联想 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 IML 评测:流星湖-U带来全新时尚外观
今年的 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 取代了较早的 2021 款 ThinkBook 14s Yoga新的处理器选项和更新的机身设计。不要把它与 ThinkBook 14 G4 Clamshell完全不同的设计和功能。
我们的测试机是基本配置,配备酷睿至尊 5 125U Meteor Lake-U CPU、16 GB 可移动 DDR5-5600 内存和 14 英寸 1200p IPS 触摸屏,售价约为 1200 美元。高端配置配备酷睿至尊 7 155U 和最高 32GB 内存,但 1200p 触摸屏和集成显卡是固定的。
ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 的替代产品包括其他通用 14 英寸笔记本电脑,如华硕 VivoBook Flip 14 宏碁 Aspire 5 Spin 14 或惠普Pavilion Plus 14 。与HP Spectre x360 14,Asus ZenBook Flip 14, 或Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 等价格较高的旗舰产品相比,该机型的目标客户更多是有预算意识的消费者和混合型远程工作者。
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
82.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
79.1 % v7 (old) | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX | 1.5 kg | 18.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 半专业、半消费者
与全黑和全专业的 ThinkPad 系列不同,ThinkBook 系列采用银色,质地更加光滑,吸引了小型企业和家庭办公用户。ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 保留了 ThinkBook Plus Twist G4 或 ThinkBook 16 G6 的金属合金材料,外观和质感保持一致。不过,与 Yoga 9 机型或惠普 Spectre 机型相比,ThinkBook 的机身更容易扭转,因此也没有那么坚硬。
由于过渡到了 16:10,该机型比 2021 年的前机型略大、略重。即便如此,该系统仍可与竞争对手的 宏碁 Aspire 5 Spin 14的重量和尺寸相当。用户需要考虑更昂贵的机型,如 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 或 Spectre x360 14,以获得明显更轻、更便携的选择。
连接性 - 完全支持 Thunderbolt
2021 年机型的所有端口在最新迭代机型上都得到了保留,只是重新进行了排列。例如,联想一键恢复按钮现在位于底部,而不是左侧边缘。此外,我们还很欣赏端口间距合理的设计,而 2021 型的端口间距更窄、更拥挤。 VivoBook Flip 14或 Aspire 5 Spin 14 的接口则更为紧凑和拥挤。
SD 读卡器
MicroSD 读卡器又回来了,但性能没有变化。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
无线局域网已从较旧的英特尔 AX201 升级到较新的 AX203。不过,由于较新的模块不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7 连接,因此性能并没有提高。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl |
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头和隐私快门。不过,红外传感器是可选配置,而且只有特定配置才配备。
维护
移除底部面板后,可看到可扩展内存(2x SODIMM)、可扩展存储(2x M.2 2280)和可移动 WLAN。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中还附带了一支有源触控笔(WE03 MI4081)。不过,这次的触控笔是通过磁力沿侧面吸附到笔记本电脑上的,而旧版 2021 的触控笔是通过一个特殊的笔槽集成到笔记本电脑上的。这种新方法不仅安全性较差,而且新笔甚至比旧版本的笔也大不了多少,因此握起来并不舒服。
在美国购买时,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和点击板
键盘
与 2021 款 ThinkBook 14s Yoga 相比,防泼溅键盘的布局有所调整。尤其是方向键和第一排功能键的尺寸更大了,不那么拥挤了,而 QWERTY 键之间的空间也缩小了,键帽稍大了一些。
键入时,每个键之间的反馈都很均匀,既有足够的阻力,也有类似 IdeaPad 的咔哒声。不过,我们仍然认为 ThinkPad 或惠普 Envy 和 Spectre 系列的键盘更坚硬,因此键入起来更令人满意。
触摸板
联想的点击板比 Aspire 5 Spin 14 的点击板要大(12 x 7.5 对 10.5 x 6.5 厘米),便于多点触控输入。按下输入点击时的反馈比其他大多数超薄笔记本电脑更坚硬、更响亮,手感更令人满意。
显示屏 - 色彩出色,但整体一般
ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 采用了 IdeaPad Flex 5 14 上的升级版面板。IdeaPad Flex 5 14.与 Aspire 5 Spin 14 或 VivoBook Flip 14 上只有 45% 的 NTSC 或 60% 的 sRGB 相比,现在的色域涵盖了完整的 sRGB 标准。这直接导致色彩明显更深、更鲜艳。
显示屏的其他方面都是典型的标准 IPS 面板,包括 60 Hz 刷新率、平均响应时间和对比度。要想获得更深邃的色彩和更好的 HDR 支持,你必须花更多的钱购买 OLED 显示屏。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 302.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 865:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.47
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE Innolux N140HCG-EQ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 BOE CQ NV140WUM-N41, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Chi Mei CMN N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -15% | -43% | -45% | -40% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.6 | 59.4 -17% | 39.8 -44% | 38.5 -46% | 41.6 -42% | 99.8 39% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 88.7 -11% | 58 -42% | 57.3 -43% | 62.1 -38% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.4 | 61.3 -16% | 41.1 -44% | 39.8 -46% | 43 -41% | 95.8 31% |
Response Times | -84% | -6% | -4% | -46% | 96% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.8 ? | 50 ? -74% | 30.2 ? -5% | 29 ? -1% | 39 ? -35% | 0.82 ? 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 35 ? -94% | 19.3 ? -7% | 19 ? -6% | 28 ? -56% | 0.95 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 504.7 ? | ||||
Screen | 38% | -81% | -115% | -97% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 302.7 | 304 0% | 335.2 11% | 249 -18% | 205 -32% | 384 27% |
Brightness | 293 | 289 -1% | 316 8% | 235 -20% | 186 -37% | 386 32% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 86 -2% | 85 -3% | 78 -11% | 98 11% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.1 71% | 0.29 17% | 0.27 23% | 0.22 37% | |
Contrast | 865 | 3040 251% | 1156 34% | 922 7% | 932 8% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.45 | 2.97 14% | 7.49 -117% | 5 -45% | 5.14 -49% | 4.06 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.04 | 5.69 6% | 22.25 -268% | 8.32 -38% | 19.57 -224% | 6.73 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.47 | 0.59 -26% | 2.17 -362% | 5.06 -977% | 3.17 -574% | 0.49 -4% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 3.58 24% | 6.9 -47% | 2.86 39% | 4.1 13% | 1.1 77% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 5804 112% | 6346 102% | 5988 109% | 6419 101% | 6807 95% | 6331 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 43.04 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 62.1 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
9% | -43% /
-62% | -55% /
-84% | -61% /
-77% | 45% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏没有经过预校准,色温尤其偏高。使用我们的 X-Rite 色差计对面板进行校准后,平均灰度值和色彩 deltaE 值分别降至 0.9 和 0.47,从而弥补了这一不足。我们建议使用上述经过校准的 ICM 配置文件,以充分利用显示屏及其完整的 sRGB 色彩。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.9 ms rise | |
↘ 9.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于亮度有限,加上光面显示屏,即使在阴凉处也会产生过度眩光,因此室外可视性相对较差。因此,2 合 1 外形更适合室内多媒体消费,而非室外应用。升级到 Yoga 9 2-in-1 14 及其更明亮的 OLED 显示屏有助于在一定程度上减少眩光。
性能 - 酷睿 i5 Meteor Lake-U 能否给人留下深刻印象?
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将联想 Vantage 和 Windows 设置为性能模式。用户应该习惯 Vantage,因为许多联想特有的功能和 BIOS 更新都可以在这里切换。
处理器
酷睿至尊 5 125U 酷睿至尊 5 125U性能与去年的 酷睿 i5-1335U.因此,原始性能与去年相比并没有显著提高。因此,酷睿至尊 5 125U 与老一代 CPU 的主要区别在于新集成的用于本地 AI 加速的 NPU。不过,在不久的将来 Windows 可以集成更多 AI 功能之前,NPU 目前的应用还很有限。
升级到 酷睿至尊 7 155U配置,性能将提升 5% 至 10%。 Yoga 9 二合一 14.
U 系列设计的性能可持续性并不完美,这也在意料之中。当循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,仅两个周期后性能就会下降近 20%,这表明在长时间的压力下 Turbo Boost 性能有限。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4492 - 4659, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
压力测试
启动 Prime95 时,CPU 平均时钟频率、温度和封装功耗将分别飙升至 3.2 GHz、100 C 和 49 W,持续约 15 秒后迅速下降并稳定在 1.7 GHz、73 C 和 25 W。
运行时 GPU 时钟频率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在 1850 MHz 和 68 C,而配备更快 Arc 8 图形处理器的 Yoga Slim 7 14 G9 则为 2250 MHz 和 80 C。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 48 |
Prime95 压力 | 1.7 | -- | 74 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.5 | 1850 | 70 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.2 | 1850 | 68 |
系统性能
由于处理器之间存在多代差距,PCMark 的结果领先于旧款 ThinkBook 14s Yoga。请注意,我们的 AIDA64 结果要比其他大多数笔记本电脑慢得多,因为我们的配置只配备了一个 DDR5 模块;在结账时或最终用户可以安装两个。双通道设置可能会进一步提高 PCMark 分数。
我们曾多次遇到从睡眠中唤醒的问题,设备会冻结在空白屏幕上,因此需要重启。我们不确定原因,也不知道这是否是一个普遍问题,但还是值得注意。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5821 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 仅在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时发现了轻微的 DPC 问题。此外,60 FPS 的 4K 视频播放也非常完美,仅在 Windows 屏幕截图测试结束时出现两次掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 512 GB SK Hynix HFS512GEJ4X112NNVMe SSD,这是一款中端 PCIe4 x4 硬盘,理论最大读写速率分别为 5000 和 4700 MB/s。该硬盘长度仅为 42 毫米,但仍支持 80 毫米硬盘。不幸的是,如下图所示,较小的硬盘往往会出现节流现象,包括联想中的 SK Hynix。最高约 5000 MB/s 的读取速度只能持续约一分钟,然后就会降到 3000 MB/s 的范围。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -11! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - 4 核集成弧形图形处理器
Core Ultra H 系列与令人印象深刻的集成式弧 8不同的是,Core Ultra U 系列只配备了集成速度较慢的 4 核变体.Arc 4 iGPU 比 Arc 8 慢 50%以上,几乎与旧的 Iris Xe 96 EUs.因此,那些期望 GPU 性能比三年前的 ThinkBook 14s Yoga 有明显甚至微小提升的用户将大失所望。
在高配置或更高配置下运行《F1 22》或《博德之门 3》会导致系统崩溃。我们在其他 Meteor Lake 笔记本电脑上也遇到过这种情况。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 4284 | 19601 | 1423 |
均衡模式 | 4298 | 18635 | 1428 |
电池供电 | 4282 | 19650 | 1418 |
使用平衡模式或电池供电不会影响性能,上表中的Fire Strike 分数几乎完全相同。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6340 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20124 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3952 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1876 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ -2! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.5 | 41.3 | 21.4 | 11.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.8 | 52.2 | 52.8 | 50 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.4 | 19.5 | 15.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.8 | 28.2 | 23.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 38 | 20 | 19 | 18 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 73.7 | 32.9 | 26.6 | 22.9 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 27.2 | 21.1 | 14.1 | 11.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 39.9 | 35.9 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.7 | 14.5 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.5 | 15 | 12.4 | 11.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音几乎总是很安静,在某些情况下甚至无法察觉。例如,在运行 3DMark 06 时,风扇噪音在前 90 秒的基准测试场景中始终保持在 30 分贝(A)以下,而 Aspire 5 Spin 14 或 VivoBook Flip 14在类似条件下,风扇噪音会更快更大。因此,在会议或视频流期间,ThinkBook 的风扇脉动问题较小。
反之,当长时间运行要求更高的负载时,风扇噪音就会变大。运行数分钟后,我们能听到 45 分贝(A)的噪音水平。 Witcher 3这比旧款 ThinkBook 14s Yoga 大得多,与 Aspire 5 Spin 14 不相上下。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.6 / 44.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Xe MAX, i5-1135G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 2% | -21% | -18% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.9 -8% | 23.1 -0% | 26 -13% | 29.95 -30% | 23.4 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.9 -6% | 23.3 1% | 27.7 -18% | 29.95 -27% | 24.1 -3% |
Idle Average * | 24.2 | 24.9 -3% | 23.3 4% | 27.7 -14% | 29.95 -24% | 24.1 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 24.9 -3% | 23.3 4% | 29.7 -23% | 29.95 -24% | 25.3 -5% |
Load Average * | 29.6 | 29.1 2% | 37.3 -26% | 46.3 -56% | 39.84 -35% | 33.4 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.9 | 38.7 14% | 42.3 6% | 39.4 12% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 29.8 34% | 38.6 14% | 45.4 -1% | 39.84 11% | 39.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于采用了非对称散热解决方案,机箱左半部分的表面温度高于右半部分。键盘和底部的热点温度分别可达到 37 C 和 39 C,比 VivoBook Flip 14 和 VivoBook Flip 14 的温度都要低。 VivoBook Flip 14和 Aspire 5 Spin 14 的温度都要低,在这两款机型上,每个热点的温度都会超过 40 摄氏度,而且平均温度更高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | -5% | -13% | -4% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.4 | 36 4% | 39.4 -5% | 41.7 -11% | 41 -10% | 39 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 37.6 4% | 38.8 1% | 54.4 -39% | 41.2 -6% | 35.8 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.6 | 26.1 9% | 31.2 -9% | 30.4 -6% | 29.6 -3% | 25.2 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.6 | 25.8 16% | 32.8 -7% | 29.8 3% | 30 2% | 25.6 16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
台式机怠速运行时的功耗在 2 瓦到 7 瓦之间,明显低于同类产品,这或许可以解释为什么在运行要求不高的负载时电池续航时间超长。否则,在运行游戏或 Prime95 等要求较高的负载时,功耗几乎与 2021 ThinkBook 14s Yoga 相同。因此,在处理器性能方面,每瓦性能比旧款酷睿 i7-1165G7 有了显著提高,而在图形性能方面却依然平平。
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,我们可以记录到小型(约 5.5 x 5.5 x 2.8 厘米)壁挂式 USB-C 交流适配器的最大功耗为 67 瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.39 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 2.3 / 6.7 / 6.8 Watt |
Load |
34.1 / 67 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | -67% | -31% | -118% | -54% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.3 | 3.6 -57% | 8 -248% | 4.3 -87% | 8.6 -274% | 6 -161% |
Idle Average * | 6.7 | 6.3 6% | 10.6 -58% | 5.8 13% | 9.56 -43% | 6.5 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 9.1 -34% | 10.7 -57% | 8.8 -29% | 25.82 -280% | 13.9 -104% |
Load Average * | 34.1 | 34 -0% | 46.8 -37% | 44 -29% | 47 -38% | 41.9 -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27.4 | 27.7 -1% | 41.5 -51% | 45.9 -68% | 43.9 -60% | |
Load Maximum * | 67 | 39 42% | 68.3 -2% | 67 -0% | 69.48 -4% | 50.8 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管内部和外观都发生了变化,但电池容量仍为 60 Wh。无线局域网的运行时间与以前基本相同,实际网页浏览时间将近 11 小时。由于从Tiger Lake 开始采用了低功耗 CPU 内核,文字处理等要求不高的任务的运行时间甚至比以前更长。
在启用联想快速充电功能的情况下,从空电到满电大约需要 90 分钟。我们很欣赏该系统完全依赖通用 USB-C 充电,而 Aspire 5 Spin 14 和 Aspire 5 Spin 14 则不需要。 Aspire 5 Spin 14则仍然配备了专有的交流桶式充电器。
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga ITL 20WE0023GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 Spin 14 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, 42 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 36% | -10% | 2% | -32% | 39% | |
Reader / Idle | 2118 | 1389 -34% | 1011 -52% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 651 | 622 -4% | 588 -10% | 664 2% | 440.9 -32% | 510 -22% |
Load | 42 | 103 145% | 122 190% | |||
H.264 | 836 |
Pros
Cons
评语--老化的图形拖累了出色的视觉设计
ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 的最大亮点在于其流畅的外观设计、舒适的键盘和点击板、简便的可维护性以及丰富的端口选项。它没有向用户强加任何噱头功能,因此核心基本功能都很可靠。毕竟,它主要是一款工作笔记本电脑,其外观设计更符合千禧一代的审美观。
新款 ThinkBook 最令人失望的可能是它的图形处理性能和价格。集成的 4 核 Arc GPU 与使用了 4 年的 Iris Xe 96 EU 相比,即使配置了最高端的 Core Ultra 7 CPU,也没有什么明显的优势。联想对 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 的售价高达 1200 美元,考虑到其 GPU 几乎不比 2021 ThinkPad 14s Yoga.如果您经常进行图像处理或视频编辑,那么价格较低的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9将为您提供更快的服务,而优越得多的 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9只贵一点点。
ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 是专为家庭办公室、会议室和出差的远程工作者设计的,因此在电池续航时间和易用性方面表现出色。不过,对于图形编辑和手写笔用户来说,薄弱的 GPU 和取消手写笔车库是一大限制。
有几种方法可以使 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 更具竞争力,例如降低 1000 美元的目标价格、增加显示屏选项,甚至是 AMD CPU 选项,因为 Radeon 780M 是一股不可忽视的力量。这款半专业机型在文字处理和偶尔的多媒体方面表现出色,但对于要求更高的应用,采用速度更快的集成 Arc 8 或 Radeon 680M/780M 的替代产品将大有裨益。
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML
- 05/17/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.