -20%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	35.2 fps -22%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	32.7 fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.2 fps -46%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 fps -63%
1920x1080 High Quality
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (26.6 - 34.4, n=8)	31.4 fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	30 fps -8%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 fps -12%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.3 fps -19%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.4 fps -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 fps -25%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	23.9 fps -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 fps -48%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.9 fps -63%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	166.6 (142.9^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (132.3 - 175.6, n=9)	160.7 fps -4%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	127 (107.9^min) fps -24%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	120.7 (109.6^min) fps -28%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	120.2 (104.3^min) fps -28%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	107.9 (89.9^min) fps -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	104.2 (80.8^min) fps -37%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	98.6 (62.9^min) fps -41%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	95.9 (79.5^min) fps -42%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	44.7 (32.5^min) fps -73%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	35 (30.6^min) fps -79%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	34.7 (32.5^min) fps -79%
1366x768 med (1/3)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	129.7 (110.9^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (121.4 - 135.7, n=9)	129.4 fps 0%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	106.9 (90.1^min) fps -18%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	105.3 (93.9^min) fps -19%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	100.1 (86.2^min) fps -23%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	84.3 (68.1^min) fps -35%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	84.1 (43.1^min) fps -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	82.2 (62.6^min) fps -37%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	68.9 (44.4^min) fps -47%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	33.6 (31.4^min) fps -74%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	27.6 (20.6^min) fps -79%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	11.5 (7.7^min) fps -91%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	92.1 (82.9^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	86.5 (77.6^min) fps -6%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	83.8 (75^min) fps -9%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	76.4 (67.4^min) fps -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	67.8 (58.5^min) fps -26%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	67.4 (41.1^min) fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	64.8 (53.8^min) fps -30%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (34.8 - 100, n=9)	58.6 fps -36%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.4 (17.6^min) fps -51%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	31.6 (29.6^min) fps -66%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	14.2 (4.8^min) fps -85%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	5.9 (4.2^min) fps -94%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	85 (75.3^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	76.2 (68.4^min) fps -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	74.5 (65.7^min) fps -12%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	67.2 (58.9^min) fps -21%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	63.6 (41.1^min) fps -25%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	62.2 (53.9^min) fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57 (48^min) fps -33%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (32.4 - 89.8, n=9)	54 fps -36%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.2 (36.5^min) fps -52%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.8 (28.6^min) fps -64%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	13.4 (9.1^min) fps -84%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	5.9 (3^min) fps -93%

Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average AMD Radeon 890M (165.1 - 199.8, n=8)	183.7 fps 0%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	182.9 (126.7^min, 158.5^P1) fps
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	178.9 (108.2^min, 151^P1) fps -2%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	163 fps -11%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	161.1 (106.7^min, 128.1^P1) fps -12%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	145.7 (66.5^min, 114.1^P1) fps -20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	143.2 (103.9^min, 123^P1) fps -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	88.9 (19.3^min, 33^P1) fps -51%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.6 (7.2^min, 20.7^P1) fps -61%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	8.5 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -95%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	77.8 (62.9^min, 66.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (71.1 - 82, n=8)	76.4 fps -2%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	72.5 (53.5^min, 62.3^P1) fps -7%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	71 fps -9%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	70.1 (36.7^min, 60.4^P1) fps -10%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	64.3 (31^min, 51.5^P1) fps -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	59.7 (48.5^min, 51.9^P1) fps -23%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	57.5 (44.8^min, 50.9^P1) fps -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.7 (15.8^min, 23.2^P1) fps -46%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.4 (7.4^min, 15.4^P1) fps -58%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	65.9 (49.2^min, 52.5^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (59.7 - 69.8, n=8)	64.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	60 (38.9^min, 46.3^P1) fps -9%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	59 fps -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	58.1 (42.5^min, 44.4^P1) fps -12%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	53.3 (28.5^min, 39.6^P1) fps -19%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	49.7 (37.5^min, 38.4^P1) fps -25%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	47.8 (34.2^min, 37.7^P1) fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.5 (12.2^min, 16.9^P1) fps -51%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.7 (7.2^min, 9.61^P1) fps -59%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	56.1 (42.7^min, 45.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (49.8 - 59.7, n=8)	54.9 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	51.6 (35.6^min, 40.1^P1) fps -8%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	49.9 (22.2^min, 25.4^P1) fps -11%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	46 fps -18%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	45.7 (27.3^min, 34.4^P1) fps -19%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	42.6 (32^min, 33.6^P1) fps -24%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	41.5 (29^min, 31.8^P1) fps -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.2 (7.4^min, 9.36^P1) fps -53%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21.8 (5^min, 5.93^P1) fps -61%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	81 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (66.5 - 91.1, n=8)	79.7 fps -2%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	56.2 fps -31%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	54 fps -33%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 fps -34%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	51.6 fps -36%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	48.1 fps -41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.3 fps -43%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	42 fps -48%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22 fps -73%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	13.6 fps -83%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	5.01 fps -94%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	65 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (54.4 - 69.9, n=8)	62.4 fps -4%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	45.1 fps -31%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	41.4 fps -36%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	40.6 fps -38%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	39.3 fps -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	36.6 fps -44%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	36.5 fps -44%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	33.1 fps -49%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.8 fps -71%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	12 fps -82%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	3.46 fps -95%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	50.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (44 - 53.3, n=8)	48.5 fps -4%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	38.9 fps -23%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	33.5 fps -34%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	33.2 fps -34%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	32.9 fps -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.6 fps -37%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	31.5 fps -38%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.4 fps -46%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19 fps -62%
Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	10.9 fps -78%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	3.09 fps -94%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	167.2 (5.26^min, 111.1^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (157.8 - 174.3, n=9)	165.3 fps -1%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	158.1 (4.25^min, 76.9^P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	144.5 (4.52^min, 76.9^P1) fps -14%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	140.3 (7.08^min, 83.3^P1) fps -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	104.3 (18.5^min, 55.6^P1) fps -38%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	66.1 (20.6^min, 38.5^P1) fps -60%
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605	11.6 (0.2759^min, 2.71^P1) fps -93%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average AMD Radeon 890M (137 - 150.9, n=5)	145 fps +6%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	137 (4.79^min, 83.3^P1) fps
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	111.7 (19.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps -18%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	110 (17.3^min, 50^P1) fps -20%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	81.2 (12.5^min, 55.6^P1) fps -41%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	51.2 (18.8^min, 34.5^P1) fps -63%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	157 (4.15^min, 100^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (129.6 - 161.5, n=8)	153.3 fps -2%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	147.9 (4.22^min, 83.3^P1) fps -6%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	144 (6.34^min, 83.3^P1) fps -8%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	127.6 (6.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	93.1 (10.4^min, 52.6^P1) fps -41%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.3 (10.6^min, 33.3^P1) fps -61%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average AMD Radeon 890M (127.8 - 146.1, n=5)	140.5 fps +10%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	127.8 (4.52^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	120.9 (6.38^min, 76.9^P1) fps -5%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	114.6 (25^min, 71.4^P1) fps -10%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	107.2 (13.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -16%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	79.6 (15.1^min, 50^P1) fps -38%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.7 (15.5^min, 29.4^P1) fps -64%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average AMD Radeon 890M (68.4 - 80.2, n=9)	77.1 fps +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	76.5 (8.24^min, 52.6^P1) fps
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	67.7 (8.85^min, 43.5^P1) fps -12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	66.5 (11.6^min, 43.5^P1) fps -13%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	52.9 (7.78^min, 37^P1) fps -31%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	51.4 (1.467^min, 27^P1) fps -33%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.6 (1.981^min, 23.8^P1) fps -48%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.7 (11^min, 18.2^P1) fps -68%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.6 (4.49^min, 12.2^P1) fps -73%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.8 (6.12^min, 22.7^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (30.4 - 33.2, n=9)	31.9 fps -3%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	29 (6.01^min, 20^P1) fps -12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (7.11^min, 18.9^P1) fps -17%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	24.8 (3^min, 15.4^P1) fps -24%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (4.17^min, 15.9^P1) fps -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.6 (5.04^min, 7.41^P1) fps -68%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	8.99 (2.43^min, 5.38^P1) fps -73%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Average AMD Radeon 890M (55.2 - 73.4, n=4)	62.9 fps +14%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	55.2 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	45.8 fps -17%
1920x1080 Low Preset
Average AMD Radeon 890M (35 - 48.5, n=9)	42.7 fps +10%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	41.1 fps +6%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	38.8 fps
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	32.4 fps -16%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.7 fps -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.2 fps -22%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average AMD Radeon 890M (29.1 - 37.9, n=9)	34.5 fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	32.1 fps +1%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.8 fps
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.2 fps -5%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.6 fps -19%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.8 fps -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.3 fps -24%
1920x1080 High Preset
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (24.1 - 31.2, n=9)	28.6 fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	26.6 fps -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.4 fps -14%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	21.7 fps -26%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	21.1 fps -28%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.7 fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (24 - 31.1, n=8)	28.4 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 fps -11%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 fps -16%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	21.2 fps -27%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.3 fps -30%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	20.2 fps -31%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	92 (79^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (75 - 101, n=8)	92 fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	78 fps -15%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	67 fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	60 (48^min) fps -35%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	44 (31^min) fps -52%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28 fps -70%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	55 (49^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (42 - 60, n=8)	54.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	46 fps -16%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	40 fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	38 (34^min) fps -31%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28 (25^min) fps -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 fps -56%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	53 (47^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (39 - 55, n=8)	50.8 fps -4%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	42 fps -21%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	37 fps -30%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	36 (31^min) fps -32%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25 (23^min) fps -53%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20 fps -62%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	50 (44^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (33 - 52, n=8)	46.6 fps -7%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	40 fps -20%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34 fps -32%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	34 (29^min) fps -32%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (21^min) fps -52%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (72.5 - 85.1, n=4)	79.1 fps +9%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	72.5 (60^min) fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	53.6 (43.6^min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (40 - 52.5, n=9)	47.2 fps +3%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	46 (38.1^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	44.1 (37.1^min) fps -4%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	39.2 (33.2^min) fps -15%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	37.8 (29.9^min) fps -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	32.7 (27.3^min) fps -29%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	32.49 (25.2427^min) fps -29%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.9 (26.2^min) fps -33%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Average AMD Radeon 890M (31.3 - 40.9, n=9)	37.2 fps +5%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	35.5 (30.3^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (30^min) fps -3%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	29.5 (24.5^min) fps -17%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.3 (21.8^min) fps -29%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.9 (21.1^min) fps -30%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.8 (20.9^min) fps -30%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	30.1 (24.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (25.4 - 32.3, n=9)	29.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (23.2^min) fps -10%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.9 (22^min) fps -14%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (18.7^min) fps -22%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.9 (18.9^min) fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	20.1 (16.8^min) fps -33%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	26.6 (22.1^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (23.1 - 28.4, n=9)	26 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	22.9 (19.3^min) fps -14%
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	20.3 (15.7^min) fps -24%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	19.8 (16.6^min) fps -26%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	19.5 (15.3^min) fps -27%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	16.9 (14.2^min) fps -36%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø25.1 (23.1-25.8)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	167.2	157	76.5	32.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	166.6	129.7	92.1	85
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	81.9	45.1	32.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	81	65	50.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	92	55	53	50
Strange Brigade (2018)	182.9	77.8	65.9	56.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	84.4	60.7	39.5	31.6
F1 22 (2022)	106	97.1	72.3	20.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	38.8	31.8	29.4	29.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	46	35.5	30.1	26.6

排放量

系统噪音

内部风扇会随着负载的变化而频繁跳动，因此几乎始终处于活动状态，十分明显。在运行浏览器或视频播放等负载要求不高的情况下，风扇噪音可达 31 分贝（A），而在玩游戏时则高达 45 分贝（A）。该系统的噪音比 Pocket 3 大，与华硕 ROG Ally 差不多。

如果禁用涡轮风扇，那么游戏时的风扇噪音将徘徊在 38 dB(A)左右，而不是 45 dB(A)。

我们测试装置中的风扇会发出明显的呼呼声，如下图噪音图中 1K Hz 频率峰值所示。我们不确定这是否是该机型的特意设计，还是我们特定设备的独特问题。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle		25.8 / 25.8 / 31 dB(A)
Load		47 / 45.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A)

	GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), N100, Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
Noise		-10%	8%	22%	9%
off / environment *	22.8	24 -5%	23.4 -3%	23.59 -3%	24.3 -7%
Idle Minimum *	25.8	31.2 -21%	24.3 6%	23.98 7%	24.3 6%
Idle Average *	25.8	31.2 -21%	25.6 1%	23.98 7%	24.3 6%
Idle Maximum *	31	33.5 -8%	25.6 17%	23.98 23%	24.3 22%
Load Average *	47	45.5 3%	38.3 19%	24.09 49%	37.9 19%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	43.3
Load Maximum *	45.1	49 -9%	40.7 10%	24.04 47%	41.8 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		48.6	40.7		39.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管采用了高性能 CPU 和小巧的外形，但表面温度却出奇地合理。键盘和底部表面的热点温度约为 36 摄氏度，而即将上市的 Pocket 3 则超过 40 摄氏度。不过，上面提到的 CPU 性能低于平均水平可能是导致表面温度低于预期的原因。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


31.4 °C	33.4 °C	30.6 °C
32.4 °C	33.8 °C	28 °C
26.4 °C	27.4 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


29 °C	35.2 °C	31.4 °C
23.2 °C	30 °C	31.2 °C
23.2 °C	26 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 28.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


26.6 °C	26.4 °C	25 °C
26.6 °C	26.4 °C	23.8 °C
24.4 °C	23.8 °C	23.2 °C

Maximum: 26.6 °C
Average: 25.1 °C


24.2 °C	27.6 °C	26.4 °C
23.6 °C	28 °C	28.6 °C
23.4 °C	24.6 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 28.6 °C
Average: 25.7 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


33.8 °C	34.6 °C	29.6 °C
33.6 °C	33.4 °C	27.6 °C
30 °C	28.6 °C	25.4 °C

Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 30.7 °C


31.6 °C	35.8 °C	34 °C
25.2 °C	33.8 °C	35.4 °C
24.6 °C	29 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 31.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.7 °C / 87.3 F (+0.7 °C / 1.3 F).

	GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA Intel Processor N100, Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Intel Pentium Silver N5030, Intel UHD Graphics 605
Heat		7%	-19%	-4%	-11%	-12%
Maximum Upper Side *	33.8	35 -4%	40.4 -20%	37.1 -10%	44.6 -32%	36.8 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	35.2	26.8 24%	39.4 -12%	40 -14%	45.9 -30%	46 -31%
Idle Upper Side *	26.6	28.4 -7%	32.6 -23%	26.2 2%	24.8 7%	27.8 -5%
Idle Bottom *	28.6	25 13%	34.4 -20%	26.6 7%	25.3 12%	28.8 -1%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

集成立体声（2x 2 W）扬声器的音量出奇地大，略高于 91 dB(A)，而大多数笔记本电脑的音量小于 90 dB(A)。不过，正如尖锐的粉红噪声图所示，低音效果差在意料之中。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 27% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

该系统的耗电量比 Win 4在运行 Prime95 或游戏等高负载时，系统功耗比 Win 4 手持设备高出约 20%。不过，与 Ryzen 7 6800U 相比，CPU 和 GPU 性能分别提高了约 60% 和 25% 至 50%，尽管硬件要求更高，但每瓦性能却有所提高。

当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时，我们可以记录到小型（约 6.6 x 6.6 x 2.9 厘米）USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 57 瓦。如果同时进行游戏，较高的开销可为其他 USB 设备供电，并获得不错的充电速度。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.9 / 3.5 Watt
Idle	6 / 8.8 / 9.2 Watt
Load	53.1 / 56.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"	GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"	GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), Micron MT 128GBCAV2U31, TN, 1366x768, 11.6"	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Pentium N5030, UHD Graphics 605, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"
Power Consumption		-19%	-12%	56%	-6%	55%
Idle Minimum *	6	7.5 -25%	9.6 -60%	2.483 59%	5.1 15%	2.8 53%
Idle Average *	8.8	12.4 -41%	11 -25%	4.2429 52%	9.8 -11%	4.8 45%
Idle Maximum *	9.2	13 -41%	11.8 -28%	4.8869 47%	11.3 -23%	5.5 40%
Load Average *	53.1	46 13%	39 27%	13.04 75%	47.5 11%	11.8 78%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	45.7
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	50.1
Load Maximum *	56.4	56 1%	42 26%	28.507 49%	68.5 -21%	23.5 58%
Witcher 3 ultra *		45.2	36.4	12.4	36	11.8

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø55 (51.9-56.3)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45.7 (40.7-56)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.91 (6.61-8.17)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.59 (7.66-10.8)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø50.1 (47.5-56.9)

Power Consumption external Monitor

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (48.9-52.7)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45.7 (43.8-52.6)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.3 (40.7-47.5)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø47 (45.9-47.6)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.4 (51.2-54)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø45 (39.1-52.9)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.08 (5.75-8.37)

GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.72 (7.14-9.51)

GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø45.7 (44.8-47)

电池寿命

45 瓦时电池的续航时间从短到一般不等，视应用而定。如果浏览网页，用户可以期待 6 小时左右的使用时间，而不间断的游戏只能持续 60 到 90 分钟。

从空电到满电的充电时间相对较短，为 90 分钟。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		6h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 03min

	GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 Wh	GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh	GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 Wh	Asus BR1104CGA-N00007XA N100, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), 50 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh	Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK Pentium N5030, UHD Graphics 605, 50.3 Wh
Battery Runtime		22%	-3%	120%	26%	43%
WiFi v1.3	373	450 21%	360 -3%	820.1 120%	451 21%	532 43%
Load	63	77 22%			82 30%
Reader / Idle		581
H.264					562

笔记本检查评级

Back to the verdict

GPD Pocket 4 - 01/31/2025 v8
Allen Ngo

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Mechanical Inputs

72%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

67 / 68 → 98%

Weight

79 / 69-83 → 69%

Battery

70%

Display

73%

Games Performance

55 / 75 → 74%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 93%

AI Performance

90%

Temperature

94%

Noise

80%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

45 / 75 → 60%

Add Points

+1%

Average

57%

80%

Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
69.2%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 30.3%

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	946
Framework Laptop 16 R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7700S	953
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	956
GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	956
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	956
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	956
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	956
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	12892
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M	12902
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	12925
GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	12940
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE i9-14900, T1000	12953
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	12990
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13042
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

评语：真正的笔记本电脑替代品，但也有不足之处

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

规格

案例

尺寸比较

连接性

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

可持续性

配件和保修

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

压力测试

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形处理器性能

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

排放量

系统噪音

温度

发言人

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理

耗电量

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Power Consumption external Monitor

电池寿命

笔记本检查评级

More articles related to this device

Transparency