联想 ThinkBook Plus 5 代混合型二合一电脑评测:双启动 Windows 11 和Android 13
英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 和骁龙 8+ Gen 1 在一台机器上。
Windows-Android 混合方式可以有效地一次性取代现有的笔记本电脑和平板电脑。不过,就电池寿命和重量而言,二合一联想机器并不一定比独立的笔记本电脑和独立的平板电脑更好。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
判决
双启动 ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid 虽然在纸面上是个好主意,但在实际使用中却不尽如人意。由于其独特的硬件和软件功能,它必须采用更大、更重的设计,电池续航时间也比传统的蛤壳型产品短。此外,打字体验和铰链也需要改进,才能与 Yoga 或 ThinkPad 的质量相媲美,尤其是考虑到 2500 多美元的售价。双启动二合一系统可以说是 "万事通,无一精 "成语的最好例证。
该机型仍然值得购买,尤其是对于那些正在考虑购买 微软 Surface Pro.作为一款 14 英寸的可拆卸式平板电脑,该系统的性能非常出色,而且由于联想的双启动功能,它有可能比 Surface Pro 更好地取代你的旧Android 平板电脑。不过,如果您很少使用平板电脑模式,那么传统的蛤壳式或可转换式笔记本电脑加上独立的专用Android 平板电脑可以用更少的钱提供更好的体验。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 2750 USD | 1.7 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Listenpreis 3000 USD | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | ||
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS LED | ||
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | ||
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS |
ThinkBook Gen 系列采用了独特的非主流概念,将这些机型与其他竞争机型区分开来。去年的 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4而今年的 ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 则是一款可拆卸机型,可在 Windows 11 和Android 13(未来将支持到Android 14)之间双启动。如果运行 Windows,则必须连接底座,因为它内置了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H CPU。如果运行Android ,系统则使用平板电脑部分的高通 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 处理器。本次评测的重点是该机型的 Windows 系统。
目前只有一种配置可供选择,包括上述双 CPU、14 英寸 2.8K OLED 触摸屏、32 GB LPDDR5x-7467 焊接内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD,售价约为 2700 美元。
该系统的竞争对手是其他可转换或可拆卸设备,如 惠普 EliteBook x360 1040 G11, 戴尔Latitude 9450 2-in-1或 微软 Surface Pro 系列.当然,联想拥有两个独立处理器的独特优势,可以双启动 Windows 11 或Android 13。
更多联想评测:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
机身采用了与 ThinkBook Gen 4 类似的 CNC 铝材,具有相同的灰色调、光滑质感和相对坚固的表面。在使用过程中,最大的问题反而与铰链有关,因为铰链不能像我们希望的那样顺利地卡在平板电脑部分。这样平板电脑就会晃动,无法完全插入。更大的铰链和更强的磁铁有可能缓解这一问题,使安装变得更容易。
连接在一起时,系统相对较大且较重。联想笔记本的重量为 1.7 千克,厚度为 16 毫米,明显重于传统的 14 英寸可折叠笔记本,如 华硕 ExpertBook P5 P5405.
联想ThinkBook Plus第五代混合本 | 长度(毫米) | 宽度(毫米) | 高度(毫米) | 重量(克) |
平板电脑部分 | 313.5 | 224 | 6.6 | 777 |
基质部分 | 313.5 | 234.5 | 9.4 | 963 |
连接性
虽然该系统总共有三个 USB-C 端口,但只有两个在对接模式下可用,一个在Android 模式下可用。扩展坞模式下的两个 USB-C 端口支持 Thunderbolt 4 连接。
交流
标配的英特尔 AX211 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。
网络摄像头
两个后置摄像头(1300 万像素 + 500 万像素)只能在Android 模式下使用,这意味着只有前置 200 万像素摄像头可在 Windows 模式下使用。前置摄像头标配红外和电子快门。
维护
底部面板由 8 颗 Torx 螺钉固定,维修相对容易。不过,除了电池和单块 M.2 固态硬盘外,没有太多需要维修的地方,因为 WLAN 和内存都是焊接的。
可持续性
联想的交流适配器使用了 90% 的消费后再生塑料,包装使用了 90% 的再生材料。屏幕后盖(A盖)在生产过程中使用了100%可回收的氢铝。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括可拆卸底座和活动触控笔。如果在美国购买,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
键盘与 IdeaPad 蛤壳式键盘最为相似,如 IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro.遗憾的是,键入体验偏弱,尤其是空格键太软,按下时的反馈微弱,令人不甚满意。我们的 ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 键盘与 ThinkPad 键盘在反馈上的差异简直是天壤之别。
触摸板
点击板大小适中(12 x 7.5 厘米),质地非常光滑。尽管有响亮的咔嗒声,但按下时的反馈非常浅,有些松软。
显示屏
就亮度、刷新率和色彩覆盖范围而言,OLED 面板与去年 13.3 英寸 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 上的面板相似。虽然完全可以使用,但其 60 Hz 的原生刷新率偏低,尤其是对于触摸屏和可转换外形来说。宏碁 Swift 14 AI 的 OLED 面板刷新率为 90 Hz。 宏碁 Swift 14 AI相比之下,感觉更流畅,反应更灵敏。
在测试过程中,HDR 模式下的最大亮度可达 572 尼特。否则,如果设置为默认的 SDR 模式,最大亮度仅为 400 尼特。
需要注意的是,OLED 面板下有一层相对较厚的玻璃,因此即使是光面面板,文本和图像的颗粒感也比预期的要严重。一些哑光面板,如 XPS 13会显得更清晰、更干净。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 390.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU SDC ATNA33AA06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X NE140QDM-NX4, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14", 144 Hz | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -0% | -19% | -20% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% | 70.8 -29% | 69 -31% | 80.6 -19% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98 -2% | 99.2 -1% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.4 | 97.1 -1% | 97.6 -1% | 71.6 -27% | 71.1 -28% | 80.1 -19% |
Response Times | -23% | 16% | -1396% | -2096% | -2297% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.8 ? | 1.9 ? -6% | 0.8 ? 56% | 36.3 ? -1917% | 54.5 ? -2928% | 59.6 ? -3211% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 ? | 2.1 ? 12% | 0.8 ? 67% | 23.4 ? -875% | 32.7 ? -1263% | 35.6 ? -1383% |
PWM Frequency | 242.3 ? | 60 ? -75% | 60 ? -75% | |||
Screen | -8% | -19% | -47% | 9% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 390.1 | 367.5 -6% | 500 28% | 457 17% | 351.3 -10% | 501.4 29% |
Brightness | 389 | 370 -5% | 499 28% | 457 17% | 328 -16% | 491 26% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 97 0% | 95 -2% | 86 -11% | 88 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.32 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 4.61 -0% | 3.55 23% | 4.9 -7% | 2.29 50% | 2.52 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.15 | 7.68 -7% | 6.38 11% | 8.5 -19% | 4.55 36% | 4.87 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.86 | 0.66 23% | 2.55 -197% | 1.7 -98% | 0.49 43% | 0.45 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.7 -59% | 2.2 -29% | 5.7 -235% | 2.2 -29% | 2.8 -65% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 1.94 113% | 2.25 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6220 105% | 6079 107% | 6405 101% | 7647 85% | 6321 103% | 6270 104% |
Contrast | 50000 | 3808 | 1464 | 1567 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-9% | -1% /
-7% | -487% /
-265% | -702% /
-349% | -765% /
-377% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱即按照 P3 标准校准,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别为 1.7 和 4.59。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.3 ms rise | |
↘ 1.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.3 Hz Amplitude: 9.4 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 242.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 242.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
显示屏的亮度足以在阴凉处舒适地使用,但阳光直射会冲淡内容和色彩。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和联想 Vantage 都设置为性能模式。
处理器
CPU 性能比我们数据库中相同配置的普通笔记本电脑慢 5%至 10%。 酷睿至尊 7 155H.造成这种差距的部分原因是该机型的 Turbo Boost 可持续性较差。例如,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,如下图所示,仅在第一次运行后,性能就会下降近 30%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升到 2.8 GHz 和 65 W,持续时间只有几秒钟,直到核心温度达到 89 C。
在运行高负载时,核心温度稳定在 65 摄氏度左右,相比之下,去年的 ThinkBook Plus 第 4 代.
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 45 |
Prime95 压力 | 1.9 | -- | 67 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.0 | 1000 | 65 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.1 | 1850 | 64 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果高于 14 英寸产品的平均水平。需要注意的是,与采用 Lunar Lake CPU 的系统相比,内存写入速度较慢,如 华硕 ExpertBook P5 P5405.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6962 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
4K60 视频回放完美,无丢帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
系统随附相同的 三星 PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLBM.2 2242 NVMe 固态硬盘。 联想 ThinkPad E16 Gen 2.支持全长 2280 驱动器,但不支持辅助驱动器。
如果在平板电脑模式下使用Android ,有一个内部 256 GB UFX 3.1 SSD,支持联想混合文件夹,可以更方便地在Android 和 Windows 之间访问相同的图片、文档、电子表格或其他文件。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
集成的 Arc 8对于 14 英寸可折叠电脑而言,它的性能处于较高水平,因为该尺寸类别中的大多数其他产品都采用酷睿 U 系列 CPU 和 Iris Xe 图形处理器相反。游戏性能与竞争对手的 Radeon 680M 或 780M但采用 AMD Radeon 890M 或 Arc Graphics 140V仍将优于我们的 ThinkBook。大多数游戏在原生 1800p 分辨率下运行效果不佳,因此您必须将其调低至 1200p,并使用中低设置以获得更高的游戏帧率。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12892 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31965 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8582 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3877 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 784 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 141 | 133.9 | 48.6 | 20.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101.8 | 81.9 | 74.9 | 66.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.3 | 41.3 | 30.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.5 | 39.9 | 32.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 68 | 48 | 45 | 40 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 188.9 | 85.2 | 69.3 | 53.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 51.2 | 43.4 | 31.6 | 25.9 |
F1 22 (2022) | 80.6 | 73.8 | 55.7 | 16.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 32.4 | 25.9 | 22.9 | 22.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 32 | 26.7 | 22.9 | 20.7 |
排放量
系统噪音
考虑到其 14 英寸的外形和酷睿 Ultra H 系列 CPU,该系统非常安静。在浏览或视频流时,风扇是静音的,直到3DMark 06 第一个基准测试场景结束时,风扇仍保持静音。即便如此,在 23 dB(A) 的静音背景下,风扇噪音也只有 28 dB(A)。
在运行要求更高的负载(如游戏)时,风扇噪音会上升到 40.5 dB(A)。在平衡(自适应)模式或性能模式下运行时,噪音水平没有任何差别。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28 / 40.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -14% | 3% | -5% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.3 -5% | 25 -8% | 24.1 -4% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 24.3 -5% | 25 -8% | 24.1 -4% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 24.3 -5% | 26 -12% | 24.1 -4% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 24.3 -5% | 29 -25% | 24.1 -4% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% |
Load Average * | 28 | 38.2 -36% | 40 -43% | 31.2 -11% | 31 -11% | 36.4 -30% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.5 | 40 1% | 31.7 22% | 45.7 -13% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.4 | 41.8 -3% | 41 -1% | 31.2 23% | 47.7 -18% | 44.7 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 | 44.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘底座和底盖的表面温度热点可分别达到 35 摄氏度和 42 摄氏度以上,而宏碁 Swift 14 AI 为 45 摄氏度左右。ThinkBook Plus Gen 5 Hybrid 的加长后部设计允许使用更大的散热解决方案。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | 2% | 5% | 6% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.6 | 34.2 4% | 41 -15% | 41.6 -17% | 39 -10% | 35.4 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.6 | 35.8 14% | 45 -8% | 43.2 -4% | 43.6 -5% | 37.8 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 28.6 6% | 26 14% | 25.7 15% | 24.4 20% | 27.2 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 30.4 11% | 28 18% | 25.3 26% | 27.4 19% | 28.2 17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
即使在仔细检查了后台应用程序或意外活动之后,耗电量也是相当高的。在最低亮度下,仅闲置就需要 9 瓦,如果设置为最高亮度,屏幕大部分为白色,则需要高达 17 瓦。这比其他大多数 14 英寸笔记本电脑的耗电量都要高出几瓦,这很可能就是我们在电池续航时间部分提到的运行时间短的原因。
系统随附一个相对较小(约 10.7 x 5.6 x 2.6 厘米)的 100 瓦 USB-C 交流适配器。从下面的截图中可以看出,系统的功耗可以超过 100 W,尽管只是暂时的。
Off / Standby | 0.96 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 9.3 / 10.9 / 17.9 Watt |
Load |
62.4 / 107 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2550 512GB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 32% | 41% | 36% | 43% | 39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.3 | 7.2 23% | 5 46% | 3.9 58% | 1.8 81% | 3.2 66% |
Idle Average * | 10.9 | 7.9 28% | 6 45% | 8.9 18% | 4.4 60% | 6.4 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 17.9 | 12.7 29% | 10 44% | 9.6 46% | 4.5 75% | 10.8 40% |
Load Average * | 62.4 | 37.6 40% | 36 42% | 43.4 30% | 40.7 35% | 54.6 12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 57.9 | 38.2 34% | 41.8 28% | 54.6 6% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 61.5 | 41.6 32% | 42.8 30% | 56.5 8% | ||
Load Maximum * | 107 | 65 39% | 60 44% | 64.1 40% | 66 38% | 70.2 34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.1 | 35.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管电池容量为 75 Wh,但 WLAN 运行时间较短,只有 5 个多小时。其他采用更高效 U 系列 CPU 的可折叠笔记本电脑,如 宏碁 Swift 14 AI可以多用几个小时。
使用随附的交流适配器从空闲状态充至满电需要不到 2 个小时。
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 63 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 58% | 147% | 219% | 218% | 167% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 305 | 481 58% | 753 147% | 973 219% | 969 218% | 815 167% |
Reader / Idle | 927 | 3353 | 1300 | |||
Load | 76 | 173 | 99 | 143 |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
- 11/08/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.