Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 性能首次亮相:惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14 笔记本电脑评测
具有人工智能加速功能的 CPU 的出现促使惠普推出了另一个机型系列,与 Spectre 和 Envy 系列并驾齐驱。该系列被称为 OmniBook,目前由兼容 Co-Pilot+ 的机器组成,配备高通骁龙和 AMD Zen 5 CPU。目前推出的机型包括 OmniBook X 14、OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell 和 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14。
我们今天的测试机是 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell,配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 CPU、32 GB LPDDR5x-7500 内存和 1600p IPS 显示屏,零售价约为 1050 美元。其他 SKU 可能只配备一半的内存和 Ryzen AI 9 365,但所有配置的 IPS 触摸屏仍保持不变。
替代产品包括其他中高端 14 英寸子笔记本,如 华硕 Zenbook S 14 UX5406, 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9或 戴尔 XPS 14.
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.1 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.2 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.50" | 3200x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
外壳 - Spectre Vibes
将 Spectre x360 14 与 EliteBook 1040 相比较,就可以得到 OmniBook Ultra 14。这款新机型大量借鉴了 Spectre 系列的设计,包括键盘面板、"钻石切割 "后角和键盘布局,同时采用了大多数 EliteBook 笔记本电脑所熟悉的深灰色纹理和金属材料。因此,它更像惠普的高端机型,而不是像Pavilion 或 Envy 系列那样更便宜或更厚。
机箱的刚性非常好,在试图扭转系统或按压其表面时,吱吱作响和翘曲现象极少。最薄弱的方面是铰链,在调整角度时容易摇晃。当打开到更大角度时,也会感觉较弱。
该系统的重量与 Spectre x360 14 差不多,但占地面积略大。较长的尺寸可归因于屏幕上下较大的边框。
需要注意的是,由于 XPS 14 配备了独立 GPU 选项,因此明显更重。
连接性 - AMD 现在正式支持 Thunderbolt 4
交流
联发科 Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 标配支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。在与 Wi-Fi 6E 测试路由器配对时,我们体验到了稳定的速度,没有出现任何问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
网络摄像头
惠普在许多笔记本电脑上都集成了一些最高像素的网络摄像头。这里的 900 万像素网络摄像头比大多数竞争对手的质量都要高,但其代价是上面提到的较厚的顶部边框。红外和物理快门均为标配。
遗憾的是,尽管摄像头像素很高,但视频质量仍被限制在 1440p30 左右。
维护
底板仅用四颗 Torx 螺钉固定,便于维修。由于底部边缘与底座紧紧相连,建议使用塑料卡或硬质边缘来松开底部边缘。
从内部来看,OmniBook Ultra 14 与 Spectre x360 14 有很多相似之处,但也有很大不同。例如,散热解决方案现在是对称的,与大多数其他高端子笔记本电脑更加一致。不过,可升级选项仍然相同,包括单个 M.2 2280 SSD 插槽、可拆卸 M.2 WLAN 模块和焊接内存。
可持续性
用于制造 OmniBook Ultra 14 的材料有很高比例来自回收后和工业回收后来源,其中键帽和剪刀的塑料含量高达 50%,边框和扬声器的塑料含量为 45%,外盖和键盘面板的金属含量为 85%,底盖的金属含量为 50%。
无塑料包装由 100% 可持续材料制成。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了常见的交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买,将享受制造商提供的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - 熟悉的体验
键盘
在 OmniBook Ultra 14 上打字的感觉很像在 Spectre x360 14 上打字,因为它们采用了相同的按键布局。这并不一定是件坏事,因为惠普 Spectre 或 EliteBook 等高端机型的键盘往往比其他大多数子笔记本电脑的键盘更 "咔嗒",反馈也更清晰,从而带来更令人满意的键入体验。我们很高兴惠普推出了我们熟悉的产品,而不是像有争议的 XPS 14键盘。
键盘的一些不足之处包括方向键过于狭窄,而且缺少某些 EliteBook 所拥有的可编程键。
触摸板
点击板比同类产品 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 稍小(12.5 x 8 厘米对 13.5 x 8 厘米)。不过,就屏幕尺寸而言,它还是很宽敞的,点击时的反馈比预期的要稍硬一些。
显示屏 - 仅 60 赫兹 IPS
有趣的是,OmniBook Ultra 14 配备的是 IPS 显示屏,而这个价位的大多数其他 14 英寸子笔记本标配的是 OLED 显示屏。即使是搭载骁龙处理器的 OmniBook X 14 也配备了 OLED 显示屏,这让搭载 AMD 处理器的 OmniBook Ultra 14 显得格格不入,因为它缺乏 P3 色彩、超深黑色级别和高刷新率选项。这些缺点代表了惠普高端设备上的中端面板。
OmniBook Ultra 14 显示屏的一张王牌也许是它对 FreeSync 的支持。因此,与其他不支持 FreeSync 的子笔记本电脑相比,该系统的游戏体验更加流畅。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 359.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1331:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 BOE0C9E, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED SDC41A2, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 27% | 26% | 25% | 23% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 99.8 49% | 99 48% | 98 46% | 97 45% | 98.5 47% |
sRGB Coverage | 99 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.9 | 89.3 30% | 89.2 29% | 88.1 28% | 85.2 24% | 87.2 27% |
Response Times | 98% | 98% | 99% | 98% | 98% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.9 ? | 0.77 ? 98% | 0.7 ? 98% | 0.44 ? 99% | 0.83 ? 98% | 0.7 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 0.75 ? 97% | 0.71 ? 97% | 0.61 ? 98% | 0.69 ? 98% | 0.77 ? 97% |
PWM Frequency | 480 | 480 ? | 240 ? | 240 | 480 | |
Screen | 20% | 28% | 26% | 15% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 359.5 | 378 5% | 374 4% | 400 11% | 392 9% | 351 -2% |
Brightness | 361 | 384 6% | 379 5% | 403 12% | 398 10% | 353 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 97 5% | 98 7% | 97 5% | 97 5% | 97 5% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | |||||
Contrast | 1331 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.64 | 1.4 15% | 1 39% | 1 39% | 1.3 21% | 1.7 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.68 | 2.2 53% | 2.2 53% | 2.8 40% | 3.2 32% | 2.2 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 0.8 18% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.7 35% | 1.1 58% | 1.3 50% | 2.3 12% | 3.1 -19% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6388 102% | 6256 104% | 6549 99% | 6586 99% | 6517 100% | 6616 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 48% /
36% | 51% /
40% | 50% /
39% | 45% /
32% | 43% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后的校准效果已经很好,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 2.6 和 1.64。使用我们的 X-Rite 色差计进一步校准面板可以改善这些结果,尽管改善幅度很小,但对于大多数用户来说,可以说是没有必要的。不过,我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise | |
↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 18.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度不错,但不如 Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 或 Galaxy Book4 Edge 14的室外可视性要好一些,但由于它们的 OLED 面板更亮。眩光始终存在且明显,因此应避免阳光直射以保持色彩。遗憾的是,由于该系统非常轻巧便携,因此显示屏的亮度不能再高一些。
性能--为游戏做好准备
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MyHP 都设置为性能模式。我们强烈建议用户熟悉 MyHP 电源配置文件,因为与其他笔记本电脑相比,MyHP 电源配置文件有更多的设置,包括智能感应、平衡、冷却、安静、性能和节能。其中一些设置会直接影响性能,下面的结果就会说明这一点。
每个惠普电源配置文件都有不同的用途:
- 智能感应:根据应用程序、笔记本电脑摆放位置和电池状态,自动调整系统以适应您的需求,优化性能、风扇噪音和温度
- 平衡:平衡风扇速度、性能和温度
- 冷却:增加风扇噪音并降低性能,以获得更低的表面温度
- 安静:降低风扇噪音并降低性能,以适应对噪音敏感的环境
- 性能:增加风扇噪音上限
- 节能:降低性能:降低性能。仅适用于电池供电
处理器
产品 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375相比,多了两个内核。 Ryzen AI 9 HX 365配置,根据合成基准测试,多线程性能提升了约 15%。Ryzen AI 9 365 的性能已经超过了常见的替代产品,如 酷睿 i7-13700H因此,Ryzen AI 9 375 仍能提供不错的性能提升,令人印象深刻。这与 Ryzen 7 8845HS相比,Ryzen 7 8845HS Ryzen 7 7840HS相比,其直接替代品 Ryzen 7 7840HS 则几乎没有任何优势。
与目前市场上的其他 14 英寸子笔记本相比,OmniBook 14 Ultra 是速度最快的笔记本之一,这一切都要归功于 AMD Zen 5 CPU。对于那些可能从 U 系列 CPU 甚至流星湖-H 平台(如 酷睿至尊 7 155H.如下图所示,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,分数仅会下降几个百分点。
与 Zen 4 Hawk Point 系列 CPU 不同,我们的 Zen 5 CPU 与 Co-Pilot+ 兼容。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
压力测试
在性能模式下运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会提升到 3.5 GHz 和 67 W,持续一分钟左右,然后稳定在 3 GHz 和 47 W。核心温度非常高,超过 97 C,这表明惠普在将散热解决方案推向极限的同时,也在尽可能地压榨性能。性能下降相对较小,尤其是与使用 U 系列处理器的笔记本电脑相比。
在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》 时,iGPU 将稳定在 2830 MHz 和 84 C,GPU 功耗为 47 W。如果使用平衡模式,这些值将降至 2231 MHz、57 C 和 27 W。因此,如果你想最大限度地发挥机器的性能,就必须忍受性能模式下更大的风扇噪音和更高的温度。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95 压力(性能模式) | 3.0 | -- | 97 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力(性能模式) | 3.3 | 1400 | 94 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 0.6 | 2231 | 57 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(智能感应模式) | 0.7 | 2178 | 56 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能模式) | 0.7 | 2830 | 84 |
系统性能
大量的内核和线程加上目前最快的集成 GPU,使得 PCMark 测试结果令人印象深刻,尤其是在生产力和数字内容创建子测试中。在编辑和多线程任务方面,我们的惠普比直接竞争对手更具优势。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7788 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
更改!
在我们的标准化延迟监控测试中注意监控! - 是否观察到所有良好或高延迟?可能是实时音频和视频编辑的问题(对于正在测试的软件/硬件配置)。
在中心下方添加两张屏幕截图(latencymon 主屏幕和驱动选项卡)。
存储设备
我们的设备配有 2 TB SK Hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,而不是 Spectre x360 14 上的 Kioxia XG8。传输速率非常出色,可与三星 PM9A1 相媲美,速度保持在 7100 MB/s 以上没有问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M 图形性能比 Radeon 780M相比,从 Radeon 680M到 780M.根据3DMark基准测试,890M在DX12游戏中的性能提升最大,比780M快30%到40%。否则,预计 DX11 游戏的提升幅度较小,仅为 10% 至 20%。
竞争产品 英特尔 Arc 8落后于 Radeon 890M 达 15%,而较新的 Arc Graphics 140V在合成基准测试中可以与新的 AMD 解决方案并驾齐驱。不过,在实际游戏过程中,Radeon 890M 的性能仍然更胜一筹,这要归功于我们的 Ryzen 9 CPU。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 9201 | 30229 | 3153 |
智能感应模式 | 9134 (-1%) | 27315 (-10%) | 3201 (-0%) |
平衡模式 | 9149 (-1%) | 27403 (-9%) | 3175 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 8791 (-5%) | 28073 (-7%) | 3091 (-2%) |
根据我们上面的Fire Strike 结果表,在智能感应或平衡模式下运行,性能最多会受到 10% 的影响。不过,在游戏时,性能下降会更明显。在 1080p 超高清设置下运行《博德之门 3》和《蒂娜的仙境》时,平均帧数分别为 31 和 34,而在智能感知或平衡模式下仅为 25 和 28。
3DMark 11 Performance | 14816 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39102 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8460 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3847 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 586 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然 Radeon 890M 在 3DMark 的成绩上与同类 Arc 8 和 Arc 140V 相差无几,但在运行实际游戏时,情况却恰恰相反,Radeon 890M 的表现始终优于这两款英特尔解决方案,有时甚至差距很大。例如,《最终幻想 XV 》和《博德之门 3》在 OmniBook 上的运行速度比在 ZenbookS 14UX5V上快 35%。 Zenbook S 14 UX5406或 Spectre x360 14。在某些游戏中,如《赛博朋克 2077》(Cyberpunk 2077)、《 》(Cyberpunk 2077, ),Deltas 的差距较小,但在考虑任何升频或帧生成技术之前,AMD GPU 的优势仍然高达 10%。
值得一提的是,《DOTA 2 Reborn》在高或超设置下运行时会出现错误,因此我们机器的数据中不包括这些具体结果。奇怪的是,这款游戏在 Radeon 880M 上运行时却没有任何问题。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -2! |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (170.3 - 172.1, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (86.9 - 88.3, n=2) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (62.1 - 62.3, n=2) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (41.2 - 41.8, n=2) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (32.5 - 34.1, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
怠速运行《赛博朋克 2077》时偶尔会出现性能下降的情况,但这表明 Radeon 890M 的驱动程序仍有待改进。值得庆幸的是,这种性能下降并不严重,但首先就不应该出现这种情况,尤其是在该系统上不存在节流问题。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 167 | 78.2 | 31.9 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 170.6 | 133.2 | 46.4 | 44.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 82.9 | 44.5 | 31.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.3 | 60 | 46.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 93 | 58 | 53 | 51 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 186.1 | 75.7 | 64.3 | 54.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 86.9 | 62.1 | 41.2 | 34.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 107.3 | 98.2 | 74.3 | 20.9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 46 | 37.9 | 31.2 | 31.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 43.7 | 38.1 | 30.4 | 26.2 |
排放量
系统噪音
在浏览器标签页或视频流之间进行多任务处理时,双内部风扇的噪音一般在 32 dB(A)左右,背景噪音为 23.8 dB(A)。虽然不是听不见,但系统仍然足够安静,没有任何脉动,可以忍受。
风扇噪音上限随电源配置文件的不同而变化很大。例如,如果在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》,风扇噪音最高可达近 41 dB(A),而在平衡模式或智能感应模式下仅为 35.4 dB(A)。当然,正如上文 GPU 性能部分所述,更安静的风扇是以更慢的性能为代价的。尽管如此,40 分贝(A)的低噪音范围还是超过了一些 14 英寸的笔记本电脑,如 Zenbook S 14 UX5406不相上下。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.9 / 43 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 10% | -2% | 13% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 23.4 2% | 23.7 -0% | 23.8 -0% | 24 -1% | 24.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.9 | 23.4 6% | 23.7 5% | 23.8 4% | 24 4% | 24.3 2% |
Idle Average * | 24.9 | 23.4 6% | 23.7 5% | 23.8 4% | 24 4% | 26.5 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.9 | 25.6 -3% | 23.7 5% | 23.8 4% | 26.3 -6% | 28.5 -14% |
Load Average * | 32.9 | 25.6 22% | 30.5 7% | 44.6 -36% | 27.2 17% | 37 -12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.9 | 31.1 24% | 35.9 12% | 27.2 33% | ||
Load Maximum * | 43 | 32.6 24% | 33.6 22% | 44.6 -4% | 27.2 37% | 43.3 -1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.9 | 39.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度的发展是对称的,以反映内部的对称冷却解决方案。在运行游戏或其他苛刻负载时,键盘中心的热点温度可略高于 41 摄氏度,平均温度比 Spectre x360 14在类似条件下的平均温度更低。竞争产品 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9的最大表面温度与我们的 Omnibook 相似,只是热点更大。
在实际使用中,我们从未发现 Omnibook 在日常使用中会让皮肤感到不适。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 12% | 5% | 6% | -2% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 39.3 3% | 43.7 -8% | 42 -4% | 47.9 -19% | 40.5 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.6 | 45 -3% | 46.9 -8% | 40.6 7% | 51.3 -18% | 42.6 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 23.8 23% | 25.8 17% | 28.2 9% | 26.7 14% | 26.9 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.2 | 24 25% | 26.3 18% | 28.9 10% | 26.9 16% | 27.8 14% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
与 IdeaPad Pro 5 14Zen 4 Ryzen 7 8845HS相比,惠普在负载情况下的功耗更低,速度更快,效率更高,从而提高了每瓦性能。例如,在惠普上运行 Prime95 时,尽管 Ryzen 8845HS 比我们的 Ryzen 9 AI 375 慢 25% 至 30%,但所需功耗约为 68 瓦,比联想少 8 瓦。
与 Zenbook S 14 UX5406 及其新 Arc 140V 的比较也很有趣。由于 Ryzen 9 AI 375 的功耗上限比酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 高,因此惠普的功耗要高得多,但尽管功耗差异巨大,游戏时的性能差异有时却微乎其微。例如,在 1080p 超高清设置下运行《赛博朋克 2077》,华硕的功耗仅为 33 W,而惠普的功耗为 67 W,尽管惠普的游戏运行速度仅快 10%。
当 CPU 使用率达到 100%或运行游戏时,我们可以记录到 65 W USB-C 交流适配器的最大功耗为 69 W(约 9.8 x 5.4 x 2 厘米)。由于系统能在压力下保持这一速度,因此如果同时运行重负载,充电速度可能会停滞。
Off / Standby | 0.15 / 0.35 Watt |
Idle | 2.7 / 5.4 / 5.5 Watt |
Load |
67.4 / 68.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 5% | -33% | -11% | -88% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 3.2 -19% | 5.1 -89% | 5.5 -104% | 5.4 -100% | 8.1 -200% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 4.2 22% | 6.2 -15% | 7.6 -41% | 9.7 -80% | 9.9 -83% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.5 | 4.9 11% | 6.9 -25% | 7.9 -44% | 10.2 -85% | 10.4 -89% |
Load Average * | 67.4 | 40.5 40% | 38.7 43% | 77.9 -16% | 28.9 57% | 75.6 -12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 67.8 | 28.6 58% | 61.5 9% | 22 68% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 67.9 | 33.1 51% | 63 7% | 24.7 64% | ||
Load Maximum * | 68.3 | 68.6 -0% | 60 12% | 94.8 -39% | 68.2 -0% | 107.1 -57% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.9 | 65.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量与 OLED 相同 Spectre x360 1468 Wh。不过,在我们的 Omnibook 上,无线局域网的运行时间要稍长一些,约为 2 个小时,最终运行时间略高于 11 个小时,部分原因是我们对 IPS 显示屏的要求较低。该系统的续航时间虽不及 Zenbook S 14 UX5406,但仍超过了大多数其他 14 英寸机型。
从空电到满电大约需要 100 分钟,在同类产品中处于平均水平。
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, 68 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 73 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 55.9 Wh | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 69.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 54% | -7% | -1% | -20% | |
Reader / Idle | 2196 | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 661 | 555 -16% | 858 30% | 527 -20% | 539 -18% | 465 -30% |
Load | 88 | 129 47% | 157 78% | 93 6% | 103 17% | 79 -10% |
H.264 | 999 | 1199 | 649 | 827 | 635 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 14 英寸超极本中的佼佼者
OmniBook Ultra 14 的最大亮点无疑是它的 Zen 5 CPU。相对于 1000 美元的价位和 14 英寸的小机身,它所提供的性能堪称疯狂。惠普并没有把 OmniBook Ultra 14 作为市场上速度最快的 14 英寸子笔记本之一进行营销,但也许他们应该这样做,因为如果不采用像 XPS 14 这样配备独立 GPU 的重型机型,你很难找到速度更快的产品。XPS 14.尤其是鹰点(Hawk Point)的表现可以说是令人失望的,因此看到这样的结果是令人兴奋的。
与速度较慢的 14 英寸超极本相比,令人印象深刻的性能是以更高的核心温度和更大的风扇噪音为代价的。当然,如果额外的性能是多余的,你也可以在平衡模式下运行,以获得更低的机器温度。
OmniBook Ultra 14 是一款野兽级子笔记本,这要归功于 Ryzen 9 Zen 5 CPU。不过,如果你需要 P3 色彩或更高分辨率,你还是得考虑价格更高的 Spectre 系列。
至于处理器之外的其他方面,该系统本质上是一款 "Spectre 14",没有 360 度铰链或 P3 广色域。它是一个豪华的解决方案,同时价格合理。对性能要求不高的用户可以选择更轻便的产品,如 LG Gram 14或 华硕 Zenbook S 14 UX5406等更轻便的替代品。
价格和供应情况
惠普现在出货的 OmniBook Ultra 14 配备了 Ryzen AI 9 365、16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,售价为 1030 美元。升级到 Ryzen AI 9 375 和双倍内存需要额外支付 300 至 400 美元。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
- 10/04/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.