Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite 评测:时尚的 Snapdragon 超便携设备,动力十足
SPRCHRGD 是 "超强 "的缩写,用它来形容再合适不过了:与其他基于 ARM 的 Windows 笔记本电脑相比,SPRCHRGD 的价格相对实惠(约 1400 美元),而且功能齐全。高通公司及其 Snapdragon X Elite SoC 为这款超便携产品提供了动力。
竞争产品包括 惠普EliteBook Ultra G1q 14、 微软 Surface Laptop 7、小米 小米红米笔记本 Pro 14 2024,以及 申克 VIA 14 Pro (M24),MacBook Air 13 M3 Apple MacBook Air 13 M3,三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14和 联想 ThinkPad T14s G6.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.7 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
92.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
87 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.2 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.3 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" | 2304x1536 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
机箱和功能 - Medion 计算机配备 USB 4.0 接口。
S1 以其纤细的边框、时尚的外观和哑光灰(Precision Gray)铝制外壳而令人眼前一亮。机盖可以打开到 130 度角,电脑重量不到 1.4 千克。不过,在稳定性和刚性方面还有待改进:只要稍稍用力,底座在扭动时就会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音,而且只要一接触笔记本电脑,就会听到噼里啪啦的声音。外观和做工也不是最好的。
S1 拥有两个 USB-A 端口(1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2)和一个 USB-C 端口(USB 4、Power Delivery、DP Alt 模式)。由于 USB-C 端口用于为笔记本电脑供电,因此该设备缺少专用的电源接口。我们希望能在笔记本电脑的右侧看到第二个连接器。电脑有两个视频输出接口(1 个 HDMI 接口,1 个通过 USB-C 接口的 DP 接口)。
所有骁龙 X 笔记本电脑都支持蓝牙 5.4 和 WiFi 7。由于没有合适的路由器,我们未能充分利用后者。不过,与 WiFi 6E 机型搭配使用后,我们获得了极佳的传输速度。网络摄像头(210 万像素)在同类产品中并不突出。 不过,摄像头和麦克风都有一个开关。Medion 没有提供以太网端口、读卡器以及可选的骁龙 5G 调制解调器。
可持续性
除了一个无印刷的普通包装盒外,还有一个塑料袋和泡沫塑料插件来保护所提供的硬件。塑料的名称已列出。由于底板可拆卸,因此可以进行维修。通过 Windows 更新功能,可以保证未来几年的软件更新。Medion 在其网站上提供了驱动程序和使用指南。
输入设备 - 配备超强背光键盘
总之,内置的 Chiclet 键盘(单级照明)给人留下了不错的印象。扁平的按键提供了舒适的阻力和明显的压力点。键入时,键盘会发出轻微的响声,但不会太恼人。 遗憾的是方向键太小,用于调节显示屏亮度的按键顺序也很奇怪。多点触摸点击板(约 11.4 x 7.6 厘米)具有精确的受力点,可用作替代鼠标。
显示屏 - 2.8K 面板,sRGB 覆盖范围
由于采用了高分辨率(2,880 x 1,800 像素)和 120 Hz 的刷新率,这款长宽比为 16:10 的 14 英寸磨砂屏幕可提供清晰流畅的图像。亮度和对比度都达到了各自的目标,而且没有 PWM 闪烁。该面板适合在室内使用,但在室外合适的天气条件下也能清晰显示。没有其他显示屏可供选择。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1197:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite CSOT MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE NE140WUM-N6G, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 18% | 16% | -2% | -2% | 17% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 74.4 | 98.4 32% | 97 30% | 70.1 -6% | 70.3 -6% | 97.8 31% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.7 0% | 98.2 -2% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.7 | 87.9 23% | 85.2 19% | 72.3 1% | 72.1 1% | 87.3 22% | ||
Response Times | -70% | -82% | 96% | -24% | -12% | -19% | -39% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 34.5 ? -21% | 48.1 ? -69% | 0.83 ? 97% | 31.1 ? -10% | 22.8 ? 20% | 32.7 ? -15% | 38.9 ? -37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.4 ? | 27.2 ? -119% | 24 ? -94% | 0.69 ? 94% | 17.1 ? -38% | 17.9 ? -44% | 15.2 ? -23% | 17.4 ? -40% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | |||||||
Screen | 14% | -18% | 10% | -6% | -97% | 16% | 23% | |
Brightness middle | 395 | 525 33% | 497 26% | 392 -1% | 466 18% | 341.4 -14% | 418 6% | 606 53% |
Brightness | 387 | 506 31% | 478 24% | 398 3% | 467 21% | 315 -19% | 408 5% | 592 53% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 90 0% | 97 8% | 94 4% | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 94 4% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.42 -27% | 0.27 18% | 0.29 12% | 0.39 -18% | 0.3 9% | 0.43 -30% | |
Contrast | 1197 | 1250 4% | 1841 54% | 1607 34% | 875 -27% | 1393 16% | 1409 18% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.86 | 1.4 25% | 3.2 -72% | 1.3 30% | 2.5 -34% | 5.63 -203% | 1.6 14% | 1.3 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.48 | 2.8 20% | 7.7 -121% | 3.2 8% | 6.1 -75% | 11.94 -243% | 2.5 28% | 2.1 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.86 | 1.3 30% | 1.1 41% | |||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.52 | 2 21% | 4.4 -75% | 2.3 9% | 4.1 -63% | 8.8 -249% | 2 21% | 2.1 17% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.14 103% | 2.14 103% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6999 93% | 6876 95% | 6119 106% | 6517 100% | 7386 88% | 6034 108% | 6851 95% | 6842 95% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
2% | -50% /
-31% | 41% /
27% | -11% /
-8% | -55% /
-80% | -2% /
7% | 0% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
2.8K 面板覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间,但没有覆盖 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 空间,这对于 S1 要求的笔记本电脑来说是可以接受的。一些同类产品的屏幕在这方面提供了更多。在色彩还原方面也没什么可抱怨的:偏差为 1.86,达到了目标水平(DeltaE < 3)。校准不会带来任何改进。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 7.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Medion 将赌注押在 Snapdragon X Elite 上
Medion 的 SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite 是一款采用骁龙 X Elite SoC 的 14 英寸超便携产品。两款机型仅在存储规格(32GB/1TB 对 16GB/512GB)上有所不同--我们的机型规格更高,价格相差 100 美元(1400 美元对 1300 美元)。
测试条件
Medion 选择不使用自己的性能配置文件,而是使用标准的 Windows 配置文件--我们使用了 "平衡 "配置文件(电池测试)和 "最佳性能 "配置文件(基准测试)。这里使用的大多数应用程序和基准测试(仍然)没有原生 ARM 版本。运行它们所需的仿真会导致性能下降,因此很难将该设备与基于英特尔和 AMD 的笔记本电脑进行直接比较。
处理器
高通 高通骁龙 X Elite X1E-78-100 的12 个 CPU 内核(4P、8E)的最高主频为 3.4 GHz。额外的涡轮增压是为兄弟机型预留的(......)。80-100, 84-100).CPU 可以短暂提供高级别的多线程性能,但从长远来看,它必须放慢速度(CB15 循环)。在第二次运行中,CB15 循环的性能急剧下降,与能量曲线无关。看来,在最初的高性能运行之后,冷却阶段是必要的。
根据现有的 ARM 和 x64 变体基准测试(Cinebench 2024、Geekbench 6.2),在单线程性能方面,骁龙与英特尔和 AMD 的竞争对手不相上下(英特尔:Core Ultra 7 155H、AMD:Core Ultra 7 155H、AMD:Core Ultra 7 155H、AMD:Core Ultra 7 155H)。Core Ultra 7 155H, Ryzen 7 8845HS).多线程测试则呈现出不一致的情况。Snapdragon 竞争对手的成绩(例如:ThinkPad T14s G6 ThinkPad T14s G6与 S1 大致处于同一水平。
有关骁龙 X 平台的更多信息,请参阅我们的分析文章 。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (6943 - 8083, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (20304 - 27958, n=5) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (3036 - 3319, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (67909 - 68494, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1518 - 2303, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (11546 - 14598, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (53201 - 66840, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (658 - 794, n=5) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (2957 - 4271, n=5) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (27950 - 39220, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
系统性能
该系统显示出基于英特尔和 AMD 的系统通常具有的迅捷响应能力,而早期的 ARM 设备(例如 Windows)却没有这种能力、 宏碁 Aspire 1).对于办公和互联网应用以及要求不高的游戏,它也不乏强劲的动力。Windows 在 ARM 平台上的运行并不完全流畅--驱动程序缺失、兼容性问题以及仿真导致的性能下降。除此之外,电脑还时不时地出现死机现象,这完全不是电脑本身的问题。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (978 - 1401, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (913 - 1321, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1090 - 1435, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (869 - 1553, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (395 - 423, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (279 - 297, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (451 - 460, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (45988 - 66715, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (60078 - 122210, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (35073 - 49282, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (7.4 - 8.9, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于延迟监控程序拒绝启动,我们无法进行延迟测试。不过,我们的标准 YouTube 视频播放(4k)却运行无阻。没有出现跳帧现象。
大容量存储器
评测设备的金士顿固态硬盘(1 TB、PCIe 4、M.2 2280)传输速度不错,但不能算是顶级固态硬盘型号之一。DiskSpd 基准测试显示固态硬盘存在热节流现象,而且 S1 没有为第二块固态硬盘提供空间。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在持续负载下 Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)在电池模式下也能提供非常稳定的性能(参见 CP 2077、Steel Nomad Light 压力测试)。基准测试成绩接近该 GPU 的平均水平。如果采用 ARM 和 x64 版本的 "Steel Nomad Light "基准测试,该 GPU 无法与 AMD 和英特尔的竞争产品(如Radeon 780M, 英特尔 Arc 8).当然,在通过模拟运行的基准测试中,差距要大得多。
在玩电脑游戏时,经常会遇到一些问题:有些游戏无法启动,有些则会崩溃。Linaro 在上列出了的游戏列表。尽管如此,Windows on ARM 笔记本电脑暂时还不会成为游戏玩家的首选。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6990 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6154 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1924 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 507 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2117 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10.3 - 31.4, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 89.8 | 83.2 | 47.5 | 20.9 | 15.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73.2 | 56.2 | 54.5 | 50.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 54.5 | 25.4 | 15.9 | 12.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 29.9 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 78.8 | 49.3 | 41.7 | 36.7 | 28 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 24.2 | 20.2 | 17.3 | 17 | 11.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 24.6 | 19.6 | 17.3 | 14.3 | 9.08 |
排放与能源 - Medion S1 的电池寿命非常长
噪音排放
与之前评测过的骁龙 X 笔记本电脑一样,S1 的风扇也需要很长时间才能启动。短时间的负载峰值和持续的中等负载一般都能悄无声息地解决。然而,风扇一旦运转起来,就会非常明显。压力测试和《赛博朋克》将音量调到了略高于 40 dB (A)。许多同类产品的音量都差不多。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| / 41.72 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -3% | -10% | 1% | -7% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.8 -8% | 24.5 -7% | 25.7 -12% | 23.4 -2% | 23.8 -3% | 23.8 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.8 -8% | 24.5 -7% | 25.7 -12% | 23.4 -2% | 23.8 -3% | 23.8 -3% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 24.8 -8% | 24.5 -7% | 25.7 -12% | 23.4 -2% | 23.8 -3% | 23.8 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 24.8 -8% | 24.5 -7% | 25.7 -12% | 24.3 -6% | 27.1 -18% | 23.8 -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.79 | 42.3 -4% | 43.6 -7% | 43.7 -7% | 31.5 23% | ||
Load Maximum * | 41.72 | 41.8 -0% | 36.7 12% | 43.6 -5% | 34.8 17% | 43.7 -5% | 40.3 3% |
Load Average * | 36.5 | 32.4 | 36.2 | 25 | 34.9 | 26 | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.7 | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
S1 发热明显:在某些情况下,赛博朋克和压力测试会导致温度超过 40 °C。即使在日常使用中(办公、上网),温度也高于同类产品的平均水平。掌托温度处于中等水平。
极端情况下的压力测试(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 以全速(3.4 GHz)连续运行。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7.7 °C / -13.9 F).
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 23% | 7% | 20% | 13% | 14% | 12% | 17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 44.3 2% | 48 -7% | 41 9% | 44.6 1% | 40.8 9% | 43.7 3% | 47.1 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 43.4 11% | 50.7 -3% | 44.2 10% | 50.9 -4% | 40.4 18% | 49.4 -1% | 44.6 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 22.3 38% | 29.4 18% | 25.3 30% | 26.5 26% | 32.2 11% | 27.7 23% | 24.7 31% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 22.1 40% | 30 19% | 26.2 29% | 26.3 29% | 31.2 16% | 28.6 23% | 24.5 34% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效,但低音显得有些单薄。此外,最大音量设置应该更高一些。
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
总体而言,S1 的耗电量略高于配备相同 SoC 的竞争对手,例如 ThinkPad T14s G6和 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14.S1 更高分辨率的屏幕在这方面可能比较明显。赛博朋克和压力测试的功耗相对稳定。电源适配器(65 瓦)的功率大小合适。压力测试开始时短暂增加的需求并未造成任何问题。
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 2.4 Watt |
Idle | 6.4 / 9.3 / 10.7 Watt |
Load |
/ 67 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 35% | 31% | 9% | -43% | 29% | -37% | 34% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.4 | 1.95 70% | 2.4 62% | 5.7 11% | 4.8 25% | 2.5 61% | 4.4 31% | 1.4 78% |
Idle Average * | 9.3 | 8.7 6% | 4.9 47% | 8.7 6% | 8.7 6% | 5.7 39% | 9.2 1% | 6.3 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 8.9 17% | 6.1 43% | 8.9 17% | 9.2 14% | 5.8 46% | 9.6 10% | 7.6 29% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35 | 30.2 14% | 81.3 -132% | 33.5 4% | 71.5 -104% | 38.5 -10% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 35 | 27.9 20% | 80.2 -129% | 26.8 23% | 71.9 -105% | |||
Load Maximum * | 67 | 35.4 47% | 66.9 -0% | 65.2 3% | 94.5 -41% | 66.4 1% | 101.7 -52% | 40.7 39% |
Load Average * | 34.3 | 44.5 | 63.2 | 24.2 | 62.6 | 26.9 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 36.9 | 23.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
S1 的续航时间也不短:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试(使用脚本加载网站时的负载说明)中,S1 在 14 小时 18 分钟后耗尽了电量。如果将屏幕刷新率降至 60 Hz,耗时可增至 16 小时 4 分钟。S1 的续航时间没有达到 ThinkPad T14s.
Pros
Cons
结论 - 仍未跻身精英行列
S1 重量轻(约 1.4 千克)、机身美观、电池续航时间长,而且采用了 Power Delivery 技术,是一款移动性极强的产品。不过,令人遗憾的是,Medion 只给电脑配备了一个 USB-C 端口(USB 4)。
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite 是一款装备精良的移动超便携式电脑,与竞争对手一样,它必须与 Windows on ARM 平台的弱点作斗争。
内置的 骁龙 X 精英版和 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5X,板载)的内置组合为办公和互联网应用以及要求不高的游戏提供了充足的动力。全面的 16:10 宽高比 IPS 屏幕(2,880 x 1,800 像素,14 英寸,120 Hz,sRGB)让人无可挑剔。风扇产生的热量在可接受范围内。不过,与同类产品相比,这款电脑的温度略高。
由于 Windows on ARM 设备的弱点,在购买前应慎重考虑:并非所有的应用程序都能运行,游戏仍然会出现问题,性能因模拟而受到影响,(外部)设备的驱动程序也经常丢失。特别是 S1,它曾多次莫名其妙地死机,而且对于这种功能有限的设备来说,价格也太高。我们将拭目以待,看看微软和高通公司是否能够--而且是否愿意--提高他们的游戏水平。
一个潜在的替代方案是 小米红米笔记本 14 2024.它提供完全的 Windows 兼容性、更强的计算能力、两个 USB-C 端口和良好的电池续航能力。此外,它还配备了与 S1 相同的屏幕。
价格和供应情况
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite 在德国多家在线零售商有售(价格以欧元计),售价约为 1,400 美元。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite
- 08/07/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.