Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
华硕新款 Zenbook S 16 是一款轻薄、高品质的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，也是首批配备 AMD 新款 Zen 5 移动处理器的设备之一。由于改进了 NPU，它还支持新的 Copilot+ AI 功能，而这些功能以前只在新的骁龙设备上使用。
我们测试的 Zenbook S 16 是两款可用机型中速度更快的一款，它配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370以及集成的 Radeon 890M32 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）和 1 TB SSD。包括 Ryzen AI 9 365、Radeon 880M、24 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 在内的这款笔记本电脑的入门价格为 1,699.99 美元。两款机型均采用相同的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏（2,880 x 1,800 像素）。
有关新款 Zen 5 移动处理器的详细信息、基准测试和效率测量，我们建议您浏览我们的分析文章，在这些文章中，我们将新款处理器与英特尔、Apple 和高通公司的竞争产品在不同功率级别上进行了比较：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.7 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 80.2 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 82.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.2 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.9 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89.7 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 |
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳 - Zenbook 厚度仅为 1.3 厘米
华硕新款 Zenbook S 16 采用 CNC 铣削铈铝外壳--至少这是制造商的营销术语。这是一种陶瓷材料，据说特别耐用，同时还能实现笔记本电脑的轻薄设计。我们的测试设备采用了斯堪的纳维亚白配色，这是一种非常浅的灰色。你也可以选择颜色更深的祖马亚灰。Zenbook S 16 给人一种非常高品质和优雅的印象，盖子上 Pro Art 徽标的精细轮廓进一步突出了这一点。笔记本的表面非常光滑，看起来非常耐脏和耐指纹印，但一旦你开始在它的外壳上留下指纹印，就不是那么容易清理了。
将笔记本电脑拿在手上，首先映入眼帘的是它纤薄的机身，我们测量到的最厚处仅为 1.3 厘米（正面为 1.1 厘米）。尽管如此，底座仍具有出色的稳定性，无论是按压还是扭转都不会产生任何噪音或导致任何问题。遗憾的是，薄薄的盖子却并非如此，因为打开盖子时不时会发出一些细微的吱吱声。铰链非常紧，但单手仍然可以打开笔记本电脑。这样做的一个好处是，在调整打开角度时，盖子几乎不会晃动。说到：它的最大开启角度可达 135 度左右。
将其尺寸与两个版本的 Galaxy Book4 Pro/Edge 16(12.5/12.3 毫米）相比，Zenbook S 16（11-13 毫米）显然更胜一筹。此外，这些设备的重量都不是很重，三者的重量均在 1.5 千克左右。反过来，所有其他对比设备都要厚得多，也明显重得多。紧凑型 65 瓦电源仅增加了 190 克（包括电缆）。
连接性 - 2x USB-C 4.0 和 USB-A
现代设备配备 USB-C 端口（这里指的是 4.0 标准）并不奇怪。然而，如此纤薄的机壳还配备了普通的 USB-A 接口，这确实非常罕见，更不用说这一功能在日常使用中是多么实用了。如果能满足我们一个愿望的话，我们希望在右侧配备第二个 USB-C 端口，这样就可以从两侧为设备充电了。
SD 读卡器
设备右侧有一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，插入时，卡会从开口处微微伸出。它的性能令人印象深刻，与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）一起使用时，我们发现最高传输速率超过了 250 MB/s，而在复制图像文件时，我们测得的传输速率仍然超过了 150 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
Zenbook S 16 配备了联发科技的全新 WLAN 模块。MT9725 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准和蓝牙 5.4。此外，它还能轻松媲美目前高通笔记本电脑内的 FastConnect 7800 模块，不过在与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，MT9725 的速度要稍快一些，尤其是在发送数据时。总之，这些结果都非常出色，我们在测试过程中没有遇到笔记本电脑的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。
| Networking | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
总的来说，这款 1080p 网络摄像头的画质只能算一般。当然，用户也可以使用 Windows 先进的 Studio Effects。此外，该摄像头还安装了红外模块，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
机箱底盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉（T5）固定，拆卸起来非常容易。笔记本电脑的内部结构以大电池（旋入式）为主，同时，你会发现它的小风扇非常小。M.2 2280 固态硬盘可以更换，而无线局域网模块和内存则是焊接上去的。
可持续性
Zenbook S 16 的产品页面没有提供任何关于生产过程中二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料使用比例的信息。其包装主要由纸板组成，但也有一些塑料元素。华硕本身也没有提供任何维修指南。与其他同类产品相比，这款笔记本电脑的功耗相对较低，我们没有注意到它在空闲或待机模式下的功耗有什么明显的特点。
输入设备 - 令人惊喜的舒适键盘
纤薄的外壳并没有对键盘造成太大的影响，因为虽然键盘的键程只有 1.1 毫米，但打字的感觉却非常好。至少在普通字母键上是这样，而较大的按键，如回车键或空格键，则感觉有点摇晃，失去了原本的高品质感觉。即便如此，用户还是可以毫不费力地撰写长篇文字，而且键盘明显比 Galaxy Book4 Pro/边缘.白色/蓝色背光有三种亮度可供选择（也可通过传感器自动调节），但最亮的设置几乎太亮，可能会有点刺眼。在这款键盘上还可以找到新的 Copilot 键，以及我们在其他华硕设备上熟悉的小方向键。
点击板的尺寸为 15 x 9.9 厘米，非常大，在我们的测试中运行完美。它的表面光滑漂亮，机械点击声低沉安静，给人一种高品质的感觉。除了常规的手势操作外，该键盘还支持边缘手势操作（例如通过右侧边缘调节亮度）。虽然它很好用、 华为振动电机的网格效果在这方面仍有优势。
显示屏 - 出色的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏
华硕为 Zenbook S 16 配备了一块 16 英寸 OLED 屏幕，但没有触摸屏。它的分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，长宽比为 16:10，属于三星最新一代 OLED 面板。从主观上看，它的画质令人惊叹，即使是明亮的区域也丝毫没有颗粒感，而且色彩看起来超级鲜艳。它的响应时间一如既往地快如闪电，得益于 120Hz 的刷新率，动作看起来非常流畅。屏幕的亮度和色温可通过传感器自动调节。
在 SDR 模式下，面板亮度超过 400 cd/m²，加上极低的黑值，用户可以享受到令人印象深刻的良好对比度。此外，还支持 HDR 内容，但像往常一样，你必须在 Windows 设置中手动激活 HDR 模式。我们测试设备的最大 HDR 亮度为 525 cd/m²，略高于宣传的 500 cd/m²。不过，Zenbook 的亮度值仍无法接近较小的 OLED 面板（>600 cd/m²）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 20350:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 0.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -1% | 0% | 1% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.5 0% | 99.4 -1% | 99.6 0% | 99.5 0% | 98.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.6 | 97.5 2% | 92.5 -3% | 96.5 1% | 97.5 2% | 89.9 -6% |
| Response Times | -23% | -3800% | -26% | -23% | -4523% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.56 ? | 0.64 ? -14% | 15.4 ? -2650% | 0.8 ? -43% | 0.64 ? -14% | 39.2 ? -6900% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.65 ? | 0.68 ? -5% | 60.6 ? -9223% | 0.89 ? -37% | 0.68 ? -5% | 14.6 ? -2146% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 | 240 ? -50% | 2753.7 ? 474% | 491.8 ? 2% | 240 ? -50% | |
| Screen | -54% | -306% | -192% | -54% | -407% | |
| Brightness middle | 407 | 385 -5% | 413 1% | 399.4 -2% | 385 -5% | 520 28% |
| Brightness | 405 | 391 -3% | 409 1% | 405 0% | 391 -3% | 510 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 97 0% | 98 1% | 97 0% | 93 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.14 -600% | 0.35 -1650% | |||
| Contrast | 20350 | 2950 -86% | 1486 -93% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 1.1 -83% | 3.48 -480% | 4.05 -575% | 1.1 -83% | 2.9 -383% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.2 | 1.8 -50% | 6.97 -481% | 6.69 -458% | 1.8 -50% | 6.2 -417% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.5 | 1.4 -180% | 4.5 -800% | 1.1 -120% | 1.4 -180% | 4.3 -760% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6453 101% | 6444 101% | 6446 101% | 6419 101% | 6444 101% | 7422 88% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.02 | 1.1 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-32% | -1369% /
-989% | -73% /
-103% | -25% /
-32% | -1644% /
-947% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量，华硕一如既往地提供了各种不同的色彩配置文件。我们选择了 "原生 "配置文件作为标准配置，但它所描绘的色彩略微过饱和，看起来有些做作。这使得内容看起来更生动、更艳丽。如果你想选择最精确的配置文件，可以选择 P3 配置文件，它的色彩和灰度偏差非常小。我们无法通过校准来进一步改善屏幕的显示效果，这也是我们在现阶段不提供配置文件下载的原因。此外，华硕还为用户提供了极为精确的 sRGB 模式--此外，P3 和 sRGB 也全部涵盖在内。这意味着 Zenbook S 16 的显示屏可以毫无限制地用于编辑照片和视频。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.35 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 30 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
该显示屏使用频率为 480 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁，与华硕的所有其他 OLED 面板类似，你可以通过 MyAsus 软件选择所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光。在亮度不超过 60% 的情况下使用直流调光，其幅度受到限制（如上图所示）。只有在亮度为 60% 或更低时，我们才能在测量过程中识别出完整的振荡曲线。基于软件的调光（选择高屏幕亮度，然后通过软件调光）可避免进入此范围。
即使没有触摸屏，OLED 显示屏也具有很强的反光性，在室内使用时有时会产生严重的反光。这种情况在室外会更加严重，尤其是在明亮的日子里，你会想找个阴凉的地方。我们注意到其视角稳定性没有问题。
性能 - 配备 AMD Zen 5（Strix Point）的 Zenbook
Zenbook S 16 有两种配置可供选择：的 Ryzen AI 9 365(10 核），配备 Radeon 880M、24 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）和 1-TB SSD，以及速度更快的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(12 核）、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD。内存采用焊接方式，无法升级。
测试条件
华硕提供各种不同的能耗配置文件，可以通过 MyAsus 软件进行选择。我们在标准模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量，笔记本电脑的能耗水平为 33/28 瓦。性能和全性能这两个所谓更快的配置文件允许消耗的最大功率为 33 瓦，因此在 CPU 测试和连续负载时优势微乎其微，但使用这些模式时 GPU 的性能更弱。设备的噪音也过大（标准模式为 45.8 dB(A)，耳语模式为 36.8 dB(A)，低音模式为 28.9 dB(A)）。
处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Zenbook S 16 配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.如果不考虑它极易混淆的名字，这就是 AMD 新推出的移动处理器，TDP 等级为 15-54 瓦，因此实际上是之前 U 和 HS 型号的组合。不过，这款新芯片与之前的高端 HX 型号（如 Ryzen 9 7945HX55瓦起），这可能会给消费者带来一些困惑。有关全新 Zen 5 处理器的所有技术细节，我们已在 详细 CPU 分析文章中进行了总结。以下是关键数据：12 个 Zen 5 CPU 内核（24 个线程），基本时钟频率为 2 GHz，提升时钟频率为 5.1 GHz。此外，现在的 NPU 功能更加强大，可以达到 50 TOPS，这也是满足微软 Copilot+ 标准最低要求（40 TOPS）的原因。
现在来谈谈处理器本身的性能。应该指出的是，Zenbook S 16 内的 HX 370 是一个较弱的版本，功率为 33/28 瓦，但其结果仍然令人印象深刻。与 Ryzen 7 8840HSHP Envy x360 2in1（40/26 瓦）相比，它在多核测试中的性能提高了 20-30%，具体取决于测试内容。英特尔的竞争产品普遍得益于其较高的短期功耗限制，尤其是在基准测试中，但如果考虑到 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 戴尔 XPS 16为例，其多核性能仅提高了 10-12%（但所需功耗也大幅提高，分别为 100 瓦/85 瓦），这的确是一项了不起的工作。
与当前的骁龙 CPU 相比，结果取决于配置。例如 X1E-80-100的直接竞争对手 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在多核测试中速度稍慢，但 X1E-78-100内的 华硕 Vivobook S 15在标准模式下速度稍快。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
在单核性能方面，我们注意到惠普 Envy 的 Ryzen 7 8840HS 比 Ryzen 7 8840HS 提高了 10-19%，具体取决于测试--包括最快的酷睿 Ultra 9 芯片在内的 Meteor Lake 竞争对手也被击败了。它的性能也超过了新的骁龙 X1E-X78-100，但双核提升至 4.0 GHz 的 X1E-80-100 则更胜一筹。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2! | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 -2! | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -2! | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 -2! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1213, n=13) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Multimedia (398 - 1612, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (101.8 - 144, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 116, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23786, n=14) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1953 - 2049, n=7) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6469 - 9246, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1795 - 11768, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3498, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1057 - 4703, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 310, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 310, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67615 - 83572, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27677 - 119900, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6063 - 6200, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13648 - 15367, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 21264, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2785 - 2884, n=7) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3157, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (12487 - 15012, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2028 - 2108, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 58.5, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.947, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.4041 - 0.4257, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
* ... smaller is better
详细的效率分析可参见我们的 单独的 CPU 文章中但即便如此，我们还是想简单了解一下它在对比组中的效率。在 Cinebench R23 测试中，我们很快发现英特尔机型的性能比新的 Zen 5 处理器差很多，但这只限于多核测试。在单核测试中，英特尔和 AMD 的表现相差无几。我们使用 Cinebench 2024 将其与骁龙芯片进行了比较。正如我们刚才看到的 X1E-80-100内的 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16性能稍弱，但这对其效率有积极影响，从而领先于 Ryzen 芯片。华硕 华硕 Vivobook S 15的性能稍好，但效率明显较低。即便如此，高通公司的 ARM 芯片在单核测试中的效率还是要高得多。
| Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
如前所述，这只是与直接竞争对手的比较。如需更广泛的比较和更多的效率测量，请参阅 我们的 Zen 5 CPU 分析。
在连续负载情况下，CPU 的性能几乎保持不变，电池运行情况也是如此。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6681, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 95053, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
系统性能
全新的 Zenbook S 16 在合成基准测试中表现出色，只是在浏览器测试中不得不承认输给了全新的 Snapdragon CPU。总的来说，Zenbook 在日常使用中是一个反应超级灵敏的系统，但我们在测试中还是遇到了一些驱动程序问题。例如，我们的 LatencyMon 版本无法正常工作，游戏F1 24 也多次出现蓝屏。不过，由于我们使用 Zen 5 的三台测试设备都出现了这种情况，我们可以认为驱动程序问题是造成这种情况的根本原因，制造商肯定会解决这个问题。我们已经就这个问题与 AMD 联系。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7487 - 7646, n=2) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (10678 - 10918, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (10345 - 10615, n=2) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 10983, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2146, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2564, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 476, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (259 - 266, n=2) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 439, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7487 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (89348 - 92030, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 94300, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (99673 - 100903, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98648 - 108954, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 100507, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (111.4 - 119.4, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
如前所述，我们无法在测试设备上运行 LatencyMon。不过，至少在播放 4K 视频（YouTube）时没有出现丢帧问题。
存储设备
我们的测试设备安装了 1TB 版本的美光 2400，首次启动后仍有 895 GB 可用。这款 M.2 2280 格式的 PCIe 4.0 SSD 可提供高达 5 GB/s 的良好传输速率，即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。虽然市场上还有更快的硬盘，但它的性能完全够用。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - Radeon 890M
Zen 5 处理器还配备了新的 Radeon 890M(RDNA 3.5) iGPU。与旧版 Radeon 780M(RDNA 3)相比，其 CU 核心数量从 12 个增至 16 个，最高时钟频率从 2.8 GHz 增至 2.9 GHz。有关更多技术细节，请参阅 我们的分析文章。
在基准测试中，我们普遍发现 AMD 已经成功缩小了与Intel Arc Graphics （8 Xe 内核）的差距。不过，由于功耗限制相对较低，Zenbook S 16 并没有充分展示出新 Radeon 890M 的潜力，这就是为什么我们也将ProArt PX13 在 iGPU 模式下的结果纳入对比。Zenbook S 16 使用更快的 LPDDR5x-7500 内存--与当前的ROG Ally X 相同。在合成测试中，Ally X 的 Radeon 780M 有时甚至更快（在涡轮增压模式下，其功耗在最初几分钟也更高），但在单项测试中差距最多只有 8%。不过，在HP Envy （配备 LPDDR5-6400 内存）中，780M 在所有基准测试中的领先优势达到了 27%。在所有测试中，它都明显优于两个骁龙 X Elite GPU 中速度较慢的一个（Adreno X1-85 ，3.8 TFLOPS）（我们尚未测试速度更快的 4.5 TFLOPS 版本，但理论上应该也能击败它）。
GPU 的性能在长期负载和电池工作状态下保持不变。更多 GPU 基准测试，请访问技术版块。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13042 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7644 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3768 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 557 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3198 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (190 - 946, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M (256 - 306, n=2) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (203 - 713, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
如果不能将笔记本的性能用于游戏，合成结果就没有什么意义了。在运行我们选择的标准游戏时，Zenbook S 16 内的 Radeon 890M 仅次于速度更快的 英特尔弧形显卡和惠普 Envy 中的旧版 Radeon 780M 相比领先约 10%。 ROG Ally X在涡轮增压模式下速度更快。ProArt PX13 的 Radeon 890M 无节流版又快了 11%。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 123, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
我们又测试了一些游戏，发现英特尔 Arc Graphics 图形处理器普遍领先。不过，Zenbook S 16 与 ROG Ally X（功耗限制略高）轮番上阵。总体而言，性能确实有所提升，但 Radeon 890M 需要更多的电力才能充分发挥其潜力。
在我们的赛博朋克连续测试中，几分钟后就出现了几次 FPS 下降。幸好随后性能又趋于稳定。你很快就会发现，在压力测试中也出现了这种情况，因此我们可以认为这是 Zenbook S 16 的配置问题。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 161.3 | 129.6 | 68.4 | 30.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 155 | 52 | 31 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161.1 | 123.1 | 35.8 | 33.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.5 | 38.3 | 28.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 66.5 | 54.4 | 44.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 81 | 50 | 46 | 33 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 165.1 | 71.1 | 60.2 | 49.8 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 81 | 76.8 | 64.2 | 16.7 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 72.8 | 69.3 | 55.6 | 12.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 45.2 | 35.8 | 25.6 | 24.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46 | 31.3 | 25.4 | 23.1 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 90.3 | 67.9 | 50.7 | 42.2 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 34.6 | 28 | 19.4 | 18.7 |
排放 - 安静的伙伴
噪音排放
在日常使用中，Zenbook S 16 是一个非常安静的伙伴，它比采用 AMD 和英特尔芯片的竞争对手安静得多。与 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16骁龙处理器相比，它的两个风扇在负载情况下声音会稍大一些，而且启动得也更快一些。在这方面，ARM 处理器显然更具优势。Zenbook S 16 的两种可选性能模式的噪音为 46 dB(A)，比标准模式大很多，就其低性能优势而言，这实在是太大了。而在耳语模式下，我们注意到最大音量为 28.9 dB(A)，几乎听不到。测试设备也没有发出额外的电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.7 / 36.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01 | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | -6% | 8% | -4% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24.6 -0% | 22.9 7% | 22.9 7% | 24.6 -0% | 24.4 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24.6 -0% | 22.9 7% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% | 24.4 1% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 24.6 -0% | 22.9 7% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% | 24.4 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.4 | 24.6 7% | 25 5% | 23 13% | 26.4 -0% | 24.4 8% |
| Load Average * | 35.7 | 28.1 21% | 45.1 -26% | 23.8 33% | 40 -12% | 32 10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.8 | 32.4 12% | 44.9 -22% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 36.8 | 32.4 12% | 44.9 -22% | 43.8 -19% | 40 -9% | 39.7 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | 40 | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
薄薄的底座让笔记本电脑的表面温度一目了然，在空闲模式下，我们已经在很多地方测得了 29-30°C 的温度。当然，这并不是关键因素，但它确实能让你知道笔记本电脑在负载情况下会出现什么问题。在游戏和压力测试时，我们注意到设备底部的一个位置温度超过 50 °C，总的来说，温度相当高。在这种情况下，使用过程中不应将笔记本电脑放在大腿上。键盘区域也会明显发热，但您仍然可以不受任何限制地打字。不过，无论如何，您在执行高要求任务时都不会遇到这样的问题。即便如此，小巧的电源装置在负载情况下也会变得过热，温度最高可达 60 °C。
在压力测试中，它的时钟频率和温度在最初几分钟就出现了波动。在大约 15 分钟的时间里，该设备的功耗值一直保持在 28 瓦左右，最后才稳定在 22-23 瓦左右。不过，华硕应该会通过即将推出的更新来稳定这方面的性能。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 1% | 9% | 17% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.9 | 44.3 6% | 46.8 -0% | 42.6 9% | 40.9 13% | 40.3 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53.5 | 51.6 4% | 45.6 15% | 47.8 11% | 42.6 20% | 45.9 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.5 | 25.1 15% | 32.2 -9% | 27.4 7% | 24.5 17% | 26.3 11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 25.8 15% | 31.4 -4% | 27.8 8% | 24.8 18% | 27.9 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
华硕为 Zenbook S 16 共配备了六个扬声器，效果非常好，笔记本电脑的音量和空间感都很强。三星的 Galaxy Book4 Edge 16在这方面还跟不上，而惠普 惠普 Envy x360则略胜一筹。
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 良好的耐力
耗电量
在空闲测量中，新款 Zenbook S 16 的表现仅次于三星Galaxy Book4 16 的两个版本。不过，在负载情况下，它的性能要优于所有采用 AMD/Intel CPU 的竞争对手，这也得益于它相对较低的功耗限制。在压力测试中，我们短暂测得的最大功率略低于 59 瓦，然后迅速降至 51 瓦，在接下来的测试过程中功率下降得更多。原则上，65 瓦的电源已经足够，但它的高温确实让我们担心--尽管笔记本电脑的永久耗电量离额定功率还有一段距离。
| Off / Standby | 0.23 / 0.51 Watt |
| Idle | 5.4 / 10.5 / 10.9 Watt |
| Load |
47.8 / 58.6 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 890M | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | -38% | -0% | 21% | -34% | -14% | -44% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 4.2 22% | 6.1 -13% | 5 7% | 3.6 33% | 4.2 22% | 5.7 ? -6% | 7 ? -30% |
| Idle Average * | 10.5 | 5.6 47% | 13.5 -29% | 6.2 41% | 5.7 46% | 11.6 -10% | 9.25 ? 12% | 11.3 ? -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 7.8 28% | 13.8 -27% | 14.7 -35% | 6.1 44% | 12.3 -13% | 12.5 ? -15% | 13.8 ? -27% |
| Load Average * | 47.8 | 28.3 41% | 63.6 -33% | 49.9 -4% | 52.5 -10% | 61.9 -29% | 61.9 ? -29% | 72.7 ? -52% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 49.2 | 38.8 21% | 67 -36% | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 46.7 | 38.2 18% | 64.6 -38% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 58.6 | 61.9 -6% | 109.7 -87% | 65 -11% | 64.7 -10% | 140.6 -140% | 76.3 ? -30% | 119.8 ? -104% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.5 | 46.6 | 57 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
该设备的电池续航时间与 78 瓦时的电池配合使用，总体上非常出色，因此 Zenbook S 16 与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16相媲美。Galaxy Book4 16 的高通版本可能更高效，但由于电池容量较小，其电池续航时间仍然明显较短。
在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的时间为 10:40 小时（60 Hz）和 9:27 小时（120 Hz）。在全亮度条件下，这些数值分别降低到 7:47 小时（60 Hz）和 7:27 小时（120 Hz）。在 150 cd/m² 下可播放视频 20 小时，在全亮度下可播放 HDR 视频不到 6 小时。
在设备打开的情况下，充满一次电需要 127 分钟，79 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -3% | -10% | -4% | 26% | -17% | |
| H.264 | 1204 | 879 -27% | 1144 -5% | 1308 9% | 788 ? -35% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 640 | 443 -31% | 686 7% | 459 -28% | 644 1% | 983 54% | 602 ? -6% |
| Load | 107 | 117 9% | 93 -13% | 116 8% | 100 -7% | 124 16% | 97.5 ? -9% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 华硕 Zenbook S 16 是一款出色的全能型产品
新款华硕 Zenbook S 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了美好的印象，它是目前市场上最好的全能笔记本之一。其高品质的纤薄机身让笔记本的稳定性丝毫不打折扣，在日常使用中，你不会缺少足够的连接（包括 USB-A）或舒适的键盘。它的扬声器非常出色，除了一些强烈的反光之外，我们对该设备的 OLED 显示屏没有什么可抱怨的。它在 HDR 模式下的亮度可以更好一些，但画质非常出色，华硕还为 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间提供了非常准确的配置文件。
全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器同样给人留下了深刻印象，尤其是在 CPU 性能方面。尽管 Zenbook S 16 的功耗限制较低，仅为 33/28 瓦，但仍可与能耗更高的英特尔 CPU 相媲美。新的 Radeon GPU 也带来了优势，不过这个优势并不像很多人想象的那么大。如需了解更多比较信息，请参阅我们对新款 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 Radeon 890M.Zenbook 的散热系统在总体上保持了相当的安静，只要你忽略两种性能模式（无论如何，这两种模式都不会带来太多的性能提升）。
新款 Zenbook S 16 是不带专用 GPU 的最佳全能笔记本电脑之一，其快速高效的 Zen 5 处理器、高品质的外壳、出色的 OLED 面板和丰富的连接选项给人留下了深刻印象。作为一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，您还可以使用所有先进的人工智能功能，而无需处理 ARM 设备所面临的兼容性问题。
这款笔记本电脑的缺点确实不多。目前，并非所有的驱动程序都已完全成熟，例如在尝试运行F1 24时会导致设备崩溃，但目前我们测试的所有三款最新的 Zen 5 设备都还存在这个问题，应该很快就会通过更新得到纠正。它在压力测试中的表现也应该得到优化。除此以外，你自然不得不提到它极其紧凑的电源，在负载情况下，它的温度实在太高了。此外，它的 2 百万像素网络摄像头还可以做得更好。
得益于更快的 NPU，Zenbook S 16 还是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，因此用户可以使用所有附加的人工智能功能，如实时字幕。这样一来，它就不会面临当前高通笔记本电脑必须面对的任何兼容性问题。它最大的竞争对手是三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 16和 Edge 16.搭载英特尔处理器的 Pro 机型不得不放弃额外的人工智能功能，而且声音也变大了，而搭载骁龙处理器的 Edge 16 则更安静，但不得不面对兼容性问题--此外，由于电池容量较小，它的运行时间也较短。在连接和显示屏方面，华硕的优势在于软件调光，而 Zenbook 的键盘则更为舒适。从价格上看，这两款设备并无太大差别，但提供的功能却不相上下。
价格和供应情况
新款 Zenbook S 16 可直接从华硕网站购买。购买，价格从 1,699.99 美元起。
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
-
09/03/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Price comparison
