data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a7c/60a7ccfaefb28fbd35509323eb4fe6e78d4a3bdb" alt="Teaser"
GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC 评测:采用 Oculink 和 Ryzen AI 9 的全新盒式设计
体积小、速度快、声音大。
GMK 首次推出了一款有趣的机箱设计,同时支持 AMD Zen 5 和 Oculink。它的外观很吸引人,适合专业设置,但 RGB LED 会让人感觉很不协调。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 采用可堆叠外形的现代 AMD Zen 5
虽然新款 EVO-X1 给人的第一印象非常好,但稍加挖掘或使用就会发现一些瑕疵。负载情况下风扇的噪音、RGB LED 灯的问题以及关闭或睡眠模式时电源状态的错误都表明,该机型本可以在发布前进行更多的微调。
抛开这些恼人的问题或缺陷不谈,EVO-X1 仍然是一款极具吸引力且功能强大的迷你 PC,适用于家庭、办公室或专业用途。它的主要卖点是集成了 Oculink 端口,这意味着买家需要利用这一功能才能真正发挥该机型的最大功效。否则,其他迷你电脑如 Beelink SER9等其他迷你电脑也配备了类似的 AMD Zen 5 处理器,但内存可拆卸,价格略低。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,099.99 List Price: 900 USD | 595 g | 63.2 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $459.98 List Price: 440 USD | 621 g | 58.4 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $599.96 List Price: 560 USD | 528 g | 47 mm | x | |
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.00 List Price: 1000 USD | 814 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $909.00 ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Pc, ... 2. $593.66 ASUS NUC 14 Pro Slim Barebon... 3. $1,669.99 ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ NUC14RVSU9 ... List Price: 1250 EUR | 622 g | 41 mm | x | |
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $699.00 List Price: 600 USD | 819 g | 51 mm | x |
EVO-X1 是 GMKtec 推出的最新一代迷你 PC。它采用了全新的机箱设计、RGB LED 和 Oculink 支持,与传统的 NucBox 系列有所不同。
我们的测试机配备了 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、集成 Radeon 890M 显卡、32 GB LPDDR5-7500 焊接内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD,售价约为 920 美元。其他 SKU 可能会配备更大的固态硬盘,但目前所有选项的 CPU 和内存都是固定的。
EVO-X1 的替代产品包括其他高性能迷你 PC,如 Beelink SER9, 华硕 NUC 14 Pro+或 BOSGAME M2.
更多 GMK 评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
新的机箱设计有助于从视觉上将 EVO-X1 与竞争对手区分开来。与主要采用塑料材质的 NucBox 系列相比,EVO-X1 锐利的方形外观和金属外壳给人更专业的感觉。尺寸和重量也比预期的更小更轻,部分原因是采用了焊接内存。
不过,RGB LED 灯却让人喜忧参半,因为它们与原本专业的外观相冲突。我们也找不到可以切换 LED 的 BIOS 设置或应用程序。甚至在关闭电源或睡眠模式下,LED 灯仍然亮着。
连接性
EVO-X1 最显著的特点是其 Oculink 端口。与 USB4 不同,Oculink 支持带宽更高的 eGPU,并可为特定应用提供直接 PCIe 连接。该系统兼容最近发布的 GMK AD-GP1 Oculink eGPU。
交流
标配的英特尔 AX200 支持 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.2。该机型不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7,考虑到相对较高的价格,这有点令人失望。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 |
维护
可持续性
GMK 没有介绍在生产过程中采取的任何可持续发展措施。包装本身主要是纸板,有一些泡沫保护。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
产品 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 是 AMD 最快的 AI HX 系列处理器之一,击败了竞争对手 Core Ultra 9 185H15% 的优势。处理器 酷睿 i9-14900HX甚至更快,但它没有集成 NPU。与即将推出的 Ryzen 7 8845HS的同比跃升也在 20% 至 25% 左右。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 27.9, n=12) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox K3 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini 01IRH8-90W20081GF |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=11) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41991 - 99088, n=12) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=12) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 79251, n=11) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=12) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20608, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=12) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
系统性能
PCMark 结果与其他 Ryzen 9 或酷睿 Ultra H 微型电脑相当,包括 NucBox K9.最大的区别在于内存性能,因为集成的 LPDDR5 内存通常比大多数其他迷你 PC 上的可拆卸内存模块更快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7173 - 7646, n=7) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9751 - 11262, n=7) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9319 - 10615, n=7) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=7) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1686 - 1847, n=6) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1719, n=6) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1817 - 2211, n=6) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1222 - 1610, n=6) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (267 - 336, n=6) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (225 - 269, n=7) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (419 - 503, n=8) | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7341 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 92030, n=12) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 100903, n=12) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (87827 - 108954, n=12) | |
Beelink SER9 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (99.8 - 119.4, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备与 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8与 Beelink SER9 上的相同,后者是 GMK NucBox M7 Pro 上 Zettastone CP200 的升级版。传输速率稳定在每秒约 4800 MB,而 Zettastone 为每秒约 3500 MB。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M 大约比即将推出的 Radeon 780M 快 10%至 15%,或比去年的竞争对手Arc 8.最新的 英特尔弧形显卡 140V可以与 AMD 解决方案并驾齐驱,但这种 GPU 仍相对较新,在迷你 PC 上还不常见。
3DMark 11 Performance | 14855 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39149 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8896 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4017 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
GMK NucBox K3 Pro | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (221 - 306, n=9) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Radeon 890M 是市场上速度最快的游戏集成解决方案之一。只要将大部分设置调低到低或中低,它就足以在 1080p 下运行《赛博朋克 2077 》等要求苛刻的游戏。
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (164.3 - 186.8, n=5) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=8) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=8) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=8) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=8) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 149.1 | 145.9 | 78.8 | 32.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.7 | 112.7 | 93.4 | 83.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 88.8 | 45.6 | 32.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 82.6 | 62.4 | 46.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 92 | 57 | 53 | 50 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 191.3 | 80.6 | 68.6 | 58.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 85.2 | 62.4 | 41.4 | 33 |
F1 22 (2022) | 106.3 | 96.1 | 72.7 | 19.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.3 | 34.1 | 28.6 | 28.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.2 | 38.2 | 28.7 | 25.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.8 / 30.3 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.6 / 46.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | GMK NucBox M7 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950H | GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000 | Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -4% | 15% | -1% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23.2 -0% | 24.6 -6% | 23 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 35.9 -29% | 29.8 -7% | 26.6 4% | 24.7 11% | 31.5 -13% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 36.7 -21% | 35.7 -18% | 26.8 12% | 29.6 2% | 32.3 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 36.7 -21% | 35.7 -17% | 26.8 12% | 29.8 2% | 34.9 -15% |
Load Average * | 44.6 | 38.4 14% | 41.9 6% | 33.4 25% | 45.7 -2% | 39 13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.2 | 38.7 12% | 43.8 1% | 34.6 22% | 47.7 -8% | 40.3 9% |
Load Maximum * | 46.1 | 39.8 14% | 44 5% | 33.8 27% | 47.4 -3% | 42.5 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力时,CPU 的主频将稳定在 2.9 GHz,温度为 67 C,功耗为 54 W,而 Beelink SER9 的主频为 3.3 GHz,温度为 71 C,功耗为 54 W。 Beelink SER9相比,配备相同 Ryzen AI 9 HX 处理器的 Beelink SER9 的主频为 3.3 GHz、温度为 71 C、功耗为 54 W。我们的 GMK 在播放《赛博朋克 2077》 时也同样会略微降温和减速。无论屏幕负载如何,核心温度都会保持在 70 C 以下。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 26 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.9 | -- | 67 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.3 | 1583 | 68 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.8 | 2249 | 65 |
能源管理
耗电量
平均功耗略低于搭载 Zen 4 的 Beelink SER8略低,同时 CPU 和 GPU 性能更快,提高了每瓦性能。遗憾的是,如上所述,GMK 在关机或进入睡眠模式时存在电源状态问题,这一点在我们的读数中非常明显,功耗水平在 3 瓦到 13 瓦之间,而理想状态下应该是 2 瓦或更低。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK NucBox M7 Pro R9 PRO 6950H, Radeon 680M, , , x, | GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x, | Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, , x, | BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, , , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -92% | -39% | -4% | -36% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 14.6 -170% | 10.9 -102% | 5.7 -6% | 4.2 22% | 6.4 -19% |
Idle Average * | 5.8 | 15 -159% | 11 -90% | 5.9 -2% | 7.2 -24% | 7.3 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 16 -176% | 11.4 -97% | 6 -3% | 13 -124% | 7.5 -29% |
Load Average * | 72.1 | 80.4 -12% | 52.8 27% | 68.7 5% | 68.5 5% | 75 -4% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 72.5 | 86.2 -19% | 57.1 21% | 78.2 -8% | 74.1 -2% | 83 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 76.1 | 89.5 -18% | 72.2 5% | 82 -8% | 144.9 -90% | 99.9 -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
笔记本检查评级
GMK EVO-X1
- 02/18/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.