微星 Prestige A16 AI+ 评测：配备强大 Ryzen 9 365 的多媒体笔记本电脑
吱吱作响。
去年，微星推出了搭载酷睿Ultra 155H处理器的Prestige 16笔记本电脑。现在，搭载 AMD 处理器的 A16 机型已经面世，配备 Ryzen 9 处理器和 NPU（Copilot+），售价 1599 欧元。这款新机型在性能上实现了重大飞跃。不过，与英特尔的同类产品相比，AMD 版本也并非一无是处。下面我们就来详细了解一下！Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - Prestige A16 AI+ 性能卓越，但也存在问题
乍一看，微星 Prestige A16 AI+ 上的 1600p IPS 显示屏非常显眼。高分辨率加上反光表面，带来了清晰、生动的视觉体验。Ryzen 9 365 处理器也给人留下了深刻印象，其性能比 Prestige A16 的英特尔同类产品高出约 10%。它的游戏性能同样值得一提，而且即使在电池模式下也能保持稳定的性能。总体而言，它的性能完全超越了 ZenBook S 16 和基于英特尔处理器的 Prestige 16 等竞争对手。
不过，由于测试过程中的技术问题，该系统未能获得更高的 3D 性能分数。该系统在某些程序和游戏中偶尔会出现问题，不过未来的驱动程序更新可能会解决这些问题。此外，制造质量还有待提高。虽然金属外壳很坚固，但在受到适度压力或扭力时会发出令人不悦的嘎吱声，触摸板按钮偶尔也会 "卡住"。
虽然 AMD Prestige A16 在原始性能方面优于英特尔 Prestige 16，但英特尔系统比 AMD Prestige A16 早一年，而且没有出现技术问题的迹象，电池寿命更长，制造质量似乎也更好。在现阶段，我们还不能推荐升级到 AMD 版本。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.9%  | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1599 Euro | 2 kg | 17.35 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 84.1%  | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,859.00 HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Zen... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $1,899.00 ASUS Zenbook Pro 16 Laptop 1... List Price: 1700 EUR | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
3. 85.6%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $864.95 List Price: 1800 Euro | 2 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED |
4. 74.7%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $799.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 2. $799.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 3. $609.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 80%  | Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 799 Euro | 1.8 kg | 24 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
6. 79.1%  | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB RAM for Acer Asp... 2. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB RAM for Acer Asp... 3. $45.89 A-Tech 16GB Module for Acer ... List Price: 929 Euro | 1.9 kg | 21 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
去年，微星推出了 MSI Prestige 16去掉了 "A"（这里的 "A "指的是 AMD），搭载了 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H在我们的评测中获得了 88 分的高分。今年，微星 Prestige A16 AI+ 更上一层楼，配备了 WiFi 7、微星人工智能引擎和令人惊叹的 OLED 显示屏等功能，是外出办公的最佳伴侣。在这篇评测中，让我们看看这款笔记本电脑究竟有多便携、功能有多强大，以及它与基于英特尔的前代产品的对比；最重要的是，它升级了什么。
与刚刚上市的 微星巅峰 A16 AI+不同的是，Prestige A16 AI+ 是一款传统的蛤壳式笔记本电脑，而不是可折叠笔记本电脑。但这两款笔记本电脑确实采用了相同的 AMD Zen 5 处理器，因此它们之间的性能比较是苹果对苹果。另一个完美的对比点是华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED，它也使用相同的 CPU。
规格 - 功能强大的处理器
外壳和功能
该机箱经过全新设计，现在采用银色表面处理的铝合金材质。不过，它比上一代产品重了很多（1.9 千克对 1.6 千克），这意味着它不再能与更轻巧的产品竞争，如 LG Gram 16.增加的重量略微影响了便携性，而这正是 前代机型的优势。从积极的一面来看，显示屏的盖子明显更结实，弯曲度很小，铰链也很坚固。底座的情况则不尽如人意。底座总体上比较稳定，但扭动时会发出一些噪音，就像有人在里面放了一个塑料袋。
要进入内部进行维护，你需要拧下七颗长短不一的十字螺丝（尤其是前面的两颗螺丝较短），其中一颗螺丝隐藏在误导性保修贴纸的中央位置。内部已重新布局，WiFi 模块和固态硬盘可以更换，但没有第二个 M.2 插槽。风扇和电池很容易拆卸，但内存是焊接的，因此用户无法升级。
与许多竞争对手的机型相比，该红外网络摄像头的全高清分辨率还有所欠缺，它们现在提供的分辨率为 370 万像素甚至 500 万像素--我们在对宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 摄像头的评测中强调了这一点。 宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI.除了网络摄像头和麦克风，该系统还包括环境光传感器和用户接近传感器。
Prestige A16 AI+ 没有局域网（RJ45）端口，但有高通芯片提供的 WiFi 7，而且在 5GHz 和 6GHz 网络上的表现都非常出色。
A16 AI+ 的端口配置不是特别齐全，但它确实有一个 MicroSD 插槽，总共有三个 USB 端口，其中只有一个是 A 型端口，这对于笔记本电脑来说实在是太少了，尤其是因为两个 USB-C 端口中的一个通常被电源占用。其他端口包括一个 HDMI 输出和一个耳机插孔。在设计方面，HDMI 和 USB-A 端口在右侧的位置比较靠近，可能会造成一些不便。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
可持续性
与联想不同的是，联想为诸如 ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 等机型提供了二氧化碳足迹数据。 ThinkPad X13 二合一或 X12 可拆卸 G2微星没有提供有关生产影响或使用可回收材料的信息。虽然包装主要采用纸板，但微星仍使用塑料包裹笔记本电脑和电源装置。
输入设备 - 良好的键盘，带粘板按钮
布局非常整洁，右侧有一个（狭长的）数字键盘。不过，微星就是微星，Fn 键默认位于 Space 键的右侧，因此用户可能会误按 Windows 键，因为它很大，而且正好位于 Fn 键的位置。新的 Copilot 键也位于右侧，紧挨着 Fn 键。大多数按键的尺寸为 1.5 x 1.5 厘米，间距均匀，而较小的功能键的尺寸为 0.5-0.8 厘米 x 1 厘米，但仍保持对齐。小巧的方向键宽度减至 1.3 厘米，整齐地排列在指定区域内。
三段式白色背光突出了清晰的字样，使用户可以在黑暗中工作。按键行程适中，反馈清晰，可实现快速键入，噪音适中。
触摸板尺寸约为 13.1 x 8.2 厘米，具有良好的滑动性能。左键点击时手指感觉良好，而右键点击时感觉有点浅，行程距离不足。一段时间后，左键不再像预期的那样工作。有时会卡住，无法正常释放。
显示屏 - Prestige A16 AI+ 有反射式 IPS 和 OLED 两种选择
Prestige A16 AI+ 采用反射式 IPS 显示屏，分辨率为 1600p，宽高比为 16:10。屏幕指定覆盖 P3 色彩空间，刷新率为 165Hz。其他 SKU 也有 2400p 的 OLED 屏幕，但目前似乎还没有，甚至微星网站上也没有列出。尽管如此，制造商仍在宣传 OLED 选项。
从主观上看，测试机型的 IPS 面板非常出色，由于表面反光，图像清晰、鲜艳。在测量方面，前代产品的类似面板略胜一筹，黑度较低，因此对比度较高。除此之外，两款屏幕并无本质区别。两者都能提供令人印象深刻的视觉效果。
平均亮度略低于 450 尼特。虽然微星声称 DCI-P3 覆盖率为 100%，但我们的测量结果显示约为 95%，而且正如预期的那样，sRGB 完全覆盖。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 488 cd/m²
Contrast: 1356:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 1.35
ΔE Greyscale 4.16 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AUO28B2 (B160QAN02.N), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Ninkear A16 Pro cso1623, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 N160JCA-EEK (Chi Mei CMN163D), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 6% | -7% | -48% | -15% | -46% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 94.6 | 96.7 2% | 99.8 5% | 79 -16% | 41.5 -56% | 68.7 -27% | 42.3 -55% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 61.2 -39% | 97.6 -2% | 63.6 -36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.4 | 84.6 1% | 94.6 13% | 79.8 -4% | 42.9 -49% | 71.1 -15% | 43.7 -48% |
| Response Times | -493% | 94% | -304% | -153% | -97% | -279% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.6 ? | 49.4 ? -782% | 0.4 ? 93% | 33.6 ? -500% | 20.7 ? -270% | 16.4 ? -193% | 31.4 ? -461% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 33.9 ? -203% | 0.6 ? 95% | 23.3 ? -108% | 15.1 ? -35% | 11.2 ? -0% | 22 ? -96% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 | ||||||
| Screen | -2% | 174% | 4% | -65% | 6% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 488 | 473.6 -3% | 391 -20% | 468 -4% | 313.3 -36% | 393.6 -19% | 352 -28% |
| Brightness | 444 | 456 3% | 391 -12% | 434 -2% | 308 -31% | 398 -10% | 324 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 98 14% | 90 5% | 91 6% | 91 6% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.19 47% | 0.02 94% | 0.23 36% | 0.37 -3% | 0.44 -22% | 0.27 25% |
| Contrast | 1356 | 2493 84% | 19550 1342% | 2035 50% | 847 -38% | 895 -34% | 1304 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.45 | 5.9 -71% | 1.42 59% | 3.4 1% | 8.42 -144% | 2.32 33% | 4.41 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.77 | 9.37 -38% | 4.69 31% | 7.2 -6% | 19.09 -182% | 3.72 45% | 15.04 -122% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.35 | 0.89 34% | 1.49 -10% | 1.8 -33% | 2.16 -60% | 1.05 22% | 3.52 -161% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.16 | 7.3 -75% | 1.5 64% | 4.5 -8% | 8.3 -100% | 2.69 35% | 3.32 20% |
| Gamma | 2.52 87% | 1.9 116% | 2.199 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.83 78% | 2.38 92% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6832 95% | 7260 90% | 6684 97% | 6373 102% | 6296 103% | 6086 107% | 7122 91% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -165% /
-71% | 91% /
126% | -102% /
-42% | -89% /
-74% | -35% /
-13% | -120% /
-73% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用的 DCI-P3 色彩空间色彩偏差过大，但使用 CalMAN 软件和 X-Rite i1Pro 3 进行校准后，Delta-E 值明显下降。灰度精确度仅为 0.21，非常不错；ColorChecker 在蓝色范围仍显示出一个明显的异常值。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
由于该显示屏亮度高，因此可以在户外工作。不过，最好寻找有遮挡的地方，并将自己置于屏幕正前方，否则反光表面可能会妨碍视线。
性能 - 功能强大的微星 Prestige A16 AI+
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365与 AMD Radeon 880M32GB 焊接内存和 1TB 三星固态硬盘的完美组合，使这款设备成为商务和生产任务的理想之选。
测试条件
微星中心是软件中心，除了三种性能模式外，还提供了人工智能驱动的网络摄像头和显示功能：生态静音、平衡和极致性能。我们使用默认的平衡模式进行测试，并关闭了 AI 引擎。
开箱后，Windows Defender 标记了一个 "潜在不受欢迎的应用程序"，即预装的 AskToolbar，我们立即删除了它。
我们在一些测试中遇到了意想不到的问题。WEBXPRT 4 最初无法生成结果，而《DOTA 2 Reborn》则出现了一些图形故障，应用程序窗口部分最小化。赛博朋克 2077》在使用外接显示器进行游戏时也出现了问题--这些问题在其他应用程序中都没有出现过，因为屏幕不时黑屏，似乎信号丢失了。此外，我们的标准电池测试工具 BatteryEater 偶尔也会崩溃，不过重启后问题就解决了。这些情况确实证明，该系统的运行并不像人们想象的那样流畅。
处理器
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365是 Zen 5 Strix Point 系列中的一款快速移动 CPU，拥有 10 个核心、一个强大的集成 GPU（iGPU）和一个可达到 50 TOPS 的 AI 加速器，与 iGPU 相结合，可达到 73 TOPS。
Cinebench R15 循环显示了相当稳定的性能曲线，仅在半小时后略有下降。CPU 性能比使用相同处理器的华硕 ZenBook S 16 好得多。事实上，在所有 CPU 测试中，Prestige A16 都名列榜首，比基于英特尔处理器的 Prestige 高出约 12%。
在 Cinebench R23 中观察到的 TDP 值有一些有趣的运行模式。在平衡模式下，系统短暂启动时的功耗为 55W，然后迅速稳定在 45W。人工智能引擎也遵循同样的模式。在 "极致性能 "模式下，TDP 会短暂达到 70 瓦的峰值，然后稳定在 50 瓦（而不是 45 瓦），而在 "生态静音 "模式下，TDP 会短暂达到 27 瓦的峰值，然后立即下降到稳定的 20 瓦。
在电池模式下，Cinebench R15 的性能下降了 12%。在 Cinebench R23 中，TDP 相当稳定，为 43W，这相当令人印象深刻，因为人们可能会期望其性能与生态静音模式下的性能差不多低。
Cinebench R15 Multi sustained load test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11462 - 18748, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1942 - 1998, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5247 - 7346, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (758 - 787, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1950 - 2855, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (293 - 306, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (175 - 270, n=5) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47754 - 70309, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5790 - 6062, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (12627 - 14513, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2778 - 2830, n=5) | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9599 - 13172, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2062 - 2095, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (18.6 - 22.7, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (50.8 - 59.5, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.4142 - 0.4272, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 29902, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 114482, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 4841, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16315, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 61298, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 69801, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1243, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 16159, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 50517, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
系统性能
这时，另一个有趣的对比显现出来。在 PCMark 10 测试中，Prestige A16 AI+ 比基于英特尔的 Prestige 16 领先 8 个百分点，而在 CrossMark 测试中，它们的位置却互换了。
总体而言，系统反应灵敏，没有明显的掉线或卡顿现象。不过，在某些应用程序中存在上述技术问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (7045 - 7641, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10421 - 11140, n=5) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (9841 - 10293, n=5) | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (8973 - 10976, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1658 - 1743, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2042, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1508 - 1599, n=4) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (2044 - 2074, n=4) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1124 - 1360, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (309 - 336, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (255 - 330, n=6) | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (430 - 456, n=6) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7596 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (87648 - 90113, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 99376, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (93627 - 100507, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (116 - 129.8, n=5) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在启用 LatencyMon 工具后，我们测试的笔记本电脑在打开多个浏览器标签页时会出现轻微的延迟问题。不过，4K/60 fps 的 YouTube 播放运行流畅，没有出现掉帧现象，其延迟值也是同类产品中最低的。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
与英特尔机型一样，A16 AI+ 配备了三星 NVMe 固态硬盘。虽然微星笔记本电脑往往配备高端固态硬盘，但测试的这款产品却采用了中端硬盘来存储用户数据。因此，与英特尔 Prestige 相比，其传输速率明显较慢。积极的一面是，在长时间使用过程中性能依然稳定，不像竞争对手如 联想 ThinkPad T16和 宏碁 Aspire 16 A16等竞争对手不同，它们都存在热节流问题。在我们的 最佳固态硬盘排行榜该硬盘排名第 182 位。尽管该固态硬盘型号早在 2020 年中期就已出现，但 Prestige A16 AI+ 是我们测试的第一款配备这种特殊硬盘的笔记本电脑。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
对于 3D 应用，处理器集成的 AMD Radeon 880M在合成 3DMark 测试中表现出色。
在我们的数据库中，它比配备相同 iGPU 的普通笔记本电脑快 10%，几乎与专用的 RTX 2050 移动版在 宏碁 Aspire 16.华硕 华硕 Zenbook S 16采用相同的 CPU 和 GPU，性能落后约 20%，而其姊妹机型采用的英特尔 Arc 8-Core 性能则领先约 15%。
A16 AI+ 在游戏方面位居第二，仅落后于配备 dGPU 的 Aspire 16，但超过了其他未配备 dGPU 的竞争对手和英特尔 Prestige。Aspire 凭借 RTX 2050 独占鳌头，而 AMD 机型在《DOTA 2 Reborn》中偶尔出现的图形故障则阻碍了其获得更高的性能分数。尽管如此，Prestige A16 AI+ 仍能以全高清模式处理《赛 博 朋克 2077》和《博德之门 3》等现代游戏，尽管是在中低设置下。切换到极致性能模式后，《博德之门 3Ultra》的性能略有提升，从 27 帧/秒提高到 28.9 帧/秒，提高了 7%。
在Fire Strike 运行时，如果不拔掉电源，3D 性能仅下降 4% 至 5%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14703 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39393 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8786 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3856 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 86, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra settings FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 166.1 | 76.9 | 31.2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.8 | 132.6 | 47.7 | 45.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.1 | 39.8 | 28.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 75.7 | 56.4 | 44.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 175.5 | 72.8 | 60.6 | 49.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 45.9 | 34.2 | 27.9 | 27 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 48 | 38.1 | 30.1 | 25.8 |
废气排放和电能 - 减少电池寿命的影响
噪音排放
在空闲模式下，两个风扇通常处于关闭状态，但在负载较重之后，它们会迅速安静下来，即使在生态静音模式下也不会完全关闭。在 25 分贝左右时，风扇噪音几乎无法察觉，但在极其安静的环境中，可以检测到轻微的脉动
。
在 3DMark06 测试中，风扇在大部分运行时间内逐渐升高到 35 分贝左右，在最后达到约 41 分贝的峰值。
不过很少达到这个峰值。在进行压力测试时，噪音在 35 到 39 分贝之间变化，《赛博朋克 2077》中也出现了类似情况。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 25.02 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.88 / 41.88 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U | Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | 3% | -4% | 1% | 5% | -11% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 24.5 -7% | 24 -4% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.5 -7% | 24 -4% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 26.3 -14% | 25 -9% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.02 | 26.3 -5% | 26 -4% | 24.7 1% | 23 8% | 23 8% | 31 -24% |
| Load Average * | 41.88 | 36.5 13% | 35 16% | 34 19% | 43.3 -3% | 37.68 10% | 46.57 -11% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.79 | 36 10% | 45.9 -15% | 40.8 -3% | 37.68 5% | 50 -26% | |
| Load Maximum * | 41.88 | 52.9 -26% | 36 14% | 46.2 -10% | 40.9 2% | 37.41 11% | 50 -19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然风扇位于靠近显示屏的中央位置，但机箱顶部左侧的温度较高，因为 SoC 位于此处。在最大负载情况下，键盘左侧的温度明显高于右侧。我们测量了靠近顶部中心的热点，温度达到 52°C，而底部温度相对较低，最高温度为 44°C。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | -9% | 12% | 10% | 2% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 52 | 48.8 6% | 48 8% | 37.1 29% | 35.4 32% | 43 17% | 47 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 47.6 -8% | 53 -20% | 43.7 1% | 33 25% | 50 -14% | 50 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 24.2 14% | 31 -11% | 24.9 11% | 30.2 -8% | 31 -11% | |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 23.6 16% | 32 -14% | 26 7% | 30.2 -8% | 32 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这些扬声器的音量很大，但低音很弱，而且整体声音不够均衡。包括一个组合式 3.5 毫米耳机端口，可让用户连接耳机或外部放大器等模拟音频设备。
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在该系统中，屏幕亮度对闲置时的能耗影响最大。当设置为 150 尼特时，笔记本电脑的功耗约为 8 至 8.5 瓦，全亮度时功耗超过 12 瓦，与基于英特尔的机型相当。采用相同 CPU 的 ZenBook S 16 的功耗与之相近。不过，平均而言，采用 Ryzen CPU 的竞争对手在空闲时的功耗往往略低。
最大耗电量约为 96W，耗时较短，略低于基于英特尔处理器的 A16。微星紧凑型 100W USB-C 电源可有效处理这些峰值负载。AMD Prestige 只有在短时间、高强度负载时才会超过极限，因为它的 Turbo Boost 时钟速度更高。
英特尔的竞争对手在游戏功耗方面可能略胜一筹，但如果考虑到 Ryzen AI 9 365 提供的更高性能，这一差距就相对微不足道了。
| Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 6.9 / 12 / 12.5 Watt |
| Load |
79.8 / 96 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Authorain NV900-1T, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 880M | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 28% | 40% | 37% | -4% | -8% | 17% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 3 57% | 6 13% | 3.1 55% | 3.3 52% | 6.5 6% | 8.8 -28% | 5.5 ? 20% | 6.9 ? -0% |
| Idle Average * | 12 | 9.5 21% | 7 42% | 6.4 47% | 7.5 37% | 10.7 11% | 12.8 -7% | 9.47 ? 21% | 11.5 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 12 4% | 13 -4% | 7.9 37% | 7.8 38% | 11.1 11% | 14.1 -13% | 10.8 ? 14% | 13.6 ? -9% |
| Load Average * | 79.8 | 68.3 14% | 44 45% | 44 45% | 56.9 29% | 68.5 14% | 80 -0% | 65.8 ? 18% | 71.9 ? 10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 62.5 | 44.6 29% | 40.6 35% | 48.7 22% | 72.8 -16% | 73.5 -18% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 74.5 | 36.7 51% | 41.2 45% | 104.4 -40% | 72 3% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 96 | 104.8 -9% | 58 40% | 86.5 10% | 62.4 35% | 107 -11% | 90.53 6% | 85 ? 11% | 118.3 ? -23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 59.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 (gaming stress test)
Power consumption - external monitor
电池寿命
这里测试的微星笔记本配备了 82 瓦时的电池，而英特尔笔记本则配备了 99.99 瓦时的电池。因此，与姊妹机型相比，该机型的运行时间略短。在显示屏亮度降低到 150cd/m2 的情况下，我们测得的 WiFi 网页浏览时间约为 11.5 小时，视频播放时间约为 10 小时。英特尔 Prestige 的电池容量增加了 18%，续航时间延长了近 50%。不过，其他竞争对手并没有明显领先。
| MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 78 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 21MN005XGE Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 86 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48.5 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | 6% | 8% | -8% | -32% | -9% | 2% | |
| H.264 | 609 | 498 -18% | 835 ? 37% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 683 | 1100 61% | 722 6% | 820 20% | 761 11% | 450 -34% | 607 -11% | 627 ? -8% |
| Load | 127 | 166 31% | 122 -4% | 94 -26% | 89 -30% | 130 2% | 97.2 ? -23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1506 | 1568 | 1168 ? |
Notebookcheck 评级 - 不如其他选择
微星 Prestige A16 AI+ 搭载了高于平均水平的 Ryzen 9 365，其性能令人印象深刻。不过，由于技术问题，它未能充分发挥潜力，这意味着其竞争对手在整体上明显领先。此外，它的制造质量也需要进一步改进。
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036
- 01/08/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
