华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

Name: Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W
Brand: Asus

AMD Strix Point 的功率为 28 瓦。

Zenbook S 16 是华硕首款配备 AMD 最新 Zen 5 移动处理器的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。此外，它还采用了 1.3 厘米的扁平机身和亮丽的 120Hz OLED 显示屏。这是否已经让骁龙笔记本电脑在短短一个月后就过时了呢？
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI AMD Laptop / Notebook Windows Wi-Fi 7 Zen 5

华硕新款 Zenbook S 16 是一款轻薄、高品质的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，也是首批配备 AMD 新款 Zen 5 移动处理器的设备之一。由于改进了 NPU，它还支持新的 Copilot+ AI 功能，而这些功能以前只在新的骁龙设备上使用。

我们测试的 Zenbook S 16 是两款可用机型中速度更快的一款，它配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370以及集成的 Radeon 890M32 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）和 1 TB SSD。包括 Ryzen AI 9 365、Radeon 880M、24 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 在内的这款笔记本电脑的入门价格为 1,699.99 美元。两款机型均采用相同的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏（2,880 x 1,800 像素）。

有关新款 Zen 5 移动处理器的详细信息、基准测试和效率测量，我们建议您浏览我们的分析文章，在这些文章中，我们将新款处理器与英特尔、Apple 和高通公司的竞争产品在不同功率级别上进行了比较：

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Zenbook S 16

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 33 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 890M, Core: 2500 MHz, RAM: 937 MHz, 24.10.18.08

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-7500, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, 1024 GB

, M.2 PCIe, 895 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 12.9 x 353.6 x 243

Battery

78 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.516 kg, Power Supply: 190 g

Price

2100 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.7 %	v8	07 / 2024	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1.5 kg	12.9 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
80.2 %	v8	07 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1.5 kg	12.3 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
82.1 %	v8	07 / 2024	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2.1 kg	18.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.8 kg	18.3 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.5 kg	12.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00"	3072x1920

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

外壳 - Zenbook 厚度仅为 1.3 厘米

华硕新款 Zenbook S 16 采用 CNC 铣削铈铝外壳--至少这是制造商的营销术语。这是一种陶瓷材料，据说特别耐用，同时还能实现笔记本电脑的轻薄设计。我们的测试设备采用了斯堪的纳维亚白配色，这是一种非常浅的灰色。你也可以选择颜色更深的祖马亚灰。Zenbook S 16 给人一种非常高品质和优雅的印象，盖子上 Pro Art 徽标的精细轮廓进一步突出了这一点。笔记本的表面非常光滑，看起来非常耐脏和耐指纹印，但一旦你开始在它的外壳上留下指纹印，就不是那么容易清理了。

将笔记本电脑拿在手上，首先映入眼帘的是它纤薄的机身，我们测量到的最厚处仅为 1.3 厘米（正面为 1.1 厘米）。尽管如此，底座仍具有出色的稳定性，无论是按压还是扭转都不会产生任何噪音或导致任何问题。遗憾的是，薄薄的盖子却并非如此，因为打开盖子时不时会发出一些细微的吱吱声。铰链非常紧，但单手仍然可以打开笔记本电脑。这样做的一个好处是，在调整打开角度时，盖子几乎不会晃动。说到：它的最大开启角度可达 135 度左右。

将其尺寸与两个版本的 Galaxy Book4 Pro/Edge 16(12.5/12.3 毫米）相比，Zenbook S 16（11-13 毫米）显然更胜一筹。此外，这些设备的重量都不是很重，三者的重量均在 1.5 千克左右。反过来，所有其他对比设备都要厚得多，也明显重得多。紧凑型 65 瓦电源仅增加了 190 克（包括电缆）。

尺寸比较

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 2x USB-C 4.0 和 USB-A

现代设备配备 USB-C 端口（这里指的是 4.0 标准）并不奇怪。然而，如此纤薄的机壳还配备了普通的 USB-A 接口，这确实非常罕见，更不用说这一功能在日常使用中是多么实用了。如果能满足我们一个愿望的话，我们希望在右侧配备第二个 USB-C 端口，这样就可以从两侧为设备充电了。

左：HDMI 2.1、2 个 USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频接口

SD 读卡器

设备右侧有一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，插入时，卡会从开口处微微伸出。它的性能令人印象深刻，与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）一起使用时，我们发现最高传输速率超过了 250 MB/s，而在复制图像文件时，我们测得的传输速率仍然超过了 150 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	151 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)	102.1 MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.8 MB/s -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.6 MB/s -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.1 MB/s -81%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	256.9 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)	142.7 MB/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	87.8 MB/s -66%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	81.9 MB/s -68%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.9 MB/s -89%

交流

Zenbook S 16 配备了联发科技的全新 WLAN 模块。MT9725 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准和蓝牙 5.4。此外，它还能轻松媲美目前高通笔记本电脑内的 FastConnect 7800 模块，不过在与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，MT9725 的速度要稍快一些，尤其是在发送数据时。总之，这些结果都非常出色，我们在测试过程中没有遇到笔记本电脑的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。

Networking
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1828 (min: 1755) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1754 (min: 1730) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1588 (min: 1549) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1749 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1606 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1669 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1171 (min: 541) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1393 (min: 1209) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	685 (min: 588) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	999 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼60%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1608 (min: 1424) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1551 (min: 1450) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1626 (min: 1381) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1639 (min: 1591) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1625 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1666 (min: 1613) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼51%

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1828 (1755-1892)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1730-1771)

网络摄像头

总的来说，这款 1080p 网络摄像头的画质只能算一般。当然，用户也可以使用 Windows 先进的 Studio Effects。此外，该摄像头还安装了红外模块，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: 9.59 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 17.37 ∆E

维护

机箱底盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉（T5）固定，拆卸起来非常容易。笔记本电脑的内部结构以大电池（旋入式）为主，同时，你会发现它的小风扇非常小。M.2 2280 固态硬盘可以更换，而无线局域网模块和内存则是焊接上去的。

可持续性

Zenbook S 16 的产品页面没有提供任何关于生产过程中_二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料使用比例的信息。其包装主要由纸板组成，但也有一些塑料元素。华硕本身也没有提供任何维修指南。与其他同类产品相比，这款笔记本电脑的功耗相对较低，我们没有注意到它在空闲或待机模式下的功耗有什么明显的特点。

输入设备 - 令人惊喜的舒适键盘

纤薄的外壳并没有对键盘造成太大的影响，因为虽然键盘的键程只有 1.1 毫米，但打字的感觉却非常好。至少在普通字母键上是这样，而较大的按键，如回车键或空格键，则感觉有点摇晃，失去了原本的高品质感觉。即便如此，用户还是可以毫不费力地撰写长篇文字，而且键盘明显比 Galaxy Book4 Pro/边缘.白色/蓝色背光有三种亮度可供选择（也可通过传感器自动调节），但最亮的设置几乎太亮，可能会有点刺眼。在这款键盘上还可以找到新的 Copilot 键，以及我们在其他华硕设备上熟悉的小方向键。

点击板的尺寸为 15 x 9.9 厘米，非常大，在我们的测试中运行完美。它的表面光滑漂亮，机械点击声低沉安静，给人一种高品质的感觉。除了常规的手势操作外，该键盘还支持边缘手势操作（例如通过右侧边缘调节亮度）。虽然它很好用、华为振动电机的网格效果在这方面仍有优势。

显示屏 - 出色的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏

华硕为 Zenbook S 16 配备了一块 16 英寸 OLED 屏幕，但没有触摸屏。它的分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，长宽比为 16:10，属于三星最新一代 OLED 面板。从主观上看，它的画质令人惊叹，即使是明亮的区域也丝毫没有颗粒感，而且色彩看起来超级鲜艳。它的响应时间一如既往地快如闪电，得益于 120Hz 的刷新率，动作看起来非常流畅。屏幕的亮度和色温可通过传感器自动调节。

在 SDR 模式下，面板亮度超过 400 cd/m²，加上极低的黑值，用户可以享受到令人印象深刻的良好对比度。此外，还支持 HDR 内容，但像往常一样，你必须在 Windows 设置中手动激活 HDR 模式。我们测试设备的最大 HDR 亮度为 525 cd/m²，略高于宣传的 500 cd/m²。不过，Zenbook 的亮度值仍无法接近较小的 OLED 面板（>600 cd/m²）。


405 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	404 cd/m²
404 cd/m²	407 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
409 cd/m²	405 cd/m²	409 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60CL10-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 404.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 20350:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz
Display		1%	-1%	0%	1%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	99.5 0%	99.4 -1%	99.6 0%	99.5 0%	98.8 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	95.6	97.5 2%	92.5 -3%	96.5 1%	97.5 2%	89.9 -6%
Response Times		-23%	-3800%	-26%	-23%	-4523%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.56 ?(0.3, 0.26)	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) -14%	15.4 ?(8.6, 6.8) -2650%	0.8 ?(0.45, 0.35) -43%	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) -14%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -6900%
Response Time Black / White *	0.65 ?(0.35, 0.3)	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) -5%	60.6 ?(56.2, 4.4) -9223%	0.89 ?(0.42, 0.47) -37%	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) -5%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -2146%
PWM Frequency	480	240 ?(100) -50%	2753.7 ?(100) 474%	491.8 ?(100) 2%	240 ?(100) -50%
Screen		-54%	-306%	-192%	-54%	-407%
Brightness middle	407	385 -5%	413 1%	399.4 -2%	385 -5%	520 28%
Brightness	405	391 -3%	409 1%	405 0%	391 -3%	510 26%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	97 0%	98 1%	97 0%	93 -4%
Black Level *	0.02		0.14 -600%			0.35 -1650%
Contrast	20350		2950 -86%			1486 -93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.6	1.1 -83%	3.48 -480%	4.05 -575%	1.1 -83%	2.9 -383%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.2	1.8 -50%	6.97 -481%	6.69 -458%	1.8 -50%	6.2 -417%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.5	1.4 -180%	4.5 -800%	1.1 -120%	1.4 -180%	4.3 -760%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.15 ^102%	2.27 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6453 ^101%	6444 ^101%	6446 ^101%	6419 ^101%	6444 ^101%	7422 ^88%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *				1.02		1.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -32%	-1369% / -989%	-73% / -103%	-25% / -32%	-1644% / -947%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量，华硕一如既往地提供了各种不同的色彩配置文件。我们选择了 "原生 "配置文件作为标准配置，但它所描绘的色彩略微过饱和，看起来有些做作。这使得内容看起来更生动、更艳丽。如果你想选择最精确的配置文件，可以选择 P3 配置文件，它的色彩和灰度偏差非常小。我们无法通过校准来进一步改善屏幕的显示效果，这也是我们在现阶段不提供配置文件下载的原因。此外，华硕还为用户提供了极为精确的 sRGB 模式--此外，P3 和 sRGB 也全部涵盖在内。这意味着 Zenbook S 16 的显示屏可以毫无限制地用于编辑照片和视频。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.35 ms rise
0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3 ms rise
0.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.26 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

480 Hz
Amplitude: 30 %

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

该显示屏使用频率为 480 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁，与华硕的所有其他 OLED 面板类似，你可以通过 MyAsus 软件选择所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光。在亮度不超过 60% 的情况下使用直流调光，其幅度受到限制（如上图所示）。只有在亮度为 60% 或更低时，我们才能在测量过程中识别出完整的振荡曲线。基于软件的调光（选择高屏幕亮度，然后通过软件调光）可避免进入此范围。

即使没有触摸屏，OLED 显示屏也具有很强的反光性，在室内使用时有时会产生严重的反光。这种情况在室外会更加严重，尤其是在明亮的日子里，你会想找个阴凉的地方。我们注意到其视角稳定性没有问题。

性能 - 配备 AMD Zen 5（Strix Point）的 Zenbook

Zenbook S 16 有两种配置可供选择：的 Ryzen AI 9 365(10 核），配备 Radeon 880M、24 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）和 1-TB SSD，以及速度更快的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(12 核）、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD。内存采用焊接方式，无法升级。

测试条件

华硕提供各种不同的能耗配置文件，可以通过 MyAsus 软件进行选择。我们在标准模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量，笔记本电脑的能耗水平为 33/28 瓦。性能和全性能这两个所谓更快的配置文件允许消耗的最大功率为 33 瓦，因此在 CPU 测试和连续负载时优势微乎其微，但使用这些模式时 GPU 的性能更弱。设备的噪音也过大（标准模式为 45.8 dB(A)，耳语模式为 36.8 dB(A)，低音模式为 28.9 dB(A)）。

处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Zenbook S 16 配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.如果不考虑它极易混淆的名字，这就是 AMD 新推出的移动处理器，TDP 等级为 15-54 瓦，因此实际上是之前 U 和 HS 型号的组合。不过，这款新芯片与之前的高端 HX 型号（如 Ryzen 9 7945HX55瓦起），这可能会给消费者带来一些困惑。有关全新 Zen 5 处理器的所有技术细节，我们已在详细 CPU 分析文章中进行了总结。以下是关键数据：12 个 Zen 5 CPU 内核（24 个线程），基本时钟频率为 2 GHz，提升时钟频率为 5.1 GHz。此外，现在的 NPU 功能更加强大，可以达到 50 TOPS，这也是满足微软 Copilot+ 标准最低要求（40 TOPS）的原因。

现在来谈谈处理器本身的性能。应该指出的是，Zenbook S 16 内的 HX 370 是一个较弱的版本，功率为 33/28 瓦，但其结果仍然令人印象深刻。与 Ryzen 7 8840HSHP Envy x360 2in1（40/26 瓦）相比，它在多核测试中的性能提高了 20-30%，具体取决于测试内容。英特尔的竞争产品普遍得益于其较高的短期功耗限制，尤其是在基准测试中，但如果考虑到酷睿至尊 7 155H在戴尔 XPS 16为例，其多核性能仅提高了 10-12%（但所需功耗也大幅提高，分别为 100 瓦/85 瓦），这的确是一项了不起的工作。

与当前的骁龙 CPU 相比，结果取决于配置。例如 X1E-80-100的直接竞争对手三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在多核测试中速度稍慢，但 X1E-78-100内的华硕 Vivobook S 15在标准模式下速度稍快。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2407 (2382.65-2498.13)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1662 (1576.29-1694.92)

Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2278 (2205.8-2679.71)

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1951 (1885.73-2044.68)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58)

在单核性能方面，我们注意到惠普 Envy 的 Ryzen 7 8840HS 比 Ryzen 7 8840HS 提高了 10-19%，具体取决于测试--包括最快的酷睿 Ultra 9 芯片在内的 Meteor Lake 竞争对手也被击败了。它的性能也超过了新的骁龙 X1E-X78-100，但双核提升至 4.0 GHz 的 X1E-80-100 则更胜一筹。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	88.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	85.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	81.2 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	78.5 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	76.9 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75 pt
Average of class Multimedia	71.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	71 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	70 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	65.2 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	55.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	55.3 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1099 Points +19%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1213, n=18)	1008 Points +9%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1001 Points +9%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	956 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (398 - 1729, n=44, last 2 years)	954 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	921 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	895 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	866 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	857 Points -7%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	123 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia (101.8 - 178, n=27, last 2 years)	122.8 Points +8%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	115.8 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 116, n=8)	115.2 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	113.6 Points
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	108 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	107 Points -6%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	104 Points -8%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23236 Points +41%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23786, n=16)	19937 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19851 Points +20%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18433 Points +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16522 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15802 (14802^min - 15802.2^max) Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15171 Points -8%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13082 (12624.7^min - 13082.1^max) Points -21%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	10856 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9410 Points -43%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2035 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1953 - 2049, n=9)	2009 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1953 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1906 Points -2%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1791 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1756 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1745 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1287 Points -34%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1130 Points -42%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9057 Points +40%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6469 - 9246, n=8)	8477 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7651 Points +18%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7146 Points +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6469 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6185 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5865 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -12%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	4994 Points -23%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	4033 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3555 Points -45%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	803 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=8)	788 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	772 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	735 Points -5%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	672 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	670 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -16%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	649 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	480 Points -38%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	420 Points -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3483 (2901.49^min - 3483.11^max) Points +39%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3498, n=8)	3259 Points +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3005 (2869.44^min - 3004.58^max) Points +20%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2818 (2643.06^min - 2817.5^max) Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2680 (2205.8^min - 2679.71^max) Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2516 (1825.4^min - 2515.57^max) Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2498.13 (2382.65^min - 2498.13^max) Points
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points -3%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2045 (1885.73^min - 2044.68^max) Points -18%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1984 (1854.94^min - 1984.03^max) Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1695 (1576.29^min - 1694.92^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	306 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 315, n=8)	306 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	298 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	280 Points -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	261 Points -12%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	260 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	254 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	235 Points -21%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	210 Points -30%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * -83%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	313 Seconds * -63%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -32%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	246 Seconds * -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	224 Seconds * -17%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	209 Seconds * -9%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	192 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	179 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	163 Seconds * +15%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=8)	154.6 Seconds * +19%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	149 Seconds * +22%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	83572 MIPS +24%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67615 - 83572, n=8)	79234 MIPS +17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	76331 MIPS +13%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	70074 MIPS +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	67615 MIPS
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	63597 MIPS -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61091 MIPS -10%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -11%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	54768 MIPS -19%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	44935 MIPS -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	43764 MIPS -35%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6200 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6063 - 6208, n=8)	6144 MIPS +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6063 MIPS
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5912 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5781 MIPS -5%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5496 MIPS -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -10%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5474 MIPS -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5374 MIPS -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5242 MIPS -14%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	4611 MIPS -24%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15338 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13648 - 15367, n=9)	14818 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14646 Points +7%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	14256 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14031 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13656 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13648 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years)	13411 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12422 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12243 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11081 Points -19%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2847 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2884, n=9)	2846 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2785 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2751 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years)	2652 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2570 Points -8%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2525 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	2454 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2440 Points -12%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2418 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2356 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14516 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (12487 - 15012, n=8)	14276 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13936 Points +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13556 Points +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	12487 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12331 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12158 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points -4%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9949 Points -20%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	9591 Points -23%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2078 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2108, n=8)	2041 Points -2%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2028 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1902 Points -8%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1894 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1805 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points -13%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1775 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1764 Points -15%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1760 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	26.9 fps +33%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=8)	24.6 fps +21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	22.7 fps +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20.8 fps +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20.3 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.9 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -19%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	15.7 fps -23%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	7.57 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.69 fps -67%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	59.7 s * -20%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	58.5 s * -18%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 66.6, n=8)	55.1 s * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	53.6 s * -8%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	51.7 s * -4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	49.6 s *
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.6 s * +8%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.8 s * +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	40.9 s * +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	39.7 s * +20%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	0.756 sec * -78%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.647 sec * -52%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4837 sec * -14%
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4828 sec * -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4688 sec * -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4638 sec * -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4457 sec * -5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4257 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.4041 - 0.4257, n=8)	0.4139 sec * +3%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4075 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

详细的效率分析可参见我们的单独的 CPU 文章中但即便如此，我们还是想简单了解一下它在对比组中的效率。在 Cinebench R23 测试中，我们很快发现英特尔机型的性能比新的 Zen 5 处理器差很多，但这只限于多核测试。在单核测试中，英特尔和 AMD 的表现相差无几。我们使用 Cinebench 2024 将其与骁龙芯片进行了比较。正如我们刚才看到的 X1E-80-100内的三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16性能稍弱，但这对其效率有积极影响，从而领先于 Ryzen 芯片。华硕华硕 Vivobook S 15的性能稍好，但效率明显较低。即便如此，高通公司的 ARM 芯片在单核测试中的效率还是要高得多。

Power Consumption: Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	354 Points per Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	245 Points per Watt -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	231 Points per Watt -35%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	199.2 Points per Watt -44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	182.6 Points per Watt -48%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	78.5 Points per Watt +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	71.1 Points per Watt +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	62.8 Points per Watt 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	62.6 Points per Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	58.9 Points per Watt -6%

Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	22.1 Points per Watt +12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	19.7 Points per Watt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	18 Points per Watt -9%

Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	7.15 Points per Watt +96%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6.39 Points per Watt +76%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3.64 Points per Watt

如前所述，这只是与直接竞争对手的比较。如需更广泛的比较和更多的效率测量，请参阅我们的 Zen 5 CPU 分析。

在连续负载情况下，CPU 的性能几乎保持不变，电池运行情况也是如此。更多 CPU 基准测试这里.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

207 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2498.13 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

298 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6469 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

772 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16522 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1953 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

113.6 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

921 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	97.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	80.3 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	69.7 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	63 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	40 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=7)	33730 KRay/s +37%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	24673 KRay/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	20007 KRay/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s -42%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14281 KRay/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13431 KRay/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6583 KRay/s -73%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=8)	131586 Points +36%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	97073 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	84591 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points -21%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75538 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68747 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	19477 Points -80%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=8)	5489 MB/s +24%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	4421 MB/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	3847 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s -20%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3480 MB/s -21%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3320 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2893 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107640 Points +27%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 99088, n=8)	93793 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89661 Points +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	84460 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83844 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	68857 Points -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=8)	18499 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	16445 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	12929 Points -21%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10066 Points -39%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9521 Points -42%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1664 Points -90%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=7)	68917 Points +34%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	51277 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	44969 Points -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	36925 Points -28%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	34153 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15344 Points -70%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=8)	78677 MB/s +16%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s +12%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74058 MB/s +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s +6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	70892 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69000 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68954 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	68042 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=8)	1413 MB/s +30%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1086 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1018 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	966 MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -14%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	857 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	617 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=8)	18424 KRay/s +32%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13959 KRay/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	10571 KRay/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7640 KRay/s -45%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6970 KRay/s -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3794 KRay/s -73%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51338 MPixel/s +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	49404 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=8)	47776 MPixel/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43340 MPixel/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	34213 MPixel/s -31%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	31491 MPixel/s -36%

系统性能

全新的 Zenbook S 16 在合成基准测试中表现出色，只是在浏览器测试中不得不承认输给了全新的 Snapdragon CPU。总的来说，Zenbook 在日常使用中是一个反应超级灵敏的系统，但我们在测试中还是遇到了一些驱动程序问题。例如，我们的 LatencyMon 版本无法正常工作，游戏F1 24 也多次出现蓝屏。不过，由于我们使用 Zen 5 的三台测试设备都出现了这种情况，我们可以认为驱动程序问题是造成这种情况的根本原因，制造商肯定会解决这个问题。我们已经就这个问题与 AMD 联系。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7487 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7173 - 7646, n=4)	7480 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	7037 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points -7%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	6958 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	6713 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	11079 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	11076 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10918 Points
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9751 - 10918, n=4)	10508 Points -4%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	10503 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10615 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9393 - 10615, n=4)	10041 Points -5%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	9933 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	8791 Points -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8343 Points -21%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=4)	10793 Points +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9828 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	9712 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8885 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	8763 Points -11%

CrossMark / Overall
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1751 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1749 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1692 - 1789, n=3)	1743 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1707 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -3%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1643 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1384 Points -21%

CrossMark / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1685 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1628 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1625 Points
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1629, n=3)	1614 Points -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1611 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1293 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2029 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1868 - 2117, n=3)	2005 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1913 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1911 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1790 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1537 Points -24%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1514 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1398 - 1520, n=3)	1449 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1398 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	1397 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1347 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1237 Points -12%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	454 Points +41%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	321 Points
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years)	312 Points -3%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	297 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (267 - 321, n=3)	291 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	285 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	275 Points -14%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	311 Points +17%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	266 Points
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)	259 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	258 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	257 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points -5%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	246 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (225 - 266, n=4)	245 Points -8%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	538 ms * -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	529 ms * -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	528 ms * -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * -20%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)	510 ms * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 503, n=5)	451 ms * -3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	439 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	422.3 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7487 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	91209 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	90221 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (88377 - 92030, n=8)	89768 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78983 MB/s -12%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	68720 MB/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63495 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	125604 MB/s +24%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100903 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=8)	99839 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	90142 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s -15%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73509 MB/s -27%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s -31%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	50273 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100401 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98429 - 108954, n=8)	100373 MB/s 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	91050 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76048 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75823 MB/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45265 MB/s -55%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	143.9 ns * -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	125.8 ns * -12%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	121.8 ns * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (108.5 - 119.4, n=8)	113.8 ns * -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	112.4 ns *
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	8.8 ns * +92%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

如前所述，我们无法在测试设备上运行 LatencyMon。不过，至少在播放 4K 视频（YouTube）时没有出现丢帧问题。

存储设备

我们的测试设备安装了 1TB 版本的美光 2400，首次启动后仍有 895 GB 可用。这款 M.2 2280 格式的 PCIe 4.0 SSD 可提供高达 5 GB/s 的良好传输速率，即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。虽然市场上还有更快的硬盘，但它的性能完全够用。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5069 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3355 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 429 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 82.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 171.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 361 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	86.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	83.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	75.9 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	75.4 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	73.1 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	61 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	55.3 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	53 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2772 (2598.84^min - 2771.51^max) MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2652 (2626.88^min - 2652.48^max) MB/s +10%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2411 (2392.64^min - 2410.68^max) MB/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2381 (2369.66^min - 2380.54^max) MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1870 - 2660, n=17)	2289 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2188 (2167.89^min - 2188.41^max) MB/s -9%
seq write
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	3150 (2866.18^min - 3149.7^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s +12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2768 (2672.71^min - 2768.03^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2138 - 3141, n=17)	2678 MB/s -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2328 (2307.7^min - 2328.26^max) MB/s -16%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2320 (2187.12^min - 2319.66^max) MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	557 (554.49^min - 557^max) MB/s -80%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s +9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	5199 (4613.53^min - 5199.14^max) MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	5048 (4430.92^min - 5048.23^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (4239 - 5093, n=17)	4726 MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3562 (3054.5^min - 3562.01^max) MB/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3331 (2575.51^min - 3331.12^max) MB/s -34%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2723 (2395.19^min - 2722.52^max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4537 (4423.9^min - 4536.71^max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s +16%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3597 (3491.97^min - 3597.45^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2884 - 3635, n=17)	3370 MB/s -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2939 (2905.25^min - 2938.94^max) MB/s -18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2344 (1404.04^min - 2343.99^max) MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	555 (553.17^min - 554.85^max) MB/s -85%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	80.8 (80.01^min - 80.76^max) MB/s +141%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s +88%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	60 (58.96^min - 60.01^max) MB/s +79%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s +64%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	52.5 (51.53^min - 52.46^max) MB/s +57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	40.3 (38.77^min - 40.27^max) MB/s +20%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	33.5 (33.26^min - 33.51^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (14.6 - 40.3, n=17)	33.5 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	190.9 (186.79^min - 190.93^max) MB/s +35%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (75.9 - 286, n=17)	177.5 MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	167.7 (152.89^min - 167.68^max) MB/s +19%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	141.2 (137.96^min - 141.21^max) MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	140.9 (133.2^min - 140.87^max) MB/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	136.5 (133.54^min - 136.47^max) MB/s -3%
4k q32 t16 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1821 (1804.4^min - 1821.4^max) MB/s +250%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s +223%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s +160%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (283 - 2850, n=17)	1133 MB/s +117%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	859 (846.09^min - 858.76^max) MB/s +65%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	588 (581.91^min - 587.83^max) MB/s +13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	569 (553.78^min - 569.31^max) MB/s +9%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	521 (508.25^min - 520.66^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1643 (1597.74^min - 1643.45^max) MB/s +457%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s +287%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (222 - 2635, n=17)	1028 MB/s +248%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s +247%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	384 (367.4^min - 383.87^max) MB/s +30%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	377 (370.57^min - 377.49^max) MB/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	373 (367.24^min - 373.12^max) MB/s +26%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	295 (292.32^min - 295.22^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	4643 Points +53%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4613 Points +52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points +44%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2404 - 6406, n=17)	4298 Points +41%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3044 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2761 Points -9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2449 Points -20%
Score Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1795 Points +111%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points +91%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points +77%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (787 - 2482, n=17)	1507 Points +77%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	1256 Points +47%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1151 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	955 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	852 Points
Score Write
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2763 Points +52%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points +46%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points +16%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1086 - 2796, n=17)	2077 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1962 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1820 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1334 Points -27%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	738 Points -59%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s +9%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	4076.04 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3882 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (3616 - 4177, n=17)	3850 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3264 MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3189 MB/s -18%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	2597 MB/s -33%
Seq Write
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2810.56 MB/s +12%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2654 MB/s +6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1946 - 3177, n=17)	2589 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2500 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2260 MB/s -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	1738.71 MB/s -30%
4K Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	69.8 MB/s +115%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s +90%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	59.26 MB/s +83%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	52.79 MB/s +63%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	51.5 MB/s +59%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (27.8 - 58.8, n=17)	47.9 MB/s +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s +45%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	32.4 MB/s
4K Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (135.6 - 288, n=17)	202 MB/s +11%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	181.5 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	176.9 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	168.8 MB/s -7%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	156.53 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	143.4 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1407 MB/s +226%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s +165%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s +164%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (349 - 2005, n=17)	1074 MB/s +149%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	838.9 MB/s +95%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	788.91 MB/s +83%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	577 MB/s +34%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	431 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	2304.92 MB/s +66%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s +58%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s +19%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (669 - 2255, n=17)	1619 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1567 MB/s +13%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1388 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	925 MB/s -33%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	407.67 MB/s -71%
Access Time Read
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	0.109 ms * -336%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	0.092 ms * -268%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * -120%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.021 - 0.116, n=17)	0.05359 ms * -114%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.041 ms * -64%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.033 ms * -32%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.025 ms *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * +12%
Access Time Write
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.13 ms *
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.091 - 0.139, n=17)	0.1092 ms * +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * +22%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	0.078 ms * +40%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Micron 2550 1TB	0.063 ms * +52%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * +53%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.032 ms * +75%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.028 ms * +78%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4987 (4559-5054.72)

显卡 - Radeon 890M

Zen 5 处理器还配备了新的 Radeon 890M(RDNA 3.5) iGPU。与旧版 Radeon 780M(RDNA 3)相比，其 CU 核心数量从 12 个增至 16 个，最高时钟频率从 2.8 GHz 增至 2.9 GHz。有关更多技术细节，请参阅我们的分析文章。

在基准测试中，我们普遍发现 AMD 已经成功缩小了与Intel Arc Graphics （8 Xe 内核）的差距。不过，由于功耗限制相对较低，Zenbook S 16 并没有充分展示出新 Radeon 890M 的潜力，这就是为什么我们也将ProArt PX13 在 iGPU 模式下的结果纳入对比。Zenbook S 16 使用更快的 LPDDR5x-7500 内存--与当前的ROG Ally X 相同。在合成测试中，Ally X 的 Radeon 780M 有时甚至更快（在涡轮增压模式下，其功耗在最初几分钟也更高），但在单项测试中差距最多只有 8%。不过，在HP Envy （配备 LPDDR5-6400 内存）中，780M 在所有基准测试中的领先优势达到了 27%。在所有测试中，它都明显优于两个骁龙 X Elite GPU 中速度较慢的一个（Adreno X1-85 ，3.8 TFLOPS）（我们尚未测试速度更快的 4.5 TFLOPS 版本，但理论上应该也能击败它）。

GPU 的性能在长期负载和电池工作状态下保持不变。更多 GPU 基准测试，请访问技术版块。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.3

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	95.3 pt
Average AMD Radeon 890M	76.6 pt
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 ^-2! AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	69.8 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	69 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	67.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	65.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	65 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	63.8 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	52.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	40.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +50%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15948 Points +20%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (13345 - 16800, n=6)	15642 Points +17%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	13828 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13345 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12670 Points -5%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12413 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12099 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6515 Points -51%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +76%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points +18%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9622 Points +18%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (8188 - 10037, n=6)	9200 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8886 Points +9%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	8775 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8567 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8188 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	7357 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6414 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +59%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points +7%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (3421 - 3676, n=7)	3526 Points +3%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3451 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3426 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3421 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	3196 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3023 Points -12%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2591 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1739 Points -49%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 112310, n=57, last 2 years)	52106 Points +52%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (34259 - 43082, n=6)	39938 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35855 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35156 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35154 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	34259 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	31772 Points -7%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	23247 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	20783 Points -39%
GPU Vulkan
Average AMD Radeon 890M (38270 - 48393, n=6)	44974 Points +18%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	38270 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35745 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (11351 - 92135, n=47, last 2 years)	34313 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33886 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32858 Points -14%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	31404 Points -18%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	26767 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	24011 Points -37%

3DMark 11 Performance		13042 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7644 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3768 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		557 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		3198 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	412 Seconds * -35%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	405 Seconds * -32%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	367 Seconds * -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * -12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	306 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 890M (229 - 306, n=5)	255 Seconds * +17%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	219 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)	209 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

如果不能将笔记本的性能用于游戏，合成结果就没有什么意义了。在运行我们选择的标准游戏时，Zenbook S 16 内的 Radeon 890M 仅次于速度更快的英特尔弧形显卡和惠普 Envy 中的旧版 Radeon 780M 相比领先约 10%。 ROG Ally X在涡轮增压模式下速度更快。ProArt PX13 的 Radeon 890M 无节流版又快了 11%。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	60.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	59.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54.7 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	54.7 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	52.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	49.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	42.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +74%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	34 fps +10%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	31.1 fps 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31 fps
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 (24^min) fps -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.1 (23^min, 24^P1) fps -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.9 (23^min) fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.1 (12^min, 21^P1) fps -25%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +76%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 (2.04^min, 22.7^P1) fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	30.4 (3.23^min, 21.7^P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (7.11^min, 18.9^P1) fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	21.5 (2.75^min, 12.5^P1) fps -29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.3 (1.247^min, 7.75^P1) fps -53%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +78%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.2 fps +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps +7%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	30 fps +5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.6 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.8 fps -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.2 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.4 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.9 fps -44%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps +76%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	55.7 (36^min, 42.8^P1) fps +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps +6%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	51.6 (35.6^min, 40.1^P1) fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	49.8 (31.1^min, 37.7^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	47 fps -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	45.4 (5^min, 8.91^P1) fps -9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	42.2 (7.1^min, 9.18^P1) fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38 fps -24%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +191%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps +141%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	78 (52.7^min) fps +136%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	76.2 (68.4^min) fps +130%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	73.6 (51.1^min) fps +122%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.4 (54.7^min) fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	53 (39.7^min) fps +60%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	36 (20.4^min) fps +9%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.1 (18.7^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +51%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.1 fps +16%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	44.2 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	40.1 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps -24%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	33.2 fps -25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps -27%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.9 fps -37%

我们又测试了一些游戏，发现英特尔 Arc Graphics 图形处理器普遍领先。不过，Zenbook S 16 与 ROG Ally X（功耗限制略高）轮番上阵。总体而言，性能确实有所提升，但 Radeon 890M 需要更多的电力才能充分发挥其潜力。

在我们的赛博朋克连续测试中，几分钟后就出现了几次 FPS 下降。幸好随后性能又趋于稳定。你很快就会发现，在压力测试中也出现了这种情况，因此我们可以认为这是 Zenbook S 16 的配置问题。

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | Far Cry 5 | F1 23

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (4.66 - 131.2, n=50, last 2 years)	51.9 fps +13%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.5 (42.9^min) fps +12%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (40 - 52.5, n=8)	47.4 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	46 (38.3^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	44.1 (37.1^min) fps -4%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.5 (19.3^min) fps -23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34.7 (25.8^min) fps -25%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31 (25.4^min) fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	27.6 (20.7^min) fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	24.4 (19.1^min) fps -47%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (9.42 - 110, n=44, last 2 years)	44.9 fps +43%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	40.7 (34.2^min) fps +30%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (31.3 - 40.9, n=8)	37.4 fps +19%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (30^min) fps +10%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.3 (19.7^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	29.5 (22.4^min) fps -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.8 (15.3^min) fps -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.3 (20.8^min) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.4 (20.9^min) fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	19.5 (15.7^min) fps -38%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (7.3 - 94.1, n=48, last 2 years)	38.1 fps +50%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 (26.6^min) fps +24%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (25.4 - 32.3, n=8)	29.4 fps +16%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (23.2^min) fps +7%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.4 (15.6^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25 (16.7^min) fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	22.8 (19.1^min) fps -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	22.1 (11^min) fps -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.9 (16.8^min) fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	17 (13.4^min) fps -33%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=50, last 2 years)	34.3 fps +48%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	27.8 (23.1^min) fps +20%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (23.1 - 28.4, n=8)	25.9 fps +12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	23.1 (18.2^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	22.9 (19.3^min) fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.2 (12.2^min) fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.7 (15.8^min) fps -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	19.1 (9.74^min) fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	14.9 (11.6^min) fps -35%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Average of class Multimedia (13.1 - 166.3, n=34, last 2 years)	63.6 fps +41%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	45.2 fps
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	44.5 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (35 - 48.5, n=8)	43.2 fps -4%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	41.1 fps -9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35 fps -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.8 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	25.1 fps -44%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average of class Multimedia (10.8 - 136.6, n=34, last 2 years)	52 fps +45%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	36.4 fps +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	35.8 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M (29.1 - 37.9, n=8)	34.9 fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	32.1 fps -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 fps -20%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	27.4 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20.6 fps -42%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Multimedia (9.5 - 119.9, n=37, last 2 years)	45.7 fps +79%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.5 fps +11%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (24.1 - 31.2, n=8)	28.5 fps +11%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	26.6 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.6 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.7 fps -7%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	18 fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Multimedia (9.1 - 117.7, n=38, last 2 years)	43.6 fps +75%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.1 fps +17%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (24 - 31.1, n=7)	28.3 fps +14%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	24.9 fps
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	22.2 fps -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	22 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	17.4 fps -30%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (37 - 187, n=50, last 2 years)	106.8 fps +32%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	98 fps +21%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (75 - 101, n=7)	92 fps +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	84 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	81 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	78 fps -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	68 (21^min) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	67 fps -17%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	63 (46^min) fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps -54%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (20 - 162, n=54, last 2 years)	78.6 fps +57%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	59 fps +18%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (42 - 60, n=7)	54.9 fps +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	52 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	50 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	46 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39 fps -22%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	38 (12^min) fps -24%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36 (6^min) fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	30 fps -40%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 154, n=58, last 2 years)	73.2 fps +59%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54 fps +17%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (39 - 55, n=7)	50.4 fps +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	46 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	42 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	38 fps -17%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	36 (24^min) fps -22%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33 (20^min) fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	28 fps -39%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years)	68.6 fps +108%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51 fps +55%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (33 - 52, n=7)	46.1 fps +40%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	45 fps +36%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	40 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35 fps +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34 (28^min) fps +3%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33 fps
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 (23^min) fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	27 fps -18%

F1 23
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (10.6 - 229, n=27, last 2 years)	106.7 fps +47%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	106.3 (88^min, 67^P1) fps +46%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	89.6 (77^min, 73^P1) fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (72.8 - 106.3, n=3)	89.1 fps +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.1 (63^min, 65^P1) fps +10%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	72.8 (52^min, 37^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	70.9 (47^min, 49^P1) fps -3%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (9.61 - 239, n=27, last 2 years)	102 fps +47%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	96.5 (83^min, 66^P1) fps +39%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (69.3 - 96.5, n=3)	80.7 fps +16%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	79 (69^min, 64^P1) fps +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74.2 (49^min, 62^P1) fps +7%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	69.3 (57^min, 31^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	62.9 (32^min, 47^P1) fps -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 209, n=29, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +52%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	70.3 (56^min, 45^P1) fps +26%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (55.6 - 70.3, n=3)	61.5 fps +11%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	56.6 (49^min, 47^P1) fps +2%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	55.6 (40^min, 26^P1) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	50.4 (41^min, 43^P1) fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	44.8 (37^min, 36^P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 70.3, n=22, last 2 years)	32.3 fps +163%
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	17 (11^min, 11^P1) fps +38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14 (10^min, 10^P1) fps +14%
Average AMD Radeon 890M (12.1 - 17, n=3)	13.8 fps +12%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	13 (6^min, 8^P1) fps +6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	12.3 (7^min, 7^P1) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø19.5 (13.6-21.2)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	161.3	129.6	68.4	30.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)	155		52	31
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	161.1	123.1	35.8	33.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	75.5	38.3	28.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	66.5	54.4	44.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	81	50	46	33
Strange Brigade (2018)	165.1	71.1	60.2	49.8
F1 22 (2022)	81	76.8	64.2	16.7
F1 23 (2023)	72.8	69.3	55.6	12.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	45.2	35.8	25.6	24.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	46	31.3	25.4	23.1
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	90.3	67.9	50.7	42.2
Ghost of Tsushima (2024)	34.6	28	19.4	18.7

排放 - 安静的伙伴

噪音排放

在日常使用中，Zenbook S 16 是一个非常安静的伙伴，它比采用 AMD 和英特尔芯片的竞争对手安静得多。与三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16骁龙处理器相比，它的两个风扇在负载情况下声音会稍大一些，而且启动得也更快一些。在这方面，ARM 处理器显然更具优势。Zenbook S 16 的两种可选性能模式的噪音为 46 dB(A)，比标准模式大很多，就其低性能优势而言，这实在是太大了。而在耳语模式下，我们注意到最大音量为 28.9 dB(A)，几乎听不到。测试设备也没有发出额外的电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.7 / 24.7 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load		35.7 / 36.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)

	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
Noise		7%	-6%	8%	-4%	2%
off / environment *	24.7	24.6 -0%	22.9 7%	22.9 7%	24.6 -0%	24.4 1%
Idle Minimum *	24.7	24.6 -0%	22.9 7%	23 7%	24.6 -0%	24.4 1%
Idle Average *	24.7	24.6 -0%	22.9 7%	23 7%	24.6 -0%	24.4 1%
Idle Maximum *	26.4	24.6 7%	25 5%	23 13%	26.4 -0%	24.4 8%
Load Average *	35.7	28.1 21%	45.1 -26%	23.8 33%	40 -12%	32 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	36.8	32.4 12%	44.9 -22%
Load Maximum *	36.8	32.4 12%	44.9 -22%	43.8 -19%	40 -9%	39.7 -8%
Witcher 3 ultra *				43.8	40	30.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

薄薄的底座让笔记本电脑的表面温度一目了然，在空闲模式下，我们已经在很多地方测得了 29-30°C 的温度。当然，这并不是关键因素，但它确实能让你知道笔记本电脑在负载情况下会出现什么问题。在游戏和压力测试时，我们注意到设备底部的一个位置温度超过 50 °C，总的来说，温度相当高。在这种情况下，使用过程中不应将笔记本电脑放在大腿上。键盘区域也会明显发热，但您仍然可以不受任何限制地打字。不过，无论如何，您在执行高要求任务时都不会遇到这样的问题。即便如此，小巧的电源装置在负载情况下也会变得过热，温度最高可达 60 °C。

在压力测试中，它的时钟频率和温度在最初几分钟就出现了波动。在大约 15 分钟的时间里，该设备的功耗值一直保持在 28 瓦左右，最后才稳定在 22-23 瓦左右。不过，华硕应该会通过即将推出的更新来稳定这方面的性能。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.3 °C	46.9 °C	44.2 °C
40 °C	44.1 °C	39.6 °C
32.4 °C	31.3 °C	32.5 °C

Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 39.5 °C


48.9 °C	53.5 °C	49.5 °C
42.2 °C	44.9 °C	42.1 °C
34.2 °C	34.9 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 53.5 °C
Average: 42.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 60.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


29.2 °C	29.5 °C	29 °C
28.4 °C	28.6 °C	28.1 °C
27.1 °C	26.9 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 28.2 °C


29.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.9 °C
28.2 °C	29.2 °C	28.9 °C
27.3 °C	27.4 °C	27.8 °C

Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 28.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.1 °C	46.1 °C	44.2 °C
38.9 °C	43.6 °C	36.5 °C
31.9 °C	30.9 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


48.6 °C	53.4 °C	49 °C
41.8 °C	47.4 °C	42.9 °C
34.8 °C	35.4 °C	35.2 °C

Maximum: 53.4 °C
Average: 43.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 58.5 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).

	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		10%	1%	9%	17%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	46.9	44.3 6%	46.8 -0%	42.6 9%	40.9 13%	40.3 14%
Maximum Bottom *	53.5	51.6 4%	45.6 15%	47.8 11%	42.6 20%	45.9 14%
Idle Upper Side *	29.5	25.1 15%	32.2 -9%	27.4 7%	24.5 17%	26.3 11%
Idle Bottom *	30.2	25.8 15%	31.4 -4%	27.8 8%	24.8 18%	27.9 8%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

华硕为 Zenbook S 16 共配备了六个扬声器，效果非常好，笔记本电脑的音量和空间感都很强。三星的 Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在这方面还跟不上，而惠普惠普 Envy x360则略胜一筹。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 良好的耐力

耗电量

在空闲测量中，新款 Zenbook S 16 的表现仅次于三星Galaxy Book4 16 的两个版本。不过，在负载情况下，它的性能要优于所有采用 AMD/Intel CPU 的竞争对手，这也得益于它相对较低的功耗限制。在压力测试中，我们短暂测得的最大功率略低于 59 瓦，然后迅速降至 51 瓦，在接下来的测试过程中功率下降得更多。原则上，65 瓦的电源已经足够，但它的高温确实让我们担心--尽管笔记本电脑的永久耗电量离额定功率还有一段距离。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.23 / 0.51 Watt
Idle	5.4 / 10.5 / 10.9 Watt
Load	47.8 / 58.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Average AMD Radeon 890M	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		24%	-38%	-0%	21%	-34%	-2%	-41%
Idle Minimum *	5.4	4.2 22%	6.1 -13%	5 7%	3.6 33%	4.2 22%	4.95 ?(2.7 - 6, n=4) 8%	6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	10.5	5.6 47%	13.5 -29%	6.2 41%	5.7 46%	11.6 -10%	7.45 ?(5.4 - 10.5, n=4) 29%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Maximum *	10.9	7.8 28%	13.8 -27%	14.7 -35%	6.1 44%	12.3 -13%	9.1 ?(5.5 - 14, n=4) 17%	13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years) -23%
Load Average *	47.8	28.3 41%	63.6 -33%	49.9 -4%	52.5 -10%	61.9 -29%	65 ?(47.8 - 76, n=4) -36%	71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years) -49%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	49.2	38.8 21%	67 -36%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	46.7	38.2 18%	64.6 -38%
Load Maximum *	58.6	61.9 -6%	109.7 -87%	65 -11%	64.7 -10%	140.6 -140%	75.7 ?(58.6 - 94, n=4) -29%	117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years) -100%
Witcher 3 ultra *				54.5	46.6	57

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø52 (50.3-58.6)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.36 (7.65-9.94)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø49.2 (48.6-49.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45.6 (43.8-50.9)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø47.4 (44-50.3)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.2 (27.4-48)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (45.1-52.7)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50 (48.2-55.8)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.42 (5.8-7.3)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø46.7 (30.7-53.8)

运行时间

该设备的电池续航时间与 78 瓦时的电池配合使用，总体上非常出色，因此 Zenbook S 16 与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16相媲美。Galaxy Book4 16 的高通版本可能更高效，但由于电池容量较小，其电池续航时间仍然明显较短。

在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的时间为 10:40 小时（60 Hz）和 9:27 小时（120 Hz）。在全亮度条件下，这些数值分别降低到 7:47 小时（60 Hz）和 7:27 小时（120 Hz）。在 150 cd/m² 下可播放视频 20 小时，在全亮度下可播放 HDR 视频不到 6 小时。

在设备打开的情况下，充满一次电需要 127 分钟，79 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 40min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 47min

	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh	Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh	HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-16%	-3%	-10%	-4%	26%	-14%
H.264	1204	879 -27%			1144 -5%	1308 9%	821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years) -32%
WiFi v1.3	640	443 -31%	686 7%	459 -28%	644 1%	983 54%	628 ?(279 - 1204, n=84, last 2 years) -2%
Load	107	117 9%	93 -13%	116 8%	100 -7%	124 16%	97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) -9%

Pros

+ 纤薄稳定的机身

+ 快速高效的 AMD Zen5 处理器

+ 亮丽的 120-Hz OLED

+ 非常出色的系统性能

+ 丰富的连接功能

+ USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 良好的音响系统

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 内存无法升级

- PWM 闪烁

- 热电源

结论 - 华硕 Zenbook S 16 是一款出色的全能型产品

新款华硕 Zenbook S 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了美好的印象，它是目前市场上最好的全能笔记本之一。其高品质的纤薄机身让笔记本的稳定性丝毫不打折扣，在日常使用中，你不会缺少足够的连接（包括 USB-A）或舒适的键盘。它的扬声器非常出色，除了一些强烈的反光之外，我们对该设备的 OLED 显示屏没有什么可抱怨的。它在 HDR 模式下的亮度可以更好一些，但画质非常出色，华硕还为 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间提供了非常准确的配置文件。

全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器同样给人留下了深刻印象，尤其是在 CPU 性能方面。尽管 Zenbook S 16 的功耗限制较低，仅为 33/28 瓦，但仍可与能耗更高的英特尔 CPU 相媲美。新的 Radeon GPU 也带来了优势，不过这个优势并不像很多人想象的那么大。如需了解更多比较信息，请参阅我们对新款 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 Radeon 890M.Zenbook 的散热系统在总体上保持了相当的安静，只要你忽略两种性能模式（无论如何，这两种模式都不会带来太多的性能提升）。

新款 Zenbook S 16 是不带专用 GPU 的最佳全能笔记本电脑之一，其快速高效的 Zen 5 处理器、高品质的外壳、出色的 OLED 面板和丰富的连接选项给人留下了深刻印象。作为一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，您还可以使用所有先进的人工智能功能，而无需处理 ARM 设备所面临的兼容性问题。

这款笔记本电脑的缺点确实不多。目前，并非所有的驱动程序都已完全成熟，例如在尝试运行F1 24时会导致设备崩溃，但目前我们测试的所有三款最新的 Zen 5 设备都还存在这个问题，应该很快就会通过更新得到纠正。它在压力测试中的表现也应该得到优化。除此以外，你自然不得不提到它极其紧凑的电源，在负载情况下，它的温度实在太高了。此外，它的 2 百万像素网络摄像头还可以做得更好。

得益于更快的 NPU，Zenbook S 16 还是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，因此用户可以使用所有附加的人工智能功能，如实时字幕。这样一来，它就不会面临当前高通笔记本电脑必须面对的任何兼容性问题。它最大的竞争对手是三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16和 Edge 16.搭载英特尔处理器的 Pro 机型不得不放弃额外的人工智能功能，而且声音也变大了，而搭载骁龙处理器的 Edge 16 则更安静，但不得不面对兼容性问题--此外，由于电池容量较小，它的运行时间也较短。在连接和显示屏方面，华硕的优势在于软件调光，而 Zenbook 的键盘则更为舒适。从价格上看，这两款设备并无太大差别，但提供的功能却不相上下。

▶ load Youtube video

价格和供应情况

新款 Zenbook S 16 可直接从华硕网站购买。购买，价格从 1,699.99 美元起。

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W - 09/03/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

89 / 98 → 91%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

74 / 80 → 92%

Weight

69 / 20-74 → 90%

Battery

88 / 95 → 93%

Display

85%

Games Performance

50 / 88 → 57%

Application Performance

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

84%

Noise

90 / 95 → 95%

Audio

85%

Camera

33 / 75 → 43%

Average

65%

85%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
84.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 41.2%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-29 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	912
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	913
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	920
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	921
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	921
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	921
Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	922
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	12925
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE i9-14900, T1000	12953
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	12990
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13042
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13042
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13042
Dell G15 5510-43NHT i5-10200H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13046
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Zenbook 厚度仅为 1.3 厘米

尺寸比较

连接性 - 2x USB-C 4.0 和 USB-A

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

可持续性

输入设备 - 令人惊喜的舒适键盘

显示屏 - 出色的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 配备 AMD Zen 5（Strix Point）的 Zenbook

测试条件

处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

显卡 - Radeon 890M

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放 - 安静的伙伴

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis

HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr audio analysis

电源管理 - 良好的耐力

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 华硕 Zenbook S 16 是一款出色的全能型产品

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison