Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Pad 7 im Test (Bildquelle: Marcus Herbrich)

小米 Pad 7 评论：经济实惠的全能平板电脑，超越Apple iPad

最佳性价比

小米 Pad 7 不仅功能强大、价格诱人，而且可选配手写笔和键盘盖，是中小学或大学的全套设备。尤其是其明亮、快速的屏幕，让 iPad 11 或 iPad Air 11 等竞争对手望尘莫及。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

结论性价比之王，略有不足

与前代产品一样，小米 Pad 7 的出色性价比给人留下了深刻印象。尤其是 144 Hz 屏幕的高亮度，在中端平板电脑中实属罕见，即使是采用部分贴合的 60 Hz 面板的Apple 也明显占优。在电池续航时间方面，Pad 7 也与同类产品存在差距，因为尽管显示屏分辨率和刷新率更高，但它的续航能力却非常强。

在Android 阵营中，很难找到这么多低于 400 欧元的平板电脑。对Pad 7不利而对Pad 7 Pro有利的原因之一是缺少指纹传感器，而这是一项重要的便利和安全功能。

与 Pad 7 Pro（骁龙 8s Gen 3）相比，Pad 7 的高通处理器稍弱，但这在日常使用中并不是问题。即使对于无 PWM 的 2136p 面板而言，Pad 7 的骁龙 7+Gen 3 也足以确保流畅的操作和稳定的游戏。

不过，那些非常重视长期软件支持的用户还是应该考虑三星的 FE 机型，如Galaxy Tab S9 FE 或 Tab S10 FE，因为 Pad 7 在这方面较弱。此外，由于不支持 GNSS 和 5G，小米平板电脑的连接性也受到了限制。尽管如此，Pad 7 提供了笔支持和键盘保护套，可以满足生产性工作的需要。

Pros

+ 运行时间长
+ 明亮、快速的面板
+ 快速 SoC，低节流
+ 良好的音效
+ 支持笔和键盘
+ 高品质外壳

Cons

- 短时间更新保证
- 对比度可以更好
- 无 GPS 或蜂窝网络
- 指纹传感器缺失
- 保修期只有 12 个月

价格和供应情况

小米 Pad 7 可在德国亚马逊或直接从制造商处购买，零售价约为 400 欧元。Pad 7 也可在美国亚马逊购买，8 GB + 128 GB 版本起价 499 美元。

Amazon Logo
$519.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 8850mAh Bluetooth 5.4 Four Speakers 13 Mp Model 2410CRP4CG (Gray, 256GB + 8GB)
  • $309.50
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version 12.1 Octa Core Global Rom 10000 mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8Mp Dual Camera (Graphite Gray, 256Gb + 8Gb)
  • $157.50
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se 8.7 4G Lte (for Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) Dual Sim Factory Unlocked 8.7 Octa Core 2.0Ghz 6650mah (Graphite Gray, 128Gb + 6Gb)

小米将Pad 7定位为 "全能型 "平板电脑，这在我们使用过程中似乎并不牵强。一方面，这款 6.2 毫米薄的中端平板电脑应该是一款真正的工作利器，这要归功于工作站模式（可在不同窗口同时打开应用程序）以及可选的键盘和笔支持。另一方面 Pad 7 Pro 型号在我们的评测中，Pad 7 Pro 在扬声器、电池和显示屏方面应该没有什么大的区别，至少在纸面上是这样。

幸运的是，入门级版本（8 GB / 128 GB）的建议零售价仅为不到 400 欧元，与前代产品相比保持不变。 不变。对于配备 256 GB 的顶配版 Pad 7 而言，50 欧元的额外收费似乎才算公平。

小米 Pad 7：规格

Xiaomi Pad 7 (Pad 7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4, A720, A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 732
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, 360 Hz, Wet-Touch-Technology, Focus Pen, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: Type-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42
Battery
8850 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3,06“, 4K 30fps, camera2 API: Full)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.28, 1080p 30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 4, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, fanless
Weight
500 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

机箱：耐用金属外壳，无侵入保护

小米 Pad 7：颜色选择
小米 Pad 7：颜色选择

从外观上看，小米 Pad 7 与 Pad 6 相比并无太大变化。 Pad 6.不过，尺寸和重量略有变化，因为制造商调整了显示格式。前代产品仍采用 16:10 显示格式，而 Pad 7 则配备了 3:2 面板。

屏幕与机身正面的尺寸比在这个价位的产品中仍然非常不错。这款中端小米平板电脑的屏占比略低于 86%，看起来比昂贵得多的 iPad Air 11相比，这款中端小米平板电脑的屏占比仅为 86%，而 iPad Air 11 的屏占比仅为 81%。

11.2 英寸显示屏由康宁大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护，不过 Pad 7 将很快推出采用纳米结构表面的版本，以减少户外使用时的反光，与 iPad Pro 13 类似。 iPad Pro 13.

铝制一体成型外壳没有什么可批评的，只是官方称它既不防溅也不防水。表面处理非常出色，磨砂金属表面只是稍稍容易沾染指纹。此外，Pad 7 还能轻松应对扭转。

小米 Pad 7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 Pad 7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 Pad 7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 Pad 7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
小米 Pad 7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
280 mm 181.85 mm 7.52 mm 571 g268.7 mm 168.96 mm 7.15 mm 520 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

硬件特色配备快速 USB 3.2 接口的小米 Pad 7

Pad 7 配备了四扬声器系统、红外爆破器、手写笔支持、NFC、Miracast 和 USB OTG，为中端平板电脑提供了全面的功能。此外，与 三星平板电脑一样，工作站模式提供了专为多任务处理而设计的用户界面。借助 HyperConnect 功能，Pad 7 还可以与 HyperOS 智能手机连接，交换数据、使用摄像头或访问最多两个应用程序。

在德国，Pad 7 有两个版本，内部 UFS 存储容量分别为 128 GB 和 256 GB，内存容量为 8 GB LPDDR5x。USB Type-C 端口符合 USB 3.2 标准，这意味着数据可以快速传输。

在测试中，我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）测得的数据传输速率高达 218 MB/s。连接的外部存储介质可以使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。在适配器的帮助下，USB 端口还可用作外接显示器的图像信号输出。

返回顶部
返回顶部
顶部：麦克风、音量按钮和红外爆破器
顶部：麦克风、音量按钮和红外爆破器
右侧电源按钮、扬声器、麦克风和扬声器
右侧电源按钮、扬声器、麦克风和扬声器
左：扬声器、USB 3.2 端口和扬声器
左：扬声器、USB 3.2 端口和扬声器

软件：HyperOS 2.0，提供Android 15

小米 Pad 7 搭载了最新的 HyperOS 2.01 版本，其中包括众多人工智能工具，如利用文字说明创作图片的 "小米画布"，以及支持文字创作和实时转录的 "AI 写作"。通过 HyperAI，还可以使用人工智能助手，它是谷歌 Gemini 的改编版。

目前，Pad 7 还没有被列入小米安全中心，但预计未来会推出两大Android 更新和三年的安全补丁。这个价位的 Galaxy Tab S9 FE但小米在中端市场并不以及时推出更新而闻名。在我们评测期间，小米平板电脑使用的是最新的Android 15 操作系统，包括从 2025 年 2 月开始的安全补丁。

小米 Pad 7：主屏幕
小米 Pad 7：主屏幕
小米 Pad 7：设置页面
小米 Pad 7：设置页面
小米 Pad 7：控制中心
小米 Pad 7：控制中心

可持续性

Pad 7 的包装似乎不使用塑料，平板电脑本身用一种织物包裹。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。小米没有提供关于所用材料及其回收率的精确细节，但制造商确实提供了关于回收主题的一般信息。

例如，增加了对回收材料的使用，包括铝、金、铜或废弃渔网中的塑料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 6E，但不具备导航功能

小米 Pad 7 没有配备蜂窝调制解调器或 GNSS 模块。安装了两个麦克风，用于视频通话。

快速 Wi-Fi 6E 标准使用 6 GHz 频段进行无线传输，与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，峰值传输速率可达近 1,900 MB/s。

高通公司的 FastConnect 6900 在 5 GHz 频道中似乎有些不稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
991 (512min - 1016max) MBit/s +10%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (227 - 1810, n=57)
955 MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
905 (435min - 974max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
816 (764min - 851max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1656, n=86, last 2 years)
548 MBit/s -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
528 (438min - 633max) MBit/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
493 (472min - 514max) MBit/s -46%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
315 (223min - 362max) MBit/s -65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1596 (1524min - 1625max) MBit/s +129%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (442 - 1787, n=57)
943 MBit/s +35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
895 (751min - 988max) MBit/s +28%
Apple iPad 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
741 (621min - 759max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
698 (460min - 923max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=86, last 2 years)
538 MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
450 (371min - 488max) MBit/s -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
352 (125min - 381max) MBit/s -50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
1798 (893min - 1866max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (229 - 1845, n=61)
1425 MBit/s -21%
Average of class Tablet
  (578 - 1888, n=19, last 2 years)
1285 MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
1574 (765min - 1607max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (960 - 1842, n=19, last 2 years)
1436 MBit/s -9%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (598 - 1844, n=61)
1352 MBit/s -14%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1768 (893-1866)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (765-1607)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (435-974)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø528 (438-633)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø698 (460-923)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1524-1625)

摄像头：Pad 7 配备 1300 万像素后置摄像头

与小米 Pad 7 自拍
与小米 Pad 7 自拍

与 专业版相比，小米 Pad 7 基本版只能沿用前代产品的摄像头设置。 前代.800 万像素前置摄像头采用固定对焦，在日光下也能获得良好的拍摄效果。可录制 1080p 短视频信息，视频通话质量也不错。

后置 1300 万像素主摄像头可在光线充足的环境下拍摄出清晰的照片，尽管动态范围并不总是最佳。色彩还原和细节水平足以满足偶尔拍摄快照的需要。

当光线条件变差时，由于 1/3.06 英寸传感器较小，Pad 7 的图像很快就会出现噪点，不过在我们的测试照片中，噪点并不像Apple iPad 11 那样严重。

用户更倾向于使用相机拍摄文档或笔记，相机应用中有一个特殊模式可用于此目的。

1x
1x
2 倍变焦
10 倍变焦（最大值）
文件模式
相机应用程序
相机应用程序
相机应用程序
相机应用程序

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下，我们仔细观察了 1300 万像素光学镜头的色彩保真度。与参考色彩的偏差几乎没有明显的异常值（Delta E>10），大多数色调都能准确捕捉。

ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7: 6.31 ∆E min: 0.58 - max: 11 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7: 46.43 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 88.38 ∆E

配件和保修：Pad 7 配有可选触控笔和键盘

小米 Focus 触控笔可与 Pad 7 配合使用
小米 Focus 触控笔可与 Pad 7 配合使用

与 Pad 6 不同的是，小米这次省去了电源适配器，因为包装中没有随附充电器。如果需要，可以单独购买一个 45 W 的充电器（零售价：25 欧元）。Pad 7 的配送范围仅包括常见的信息文件和一条 USB 数据线。不过，USB 3.2 Gen 1 功能（图像输出）无法通过附带的数据线实现。

此外，小米还为 Pad 7 提供了售价约 100 欧元的Focus Pen和售价约 130 欧元的键盘盖作为可选配件。如果你直接向制造商订购，键盘盖是免费提供的，而笔的折扣价为 70 欧元。

小米平板电脑在德国提供12个月的保修服务。保修。

输入设备和操作：机载无指纹传感器

Pad 7 Pro 的电容式指纹扫描仪 Pad 7 Pro遗憾的是，Pad 7 上没有指纹扫描仪。因此，生物识别解锁只能通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。在光线条件良好的测试中，2D 人脸识别的反应速度和识别率都令我们信服，但这种方法被认为是相当不安全的。

11.2 英寸液晶面板的采样率高达 360 Hz，可以快速、精确地实现触摸输入。得益于 144 Hz 的高刷新率，HyperOS 界面上的动画也显得非常流畅。没有用于触觉的振动电机。

重 15 克的 Focus Pen 可以区分 8,192 个压力级别，让 Pad 7 的手写笔记变得非常容易。塑料笔握持舒适，手感优质，快速移动时屏幕几乎不会落后于笔尖。制造商称其延迟时间低至 3 毫秒。该笔支持手势控制和 "聚焦 "按钮，除其他功能外，还可用作遥控快门。

手写笔可以收纳在 Focus 键盘中，该键盘在运输过程中提供背光和 0 至 124° 的无级调节显示角度。不过，我们没有拿到键盘盖进行测试。

小米 Pad 7：默认键盘
小米 Pad 7：默认键盘
小米 Pad 7：纵向模式下的默认键盘

显示屏明亮的 144 Hz LCD，无 PWM

液晶显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由红色、蓝色和绿色 LED 组成
液晶显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由红色、蓝色和绿色 LED 组成

Pad 7 的 11.2 英寸液晶面板采用 3,200 x 2,136 分辨率，像素密度为 344 PPI，同时提供 44 Hz 至 144 Hz 的 7 级自适应刷新率。这款支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）的面板还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证，可实现无闪烁显示。我们在测量中也无法检测到 PWM 闪烁。

小米承诺的最大亮度为 800 cd/m²，我们可以在 APL18 测试和纯白背景下确认这一点，这对于一款中端平板电脑来说是一个很高的数值。令人惊讶的是，在我们的 HDR 视频中，亮度却因某种原因降至 565 cd/m²。

801
cd/m²		835
cd/m²		810
cd/m²
812
cd/m²		838
cd/m²		804
cd/m²
813
cd/m²		802
cd/m²		822
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 838 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 815.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 838 cd/m²
Contrast: 952:1 (Black: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"		Apple iPad 10
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen
6%
17%
-25%
-0%
-5%
Brightness middle
838
776
-7%
473
-44%
513
-39%
467
-44%
486
-42%
Brightness
815
750
-8%
449
-45%
480
-41%
468
-43%
466
-43%
Brightness Distribution
96
91
-5%
87
-9%
86
-10%
92
-4%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.88
0.58
34%
0.25
72%
0.4
55%
0.49
44%
0.26
70%
Contrast
952
1338
41%
1892
99%
1283
35%
953
0%
1869
96%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.56
13%
2.82
-57%
1.4
22%
2.29
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
4.5
-15%
3.8
3%
8.83
-126%
3.3
15%
6.82
-75%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
2.5
-0%
1.3
48%
2.9
-16%
2.3
8%
2.8
-12%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.178 101%
2.265 97%
2.21 100%
2.229 99%
CCT
6912 94%
6892 94%
6726 97%
7189 90%
6852 95%
7145 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

根据提供的规格，中端平板电脑与 专业版在屏幕方面没有区别。不过，Pad 7 的黑度明显较差，这可能表明显示屏供应商与其他产品不同 小米设备.

尽管如此，在日常使用中，黑阶仍能确保约 1:1,000 的平均对比度，在 APL18 测量中，由于黑色更丰富（0.84 cd/m²），对比度略高。不过，与竞争对手相比 照度低得多的竞争产品相比应该考虑到 Pad 7 的高亮度，这往往会导致黑色色调显得不那么深，因为光线没有完全被液晶阻挡。

彩色显示屏的设置选项也很丰富。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。色彩校准得非常好。个别颜色之间的差异几乎看不出来。

色彩准确度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：sRGB 扩展设置，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
15.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.774 ms rise
↘ 12.01 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.732 ms rise
↘ 24.21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

液晶屏的可视角度稳定性很好，作为一款中端平板电脑，Pad 7 在户外给人留下了深刻的印象。这意味着在户外使用时有足够的亮度。

不过，在我们这款没有纳米纹理涂层的平板电脑上，玻璃表面的反光令人讨厌。在全黑的图像上会出现液晶屏特有的轻微混浊，但这在日常使用中几乎不会产生任何负面影响。

小米 Pad 7：户外观赏
小米 Pad 7：户外观赏
小米 Pad 7：户外观赏
小米 Pad 7：户外观赏
小米 Pad 7：稳定的可视角度
小米 Pad 7：稳定的可视角度

性能小米采用骁龙 7+ 第三代处理器

骁龙 7+ Gen 3 骁龙 7+ 第三代的性能低于 骁龙 8s 第 3 代的 Pad 7 Pro.尽管如此，对于中端平板电脑而言，SoC 仍然非常强大。Geekbench 数值显示，单核心和多核心的性能与采用 骁龙 870.

总体而言，Pad 7 的性能出人意料地接近 Pro 机型。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1168 - 1893, n=2)
1531 Points -19%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1299 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=83, last 2 years)
1186 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1007 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
966 Points -49%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
412 Points -78%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (3865 - 5089, n=2)
4477 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=83, last 2 years)
3823 Points -25%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3357 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2616 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
2021 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1425 Points -72%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1580 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1403 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1391 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (876 - 1391, n=2)
1134 Points -18%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1003 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
774 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
767 Points -45%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 2224, n=73, last 2 years)
765 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
4465 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (3661 - 4465, n=2)
4063 Points -9%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
4027 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3328 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 10522, n=73, last 2 years)
2846 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2744 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
2045 Points -54%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1095324 - 1408366, n=2)
1251845 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=48, last 2 years)
861288 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
612145 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
459194 Points -67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
329731 Points -77%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
15466 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (14109 - 15466, n=2)
14788 Points -4%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13728 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
12802 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
12637 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=74, last 2 years)
10413 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8752 Points -43%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1098 Points
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
987 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (722 - 1098, n=2)
910 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
797 Points -27%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
754 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
747 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
601 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
419 Points -62%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
8323 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (6899 - 8323, n=2)
7611 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5289 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4494 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4151 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
3976 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2383 Points -71%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
9977 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (9114 - 9977, n=2)
9546 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
9324 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8463 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
8365 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7477 Points -25%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5259 Points -47%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points +29%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
10045 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (6544 - 10045, n=2)
8295 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6127 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=59, last 2 years)
5243 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
3932 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
3222 Points -68%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2554 Points -75%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
24169 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (23684 - 24169, n=2)
23927 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
11263 Points -53%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
10359 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
5145 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4622 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2243 Points -91%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1887 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1604 - 1887, n=2)
1746 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
1433 Points -24%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1336 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=59, last 2 years)
1306 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1297 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1071 Points -43%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
16501 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
13965 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (10851 - 13965, n=2)
12408 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
12084 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
7223 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
5087 Points -64%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3820 Points -73%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
38990 Points +3311%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)
7309 Points +539%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1143 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (811 - 1143, n=2)
977 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
258 Points -77%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=9, last 2 years)
1396 Points +50%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1082 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
933 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (n=1)
933 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
130 Points -86%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=9, last 2 years)
1178 Points +194%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
466 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
401 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (n=1)
401 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
86 Points -79%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
473 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=9, last 2 years)
448 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
404 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (n=1)
404 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
86 Points -79%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 8305, n=6, last 2 years)
2251 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
456 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
3671 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (n=1)
3671 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=8, last 2 years)
2165 Points -41%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
113 Points -97%

这一趋势在 GPU 测试中得以延续，我们经常看到 Pad 7 Pro甚至比非 Pro 版本稍弱，这可能是由于 Adreno 732和 Adreno 735GPU 规格相似。

与 iPad 10或 红米 Pad Pro进行比较，可以看出 Pad 7 的 GPU 性能很强。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2124 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
641 Points -79%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -96%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2250 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
632 Points -80%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points -96%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
8539 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2268 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
583 Points -95%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -34%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps -51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps -10%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
317 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95 fps -81%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -2%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -62%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps -10%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
171 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
63 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
58 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -54%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps -8%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
120 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
42 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
45 fps +25%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -58%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -4%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
75 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
25 fps -78%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
34 fps +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -62%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
32 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
10 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
47 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -62%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
94 fps -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
27 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
16 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4.5 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%

Pad 7 在浏览器基准测试中表现出色，甚至经常领先于 专业版机型。不过，我们测试的是后者的中文版，没有原生集成谷歌服务，如 Chrome 浏览器。

在日常使用中，浏览器的运行速度也令人印象深刻；网站打开速度很快，滚动浏览也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
187.643 Points
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
178.932 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (119.9 - 187.6, n=2)
153.8 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=70, last 2 years)
124.1 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
102.343 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
66.048 Points -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
272 runs/min +88%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
152.1 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
145 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (107 - 145, n=2)
126 runs/min -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
90.6 runs/min -38%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
61.9 runs/min -57%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
15.9 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=39, last 2 years)
13.9 runs/min -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (11 - 15.9, n=2)
13.5 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
5.3 runs/min -67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
3.7 runs/min -77%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
147 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (110 - 151, n=2)
130.5 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
115.8 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
114 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
68 Points -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (55668 - 66744, n=2)
61206 Points -8%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
59963 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=92, last 2 years)
33802 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
32436 Points -51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
16498 Points -75%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=78, last 2 years)
3494 ms * -519%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
2459.4 ms * -335%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
1287.1 ms * -128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms * -104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (565 - 1153, n=2)
859 ms * -52%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * -16%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms *
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
547 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

得益于快速的 UFS 4.0 标准，小米平板电脑 256 GB 版本的读写速度非常出色。值得注意的是，128 GB 存储容量的版本仅配备了 UFS 3.1，因此性能较差。

Xiaomi Pad 7Xiaomi Pad 7 ProLenovo Tab K11 PlusXiaomi Redmi Pad ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-51%
-55%
-76%
4%
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
3911.82
3849.52
-2%
1003.25
-74%
844.9
-78%
521.67
-87%
3674 ?(3249 - 4384, n=34)
-6%
1193 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=75, last 2 years)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
3387.43
3283.91
-3%
876.29
-74%
705.3
-79%
80.44
-98%
2674 ?(555 - 3387, n=34)
-21%
834 ?(78.2 - 3387, n=75, last 2 years)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
311.09
302.34
-3%
244.03
-22%
215.5
-31%
167.23
-46%
387 ?(218 - 483, n=34)
24%
200 ?(18.4 - 474, n=75, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
344.51
346.85
1%
232.16
-33%
231.4
-33%
98.68
-71%
408 ?(51.8 - 730, n=34)
18%
203 ?(8.23 - 668, n=75, last 2 years)
-41%

游戏：小米 Pad 7 实现 120 FPS

我们使用GameBench 应用程序测试了小米 Pad 7 的游戏适用性。.虽然 骁龙 7+ 第三代虽然骁龙7+Gen3 是一款中端 SoC，但在 11.2 英寸屏幕上，在最高图形设置下，《源氏冲击》等要求苛刻的游戏也能以 60 帧/秒的速度稳定运行，这已经是Android 上的最好成绩了。

由于小米平板电脑不支持游戏中的 120 帧选项，《PUBG Mobile》的高帧率游戏只能达到 90 帧。在《死亡扳机》等老游戏中，我们测得的平均帧率为 117 fps。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7; Dead Trigger 2: Ø116.7 (109-120)
Xiaomi Pad 7; Genshin Impact: Ø59.8 (57-60)
Xiaomi Pad 7; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.2 (80-90)
Xiaomi Pad 7; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (58-60)
Xiaomi Pad 7; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)

排放：Pad 7 在负载情况下几乎不会节流

温度

Pad 7 在负载情况下不会产生过多热量；即使在温度热点，我们也只测得不到 42 °C的适度升温。这也有利于持续性能，我们用 3DMark Wild Life Stress 测试来检验。

在负载情况下 骁龙 7+ Gen 3在负载情况下仅会出现 1.5% 至 13% 的节流，这使得日常使用中系统性能明显下降的可能性很小。

Max. Load
 32.5 °C41.4 °C41.7 °C 
 29.8 °C33.1 °C31.6 °C 
 29.9 °C31.3 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
39.4 °C38.2 °C34.4 °C
34 °C34.6 °C30.1 °C
30 °C30.7 °C29 °C
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.1 % +14%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 %
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
86.2 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
98.2 % +10%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 %
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
86.3 % -3%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % -2%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
% -100%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.8 (16.3-18.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.4 (58.5-67.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.15 (7.1-7.2)
小米 Pad 7 的表面温度：顶部
小米 Pad 7 的表面温度：顶部
小米 Pad 7 表面温度：底部
小米 Pad 7 表面温度：底部

扬声器

Pad 7 的音质在同价位产品中确实不错。Pad 7 的杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证四扬声器系统提供了迷人的立体声和听觉体验。我们的粉红噪声测量显示，声音中有轻微的低音，这在日常使用中也能感受到。

为了配合无线或有线耳机使用，小米平板电脑提供了一个 USB Type-C 端口和 5.4 版蓝牙。Pad 7 的购买者还有多种编解码器可供选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.240.62532.540.23121.932.44031.433.55033.538.26321.736.7802444.110017.846.712516.652.316019.760.72001958.625017.562.731516.26440016.562.850012.368.163012.375.48001577.7100013.280.5125012.481.4160011.683.5200013.377.625001278.3315012.778.6400012.976.8500013.368.863001375.1800013.176.51000013.578.61250013.662.81600013.468.3SPL25.490.4N0.786.6median 13.3median 75.4Delta1.7834.838.434.737.924.629.626.528.32934.23127.517.525.116.931.11836.421.239.921.645.62253.923.557.616.456.917.562.717.565.416.372.115.376.112.876.111.271.811.265.611.867.412.264.412.766.813.167.713.660.814.558.115.263.415.966.216.754.426.8820.948.8median 15.9median 63.436.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 7Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间：小米 Pad 7 持久耐用

能源消耗

虽然不再随附合适的电源适配器，但这款中端平板电脑兼容 QuickCharge 3 (QC3) 和 Power Delivery 3 (PD3)，这意味着可以使用标准的移动电源。使用 小米 25000移动电源，可在约 1.5 小时内将电池充满。

整体功耗堪称典范。Pad 7 在空闲模式下的功耗仅为 1.7 W，对于一款 11.2 英寸的平板电脑来说，能耗相对较低。在负载情况下，峰值功耗明显低于 Pad 7 Pro.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.74 / 1.72 / 1.74 Watt
Load midlight 7.26 / 8.11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh		Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
7040 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-18%
0%
-55%
-167%
4%
-0%
-99%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
0.75
-1%
1.1
-49%
1.7
-130%
1.34
-81%
1.2
-62%
0.82 ?(0.74 - 0.9, n=2)
-11%
1.761 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=72, last 2 years)
-138%
Idle Average *
1.72
1.5
13%
1.3
24%
2.2
-28%
7.78
-352%
1.4
19%
1.41 ?(1.1 - 1.72, n=2)
18%
3.75 ?(1 - 9.2, n=72, last 2 years)
-118%
Idle Maximum *
1.74
1.56
10%
1.6
8%
2.9
-67%
7.89
-353%
1.8
-3%
1.62 ?(1.5 - 1.74, n=2)
7%
4.24 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=72, last 2 years)
-144%
Load Average *
7.26
7.92
-9%
4.4
39%
5.8
20%
9.05
-25%
2.5
66%
6.98 ?(6.7 - 7.26, n=2)
4%
9.47 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=72, last 2 years)
-30%
Load Maximum *
8.11
16.5
-103%
9.8
-21%
13.9
-71%
9.98
-23%
8.3
-2%
9.71 ?(8.11 - 11.3, n=2)
-20%
13.2 ?(3.9 - 46.7, n=72, last 2 years)
-63%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.53 (0.924-8.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.65 (5.85-14.8)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.05 (7.98-8.09)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.57 (6.35-6.93)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

电池寿命

在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，Pad 7 的续航能力相当出色，Wi-Fi 下的备份时间超过 18 小时，视频播放时间接近 21 小时。小米 Pad 7 的续航时间比 iPad 10 高出 8 个多小时。 Apple iPad 10.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
41h 21min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
18h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 01min
Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh		Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-26%
-10%
-33%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2481
1517
-39%
2236
-10%
1729
-30%
3057
23%
H.264
1249
727
-42%
1052
-16%
740
-41%
942
-25%
WiFi v1.3
1086
1054
-3%
734
-32%
924
-15%
647
-40%
754
-31%
Load
241
260
8%
245
2%
191
-21%
287
19%

Notebookcheck 对小米 Pad 7 的总体印象

小米 Pad 7 拥有超亮的 144 Hz 显示屏、强大的生产力功能和超长的电池续航时间，有望成为中端手机中的大热门。

Xiaomi Pad 7 - 04/11/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 82%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
42 / 65 → 65%
Application Performance
70 / 92 → 76%
AI Performance
27%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
60 / 90 → 66%
Average
66%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
70%
Power Use
95.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 50.1%

Potential competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $519.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $309.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
3. $157.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se 8.7 4G L...
List Price: 400€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
2.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $519.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $309.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
3. $304.00
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 450€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS
3.
78.1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $199.99
Lenovo Tab K11 TB330XU Table...
2. $9.99
XunyLyee 2 Pack, Screen Prot...
3. $48.89
Lenovo Tab Pen Plus (AP500U/...
520 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.45"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
4.
78.7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon: $304.00
List Price: 380€		571 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS
5.
88.6% v7 (old)
Apple iPad 10
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic ⎘
Apple A14 Bionic GPU ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $349.00
Apple iPad (10th Generation)...
2. $327.55
New Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 ...
3. $359.99
Apple iPad (10th Generation)...
List Price: 579€		477 g64 GB SSD10.90"
2360x1640
264 PPI
IPS
6.
85.3% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.0		Amazon: $279.99
List Price: 429€		467 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash10.40"
2000x1200
224 PPI
TFT

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Pad 7 评论：经济实惠的全能平板电脑，超越Apple iPad
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-04-16 (Update: 2025-04-16)