Beelink SER9 评测:AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快
全新 Ryzen AI 9 处理器进一步提升性能。
Beelink 在大多数竞争对手之前就采用了 AMD 最新的 Ryzen 9 CPU,从而提升了迷你 PC 领域的竞争力。不过,价格也相应上涨,使其成为该制造商推出的价格较高的产品之一。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
判决
SER8 是一款出色的迷你 PC,它进行了全面的重新设计,配备了先进的 AMD Zen 4 CPU 和经过改良的端口。SER9 通过升级到更快的 Zen 5 处理器,在性能上实现了翻倍的提升,这也是强大用户所欣赏的。考虑到 SER9 的尺寸,新的 Ryzen 9 AI CPU 比预期的更快更安静。
当然,SER9 并不完美,其他迷你 PC 上常见的功能,如 VESA 安装、可升级内存或 Kensington Lock 等,Beelink 都没有配备。此外,由于集成了立体声扬声器和蒸汽腔冷却系统,该系统比许多竞争对手稍大、稍重。当然,它的速度比许多其他选择都要快,但在尺寸和功耗方面,你会为此付出代价。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.00 List Price: 1000 USD | 814 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $599.00 Beelink SER8 Mini PC, AMD Ry... 2. $599.00 Beelink Mini PC SER8 AMD Ryz... 3. $629.00 Beelink SER8 Mini PC, AMD Ry... List Price: 650 USD | 776 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 CASIMY 19V 3.42A Mini PC Ada... 2. $18.99 KFD 19V 65W Power Supply for... 3. $329.00 Beelink EQi12 Mini PC, Intel... List Price: 430 USD | 440 g | 40 mm | x | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $689.00 List Price: 950 USD | 660 g | 50.1 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 560 USD | 528 g | 47 mm | x | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,000.89 ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ Full System... 2. $599.99 ASUS NUC 14 Pro Slim Barebon... 3. $1,099.00 ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Pc, ... List Price: 1250 EUR | 622 g | 41 mm | x |
SER9 继承了 SER8 将 Zen 4 Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU 替换为较新的 Zen 5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370。机箱在其他方面完全相同。
我们的配置包括上述 Zen 5 CPU、32 GB 内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD,零售价为 1000 美元。在撰写本文时还没有其他 SKU。
SER9 的替代产品包括其他高端 H 系列迷你电脑,如 GMK NucBox K9, 华硕 NUC 14 Pro或 博弈 M1.
更多 Beelink 评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
与 SER7 相比,SER8 已经进行了全面改造 SER7 因此,SER9 只是在 SER8 的基础上进行了小幅翻新,在外观上没有大的区别。与 SER7 时代的老式设计相比,灰色金属机箱和塑料底部看起来和感觉上都更加专业。
连接性
端口选项与 SER8 相比没有变化。需要注意的是,该系统可使用第三方 USB-C AC 适配器供电,以取代包装盒中的桶式 AC 适配器。
交流
英特尔 AX200 标配支持 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.2。不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和 Wi-Fi 7。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SER9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
维护
维修与 SER8 类似,但有一个明显的不同:由于 SER9 上的内存是焊接的,因此现在没有更多的 SODIMM 插槽。
可持续性
包装主要是纸和纸板,配件用塑料包装。制造商没有宣传其他可持续发展措施。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中除了常规的文件和交流适配器外,还有一根 HDMI 电缆。没有 VESA 安装。
如果在美国购买,制造商提供为期一年的保修服务。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
原始 CPU 性能卓越,具有稳定的 Turbo Boost 性能,与上一代产品相比,性能有了大幅提升 Ryzen 7 8845HS提升了约 30%。在与 酷睿至尊 9 185H相比也是如此,它比我们的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 -1! | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro -2! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6469 - 9246, n=8) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=8) | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 315, n=8) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=8) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 66.6, n=8) | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=7) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=8) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=8) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 99088, n=8) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=8) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=7) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=8) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=8) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=8) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=8) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7173 - 7646, n=4) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9751 - 10918, n=4) | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9393 - 10615, n=4) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=4) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1692 - 1789, n=3) | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1629, n=3) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1868 - 2117, n=3) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1398 - 1520, n=3) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (267 - 321, n=3) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (225 - 266, n=4) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 503, n=5) | |
Beelink SER9 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7613 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (88377 - 92030, n=8) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=8) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98429 - 108954, n=8) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (108.5 - 119.4, n=8) | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
遗憾的是,60 FPS 的 4K 视频播放效果并不完美,在 60 秒的时间内记录了 10 次丢帧。相比之下,大多数搭载英特尔处理器的微型电脑,如 微星 Cubi NUC 1M则完全没有掉帧现象。
LatencyMon 与 Strix Point CPU 不兼容。
存储设备
系统随附相同的 CT1000P3PSSD8 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。传输速率稍慢,为每秒 4500 MB,而 SER8 为每秒 5000 MB。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
Beelink SER9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
图形性能是所有集成显卡迷你 PC 中最快的。我们的 Radeon 890M超越了竞争对手 Arc 8或 Arc 140V在游戏中始终保持领先。AMD 还更新了驱动程序,修复了我们在运行《DOTA 2 Reborn》时遇到的性能问题。
遗憾的是,游戏帧率可能会出现周期性下降。例如,在 1080p 超高设置下空闲运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,帧率偶尔会从 25 降到 22,而不是保持在 25。
3DMark 11 Performance | 15873 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39590 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9188 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3917 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 502 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (229 - 306, n=5) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Khadas Mind 2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Beelink SER9 -1! | |
Beelink SER8 -1! | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro -1! | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro -3! | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M -2! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Beelink SEi11 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink SER9 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (178.8 - 186.8, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink SER9 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=5) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=5) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=5) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M6 | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=5) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.1 | 158.9 | 79 | 31.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175.6 | 133.6 | 100 | 89.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 94.6 | 47.5 | 33.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 85.1 | 67.6 | 51.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 101 | 60 | 55 | 52 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 199.8 | 82 | 69.8 | 59.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 88.3 | 62.3 | 41.8 | 32.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 110.1 | 100.8 | 76.8 | 21.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35 | 29.1 | 28.2 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.6 | 40.5 | 28.7 | 25.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音特性和上限与我们在去年的 SER8 上记录的非常接近,这意味着较新的 Zen 5 CPU 所提供的额外性能并没有转化为更大噪音的迷你 PC。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.6 / 26.8 / 26.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.4 / 33.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN | MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000 | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 2% | -11% | -23% | -19% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23.6 -2% | 22.8 2% | 23.5 -1% | 23 1% | 24.6 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.6 | 28.8 -8% | 24.7 7% | 29.9 -12% | 29.8 -12% | 24.7 7% |
Idle Average * | 26.8 | 28.8 -7% | 24.7 8% | 29.9 -12% | 35.7 -33% | 29.6 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.8 | 30.5 -14% | 25.3 6% | 32 -19% | 35.7 -33% | 29.8 -11% |
Load Average * | 33.4 | 34.6 -4% | 33.2 1% | 33.5 -0% | 41.9 -25% | 45.7 -37% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 34.6 | 34.1 1% | 39.1 -13% | 43.8 -27% | 47.7 -38% | |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 34.5 -2% | 37.8 -12% | 40.5 -20% | 44 -30% | 47.4 -40% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管侧面和边缘没有通风栅,但表面温度不成问题。在运行要求较高的负载时,顶部温度仅达到约 30 摄氏度,而交流适配器的温度会超过 40 摄氏度。
压力测试
运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 稳定在 3.3 GHz、71 C 和 54 W。运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,核心温度稳定在 68 摄氏度,而去年的 SER8 为 62 摄氏度。
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 31 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.3 | -- | 71 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.5 | 1598 | 71 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.9 | 2327 | 68 |
发言人
Beelink SER9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 27%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Beelink 的功耗明显高于许多其他迷你 PC,这是其高性能的代价。例如,在玩游戏时,我们的 SER9 需要的电量比 微星 Cubi NUC 1M慢 2 倍以上。
在高处理压力下,系统仅需 80 多瓦的功率,而小巧(7 x 7 x 3 厘米)的 100 瓦壁挂式交流适配器就足够了。
Off / Standby | 0.7 / 0.84 Watt |
Idle | 5.7 / 5.9 / 6 Watt |
Load |
68.7 / 82 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Beelink SEi11 Pro i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN, , x, | MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, , x, | GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x, | Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -35% | 1% | -34% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.7 | 7.3 -28% | 9.8 -72% | 6.4 -12% | 10.9 -91% | 5.1 11% |
Idle Average * | 5.9 | 7.3 -24% | 10.3 -75% | 8.3 -41% | 11 -86% | 6.4 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 6 | 8.4 -40% | 10.5 -75% | 10.4 -73% | 11.4 -90% | 14.7 -145% |
Load Average * | 68.7 | 68.2 1% | 54.2 21% | 38.5 44% | 52.8 23% | 55.5 19% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 78.2 | 36.1 54% | 57.1 27% | 59.1 24% | ||
Load Maximum * | 82 | 84.3 -3% | 59 28% | 52.5 36% | 72.2 12% | 103.3 -26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 75.1 | 53.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
笔记本检查评级
Beelink SER9
- 11/14/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.