英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 性能首次亮相:联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 笔记本电脑评测
就在 在短短一个月前的 IFA 2024现在,Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 成为首批搭载英特尔全新 Lunar Lake 平台的联想笔记本电脑之一。Aura 系列是与英特尔合作设计的,这意味着所有 Aura 机型都将只配备英特尔处理器,并支持 Co-Pilot+。
我们的测试机配备了 Core Ultra 7 256V CPU、集成 Arc 140V 显卡、1 TB SSD 和 15.3 英寸 2.8K IPS 触摸屏,售价约为 1380 美元。目前仅有的其他 SKU 仅在内存容量上有所不同。
Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 的替代产品包括其他高端多媒体笔记本电脑,如 华硕 Zenbook S16, 惠普 Spectre x360 16或 戴尔 XPS 系列.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.3 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | 1.5 kg | 13.9 mm | 15.30" | 2880x1800 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.95 mm | 16.00" | 2048x1280 | |
74.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 通过 MIL-STD-810H 认证
Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 采用了与 Yoga 系列其他机型和大多数 IdeaPad Pro 机型相同的铝质材料和灰色配色方案。前者可以理解,但后者意味着越来越难以从视觉上区分联想笔记本电脑。灰暗的单色设计需要一些修饰或点缀,才能让 Aura 系列从众多产品中脱颖而出。
在其他方面,Aura 系列的机箱刚性非常出色,可与 Yoga Pro 7 14因为 Aura 借鉴了许多相同的外部设计元素。我们仍然认为 惠普 Spectre的整体强度更高,因为 Aura 的底座和铰链的弯曲和跷起程度分别略大于 HP Spectre。
独特的 15.3 英寸屏幕尺寸使 Aura 比大多数 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑更小、更轻,仅重几百克。它在 15 英寸领域最接近的竞争对手之一是搭载骁龙处理器的 华硕 VivoBook S 15它的重量稍轻,但没有联想的轻薄。
连接性
端口选项与 Yoga Pro 7 14 完全相同,但重新排列后效果更好。两个 USB-C 端口不再挨在一起,而是位于笔记本电脑的两侧,充电方向更加自由。
替代产品如 XPS 14或 Spectre x360 16 虽然尺寸不同,但提供的端口选项并不比我们的 Aura 多多少。
交流
英特尔 BE201 是支持 Wi-Fi 7 的标准配置,尽管绝大多数用户还没有兼容的路由器。不过,在与我们的 Wi-Fi 6E 测试网络配对时,其性能还是稳定可靠的。
网络摄像头
200 万像素的网络摄像头可能还不错,但在分辨率更高的 500 万像素和 900 万像素网络摄像头逐渐普及的今天,它已经开始显出老态。惠普 Spectre 或 蜻蜓系列对于经常进行视频会议的用户来说,惠普 Spectre 或 Dragonfly 系列的同类产品不仅图像更清晰,而且网络摄像头功能也比联想的多。
红外和数码相机锁定开关都是标配。
维护
底部面板由 5 颗 Torx 螺钉固定,便于维修。不过,由于只有 M.2 2242 PCIe4 x4 固态硬盘是可拆卸的,而内存和 WLAN 模块则是焊接的,因此内部升级空间不大。
可持续性
联想声称,底盖采用了 50% 的回收铝,交流适配器采用了 90% 的消费后塑料,键盘采用了 50% 的消费后塑料。生产过程还通过了碳中和认证。
包装由纸板和纸张组成,100% 无塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买,则适用通常的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备
键盘
按键布局和图标与 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 相同,甚至连两级白色背光也一样。按键反馈似乎也完全相同,因为咔哒声仍然比较响亮,尤其是在敲击空格键时。除此之外,打字体验还是令人满意的,比 XPS 15如果你喜欢更响亮、更坚固的按键,那么打字体验会更好。
触摸板
点击板(13.5 x 8 厘米)比 Yoga 7 16 G8 上的点击板(13 x 8 厘米)大,但比 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G8 上的点击板小。 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G8(15 x 9.5 厘米)。滑动顺畅,但在较慢的速度下会有一些粘滞感,以减少点击时的意外滑动。向下按压表面时,反馈也相对于安静的咔哒声更加敏锐,带来令人满意的感觉。
显示屏 - 针对 P3 颜色进行了预校准
Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura 是市场上为数不多的 15.3 英寸笔记本电脑之一,因为 15.x 英寸类别中的大多数机型要么升至 16.0 英寸,要么降至 15.0 英寸。不过,它的 IPS 触摸屏质量上乘,具有全 DCI-P3 色彩、支持 HDR400 和 120 Hz 刷新率,而其他大多数 IPS 面板只有 sRGB,没有 HDR。在 OLED 逐渐成为主流的情况下,这些特性有助于联想笔记本电脑在与其他多媒体笔记本电脑的竞争中保持优势。
遗憾的是,我们的设备会出现刷新率问题。即使设置为 120 Hz 并禁用动态刷新率,屏幕偶尔也会在使用过程中改变刷新率。鼠标光标会无缘无故地明显跳帧。性能似乎没有受到影响,但用户体验会变得抖动,不像 120 Hz 那样流畅。我们不确定这是否是该机型的一个错误,或者只是我们测试设备上的一个特定问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 509 cd/m²
Contrast: 1591:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.06
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 LEN1602K, OLED, 2048x1280, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED SDC41A2, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -49% | 0% | 3% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.8 | 99.7 1% | 41.5 -58% | 98.5 0% | 99.9 1% | 99.6 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 61.2 -39% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.5 | 97.8 12% | 42.9 -51% | 87.2 0% | 95.6 9% | 96.7 11% |
Response Times | 96% | 20% | 97% | 97% | 96% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27 ? | 0.58 ? 98% | 20.7 ? 23% | 0.7 ? 97% | 0.56 ? 98% | 0.78 ? 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.9 ? | 1 ? 94% | 15.1 ? 16% | 0.77 ? 96% | 0.65 ? 96% | 0.86 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 | 480 | 480 ? | ||
Screen | -26% | -138% | -7% | 183% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 509 | 367.6 -28% | 313.3 -38% | 351 -31% | 407 -20% | 385.2 -24% |
Brightness | 479 | 371 -23% | 308 -36% | 353 -26% | 405 -15% | 387 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 98 9% | 91 1% | 97 8% | 97 8% | 99 10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.37 -16% | 0.02 94% | |||
Contrast | 1591 | 847 -47% | 20350 1179% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 4.31 -74% | 8.42 -241% | 1.7 31% | 0.6 76% | 1.73 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.73 | 6.85 -45% | 19.09 -304% | 2.2 53% | 1.2 75% | 3.95 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.06 | 1.11 -5% | 2.16 -104% | 0.8 25% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.7 -13% | 8.3 -453% | 3.1 -107% | 0.5 67% | 2.6 -73% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.83 78% | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6790 96% | 6272 104% | 6296 103% | 6616 98% | 6453 101% | 6133 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
2% | -56% /
-96% | 30% /
12% | 94% /
128% | 30% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏出厂时已进行了预校准,我们的独立 X-Rite 色度计也证实了这一点,根据 P3 标准,灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.5 和 2.47。因此,对于大多数买家来说,不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.7 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
显示屏最大亮度约为 500 尼特,比华硕 Vivobook S 15 等竞争对手略亮。 华硕 Vivobook S 15或 Spectre x360 16 等竞争对手稍亮一些。在户外,眩光仍然不可避免,特别是考虑到光面屏幕,这种优势不足以产生明显的差异。在阴暗处时,可视性充其量还可以接受。
绩效 - 效率优先法
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和联想 Vantage 都设置为性能模式。Vantage 再次进行了重新设计,因此与其他 Yoga 或 IdeaPad 笔记本电脑相比,许多设置的位置都发生了变化。尤其是电源配置文件被埋在两三个子菜单下,令人恼火。联想增加了一个 "模式 "热键,可以更方便地启动电源配置文件菜单。
处理器
我们对酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 的性能印象并不特别深刻。 酷睿至尊 7 258V和 酷睿至尊 7 256V256V 也是如此,虽然处理器基本相同,但内存只有封装内存的一半。即便如此,根据多项基准测试,Zenbook S 14 UX540 的多线程性能仍然比酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 快近 20%。 Zenbook S 14 UX5406.目前,我们的 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑样本量还很小,但我们已经看到不同型号之间的性能差异相对较大。这表明,与上一代处理器相比,Lunar Lake 处理器的功率范围更广,以适应更广泛的笔记本电脑尺寸。
与我们最初从华硕购买的 Core Ultra 7 258V 样品相比,上述性能提升固然值得欢迎,但较早的 H 系列处理器仍然快了约 15% 至 30%,包括 Ryzen 7 7840HS或 酷睿至尊 7 155H.因此,新酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 或 Ultra 7 256V 的性能更接近酷睿 7 U 或 Ryzen 7 U 系列。
与即将推出的 Meteor Lake 平台不同,集成的 NPU 支持 Co-Pilot+。由于 CineBench R15 基准测试与 Lunar Lake 平台之间目前存在兼容性问题,因此下文不包含该测试结果。
Cinebench R23 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (12287 - 12812, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (4425 - 4428, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (6506 - 6832, n=2) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (51767 - 52282, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
压力测试
在性能模式下启动 Prime95 压力模式时,CPU 会升至 3.5 GHz,功耗为 39 W。约 40 秒后,当核心温度达到 90 摄氏度时,CPU 会降至 3.1 GHz 和 30 W,以保持 79 摄氏度的核心温度,如下图所示。如果运行在平衡模式下,性能将进一步降至 2.6 GHz 和 20 W。无论采用哪种模式,最大 Turbo Boost 功率都相对有限,这在非 Core-H 系列处理器中是意料之中的。
ZenBook S 14 ZenBook S 14及其酷睿 Ultra 258V 处理器的瓦特数低于联想处理器,这就解释了上述两者之间的性能差距。
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》(代表典型的游戏压力)时,核心温度稳定在 66 C。从各方面考虑,这都是相对较低的温度。 Yoga 9 2 合 1 14IMH9为例,在类似的游戏条件下,其温度会稳定在 74 摄氏度。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 50 |
Prime95 压力(平衡模式) | 2.6 | -- | 65 |
Prime95 压力(性能模式) | 3.1 | -- | 79 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.4 | 1500 | 71 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.4 | 1400 - 1950 | 66 |
系统性能
PCMark 测试结果尚可,但由于上文提到的处理器性能一般,结果基本令人失望。在基本功能和生产力子测试中,我们的 Aura 远远落后于采用 AMD 处理器的 华硕 Zenbook S16及其性能更强的 Zen 5 CPU。
得益于快速的 LPDDR5x-8533 内存,AIDA64 内存测试结果在所有笔记本电脑中名列前茅。内置内存是 Lunar Lake 的一大亮点和与众不同之处。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6771 - 6955, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9627 - 10006, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8997 - 9219, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9727 - 9898, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1663 - 1736, n=2) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1612 - 1682, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1862 - 1953, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1301 - 1343, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (306 - 310, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (284 - 286, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (472 - 474, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6771 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (101642 - 104459, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (88013 - 89144, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (112340 - 117933, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (99.6 - 99.6, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
4K60 视频播放完美无瑕,在 60 秒的时间内没有出现掉帧现象。这与采用 AMD 处理器的 OmniBook Ultra 14 形成鲜明对比,后者在播放过程中会持续出现掉帧现象。
LatencyMon 与新的 Lunar Lake CPU 不兼容,就像 Zen 5 系列一样。
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 1 TB 西部数据 SN740 SDDPMQD而其他大多数 Yoga 机型通常配备的是三星或 SK Hynix 固态硬盘。西部数据固态硬盘的传输速率为 5200 MB/s,没有出现性能下降的迹象。尽管如此,更常见的三星 PM9A1 还是比 WD 快了近 2000 MB/s。
请记住,尽管该机的外形尺寸为 15.3 英寸,但它不支持全长的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU 性能 - 3DMark 分数强劲,游戏分数较低
3DMark 测试结果非常出色,远远领先于即将推出的 Iris Xe 96 EUs略高于 Arc 8.分数甚至超过了竞争对手 Radeon 890M高出几个百分点,但在实际游戏中的表现则另当别论,我们将在下文中详细介绍。
性能参数 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 8631 | 22132 | 2763 |
均衡模式 | 7908 (-8%) | 21360 (-4%) | 2801 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 8529 (-1%) | 21747 (-2%) | 3052 (-0%) |
根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表,在平衡模式下运行性能会降低几个百分点,这与我们的压力测试观察结果一致。
3DMark 11 Performance | 10962 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29174 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7700 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4106 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 659 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
搭载 Radeon 890M 处理器的 OmniBook Ultra 14在《赛博朋克 2077》等游戏中,在 10 个测试项目中,有 9 个项目的性能都超过了我们的 Aura,甚至高达 30% 至 40%。唯一的例外是在《DOTA 2 Reborn》中,新的 AMD GPU 目前出现了渲染问题。
游戏时的性能劣势并没有反映出我们上面的 3DMark 结果,Arc Graphics 140V 与 Radeon 890M 相比更具竞争力。这是因为 OmniBook Ultra 14 的 CPU 比酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 强大得多,这表明在 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑上,CPU 受限的情况可能很常见。
F1 22在 Ultra 设置下仍然会崩溃,这与使用 Arc 8 的 PC 上的情况很相似。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng -1! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 141.9 | 140.5 | 58.3 | 22.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.1 | 83.4 | 78.2 | 75.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 68.2 | 41.7 | 29.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44.8 | 35.8 | 35.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 77 | 44 | 39 | 36 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 186.4 | 69.8 | 59.5 | 51.1 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 56.5 | 42.1 | 28.2 | 23.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 85.3 | 75.7 | 54.8 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35.2 | 28.6 | 25.2 | 24.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.3 | 32.6 | 27.2 | 18.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音几乎总是很安静,甚至在大多数日常场景中几乎听不到。浏览网页或播放视频时的噪音仅为 26 dB(A),而安静的背景噪音为 23 dB(A)。此外,也不存在脉动现象。
当运行游戏等要求更高的负载时,情况就会发生变化,风扇噪音可能会超过 34 分贝(A)。虽然无论如何都不会让人分心,但还是比我们在 Zenbook S 14 上记录的噪音大一些。 Zenbook S 14Zenbook S 14 所记录到的噪音要大一些。因此,联想的性能普遍更快,但代价是更高的功耗和更大的风扇噪音。
在性能模式或平衡模式下,当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们记录到的最大风扇噪音为 44.3 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 26.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.9 / 44.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -5% | 13% | -9% | -4% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23 1% | 24.3 -5% | 24.7 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23 1% | 24.3 -5% | 24.7 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23.3 -0% | 23 1% | 23 1% | 26.5 -14% | 24.7 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 23.3 11% | 23 12% | 23 12% | 28.5 -9% | 26.4 -1% | 23.7 9% |
Load Average * | 30.9 | 45.7 -48% | 43.3 -40% | 23 26% | 37 -20% | 35.7 -16% | 30.5 1% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 34.1 | 48.4 -42% | 40.8 -20% | 36.8 -8% | 31.1 9% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.3 | 48.4 -9% | 40.9 8% | 28.62 35% | 43.3 2% | 36.8 17% | 33.6 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27 | 39.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度的发展是对称的,热点位于机箱的中后部。在玩游戏时,这些区域的温度可达 41 摄氏度,而当 CPU 长时间处于满负荷工作状态时,温度则会超过 46 摄氏度。与搭载骁龙处理器的华硕 VivoBook S 15 相比,结果并无明显差异,但平均温度却低于体积更小、性能更强的 XPS 14.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -13% | 16% | 9% | 12% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.2 | 48.2 -4% | 35.4 23% | 37 20% | 40.5 12% | 46.9 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41 | 59.4 -45% | 33 20% | 44 -7% | 42.6 -4% | 53.5 -30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 34.2 -1% | 30.2 11% | 31 9% | 26.9 21% | 29.5 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.8 | 34.8 -3% | 30.2 11% | 29 14% | 27.8 18% | 30.2 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
整体功耗较低,可与许多酷睿 U 系列笔记本电脑媲美,如 IdeaPad Slim 5 16尽管我们的酷睿至尊 7 256V 在原始基准测试中超过了大多数酷睿 U 系列笔记本电脑。因此,每瓦性能比 Meteor Lake-U 高出不少,在与新兴的 Snapdragon X Plus 相比时更具竞争力。以运行 Prime95 为例,其功耗比搭载骁龙处理器的 VivoBook S 15(52 瓦比 35 瓦)高出约 50%,而在这一过程中,多线程性能却提高了约 50%。
功耗也普遍高于搭载酷睿至尊 7 258V 的 ZenBook S 14,这与联想处理器的更高性能是一致的。
更高的负载(如游戏)需要约 49 W 的功耗,效率远高于搭载 Iris Xe 的笔记本电脑,但仍远远落后于搭载 Radeon 890M 的替代产品,如ZenBook S16 。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 9 x 4.6 x 2.7 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 67 W。
Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.61 Watt |
Idle | 3.4 / 8.8 / 9.3 Watt |
Load |
45.4 / 66.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2048x1280, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5" | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -105% | 3% | 3% | -58% | -13% | 14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 5.6 -65% | 3.3 3% | 4.1 -21% | 8.1 -138% | 5.4 -59% | 5.1 -50% |
Idle Average * | 8.8 | 7.3 17% | 7.5 15% | 4.5 49% | 9.9 -13% | 10.5 -19% | 6.2 30% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 14.6 -57% | 7.8 16% | 5.9 37% | 10.4 -12% | 10.9 -17% | 6.9 26% |
Load Average * | 45.4 | 86.3 -90% | 56.9 -25% | 51.2 -13% | 75.6 -67% | 47.8 -5% | 38.7 15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 44.8 | 135.8 -203% | 41.2 8% | 46.7 -4% | 28.6 36% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 49.4 | 136.4 -176% | 48.7 1% | 49.2 -0% | 33.1 33% | ||
Load Maximum * | 66.3 | 172 -159% | 62.4 6% | 90.4 -36% | 107.1 -62% | 58.6 12% | 60 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.6 | 65.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
70 Wh 的电池容量比许多其他 15 英寸笔记本电脑都要小,但英特尔新 CPU 系列的高效性依然熠熠生辉。WLAN 运行时间超过 17 小时,比惠普、戴尔或华硕采用老一代处理器的竞争机型多出几个小时。运行时间甚至比搭载骁龙处理器的 华硕 VivoBook S 15.
即使启用了联想快速充电功能,从空电到满电的充电时间也比预期的要慢,约为 2 小时。我们重复测试了几次,但结果并没有改善。许多联想笔记本电脑都有快速充电功能,充电时间可缩短至 45 分钟左右,因此我们的 Yoga 测试机充电速度异常缓慢可能是一个错误。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 83 Wh | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 69.5 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -52% | -35% | -16% | -46% | -14% | 4% | |
Reader / Idle | 2760 | 1338 -52% | 1568 -43% | ||||
H.264 | 976 | 862 -12% | 635 -35% | 1204 23% | 1199 23% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1025 | 639 -38% | 761 -26% | 717 -30% | 465 -55% | 640 -38% | 858 -16% |
Load | 148 | 50 -66% | 94 -36% | 139 -6% | 79 -47% | 107 -28% | 157 6% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 联想 MacBook Air 15 的最佳挑战者
英特尔在开发 Lunar Lake 时将效率作为重中之重,结果也反映了这一点。电池续航时间是所有 Windows 笔记本电脑中最长的,可与 MacBook Air 15同时,与其他多媒体笔记本电脑相比,负载情况下的核心温度仍然较低。风扇噪音、轻薄和便携性也间接受益于这种效率优先的方法。
全新 Lunar Lake CPU 的缺点主要集中在性能方面。与去年的 Core-U 或 Arc 8 相比,它的性能平平。如果用户想要一台性能第一、效率第二的笔记本电脑,那么老款酷睿Ultra 7 155H机型会更有价值。最新的移动 Zen 5 笔记本,如 惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14也属于后一类。
如果旅行者觉得 14 英寸的子笔记本太小,16 英寸的多媒体笔记本太大,那么 15 英寸的 Yoga Slim 7 Aura 会让他们喜欢不已。不过,功能强大的用户应该选择酷睿 H 和 Zen 5。
鉴于上述优缺点,Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 最适合移动用户或旅行者,他们可以充分利用 Lunar Lake 带来的类似 MacBook Air 的尺寸和超长运行时间。否则,经常使用交流电源插座的用户可能需要更强大的替代产品,如 华硕 ZenBook S 16或 联想 Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8它们往往能提供更出色的性价比。
价格和供应情况
联想目前正在出货的Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 评测价为 1380 美元。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
- 10/11/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.