惠普 Envy x360 2 合 1 14 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：近乎顶级的可折叠体验，让我们欲罢不能
惠普公司的笔记本电脑部门已重新启动，成为更具凝聚力的 "Omni "品牌。但 Envy、Spectre、Victus 和 Omen 品牌的产品仍在销售。
Envy x360 2-in-1 14 最近在印度推出，同时推出的还有 Omen Transcend 14都采用了英特尔流星湖处理器。
我们之前评测过 Envy x360 2-in-1 16搭载了 AMD Hawk Point Ryzen 7 8840HS 处理器的 Envy x360 2-in-1 16。.在本期评测中，我们将对搭载以下处理器的 Envy x360 2 合 1 14 进行评测 英特尔酷睿 5 125U.
我们的测试机型通过了英特尔 Evo 认证，配备了 16GB LPDDR5-6400 内存、120 Hz 2.8K 触摸 OLED 面板和 512GB NVMe 固态硬盘。该配置的价格为 1,07,999 ₹ 或 1,140 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.2 % | 06 / 2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
底盘优质、可靠的全铝结构
Envy x360 2-in-1 14 的印度版本采用了可回收的全铝 "大气蓝 "配色，而美国和欧洲市场则采用了 "流星银 "配色。不过，背板由塑料制成。
机身采用了圆润的美学设计，可能比 Spectre x360 16.惠普宣称屏占比为 89.5%，但实际值约为 83%。
17.5 毫米的纤薄机身和 1.4 千克的重量为便携性提供了良好的保障。惠普似乎把结构设计得恰到好处--键盘面板不会弯曲；显示屏不会晃动，单指就能提起。宽大的触摸板周围有足够的空间，让你在打字时手腕得到舒适的休息。
机身的防污和防指纹性能也不错。惠普帮了大家一个大忙，没有在触控板表面贴满各种品牌标志--只有 "Envy "和 "poly studio "印在触控板两侧，还有一个英特尔 Evo 贴纸。右侧铰链上也有 "Envy "的雕刻。
铰链的质量对于敞篷机来说至关重要，Envy x360 14 采用了坚固的铰链，既易于旋转，又足够坚硬，可以在任何角度固定显示屏。
总的来说，惠普在 Envy x360 14 的制造质量方面做得很好，给人一种耐用笔记本电脑的印象。
连接性出色的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量
Envy x360 14 配备了丰富的端口选择，详情如下。端口布局合理，连接多个设备毫无障碍。两个 Type-C 端口都支持辅助模式和电源传输。
不过，一个小瑕疵是右侧唯一的 USB 端口和耳机插孔位于最远端，而不是靠近底座。
交流
Envy x360 14 在 5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频段都具有出色的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量。与我们的参考机型华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器在 1 米清晰视线距离内进行测试时，5 GHz 传输速率甚至达到了 2.04 Gb/s的峰值。
尽管如此，5 GHz 的传输速度并不稳定。切换到 6 GHz 6E 频段后，吞吐量趋于稳定，平均发送和接收速度也略有提高。
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242) | |
| Average of class Convertible (426 - 1720, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (492 - 1753, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214) | |
| Average of class Convertible (685 - 1775, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213) | |
| Average of class Convertible (824 - 1771, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
网络摄像头
与 Pavilion 加 14和 Pavilion Plus 16Envy x360 2 合 1 14 还集成了 500 万像素网络摄像头，可利用 NPU 实现 Windows Studio 特效。
与许多其他笔记本电脑相比，网络摄像头在良好的环境光线下使用 ColorChecker Passport 可输出相当准确的色彩。不过，测试图表图像中的细节有所损失。
安全
Envy x360 14 配备了内置 TPM 2.0 模块，以满足 Windows 11 的安全要求。这款笔记本电脑具有基于红外的 Windows Hello 生物识别登录功能，我们发现该功能既快速又准确。此外，还提供了一个物理网络摄像头快门，以增加私密性。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了 65 W USB Type-C 电源适配器和常规文件外，没有其他配件。零售机附带一个 HP 310 背包。
惠普印度公司为Envy x360 14提供标准的一年保修服务。购买者可以通过符合条件的HP Care Packs 将保修期延长两年，并享受三年的意外损坏保护。2,999 起。
维护
进入 Envy x360 14 的内部非常简单，只需卸下四颗 Torx T5H 螺钉，底板就会毫不费力地脱落。
我们看到的是一个密集的布局，只有 NVMe 固态硬盘和 WLAN 卡是可升级的组件。WLAN 卡位于 CPU 旁边，隐藏在隔热层下。如果需要，59 Wh 电池可以拧开更换。
输入设备：精美的键盘和反应灵敏的触摸屏
键盘
Envy x360 14 的 ANSI 键盘非常适合打字。考虑到其纤薄的尺寸，按键键程很好，敲击无误，触感也非常好。
键盘采用三段式白色背光，提高了弱光环境下的可视性，按键图例允许足够的光线通过。F1-F12 键及其辅助功能均可发光，其 Fn 功能可通过 myHP 应用程序进行配置。
与所有配备 NPU 的现代笔记本电脑一样，专用的 Copilot 键取代了应用程序菜单键。左右方向键的大小适中，但上下方向键的大小却不尽人意。
触摸板
12.5 厘米 x 8 厘米的触摸板感觉宽敞，易于使用。点击的力度适中，只需极少的操作。
除右下角外，整个触摸板都可用作鼠标左键。完全支持 WindowsPrecision 手势。
触摸屏
作为一款可折叠设备，Envy x360 14 还支持触摸和笔输入。随附的惠普 MPP 2.0 倾斜笔可以进行精确的注释、记录和素描。
这支笔有两个可定制的按钮，其功能可通过 myHP 应用程序进行配置。笔顶部的环形 LED 指示灯可显示充电状态。
据惠普称，该笔支持 4,096 级压力，所需的驱动力小于 5 克。包装中还包括两个可更换的笔尖。
显示屏生动的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏，带 HDR 和 DC 调光功能
Envy x360 2-in-1 14 的 48-120 Hz OLED 显示屏可提供身临其境的观看体验。屏幕分辨率为 2880 x 1800，屏幕比例为 16:10，通过了 "IMAX 增强 "认证。它与我们之前在Pavilion Plus 14 上测试过的三星 SDC4197 面板相同。光面屏幕由康宁大猩猩 NBT 玻璃保护。
还可以配置 FHD+ 非 OLED 触摸屏，这可以为您节省 8,000 英镑（美国商店为 150 美元）的现金。
惠普宣称 SDR 亮度为 400 尼特，在 HDR 模式下可高达 500 尼特。我们的测量结果显示，SDR 模式下的最高亮度为 372 尼特，亮度分布高度一致，对比度几乎为无限。
我们记录的最大 HDR 亮度为 567 尼特。由于这是一款 OLED 面板，因此不会出现背光渗漏。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 162 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.48
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -17% | -12% | 0% | 1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 71.6 -28% | 80.6 -19% | 99.93 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.8 | 73.4 -23% | 80.1 -16% | 95.51 1% | 97.6 3% | 95.8 1% |
| Response Times | -130% | -366% | 92% | 162% | 168% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10.8 ? | 28.8 ? -167% | 59.6 ? -452% | 3 ? 72% | 0.69 ? 94% | 0.82 ? 92% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.37 ? | 18 ? -92% | 35.6 ? -280% | 20 ? -113% | 0.71 ? 92% | 0.95 ? 90% |
| PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 500 ? 317% | 480 ? 300% | 504.7 ? 321% | ||
| Screen | -14% | 19% | -51% | 29% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 366 | 302.7 -17% | 501.4 37% | 384 5% | 391 7% | 384 5% |
| Brightness | 368 | 293 -20% | 491 33% | 380 3% | 392 7% | 386 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 88 -10% | 88 -10% | 98 0% | 98 0% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.74 | 3.45 -26% | 2.52 8% | 4.68 -71% | 1.1 60% | 4.06 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.37 | 6.04 -38% | 4.87 -11% | 7.06 -62% | 2.4 45% | 6.73 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.48 | 0.47 68% | 0.45 70% | 3.79 -156% | 0.49 67% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 4.7 -57% | 2.8 7% | 5.2 -73% | 1.3 57% | 1.1 63% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6146 106% | 5804 112% | 6270 104% | 7651 85% | 6336 103% | 6331 103% |
| Contrast | 865 | 1567 | 7680 | 19550 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -54% /
-34% | -120% /
-53% | 14% /
-6% | 64% /
55% | 58% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
Envy x360 14 的 OLED 面板覆盖了 100% 的 sRGB 和 Display P3 色域，以及令人印象深刻的 95% 的 Adobe RGB 覆盖率。这使它非常适合媒体消费和编辑工作流程。
开箱即用的色彩令人满意，灰度和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000 的平均偏差分别为 3 和 2.74。
使用 Portrait Displays 提供的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件，我们将平均灰度 Delta E 2000 值缩小到 0.5，ColorChecker 平均值缩小到 1.48。不过，该面板在准确再现光谱中 100% 红色和 100% 蓝色部分方面仍然存在问题。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.83 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.54 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
响应时间与我们之前使用Pavilion Plus 14 测得的时间相同。从 50% 灰色到 80% 灰色的过渡由于其急剧下降而需要人工估算。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 29.4 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在 100 尼特亮度以上，面板使用 120 赫兹或 240 赫兹的直流调光频率。亮度较低时，PWM 会以 240 赫兹或 480 赫兹的频率启动。
光面屏幕给阳光直射下的可读性带来了挑战。可视角度比较稳定，但在极端情况下会出现轻微的绿色。
性能：动力不足的酷睿 5125U 难以弯曲
我们的 HP Envy x360 2 合 1 14 机型搭载了 英特尔酷睿至强5 125U流星湖处理器。与我们在联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 中看到的 49 W 机型不同，它的 PL2（性能模式）配置较低，仅为 29 W。 联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1和 联想 ThinkBook 14 2 合 1.因此，正如我们将在下文中看到的那样，预计会出现一些性能倒退。
买家还可以选择 英特尔酷睿 7 155U作为最高规格配置。
测试条件
惠普在 myHP 应用程序中提供了六种性能模式供用户选择。我们在所有基准测试中都使用了 "性能模式"，因为它允许酷睿至尊 5 125U 使用 23 W PL1 和 29 W PL2。
我们还在 Cinebench R15 循环中测试了智能感应模式（15 W / 29 W）。笔记本在使用电池时默认为省电模式（8.5 W / 9 W），刷新率也从 120 Hz 降为 60 Hz。
处理器
英特尔酷睿 Ultra 125U 共提供 12 个内核（2P + 8E + 2 LP）和 14 个线程，最高主频可达 4.3 GHz。累计性能比该处理器的平均成绩低约 11%，比 ThinkBook 14 2 合 1 落后 16%。
处理器 酷睿 i7-1355UPavilion Plus 14 中的酷睿 i7-1355U 在 Cinebench R15 多核跑分中比 Envy x360 14 高出 12%。不过，Envy x360 14 的持续性能有所提高，从而弥补了这一不足。
在 Cinebench 单核心测试中，功耗受限的酷睿至尊 5 125U 似乎更胜一筹，成功超越了 48 W PL2 Ryzen 7 7730U的 Envy x360 15.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (6650 - 10483, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1534 - 1587, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2558 - 4033, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (592 - 608, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1117 - 1680, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (222 - 229, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (328 - 485, n=8) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (28563 - 41152, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4492 - 4659, n=7) | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14513, n=41, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (8384 - 9601, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2814, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2129 - 2177, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7417 - 8581, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1531 - 1607, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (7.26 - 12, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (45.5 - 55.5, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (0.526 - 0.555, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
* ... smaller is better
在 Cinebench R15 多核模式下运行 15 个循环后发现，酷睿至尊 5 125U 在性能模式和智能感应模式下都能最大限度地利用分配给它的 30 W PL2。在这两种模式下，CPU 的最高时钟频率都略高于 3 GHz。
相比之下，省电模式仅使用 9.5 W 的峰值封装功率，将最高时钟频率降至 1.66 GHz，但核心温度却降低到 52 °C。
Cinebench R20 分数在电池电量不足的情况下大幅下降，单核和多核分数分别下降了 45.7% 和 42.5%。
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
更多信息和性能比较，请参阅我们的专栏 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125U页面。
系统性能
在系统性能基准测试中，Envy x360 14 并没有给人留下深刻印象，但 CrossMark 的总成绩显示它比 ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 和 Envy x360 15 有微弱的提升。
主观而言，我们在使用 Envy x360 14 执行 Office、网页浏览和媒体播放等常规任务时没有遇到任何重大问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
| Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5059 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5420 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5639 points | |
Help | ||
DPC 延迟
测量到的最高中断到处理延迟为 1903.2 µs，这可能会给实时音频编辑工作流程带来问题。虽然我们确实看到了一些丢帧现象，但 YouTube 4K60 的播放似乎相对没有卡顿。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
我们的 DPC 延迟排名页面提供了一份经评测的笔记本电脑延迟测量值表。
存储设备
Envy x360 14 安装的 Kioxia BG5 512 GB NVMe SSD 没有打破任何速度记录，但提供了不错的连续读取和 4k 读取能力。
Pavilion Plus 14 等竞争对手能够提供性能更强的 WD 和 Sk hynix 硬盘。
它无法通过 M.2 或 SATA 固态硬盘进行额外的存储扩展。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
固态硬盘上的散热垫可确保在队列深度为 8 的 DiskSpd 读取循环中将硬盘节流降至最低。
查看我们的 固态硬盘和硬盘基准页面，了解更多存储性能比较。
图形处理器性能
Envy x360 14 的 Core Ultra 5 125U 配备了新的 英特尔弧形 4 核iGPU 配备 64 个着色器，支持 DirectX 12_2。
在累积 3DMark 测试中，该 iGPU 的表现优于 Envy x360 15 的 RX Vega 8但比 Radeon 780MPavilion Plus 14 的 Radeon 780M 慢 25%。
此外，其整体 3DMark 性能比 Arc 8 核在 酷睿至尊 7 155H但在其他方面与 Iris Xe Graphics G7 96 EUsPavilion Plus 14 中的 Iris Xe Graphics G7 96 EU。
3DMarkTime Spy 图形得分在电池供电情况下下降了近 29%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7353 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 84512 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20246 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4714 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2377 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2152 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 335 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1642 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Arc 4 核 iGPU 可以为创意工作流提供不错的硬件加速，但 1080p 超高帧率游戏仍不在此列，除非是要求不高的旧版游戏，如Dota 2 Reborn 。
尽管如此，该 GPU 与英特尔 XeSS 兼容，在支持 XeSS 的游戏中结合较低的画质设置，可以提高帧率。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU | |
Witcher 3 FPS 图表
Arc 4 核 iGPU 在 Witcher 3 1080p 超高清下只能达到约 15-16 帧/秒，但帧率稳定，没有明显的节流现象。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 79.6 | 51.1 | 28 | 14.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 74.1 | 43.7 | 48.4 | 45.5 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.7 | 22 | 16.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 35 | 27.3 | 22.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 33 | 23 | 21 | 18 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 111.2 | 47 | 34.7 | 28.4 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 40.1 | 37.3 | 23.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 19.3 | 15.3 | 13 | 11.2 |
排放：安静的风扇外形，可承受的表面温度
系统噪音
Envy x360 14 的单风扇通常运行安静，即使在 "性能 "设置下，在大多数任务中也很少超过 35 分贝（A）。
但在 "冷却 "模式下，无论工作负载如何，风扇都会持续转动，即使在闲置状态下也会产生明显的噪音。
冷却模式保守的功率限制也严重影响了性能。惠普应该在 "性能 "模式下采用这种风扇配置文件。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.18 / 25.18 / 25.18 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.37 / 34.38 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 21.38 dB(A) | ||
| 性能模式 | 怠速 dB(A) | 负载平均 dB(A) | 负载最大 dB(A) | Witcher 3 1080p Ultra dB(A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音（9 / 21 瓦） | 24.76 | 22.63 | 25.01 | 23.43 / 9 帧/秒 |
| 清凉（8 / 12 瓦） | 32.17 | 38.24 | 38.78 | 38.93 / 8 帧/秒 |
| 节能（8.5 / 9 瓦） | 21.38 | 22.50 | 24.96 | 25.11 / 11 帧/秒 |
| 平衡（20 / 29 瓦） | 21.38 | 31.96 | 32.44 | 32.37 / 17 帧/秒 |
| 智能感应（15 / 29 瓦） | 21.38 | 23.19 | 32.13 | 31.99 / 16 帧/秒 |
| 性能（23 / 29 瓦） | 25.18 | 34.37 | 34.38 | 37.03 / 17 帧/秒 |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, Vega 8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -8% | -7% | -2% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 21.38 | 23 -8% | 23.9 -12% | 25.8 -21% | 23.4 -9% | 23.4 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.18 | 23.5 7% | 23.9 5% | 25.9 -3% | 23.4 7% | 24.1 4% |
| Idle Average * | 25.18 | 24.2 4% | 23.9 5% | 25.9 -3% | 23.4 7% | 24.1 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.18 | 24.2 4% | 23.9 5% | 25.9 -3% | 24.5 3% | 25.3 -0% |
| Load Average * | 34.37 | 29.6 14% | 36.4 -6% | 32.2 6% | 39.3 -14% | 33.4 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37 | 44.9 -21% | 44.7 -21% | 35.9 3% | 39.4 -6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 34.38 | 44.9 -31% | 44.7 -30% | 40.37 -17% | 39.3 -14% | 39.4 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Envy x360 14 的单热管风扇组合在散热方面似乎做得不错，因为 CPU 的功率不足。
在满载 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 和 FurMark 1280x720、无 AA 负载的情况下，我们记录到机箱右下方的最高温度为 45.2 °C。触摸板和掌托区域即使在压力下也保持凉爽。
这些温度在实际应用中不太可能出现，因此该设备可以舒适地放在膝上，用于日常工作和多媒体消费。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 4% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.4 | 37.4 5% | 35.4 10% | 38.5 2% | 40.9 -4% | 39 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.2 | 39 14% | 37.8 16% | 40.3 11% | 46.8 -4% | 35.8 21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 28.6 1% | 27.2 6% | 27.9 4% | 24.1 17% | 25.2 13% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 30.6 -4% | 28.2 4% | 27.8 5% | 24.6 16% | 25.6 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
Prime95 in-place large FFTs 压力使 Envy x360 14 的 Core Ultra 5 125U 的最高频率升至 2.1 GHz，功耗为 30 W。不过，这只是瞬间的峰值，平均频率稳定在 1.6 GHz，功耗为 20.5 W。
在加入 FurMark（1280 x 720，无 AA）后，Arc 4-Core iGPU 进入战场，峰值频率提升至 1,750 MHz，耗电量为 9.6 W。
在 Witcher 3 的 1080p 超高速下，Arc 4-Core 的主频进一步提升至 1,850 MHz，功耗仅为 7.9 W。在整个压力测试过程中，GPU 都能保持这一频率，而 Core Ultra 5 125U CPU 则从峰值 3.1 GHz（功耗 29.6 W）降至平均 1.89 GHz（功耗 17.55 W）。
| 压力测试 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) |
| 系统空闲 | 1.32 | 550 | 38 | 42 |
| Prime95 | 1.56 | 200 | 71 | 68 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 0.85 | 1,500 | 66 | 72 |
| Witcher 3 (1080p Ultra) | 1.38 | 1,850 | 58 | 66 |
发言人
Envy x360 2 合 1 14 的立体声扬声器可提供近 81 db(A) 的响度，对于一般大小的房间来说应该足够了。
低频响应较低，但仍相当清晰。中音和高音的再现令人满意。扬声器由 Poly 调音，惠普早在 2022 年就收购了 Poly。虽然没有提供杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos），但这款笔记本电脑支持 DTS:X 增强功能。
此外，3.5 毫米耳机组合插孔和蓝牙 5.3 支持连接更高品质的外部音频设备。
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理：高度经济的耗电量和良好的电池寿命
耗电量
与竞争对手相比，Envy x360 14 的空闲功耗较低，即使在负载情况下也能保持高能效。采用相同 SoC 的 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4 也很省电，但在最大负载下能耗明显更高。
| Off / Standby | 0.45 / 1.08 Watt |
| Idle | 3.54 / 4.66 / 6.38 Watt |
| Load |
28.2 / 46.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, Vega 8, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -45% | -50% | -72% | -57% | -33% | -61% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.54 | 2.3 35% | 3.2 10% | 5.78 -63% | 6.1 -72% | 6 -69% | 3.71 ? -5% | 5.18 ? -46% |
| Idle Average * | 4.66 | 6.7 -44% | 6.4 -37% | 7.84 -68% | 10 -115% | 6.5 -39% | 6.77 ? -45% | 8.18 ? -76% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.38 | 6.8 -7% | 10.8 -69% | 7.98 -25% | 10.3 -61% | 13.9 -118% | 8.31 ? -30% | 11.1 ? -74% |
| Load Average * | 28.2 | 34.1 -21% | 54.6 -94% | 42.3 -50% | 53.3 -89% | 41.9 -49% | 41.3 ? -46% | 46.8 ? -66% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 27.4 | 27.4 -0% | 35.5 -30% | 41.7 -52% | 42 -53% | 43.9 -60% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 46.9 | 67 -43% | 70.2 -50% | 65 -39% | 67 -43% | 50.8 -8% | 65.5 ? -40% | 67.2 ? -43% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
Envy x360 14 的电池续航时间值得称赞，能够轻松度过标准工作日。不过，参与对比的其他笔记本电脑能够提供更长的续航时间。
华硕 华硕 ZenBook 14配备了 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 150 尼特条件下播放 H.264 1080p 视频时，续航时间延长了 25%。 戴尔Latitude 9450 二合一配备 酷睿至尊 7 165U则可延长网页浏览运行时间。
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 59 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, Vega 8, 55 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 35% | -13% | 21% | -16% | -4% | |
| H.264 | 810 | 1010 25% | 765 ? -6% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 605 | 651 8% | 815 35% | 527 -13% | 707 17% | 510 -16% | 599 ? -1% |
| Reader / Idle | 2118 | 1300 | 1011 | 1330 ? | |||
| Load | 42 | 143 | 107 | 134 | 122 | 113.1 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论：功能令人印象深刻，性能值得商榷
惠普在 Envy x360 2-in-1 14 上做了很多正确的事情，这款可折叠机总体上成功地提供了近乎顶级的移动计算体验。
机身外观别致，制造质量一流，连接选项充足，避免了 "加密狗地狱"。高 Wi-Fi 吞吐量和可用的 500 万像素网络摄像头都是值得欢迎的功能，但并非所有 Envy x360 14 的竞争对手都能做到这一点。
输入体验方面，Envy x360 14 符合所有标准--按键易于键入、触摸板顺滑、笔触反应灵敏。我们对 "IMAX Enhanced"（IMAX 增强型）品牌并不太感冒--反正准备杂货清单也不需要电影体验。不过，120 Hz OLED 显示屏提供了身临其境的观看体验，具有高宽比、色彩鲜艳、响应时间适中，以及高亮度下的直流调光功能。
如果你能忽略惠普对 CPU 的人为削弱，Envy x360 2-in-1 14 的多功能构造、低排放和节俭的功耗会给你留下深刻印象。
Envy x360 14 的不足之处在于性能，而这正是惠普的强项。虽然 17.5 毫米薄的机身造成散热限制是可以理解的，但惠普完全可以让英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 在众多电源配置文件中的一个配置文件中以更高的瓦特数运行。
说到电源配置文件--其中三个具有相同的 29 W PL2--惠普本可以合并其中的一些配置文件，以方便用户和评测人员。令人费解的是，为什么 "凉爽 "模式只能让风扇以 12 W 的功率运行 CPU，而不能在 "性能 "模式下为需要额外功率的用户提供更高的风扇转速和功率。
电池续航时间实际上相当不错，但需要注意的是 联想 ThinkBook 14 2 合 1, 戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1和 华硕 ZenBook 14提供更长的续航时间。
而新的 骁龙 X 精英笔记本电脑Envy x360 14 的 NPU 拥有足够的马力，至少可以帮助你在群组通话中保持良好的状态，并加速某些本地 AI 任务，因此适合学生或休闲用户选择。
价格和供应情况
经过测试的惠普Envy x360 2合1 14配置在惠普印度公司的售价为1,07,999英镑，在惠普美国公司的售价为1,139.99美元。惠普德国分公司提供 1 TB 版本，售价 1,199 欧元。
Envy x360 14 在印度亚马逊的售价为 1,03,999 英镑（酷睿超 5 版本）和 1,32,990 英镑（酷睿超 7版本）。
美国百思买的FHD+ Core Ultra 5 型号售价为 999.99 美元，FHD + Core Ultra 7型号售价为 1,099.99 美元。
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU
- 10/08/2024 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
